Eleven types of tropical crop residues
from seven plant species available at Chamcar Daung, Cambodia, were selected for a
screening test to evaluate in vitro pepsin/pancreatin digestibility of N and to
explore the possible interdependence with other non-conventional tests for assessing nutritive value of crop residues for pigs. Leaves
and petioles were from banana (Musa acuminata) and sugar cane (Saccharum
officinarum) whereas the aerial part was from amaranthus (Amaranthus
spp), canavalia (Canavalia ensiformis) and mucuna (Stizolobium deeringianum).
Old and new rice (Oryza sativa) straw and cassava (Manihot esculenta)
foliage, either in natura, sun-dried or ensiled after 0 or 24 hr of wilting were
also evaluated.
The values for DM, N and NDF ranged
from 18.8 to 91.9%, 1.30 to 4.97% and 32.3 to 88.7% (in dry basis), respectively. In
vitro N digestibility was associated negatively with NDF-linked N (r = - 0.78)and positively with water solubility of N (r
= 0.88), DM solubility (r = 0.64) and in vitro DM digestibility (r = 0.61).
It is concluded that the water
solubility method is suitable for evaluating tropical fibrous crop residues as feed for
pigs and that cell wall linked N is one of the major factors influencing in vitro N
digestibility
Key words:In vitro digestibility, water solubility, plant cell wall, nitrogen, tropical crop residues, pigs
There is a considerable amount of information concerning the use of
crop residues as feed for ruminants (Greenhalgh 1984; Owen and Aboud 1987; Owen and
Jayasuriya 1989), but much less concerning the use of this type of biomass for feeding
pigs (Perez 1997). Simple methods such as in sacco
rumen degradability (Řrskov et al 1980), in vitro gas
production (Menke et al 1979; Ly et al 1997) and water solubility of dry matter (Ly and
Preston 1997) have facilitated the evaluation of crop residues for ruminants. However,
despite the existence of simple in vitro
methods for monogastric animals such as in vitro digestibility of N, as determined
by pepsin/pancreatin treatment (Dierick et al
1985; Boisen and Fernandez 1995; Pujol et al
2001; Swiech and Buraczewska 2001) and water soluble N (Ly and Preston 2001), there have
been fewer attempts to apply them to crop residues.
The aim of the present communication is to
report the potential nutritive value of eleven types of
tropical crop residues for pigs, by using non-conventional methods of feed
evaluation.
Eleven samples
from seven crop residues (Table 1) periodically harvested at the Ecological Farm, at
Chamcar Daung, were selected for the study. The samples were sun-dried and ground, except
for one sample of cassava leaves which was analysed using fresh material, prior to
determining water solubility of DM and N as described by Ly and
Table 1. Identification of the studied tropical
crop residues and other foliages |
|||
Common
name of plant |
|||
Scientific name |
Status of foliage |
English |
Khmer |
Amaranthus spp |
Fresh foliage |
Amaranthus |
|
Canavalia
ensiformis |
Fresh leaves |
Sword bean |
|
Manihot
esculenta |
Fresh leaves |
Cassava |
Dam longcheu |
|
Ensiled un-wilted leaves |
Cassava |
Dam longpaab |
|
Ensiled wilted leaves |
Cassava |
Dam longpaab |
|
Sun-dried leaves |
Cassava |
Dam longsgnout |
Musa acuminata |
Fresh leaves |
Banana |
Chek |
Oriza
sativa |
Dry foliage
(newly harvested) |
Rice straw |
Cham beung |
|
Dry foliage
(harvested at least one month ago) |
Rice straw |
Cham beung |
Saccharum officinarum |
Fresh leaves |
Sugar cane |
Slek ampov |
Stilozobium
deeringianum |
Fresh leaves |
Velvet bean |
The values for DM, N and NDF in the
selected samples (Table 2) were in a wide range (18.8 to 91.9%, and [in dry basis] 1.30 to
4.97% and 32.3 to 88.7%, respectively).
Table 2. Chemical composition of several crop
residues and other foliages (% DM basis for |
||||
DM |
NDF |
N |
||
Amaranthus spp |
14.9 |
76.9 |
52.7 |
2.70 |
Canavalia ensiformis |
21.0 |
90.5 |
32.4 |
3.91 |
Cassava leaves |
||||
Fresh |
18.8 |
90.4 |
38.3 |
4.04 |
Ensiled (not wilted) |
19.1 |
92.4 |
50.5 |
4.31 |
Ensiled wilted |
41.3 |
89.1 |
66.6 |
3.87 |
Sun-dried |
91.9 |
90.7 |
51.3 |
4.34 |
Banana leaves |
21.9 |
90.8 |
74.0 |
3.30 |
Rice straw |
||||
New |
86.1 |
85.5 |
85.4 |
1.30 |
Old |
89.2 |
86.7 |
88.8 |
1.49 |
Sugar
cane leaves |
26.1 |
91.9 |
78.0 |
1.65 |
Stilozobium
deeringianum |
22.1 |
91.7 |
45.6 |
4.97 |
Pearson correlation coefficients and other statistical approaches were established by
standard biometrical analyses (Steel and Torrie 1980), using the Minitab software (Ryan et al 1985).
As shown in Table 3, highest in
vitro N digestibility values were obtained for fresh cassava leaves (68.0%) and the
lowest for leaves from sugar cane (3.7%). Water soluble N followed as similar pattern.
Surprisingly, rice straw had values for water solubility and in vitro digestibility
of N which were comparable with those of cassava.
Table 3. Water solubility and in vitro digestibility of leaves and foliage of
several crop residues |
||||
WSDM |
IVDDM |
WSN |
IVDN |
|
Amaranthus spp |
43.5 |
41.1 |
56.5 |
51.5 |
Canavalia ensiformis |
42.8 |
40.5 |
57.6 |
50.0 |
Cassava leaves |
||||
Fresh |
48.3 |
64.1 |
63.6 |
68.0 |
Ensiled (not wilted) |
49.6 |
40.7 |
55.6 |
58.2 |
Ensiled wilted |
43.4 |
43.6 |
58.2 |
63.2 |
Sun-dried |
39.5 |
52.7 |
40.7 |
51.7 |
Musa acuminata |
24.0 |
22.4 |
32.2 |
32.0 |
Rice straw |
||||
New |
15.0 |
9.9 |
50.1 |
49.1 |
Old |
15.8 |
12.2 |
64.1 |
61.4 |
Saccharum officinarum |
7.3 |
7.6 |
5.5 |
3.7 |
Stilozobium
deeringianum |
30.7 |
38.7 |
36.6 |
50.6 |
WSDM, IVDDM, WSN and
IVDN are water solubility of DM, in vitro
digestibility of DM, water solubility of N and in
vitro digestibility of N, respectively. |
Table 4. Pearson correlation coefficients for non
conventional indices of nutritive value of crop
residues and other foliages |
|||||||
DM |
N |
NDF |
NDFN |
WSDM |
IVDDM |
WSN |
|
N
|
-0.41 |
||||||
NDF
|
0.15 |
-0.49 |
|||||
NDFN |
-0.42 |
-0.25 |
0.53 |
||||
WSDM |
-0.40 |
0.76 |
-0.56 |
-0.42 |
|||
IVDDM |
-0.31 |
0.82 |
-0.58 |
-0.44 |
0.91 |
||
WSN |
0.13 |
0.15 |
-0.56 |
-0.79 |
0.59 |
0.45 |
|
IVDN |
0.14 |
0.45 |
-0.60 |
-0.77 |
0.64 |
0.60 |
0.88 |
DM, N, NDF, NDFN, WSDM, IVDDM, WSN and IVDN are dry
matter, nitrogen, neutral detergent fibre, neutral detergent fibre-linked N, water
solubility of DM, in vitro digestibility
of DM, water solubility of N and in vitro
digestibility of N, respectively. |
Figure 1: Relationship
between water soluble N and in vitro N
digestibility
in a range of leaves from crop residues
The water soluble DM estimate was a better predictor (R2 = 0.83) of in vitro dry matter digestibility than was the NDF estimate (R2 = 0.71) (Figures 2 and 3). These findings are in general agreement with those reported for tree leaves and water plants (Ly et al 2001; Ly et al 2002).
Figure 2: Relationship between water soluble dry matter and in vitro dry matter digestibility in a range of leaves from crop residues |
Figure 3: Relationship between NDF and in vitro dry matter digestibility in a range of leaves from crop residues |
The results indicate that:
ˇ The water solubility method is suitable for evaluating tropical fibrous crop residues as feeds for pigs.
ˇ Cell
wall linked N appears to be one of the major factors influencing the digestibility of the
nitrogenous fraction.
This publication is an output from a collaborative research project
funded by FAO,
AOAC 1990 Official Methods of
Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 15th edition (K Helrick
editor)
Boisen S
and Fernandez J A 1995 Prediction of the apparent ileal digestibility of protein and
amino acids in feedstuffs and feed mixtures for pigs by in vitro analysis. Animal
Feed Science and Technology 51:29-43
Dierick, N,
Vervaeke, I, Decuypere, J and Henderickx, H 1985 Protein digestion in pig measured in
vivo and in vitro. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Seminar
on Digestive Physiology in the Pig (A Just, H Jorgensen and JA Fernández, editors).
National Institute of Animal Science.
Greenhalgh J F D 1984 Upgrading
crop and agricultural by-products for animal production. In: Herbivore Nutrition in the
Subtropics and Tropics (FMC Gilchrist and RI Mackie, editors) Science Pres, Craighall
Licitra G, Hernandez T M and Van Soest P J 1996 Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feed. Animal Feed Science and Technology 57:347-358
Ly J and Preston T R 1997 An approach to the estimation of washing losses in leaves of tropical trees. Livestock Research for Rural Development (9) 3: http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd9/3/ly931
Ly J, Nguyen Van Lai, Rodríguez Lylian and Preston T R 1997 In vitro gas production and washing losses of tropical crop residues for ruminants and pigs. Livestock Research for Rural Development (9) 4: http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd9/4/ly941.htm
Ly J, Chhay Ty, Chiev Phiny and
Ly J and Preston T R 2001 In
vitro estimates of nitrogen digestibility for pigs and water-solble nitrogen are
correlated in tropical forage feeds. Livestock Research for Rural Development 13(1):
http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd13/1/ly131.htm
Ly J, Pok Samkol and Preston T R 2002 Nutritional
evaluation of aquatic plants for pigs. Pepsin/pancreatin digestibility of six plant
species. Livestock Research for Rural Development
13(1): http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd14/1/ly141a.htm
Menke K H, Raab L, Salewski A, Steingass H, Fritz D and Schneider W 1979 The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93:217-222
Řrskov E R, Hovell D and Mould F 1980 The use of the nylon bag technique for the evaluation of feeds feedstuffs. Tropical Animal Production (5) 3:195-213
Owen E and Aboud A A O 1987
Practical problems of feeding crop residues. Proceedings of a Workshop on Plant Breeding
and Nutritive value of crop residues. ILCA.
Owen E and Jayasuriya M C N 1989
Use of crop residues as animal feeds in developing countries.
Research and Development in Agriculture 6:129-138
Perez R 1997 Feeding pigs in the
tropics. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper No 132.
Pujol S, Torraldona D and Boisen S
2001 In vivo and in vitro ileal digestibility of protein and amino acid
in barley. In: Digestive Physiology of Pigs (JE Lindberg and B Ogle, editors). CABI
Publishing,
Ryan, B F, Joiner, B L and Ryan Jr,
T A 1985 Minitab (2nd edition) Hilliday Lithograph
Steel, R G D and Torrie, J A 1980
Principles and Procedures of Statistics: a Biometrical Approach. McGraw-Hill Book Company
(second edition).
Sundstol R
1980 Straw and other fibrous by-products. Livestock Production Science. 19:137-158
Swiech E
and Buraczewska L 2001 In vivo and in vitro protein and amino acid digestibility of
soybean and rapeseed products in pig diets. In: Digestive Physiology of Pigs (JE Lindberg
and B Ogle, editors). CABI Publishing,
Undersander,
D, Mertens, DR and Theix, N 1993 Forage analysis procedures. National Forage Testing
Association.
Van Soest,
PJ, Robertson, J B and Lewis, B A 1991 Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent
fiber and non starch polysachharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy
Science 74:3583-3593
Received