This study was carried out to
describe rural poultry production and productivity in Casamance,
Chicken holders were mostly Fulani or Mandingue and predominantly (52 %) women. Chicken flocks (n= 22.7 ± 8.6 in size) were mainly associated with small ruminants. A few (22 %) of the holders had a hen house, scavenging being the main husbandry system. The stocking rate was low in females (3.5 %) while it was high in growers (19 %) and adult males (21 %). Egg number per clutch and egg weight were respectively 9.16±2.4 and 37.5±2.9 g. Hatchability was 77 % for a reproductive cycle of 92±19 days. The death rate was high (43 %) in chicks, medium (16%) in growers and low (3%) in adult birds. Body weight was 31.7±5.3 g at one week and 398±107 g (females) and 588±152 g (males) at 3 months of age.
It was concluded that rural poultry productivity could be significantly increased through the improvement of chick brooding.
Senegal is a country where livestock accounts for 7.4 % of the national GDP and 35.5 % of the primary sector. However the level of meat intake per capita decreased from 21.5 kg/year in 1960 to 13 kg in 1974 and to 11 kg in 1990. In order to alleviate this protein malnutrition a special emphasis was laid on short cycle animal production (ANON 1991), specially modern poultry. In spite of the important development of this sector during this last decade, rural poultry still represents 80% of the total poultry population (ANON 1990). Moreover, according to Buldgen et al (1992), village chickens are a flexible source of revenue and they play a key role in protein malnutrition alleviation since it is not common to slaughter cattle or small ruminants for guests and during traditional ceremonies. However, one of the main conclusions of the last meeting of the African Network for Rural Poultry Development was the lack of reliable information on the biological and socio-economic factors affecting the input - output relationships and the economic efficiency of the production systems.
The present work was undertaken
to study rural chicken production and productivity in southern
This study was carried out in
A survey was first carried out during May 1999 in 150 households to define the characteristics of the poultry production systems. The survey guide was a questionnaire related to socio-economic status of the holders, flock characteristics, management and use. From October 1999 to May 2000 a follow up was implemented in 52 of these households. During this follow up, flock size was checked weekly and any change (absence or introduction of chicken) was investigated (purchase, grant, mortality, sale consumption etc...).
The reproductive performance of hens (number of eggs per clutch, egg weight, hatchability, reproductive cycle) was recorded. The production cost (feeding, vaccination and deworming) was also investigated. Every fortnight, chicks were weighed using an electronic balance.
These data were processed using
the Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS).
In
Table 1: Rural poultry production characteristics in s |
|
Socio-economic status of holders:
Ethnic groups |
|
Fulani |
69.3 |
Mandingue
(%) |
19.2 |
Others |
11.4 |
Women
share in ownership (%) |
52 |
Flock size and composition |
|
Size |
22.7± 8.6 |
Number
of chicks |
16.7 ±7.3 |
Number
of growers |
2.23 ±1.2 |
Number
of adult females |
0.9 ± 0.9 |
Number
of adult males |
2.8 ± 1.5 |
Husbandry |
|
Presence
of hen house (%) |
22 |
Presence
of waterer (%) |
94 |
Vaccination
(%) |
22 |
The flock size which was 22.7±8.6 was superior to results observed in most of West African countries where flock size ranged from 9 to 22 (Van Veluw 1987; Sonaiya 1990; Aklobessi et al 1992; Buldgen et al 1992; Kitalyi and Mayer 1998). It was composed of 16.7 chicks, 2.23 growers, 0.9 adult male and 2.8 adult females. The ratio growers/chicks was low (13 %) and could be the consequence of an early use of the growers or a high death rate of the chicks. In disagreement with results observed by most of these authors no other poultry specie (guinea fowl, duck, turkey and geese) was encountered. Poultry production was however associated with small ruminants, the mean number of goat and sheep per household being respectively 7.6 and 2.8.
In 22 % of the households, a
small hen house made with local material was observed (Table 1). In all the
other cases the chicken were housed on the veranda, under mortar or in the
kitchen. Scavenging was the major feeding system. Chicks fed on insects, worms,
grains, food wastes and by products, mainly cereal brans
that fall on the ground when women pound cereals. Watering was mainly done in
cans hidden in the ground (43.3 %) or in a wooden locally-made drinker (44.1%).
Although 22% of the holders declared during the survey that they usually
vaccinated against
The number of eggs laid per clutch was 9.1 ± 2.4 with an average egg weight of 37.5 ± 2.9 g and a reproductive cycle (laying, hatching, taking care of chicks, resting) of 92 ± 19 days (Table 2).
Table 2: Reproductive and growth performance |
||
|
Mean ± SE |
|
Reproductive cycle (days) |
92 ± 19 |
|
Egg production |
|
|
Number |
9.1 ± 2.4 |
|
Weight
(g) |
37.5 ± 2.9 |
|
Hatchability (%) |
77.0 |
|
Weight chicks (g) |
||
One
week |
31.7 ± 5.3 |
|
Weight growers at 3 months |
|
|
Female |
398 ± 107 |
|
Male |
558 ± 152 |
|
As a consequence, the number of clutches per year and the total number of eggs per hen and per year were respectively 3.96 and 36.1. These results are in agreement with reports from other developing countries (Table 3) where egg weight ranged from 30.7 to 49 g and egg number from 18.5 to 48.9. In addition to genetic effects, this low egg production could be improved and even doubled without any detrimental effect on hatchability through rational feeding as demonstrated by Buldgen et al (1992). Sonaiya (1990) suggested that the implementation of a mini-hatchery, which would buy fertile eggs and sell chicks to farmers, could be an alternative solution to this low productivity. The improvement of egg production could also be achieved by early weaning of the chicks but its effect on chick survival and female reproductive life needs to be known.
Hatchability as observed in this
study compared favourably with that reported in
The death rate was high in chicks
(43%) moderate in growers (16 %) and low (3 %) in adult birds. This low
viability of young birds was acknowledged by previous studies (Table 3). For most
of the authors it was mainly due to diseases.
Table 3: Production coefficients of rural poultry in selected
developing countries in |
||||||
|
Country |
Clutches per year |
Egg per
clutch |
Egg weight
(g) |
Hatchability
(%) |
Chick mortality |
Kitalyi
& Mayer 1998 |
|
1.1 |
13 |
- |
71 |
66 |
Buldgen
et al 1992 |
|
5 |
8-10 |
40 |
80 |
66 |
Mourad
et al 1997 |
|
3.78 |
10 |
30.7 |
87.5 |
10.7 |
Shanawany & Banerjee 1991 |
|
- |
- |
44-49 |
39-42 |
- |
Bourzat
& Saunders 1990 |
|
2.7-3 |
12-18 |
30-40 |
60-90 |
- |
Minga et al 1989 |
Tanzania |
- |
6-20 |
41 |
50-100 |
>80 |
Van Veluw 1987 |
Ghana |
2.5 |
10 |
- |
72 |
50 |
Wilson et al 1987 |
Mali |
2.1 |
8.8 |
34.4 |
69.1 |
56 |
Wilson 1979 |
Sudan |
4.5 |
10.87 |
40.6 |
90 |
- |
Thus in
The weights of one-week-old
chicks confirmed results reported by Buldgen et al
(1992) while at 3 months they were as heavy as chickens raised
on station by the same authors.
Role of the poultry
Almost all of the holders interviewed declared that they didn't sell or consume eggs because they preferred to keep them for incubation. Abandoned or unhatched eggs were sometimes eaten but not by young women because, according to the farmers, it would have a negative impact on their reproductive career. A high proportion (77%) of the respondents obtained their chickens from market but grants (12%) and 'confiage' (7.9 %) were other means of chicken purchase.
The stocking rate was low in
females (3.5%) and high in young (19%) and adult males (21%). Self consumption
was the main (67%) cause of chicken use. Village chickens were mostly
slaughtered for guests, but also during naming ceremonies and
weddings. In this way and in accordance with Buldgen
et al. (1992) they largely contribute to protein malnutrition alleviation. They
were also exchanged against goats, the modality being 2 males and 4 hens for a
goat.
This study shows that in
The authors are grateful to the
International Foundation for Science (IFS) for funding this study
Aklobessi K K, Guitoba K, Kenkou
G K and Kougbenya L 1992 Evaluation de la méthodologie d'étude de base
de la production avicole rurale en Afrique. Rapport du Togo. Ministère du
Développement Rural, 20 p.
ANON 1991 Projet de
Développement des Espèces à
Cycle
Court (PRODEC).
BDPA-SCETAGRI, Paris, France, 176p.
ANON 1990 Les statistiques de l'élevage. Juin 1989.
Bourzat D and Saunders M 1990 Improvement
of traditional methods of poultry production in
Buldgen A, Detimmerman
F, Sall B and Compere R 1992 Etude des paramètres démogrphiques et zootechniques de
la poule locale du bassin arachidier sénégalais. Revue d'élevage et de
médecine vétérinaire des
pays tropicaux, 45 (3 - 4) :
341 - 347.
Kitalyi A J and Mayer A 1998 Village chicken production systems in rural
Minga U M, Katule A, Maeda T
and Musasa
J 1989 Potential and problems of the traditional chicken
industry in
Mourad M, Bah A S and Gbanamou 1997 Evaluation de la
productivité et de la mortalité de la poule locale sur le plateau du Sankaran, Faranah, Guinée en
1993-1994. Revue Elev. Méd. Vét.
Pays Trop., 50, 343-349.
Shanawany M M and Banerjee A K 1991 Indigenous chicken genotypes of Ethiopia Animal
Genetic Ressouces Information 8 : 84-88.
Sonaiya E B K 1990 Poultry husbandry in small farms. Entwicklung and landlicher
Raum 4, 3-6.
Van Veluw K 1987 Traditional
poultry keeping in
Wilson R T 1979 Studies on the livestock of Southern Darfur,
Sudan. VII. Production of Poultry under simulated traditional conditions.
Tropical Animal Health Production, 11 / 143-150.
Wilson R T, Traore A , Kuit H G and
Received 19 November 2001