Information from
400 randomly selected female farmers was obtained during the year 1997 to assess the
production performance of backyard chicken in Charsadda
district, North West Frontier Province (NWFP), Pakistan.
Only 16.3% of the farmers were regularly vaccinating their flocks. The majority of the farmers initiated immunization only at the time of disease onset (29.7%) followed by those (28.5%) who did not vaccinate. A high proportion (53.3%) provided no housing, 29.8% provide night shelters and 17% had no housing. Average flock size was 22.0 birds, comprising 8.86 chicks, 2.03 pullets and 11.1 layers. The local Desi chicken dominated the flocks (10.2 birds) followed by Fayumi (6.76), Rhode Island Red (4.20) with White Leghorn least popular (0.83 ). Average mortality in a flock was 23.6%. Mortality was higher in layers (28.1%) than in pullets (18.7%) and chicks (24.2%). Significantly higher losses were found in White Leghorn (35.6%) than in Desi chicken (17.5%). Similarly, higher mortality was found in chicken without housing facilities (26.7%) than in those with access to houses (21.6%). Regular vaccination was associated with higher productivity than vaccination at the onset of disease or no vaccination. Average annual egg production was 76.4 for Desi, 109 for Fayumi, 169 for Rhode Island and 153 for White Leghorn. Mean hatchability was 61.2% with an annual frequency of 4.6 settings and 15.1 eggs set per broody hen.
Farmer preference for the local Desi chicken reflected their greater capacity to survive and adapt to scavenging management systems. Fayumi and Rhode Island chickens appear to merit further studies as breeds that could improve the productivity of scavenging systems, as they had higher egg production and only slightly higher mortality than Desi chicken.
Backyard chicken production is a
subsistence activity, providing eggs and meat for family consumption and, to some extent,
cash income. Annual household
egg production per household from backyard chickens in Mardan
Division, NWFP,
The present study was an effort
to characterize the production performance of backyard chicken in Charsadda
district, North West Frontier Province (NWFP),
Information from 400 randomly
selected women farmers in Charsadda district, North West Frontier Province
(NWFP),
Information was collected regarding:
· type of household
·
flock size
·
eggs
produced, consumed, and used for hatching
·
mortality in
chicks, pullets and layers
· health coverage/vaccination
programs
·
housing
facilities
The data were analyzed using a
General Linear Model (GLM) program (Steel and Torrie 1981),
Chi-square test and Univariate analysis. The following
statistical model was constructed.
Yijklm = µ+ ai
+ bj + ck + dl + ejklm
Where, Yijklm
was the observed parameter in chickens of i type
having j age produced in k housing under l health
coverage program,
µ = population constant common
to all observations,
ai = the effect of i
type of chicken (i= Desi
(nondescript indigenous chicken), RIR (Rhode Island Red), WLH (White Leghorn) and Fayumi chicken,
bj = the effect of j age of the chicken (j= chick, pullet and layer),
ck
= the effect of k housing (k = night shelter only, no house and proper house
according to the requirements of the chicken),
dl
= the effect of l health coverage program (l= regular vaccination [at day 7,
21 and after every 03 months), partial vaccination [during winter and summer season],
vaccination at the time of disease onset and no vaccination),
eijklm
= the residual term associated with each Yijklm, assumed to be normally, independently and
identically distributed with mean zero and variance 1.
For comparison of the numbers of
farmers following activities such as housing and vaccination/health coverage program the
following form of Chi-square test was used:
Ó (O-E)2
x2 = ------------------
E
The average flock size (Table 1)
was similar to what was reported by Shakir et al (1999) for
households in Chitral and higher that than was found by Qureshi (1985) who reported a flock size of 1 to 12 birds. The
findings suggest an increase in flock size from 1985 onwards, which could be attributed to
public awareness about backyard chicken production and the importance of poultry products.
Table 1.
Production
statistics of backyard chicken in Charsadda district
|
||
Mean±SE |
CV |
|
Flock statistics |
||
Flock size |
22.0±1.58 |
53.5 |
Chicks |
8.86±1.16 |
75.5 |
Pullets |
2.03±0.87 |
54.1 |
Adult birds |
11.1±0.54 |
51.6 |
Egg production and uses |
||
Total egg production per flock |
1407±174 |
49.2 |
Eggs produced per bird |
127±5.15 |
60.2 |
Total egg consumption |
658±69 |
73.6 |
Total eggs for hatching purpose |
69.6±12.0 |
83.1 |
Hatching performance |
|
|
Hatchability (%) |
61.2±10.9 |
79.8 |
Frequency of eggs set per year |
4.6±1.38 |
13.4 |
Number of eggs set per hen |
15.1±0.42 |
27.3 |
Mortality (%) |
|
|
Overall mortality in a flock |
23.6±4.82 |
28.5 |
In chicks |
24.1b±0.89 |
78.3 |
In pullets |
18.7c±1.23 |
69.4 |
In adult birds |
28.1a±2.05 |
85.3 |
abc Means with different subscripts are
significantly different at P = 0.05. |
The local Desi
chicken was the most numerous breed, followed by
Table 2. Production data
of backyard chicken according to breed, housing and health coverage |
||||
Flock
size |
Mortality |
Total
egg production |
Eggs /bird |
|
Breed |
||||
Desi |
10.2a±1.2 |
17.5c±12.7 |
458b±154 |
76.4d±0.9 |
Fayumi |
6.76b±1.3 |
18.6c±14.4 |
327c±144 |
109c±1.8 |
RIR |
4.20c±0.5 |
22.8b±5.6 |
509a±176 |
169a±2.1 |
WLH |
0.83d±0.1 |
35.6a±2.6 |
113d±70.3 |
153b±7.5 |
Housing |
||||
Proper houses |
31.1a±11 |
21.6b±2 |
1813a±930 |
164a±20 |
Night shelter only |
20.6b±1.1 |
22.7b±1.5 |
1206b±56.7 |
109b±4.29 |
No house |
14.1c±1.6 |
26.7a±3.2 |
1202b±87.6 |
109b±9.7 |
Health coverage (vaccination against |
||||
Regular |
26.5a±1.3 |
17.9d±1.7 |
2026a±61.2 |
183a±4.8 |
Partial |
23.5b±2.1 |
20.7c±2.5 |
1296b±76.9 |
117b±6.5 |
At disease onset |
20.2c±0.2 |
29.1a±2.4 |
1077d±82.6 |
97.4d±6.9 |
None |
17.6c±1.2 |
26.8b±2.1 |
1229c±72.6 |
111c±6.8 |
abcd Means with different subscripts within columns / criteria
are different at P= 0.05. |
Household flock size was in
direct proportion to the quality of the housing. Charsadda
usually suffers severe winter conditions and birds having no housing facilities are
adversely affected, causing severe death losses in the area as was reported by Naila et al (2001). In a
similar fashion, the size of the flock was also directly related to the quality of the
vaccination program. Shakir et al (1999) also reported higher
flock sizes (27.4 birds) for households that vaccinated their birds than those not
vaccinating (18.9 birds). The implication from the findings of the present study is that
the unvaccinated flocks could have been infected with diseases, thereby resulting in
higher death rates and reduced flock size, or that the farmers may have sold the birds as
and when there was an onset of disease.
The average mortality in the
flocks was 23.6±4.87%. Mortality was highest in layers, followed by chicks then pullets. Shakir et al (1999) reported a lower mortality (13.6%) in Chitral and Farooq et al (2000) a higher
one (29.8%) in Mardan division. The high mortality in the
present study could
possibly be related to a minimal health coverage program and poor management practices.
Losses were highest in White
Leghorn followed by
Annual average household egg
production was 1407±5.15, representing 127±5.15 eggs produced per bird (Table 1).
Household consumption was 658±69. A higher
production of eggs per household (2976 eggs) and a higher consumption (1255 eggs) was
reported in Chitral by Shakir et
al (1999). By contrast, Farooq et al (2000) reported much
smaller household annual egg consumption (212 eggs). Backyard chicken production is more
intensively practiced in Chitral than in other parts of the
NWFP, as it is the only developed livestock production activity there. However, the
relatively high household annual egg production and consumption in Charsadda
could probably be related to heightened interest of the women in chicken production for
that area. A majority of the female farmers in the area were eager to develop backyard
chicken production and try out new innovations. They were enthusiastic in establishing
groups and receiving training in chicken and other livestock production activities.
Egg production per Desi chicken was only half of that for
Egg production per bird was 50%
higher when proper housing was provided compared with only shelter at night or no shelter.
Regular or partial vaccination had a similar positive effect on egg production, but as
with mortality, vaccination when the disease occurred had no effect on egg production.
The annual average of eggs used
for hatching by a household was 69.6±12.0. Shakir et al.
(1999) in Chitral reported a figure of 56.3 eggs while in the
study of Farooq et al (2000) in Mardan
division the number was only 4.5. Average hatchability was 61.2±10.%
in the present study which can be compared with 73.6% reported in Mardan
division by Farooq et al (2000). The lower hatchability in the
present study could possibly be attributed to lack of experience in selection of eggs for
hatching. The average annual frequency of egg setting was 4.6±1.38 and the average number
of eggs set under a broody hen was 15.1±2.42 (Table 1). Farooq
et al (2000) reported similar data for eggs per broody hen (15.0) but with a smaller
annual frequency of sets (3.01).
A high proportion (53.3%) of
farmers provided no housing facilities for their chickens (Table 3). The reason would appear to be a lack of knowledge
about this issue, since the survey data showed significant advantages for most production
traits when some form of housing was provided.
Table 3. Proportion of farmers in housing and
health categories |
|
Proportion of farmers
(%) |
|
Housing |
|
Proper houses |
17.0c |
Night shelter
only |
29.8b |
No house |
53.3a |
Health
coverage (vaccination) |
|
Regular |
16.3c |
Partial |
25.5b |
At the onset of
disease |
29.7a |
None |
28.5a |
abc Means with different subscripts in each category
are different at ? = 0.05. |
The fact that most farmers
(29.8%) only vaccinated their flocks at the time of disease onset would also indicate a
lack of knowledge of when to vaccinate, since all the production data indicated advantages
from regular vaccination at the prescribed intervals. The reason for not vaccinating could
also be partly because of unavailability of the vaccine. Many
of the farmers expressed complaints about limited vaccine availability.
Farooq M, Shoukat
K, Asrar M, Shah Mussawar, Durrani F R, Asghar A and Faisal S 2000
Impact of female livestock extension workers on rural house-hold chicken production.
Livestock Research for Rural Development 12 (4) 1: http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd12/4/faro124.htm
Naila C, Farooq
M, Durrani F R, Asghar A and Pervez 2001 Prevalence and economic ramification of Newcastle
disease in backyard chicken in Charsadda, NWFP, Pakistan.
Online Journal of Biological
Science. 1(5):421-424.
Qureshi M S
1985 Annual report of Poultry Research Institute.
Shakir M K, Mian
M A, Syed M and Farooq M 1999 Contribution of backyard chicken to
household economy in Chitral, NWFP, Pakistan. M.Sc. (Hons) Anim.
Husbandry, NWFP,
Steel R G D and Torrie J H 1981
Principles and procedures of statistics; A biometrical approach. 2nd.
Ed.
Received