Livestock Research for Rural Development 30 (7) 2018 | Guide for preparation of papers | LRRD Newsletter | Citation of this paper |
The aims of this study were to evaluate the effect of adding biochar to feed and chicken litter on growth performance, hematological and biochemical blood parameters, fecal E.coli and litter total coliforms. The experiment was designed as a 2*2 factorial in a completely randomized design with four replicates; factor 1 was biochar in feed (No biochar: FBio0 or biochar 1%: FBio1); factor 2 was biochar in chicken litter (No biochar: LBio0 or biochar 1%: LBio1). Biochar was made from rice husk. One-day-old local chickens (Noi lai breed) (n=192) were used with 12 chickens per treatment/replicate.
Supplementing chicken feed with 1% rice husk biochar or adding it to the litter reduced plasma triglycerides, total coliform in litter and E. coli in feces, but had no impact on live weight gain, feed consumption and feed conversion ratio.
Key words: E. coli, coliform, feed conversion, prebiotic
Biochar is a carbon-rich product obtained from the carbonization of biomass. It is commonly used as a soil amendment for crop production and has been shown to increase nutrient availability, soil organic matter, water holding capacity and growth rates of many plants, vegetables (Lehmann 2007; Preston 2015; Bouaravong et al 2017).
The use of antibiotics as feed additives to suppress gut bacteria has been banned in the EU (Huyghebaert et al 2011) and in Vietnam (2017) because of concern to human health in terms of antibiotic resistant microbes and residual antibiotic presence in animal products (Marshall et al 2011). Many studies have been done to find alternatives to antibiotics in animal diets. Biochar amended feed showed its potential in control of poultry zoonotic pathogens (Prsai et al 2016), but few studies have been conducted using biochar as a feed additive in animal production.
The purpose of this study was to access the effects on growth performance, blood parameters and fecal bacteria of local chicken (Noi lai) when biochar was added to the diet or to the litter on which the birds were raised.
This experiment was conducted at a farm in Binh Thuy district, Cantho province, Vietnam from December 2017 to March 2018.
The experiment was arranged according to a 2*2 factorial in a completely randomized design (CRD) with four replicates. The factors were:
Biochar in feed: 0 (FBio0) and 1% (FBio1) of weight of feed
Biochar in litter: 0 (LBio0) and 1% (LBio1) of weight of rice husk (used as chicken litter)
One-day-old old local chicks (Noi lai breed; Photo 1) (n=192) were used with twelve per treatment/replicate (equal males and females).
The trial started after the incubation period (three weeks) and lasted 11 weeks. All birds were vaccinated against infectious diseases; they were subjected to 24 hours of light/day and had free access to feed and water.
Feed intake was recorded by feeding weighed quantities of feed daily and subtracting the left over from the previous day. The birds were weighed at the start, weekly and at the end. Feed conversion ratio was calculated as the ratio of feed consumed to live weight gain.
The biochar was prepared by pyrolysis of rice husk (Photo 2; Table 1). The diet was based on maize and soybean meal (Table 2).
Table 1. Rice husk biochar composition | |
Composition |
Biochar |
pH |
7.7 |
Dry matter (%) |
94.16 |
Carbon (%) |
42.72 |
Nitrogen (%) |
0.46 |
Water holding capacity (liters/kg) |
3.21 |
Table 2. Diet formulation and composition of chicken feed |
|
% air-dry |
(%) |
Rice bran |
12.1 |
Maize |
60 |
Soybean meal |
22 |
Fish meal |
3.0 |
Dicalcium phosphate |
1.0 |
Vitamin premix |
0.31 |
Tra fish oil |
1.5 |
Choline chloride |
0.05 |
Composition (% as fed) |
|
Dry matter |
88.1 |
Crude protein |
18.5 |
Ether extract |
3.9 |
NDF |
13.1 |
Crude fibre |
2.41 |
Ash |
5.7 |
Calcium |
0.71 |
Available phosphorus |
0.41 |
Lysine |
0.91 |
Methionine |
0.34 |
Photo 1. One day old Noi lai chicks (incubation period) |
Photo 2. Making biochar from rice husk |
At the end of the experiment, blood samples were taken from the wing vein in the morning before feeding using sterilized syringe and needles and EDTA anticoagulant-treated test tubes. The counts of red blood cells (RBC) and white blood cells (WBC) were determined by a haemocytometer method using the Natt-Herrick solution; haematocrit values were measured by microhematocrit methods (Kececi et al 1998). Plasma was collected by centrifugation at 3000 x g for 15 minutes and total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and HLD-cholesterol and triglycerides were determined using a biochemistry analyser (Siemens Advia 1200).
To determine bacteria E. coli, cloacal fecal samples were collected (n = 192), while total Coliforms were taken from chicken litter (included faeces and litter, n = 80). Pooled samples of each were done with 8 replicates for E. coli and 4 for total coliform, respectively. The samples were kept at 4oC until microbiological examination. Cloacal fecal E. coli samples were cultured by colony-count technique at 44°C using 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl -D-glucuronide (ISO 16649-2:2001). Total Coliforms in chicken litter were determined by horizontal method for the enumeration of coliforms - colony-count technique (ISO 4832:2006).
Parasite eggs in faeces (from hookworm, ascarid, whipworm, tapeworm and coccidia) were tested by the Modified Wisconsin Sugar Centrifugal-Flotation Method, according to Pittman et al (2010).
Data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the General Linear Model (GLM) available in Minitab 13.2. The Tukey test in the same software was used to detect significant differences among treatment means.
Addition of biochar in feed or in the litter did not affect the feed intake, weight gain or feed conversion. However, it appeared that the birds fed biochar or had access to biochar in the litter were stronger and healthier than those without access to biochar.
Table 3.
Mean values for changes in live weight, feed intake and
feed conversion ration Growth |
|||||
Initial weight |
Final weight |
Weight gain |
Feed intake |
FCR |
|
Biochar effect |
|||||
FBio0 |
163.2 |
1263 |
1100 |
51.84 |
3.64 |
FBioc1 |
164.1 |
1349 |
1185 |
54.12 |
3.54 |
Litter effect |
|||||
LBio0 |
164.6 |
1305 |
1140 |
55.37 |
3.77 |
LBio1 |
162.6 |
1308 |
1145 |
50.59 |
3.41 |
Biochar*litter effect |
|||||
FBio0* LBio0 |
165.2 |
1226 |
1061 |
53.68 |
3.90 |
FBio0* LBio1 |
161.1 |
1300 |
1139 |
50.00 |
3.39 |
FBio1* LBio0 |
164.0 |
1383 |
1219 |
57.06 |
3.65 |
FBio1* LBio1 |
164.2 |
1315 |
1151 |
51.18 |
3.44 |
SEM/p |
|||||
Biochar effect |
37.1/0.14 |
39.1/0.16 |
1.38/0.28 |
0.16/0.67 |
|
Litter effect |
37.1/0.96 |
39.1/0.93 |
1.38/0.04 |
0.16/0.15 |
|
Biochar * litter effect |
52.4/0.24 |
55.4/0.22 |
1.96/0.59 |
0.23/0.22 |
|
All chickens were healthy with only two deaths (one on FBio0*LBio0 and one on FBio0* LBio1) during incubation period due to cold and windy weather caused by the Typhoon. Intake of biochar did not influence numbers of red and white blood cells nor hemoglobin. However, content of plasma triglycerides was reduced in chickens fed biochar and litter inclusion of biochar (Table 4 and Figure 1). It seemed that chicken consumed more biochar in chicken litter as they pecked black particles in their feed.
Table 4. Mean values for haematological parameters of Noi Lai chicken fed 1% biochar in the feed or added to the litter |
||||||||||||||
Red cells |
White cells |
Hemoglobin |
Cholesterol |
Triglyceride |
LDL-C |
HDL-C |
||||||||
Biochar effect |
||||||||||||||
FBio0 |
2.84 |
23.3 |
28.4 |
3.33 |
1.44 |
0.96 |
1.94 |
|||||||
FBioc1 |
2.70 |
23.4 |
28.5 |
3.11 |
1.29 |
0.88 |
1.86 |
|||||||
Litter effect |
||||||||||||||
LBio0 |
2.72 |
23.3 |
28.9 |
3.34 |
2.06 |
0.96 |
2.00 |
|||||||
LBio1 |
2.82 |
23.3 |
28.1 |
3.09 |
0.67 |
0.88 |
1.80 |
|||||||
Biochar * Litter |
||||||||||||||
FBio0* LBio0 |
2.78 |
22.9 |
28.6 |
3.38 |
2.28a |
0.98 |
2.04 |
|||||||
FBio0* LBio1 |
2.90 |
23.7 |
28.3 |
3.29 |
0.61b |
0.94 |
1.85 |
|||||||
FBio1* LBio0 |
2.67 |
23.8 |
29.1 |
3.31 |
1.85a |
0.94 |
1.96 |
|||||||
FBio1* LBio1 |
2.74 |
22.9 |
27.9 |
2.90 |
0.73b |
0.81 |
1.75 |
|||||||
SEM/p |
||||||||||||||
Biochar effect |
0.07/0.21 |
0.39/89 |
0.69/0.95 |
0.15/0.30 |
0.08/0.11 |
0.04/0.20 |
0.09/0.52 |
|||||||
Litter effect |
0.07/0.36 |
0.39/0.96 |
0.69/0.42 |
0.15/0.35 |
0.08/<0.01 |
0.04/0.20 |
0.09/0.16 |
|||||||
Biochar*litter effect |
0.1/0.83 |
0.55/0.17 |
0.98/0.66 |
0.2/0.45 |
0.08/0.03 |
0.04/0.47 |
0.09/0.93 |
|||||||
abMeans in the same column for each parameter with different superscripts are different at P<0.05 |
Figure 1. Effect of biochar on plasma triglycerides |
There was no evidence of parasites (hookworm, ascarid, whipworm, tapeworm and coccidia) in intestine and fecal samples.
The addition of biochar into chicken feed reduced total Coliforms in litter from 1.4x106 to 5.1x105 CFU/g and E. coli from 1.7x106 to 8.2x105 CFU/g (Table 5; Figure 2 and 3). Prasai et al (2017) reported that biochar inhibited growth of microbial pathogens. Other studies indicated the effective role of biochar in removing E. coli from storm water (Mohanty et al 2014) and for water purification (Gwenzi et al 2017).
Table 5. Mean values for E. coli in feces and Coliforms in litter |
||
E.coli |
Coliform |
|
Biochar effect |
||
FBio0 |
1.7x106 |
1.4x106 |
FBioc1 |
8.2x105 |
5.1x105 |
Litter effect |
||
LBio0 |
1.3x106 |
9.6x105 |
LBio1 |
1.2x106 |
9.1x105 |
Biochar x Litter effect |
||
FBio0x LBio0 |
1.7x106 |
1.5x106 |
FBio0x LBio1 |
1.6x106 |
1.2x106 |
FBio1x LBio0 |
8.3x105 |
4.2x105 |
FBio1x LBio1 |
8.1x105 |
6.0x105 |
SEM/p |
||
Biochar effect |
1.8x105/0.04 |
2.5x105/0.04 |
Litter effect |
1.8x105/0.81 |
2.5x105/0.89 |
Biochar x litter |
2.6x105/0.85 |
3.6x105/0.54 |
Figure 2. Effect of biochar in feed and litter on fecal E. coli | Figure 3. Effect of biochar in feed and litter on Coliforms in litter |
The reports on feeding biochar to chickens are variable. Jiya et al (2013) reported better growth rate and higher final body weighs for broilers fed a diet supplemented with 2% activated coconut shell charcoal during the starter phase. In contrast, Hċllbar (2014) found that 0.5 or 1% biochar made from broiler litter had no impact on weight gain, feed consumption, feed conversion ratio or health of broiler chicken; they supposed the reason could be due to the source of biochar.
There are increasing numbers of studies showing benefits from feeding 1% dietary biochar on growth and feed conversion in cattle (Leng et al 2014; Sengsouly and Preston 2016), goats (Silivong et al al 2016; Le Thi Thuy Hang et a 2018), pigs (Sivilai et al 2018) and fish (Lan et al 2016). Benefits from feeding biochar to all classes of livestock could be ascribed to the possibility that biochar binds toxins from the feed which are either excreted in the feces or degraded by some organisms in the animal’s gut microbiome (Leng 2018, personal communication).
The authors would like to express sincere gratitude to Professor Thomas R Preston for valuable advice in this research.
Bouaravong B, Dung N N X and Preston T R 2017: Effect of biochar and biodigester effluent on yield of Taro (Colocasia esculenta) foliage. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 29, Article #69. Retrieved June 9, 2018, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd29/4/boun29069.html
Gwenzi W, Chaukura N, Noubactep C and Mukome F N D 2017: Biochar-based water treatment systems as a potential low-cost and sustainable technology for clean water provision. J. Environ. Manage. 197, 732–749.
Hċllbar 2014 Investigating Benefits of Supplementing Broiler Feed with Broiler Litter Biochar. www.hallbarconsulting.com
Huyghebaert G, Ducatelle R, Van Immerseel F 2011: An update on alternatives to antimicrobial growth promoters for broilers. Vet. J. 187 182–188 10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.03.003
ISO 16649-2 2001: Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs — Horizontal method for the enumeration of -glucuronidase-positive Escherichia coli. Part 2: Colony-count technique at 44 °C using 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl -D-glucuronide. AFNOR Association Française. www.afnor.org. 1-6
ISO 4832:2006 : Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs - Horizontal method for the enumeration of coliforms - Colony-count technique. AFNOR Association Française. www.afnor.org.
Jiya E Z, Ayanwale B A, L jaiya A T, Ugochukwu A and Tsado D 2013 Effect of Activated Coconut Shell Charcoal Meal on Growth Performance and Nutrient Digestibility of Broiler Chickens. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology 3(2): 268-276.
Kececi O, Oguz H, Kurtoglu V and Demet Ö 1998 Effects of polyvinylpolypyrrolidone, synthetic zeolite and bentonite on serum bio- chemical and haematological characters of broiler chickens during aflatoxicosis. British Poultry Science 39: 452-458.
Lan T T, Preston T R and Leng R A 2016: Feeding biochar or charcoal increased the growth rate of striped catfish (Pangasius hypophthalmus) and improved water quality. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 28, Article #84. Retrieved June 22, 2018, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd28/5/lan28084.html
Lehmann J 2007 A handful of carbon. Nature447 143-144 http://www.css.cornell.edu/faculty/lehmann/publ/Nature%20447,%20143-144,%202007%20Lehmann.pdf
Leng R A, Preston T R and Inthapanya S 2012: Biochar reduces enteric methane and improves growth and feed conversion in local “Yellow” cattle fed cassava root chips and fresh cassava foliage. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 24, Article #199. Retrieved June 22, 2018, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/11/leng24199.htm
Marshall B M and Levy S B 2011: Food animals and antimicrobials: impacts on human health. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 24 718–733 10.1128/CMR.00002-11 [ PMC free article]
Mohanty S K, Cantrell K B, Nelson K L and Boehm A B 2014 Efficacy of biochar to remove Escherichia coli from stormwater under steady and intermittent flow. title="Water research."Water Res. 2014 Sep 15;61:288-96. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.05.026. Epub 2014 May 28.
Pittman J S, Shepherd G, Thacker B J and Myers G H 2010 Modifed technique for collecting and processing fecal material for diagnosing intestinal parasites in swine. Journal of Swine Health Prodution 2010;18(5):249–252.
Prasai T P , Walsh K B , Bhattarai S P , Midmore D J , Thi T. H. Van , Moore R J and Stanley D 2016 Biochar, Bentonite and Zeolite Supplemented Feeding of Layer Chickens Alters Intestinal Microbiota and Reduces Campylobacter Load. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4845986/pdf/pone.0154061.pdf
Prasai T P, Walsh K B, Bhattarai S P, Midmore D J, Van T T H, Moore R J and Stanley D 2016 Biochar, Bentonite and Zeolite supplemented feeding of layer chickens alters intestinal microbiota and reduces Campylobacter load. PLoS ONE, 11(4), [0154061]. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154061
Preston T R 2015 The role of biochar in farming systems producing food and energy from biomass. In: Geotherapy: Innovative Methods of Soil Fertility Restoration, Carbon Sequestration and Reversing CO2 Increase (Editor: Thomas J Goreau) CRC Press, Tayler and Francis Group, Boca Raton, Florida USA
Sengsouly P and Preston T R 2016: Effect of rice-wine distillers’ byproduct and biochar on growth performance and methane emissions in local “Yellow” cattle fed ensiled cassava root, urea, cassava foliage and rice straw. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 28, Article #178. Retrieved June 22, 2018, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd28/10/seng28178.html
Silivong P and Preston T R 2016: Supplements of water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) and biochar improved feed intake, digestibility, N retention and growth performance of goats fed foliage of Bauhinia acuminata as the basal diet. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 28, Article #98. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd28/5/sili28098.html
Sivilai B, Preston T R, Leng R A, Hang D T and Linh N Q 2018 Rice distillers’ byproduct and biochar as additives to a forage-based diet for growing Moo Lath pigs; effects on growth and feed conversion. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 30, Article #111. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd30/6/lert30111.html
Thuy Hang L T, Preston T R, Leng R A and Ba N X 2018: Effect of biochar and water spinach on feed intake, digestibility and N-retention in goats fed urea-treated cassava stems. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 30, Article #93. Retrieved June 22, 2018, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd30/5/thuyh30093.html
Received 10 June 2018; Accepted 22 June 2018; Published 3 July 2018