Livestock Research for Rural Development 37 (3) 2025 LRRD Search LRRD Misssion Guide for preparation of papers LRRD Newsletter

Citation of this paper

Optimizing carcass yield through lysine-supplemented diets with locally sourced kepayang (Pangium edule) oil in broilers

Wiwaha Anas Sumadja, Noferdiman and Nurhayati

Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Animal Science, University of Jambi, Indonesia
wiwahasumadja@unja.ac.id

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of lysine supplementation in broiler diets containing kepayang (Pangium edule) oil on growth performance and carcass traits. Two hundred day-old broiler chicks (initial BW: 48.52 g) were assigned to a completely randomized design with four dietary treatments and five replicates of 10 birds each. The treatments were: T1 = control diet (no kepayang oil or lysine), T2 = 2% kepayang oil + 0.4% lysine, T3 = 4% kepayang oil + 0.8% lysine and T4 = 6% kepayang oil + 1.2% lysine. Feed intake, body weight gain, feed conversion ratio (FCR), slaughter weight, carcass weight, abdominal fat and internal organ traits were recorded. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and significant differences were tested using Duncan's multiple range test. Lysine supplementation in diets containing kepayang oil significantly reduced feed intake during the finisher phase and overall period (p<0.05), with no significant effect during the starter phase. Body weight gain and FCR were not significantly affected across all periods. Slaughter and carcass weights were significantly improved in T3 (p<0.05), while relative carcass weight and internal organ weights showed no significant differences, except heart weight (p=0.057). These findings suggest that 4% kepayang oil combined with 0.8% lysine can enhance carcass yield without adverse effects on performance.

Keywords: carcass yield, growth performance, internal organs, Kepayang oil


Introduction

In many rural areas of developing countries, poultry farming plays a vital role in household income, nutrition and food security. However, high feed costs—particularly for energy and protein sources—remain a major constraint to productivity and profitability. Since feed can account for up to 70% of total production costs, identifying affordable and locally available feed resources is critical to improving the sustainability of smallholder poultry systems (Thirumalaisamy et al 2016).

Vegetable oils are effective energy sources in broiler diets. They improve feed palatability, support fat-soluble vitamin absorption and contribute essential fatty acids that enhance feed efficiency and energy utilization (Baiăo and Lara 2005; Poorghasemi et al 2015; Attia et al 2019). While palm, soybean and coconut oils are commonly used, their cost and availability can be limiting in rural communities. Exploring alternative oils derived from local plants may provide a cost-effective solution.

Kepayang (Pangium edule Reinw) is a native tree found widely in Southeast Asia, including in rural Indonesia, where its seeds are traditionally used in food after proper detoxification. Oil extracted from kepayang seeds is rich in unsaturated fatty acids, especially α-linolenic acid, which supports energy metabolism and may enhance the nutritional quality of poultry meat (Cakrawati 2006; Fauzi et al 2008). Despite its availability, kepayang oil has received little attention as a feed ingredient.

In addition to energy, amino acid balance is essential in poultry diets. Lysine, often the second limiting amino acid in corn–soybean diets, is critical for protein synthesis, muscle growth and immune function (Siqueira et al 2013). Supplementing lysine in diets containing alternative energy sources may improve overall feed utilization and growth performance.

This study investigates the combined effects of kepayang oil and lysine supplementation on growth performance and carcass traits in broilers. The goal is to assess the potential of this locally available oil as a practical and sustainable feed ingredient for rural poultry production


Materials and methods

Experimental design, birds and diets

A total of 200 unsexed day-old broiler chicks (strain CP 707) with uniform initial body weights were randomly allocated to four dietary treatments in a completely randomized design (CRD). Each treatment consisted of five replicates with ten birds per replicate. The birds were housed in floor pens under standardized management, hygienic and environmental conditions for the entire duration of the 35-day trial.

The kepayang oil used in this study was obtained from a local market in Sarolangun Regency, Jambi Province, Indonesia. The oil was traditionally produced by local communities living around the forest area, using seeds extracted from the ripe fruits of kepayang trees (Photo 1 and Photo 2). This locally sourced oil represents a typical product utilized in traditional practices and was chosen to reflect the potential of indigenous resources in poultry feed applications.

Photo 1. Kepayang (Pangium edule Reinw) Trees
Source: https://trubus.id/kepayang-menjaga-alam/
Photo 2. Kepayang (Pangium edule Reinw) Fruits
Source: https://gemapos.id/25581/mengenal-pohon-kepayang-si-penghasil-kluwek-dan-minyak-yang-sehat#google_vignette

The experimental diets were formulated with graded levels of kepayang (Pangium edule Reinw) oil and supplemental lysine as follows:

T1: Basal diet without kepayang oil or lysine supplementation (control),

T2: Basal diet + 2% kepayang oil + 0.4% lysine,

T3: Basal diet + 4% kepayang oil + 0.8% lysine,

T4: Basal diet + 6% kepayang oil + 1.2% lysine.

The compositition of feed ingredients in research diets and nutrients content of treatment diets are presented in Tables 1 and 2 respectively. All diets were formulated to be isoenergetic and isonitrogenous and to meet or exceed the nutrient requirements recommended by the NRC (1994) for broiler chickens. Feed and water were provided ad libitum throughout the study.

Table 1. Compositition of feed ingredients in research diets

Feeds

Starter (%)

Finisher (%)

T1

T2

T3

T4

T1

T2

T3

T4

Maize

51

49

49

48

55

52.6

52.2

51.8

Kepayang Oil

0

2

4

6

0

2

4

6

Fish Meal

11

10.6

10.2

9.8

7

7

7

7

Rice Bran

11

11

9

8

15

15

13

11

Soy Bean Meal

26

26

26

26

22

22

22

22

Bone Meal

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

CaCO3

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

Premix

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

Lysine

0.00

0.40

0.80

1.20

0.00

0.40

0.80

1.20



Table 2. Nutrients content of Treatment Diets

Nutrients

Starter (%)

Finisher (%)

T1

T2

T3

T4

T1

T2

T3

T4

Dry Matter

89.61

87.51

85.35

83.22

89.11

87.04

84.90

82.77

Crude Protein

23.69

23.31

22.92

22.54

20.32

20.12

19.91

19.70

Fat

3.54

3.43

3.31

3.20

3.56

3.46

3.36

3.26

Crude Fibre

3.69

3.64

3.36

3.20

4.08

4.03

3.76

3.49

Ca

1.49

1.45

1.43

1.40

1.30

1.28

1.27

1.26

P

0.71

0.69

0.65

0.62

0.62

0.61

0.59

0.56

Lysine

0.90

1.29

1.69

2.09

0.77

1.17

1.57

1.97

Premix

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

0.25

EM (Kkal/g)

3147.08

3176.60

3228.55

3269.28

3116.04

3143.64

3193.65

3243.67

Growth performance measurement

Growth performance was evaluated across two feeding phases: the starter phase (1–21 days) and the finisher phase (22–35 days). Parameters recorded included body weight gain (BWG), feed intake (FI) and feed conversion ratio (FCR). Feed intake was calculated as the difference between the feed offered and feed refused, while FCR was computed as the ratio of feed intake to body weight gain.

Carcass evaluation

At the end of the feeding trial (day 35), two birds from each replicate (closest to the replicate's average body weight) were selected for carcass analysis. Birds were fasted for 12 hours, humanely slaughtered, defeathered and eviscerated. Carcass traits recorded included live body weight, slaughter body weiht and carcass weight. In addition, the weights of internal organs such as liver, heart and gizzard, proventriculus and pancreas were recorded and lengths of the duodenum, jejunum, ileum were measured. Abdominal fat deposition also was measured.

Statistical analysis

Data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) according to the CRD model using SAS software (Version 9.3; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). When significant differences (p < 0.05) were detected, treatment means were compared using Duncan’s multiple range test. All results are presented as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM).


Results and discussion

Growth performances

The effects of dietary treatments on growth performance are presented in Tables 3. During the starter period (1–21 days of age), no significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed among treatments for feed intake, body weight gain (BWG), or feed conversion ratio (FCR). These findings align with those reported by Nájera-Pedraza et al (2023), who observed no effects of palm oil supplementation on broiler performance during early growth. Similarly, Mardhotillah et al (2020) and Al-Abdullatif et al (2023) reported that the inclusion of dietary oils such as rice bran or palm oil did not influence broiler BWG in the initial three weeks. The lack of effect observed in this study may be attributed to the isonitrogenous and isoenergetic nature of the experimental diets, as well as the possibility that birds prioritize lean tissue development over fat accumulation during early growth stages. Moreover, the nutritional modifications (e.g., added lysine and kepayang oil) may not have exerted substantial influence due to adequate baseline nutrient levels in starter diets.

Table 3. Effect of treatments on consumption, growth rate and feed conversion of broiler chickens

Parameter

Treatments

SDEV

p - value

T1

T2

T3

T4

Feed Consumption (g/chick-1)

Starter

713.18NS

712.77NS

724.02NS

722.94NS

47.71

0.97

Finisher

873.98a

897.96a

877.848a

752.77b

62.89

0.02

overall period

1587.17a

1610.73a

1601.86a

1475.72b

51.09

0.003

Body Weigt Gain (g/chick-1)

Starter Period

380.67NS

384.33NS

420.52NS

443.38NS

36.89

0.36

Finisher Period

461.69NS

465.21NS

464.06NS

443.38NS

37.93

0.83

overall period

903.34NS

866.44NS

868.88NS

841.89NS

73.33

0.66

Feed Conversion Ratio

Starter

1.88NS

1.87NS

1.73NS

1.86NS

0.20

0.65

Finisher

1.91NS

1.97NS

1.89NS

1.72NS

0.27

0.60

Week 1-5

1.77NS

1.88NS

1.85NS

1.76NS

0.17

0.68

Note: NS: Non Significant different. Different letters in the same row showed differences p<0.05

During the finisher period (22–35 days of age), feed intake was significantly influenced by dietary treatments ( p < 0.05). Birds fed diets with higher levels of kepayang oil and lysine consumed less feed, which could be attributed to the increased energy density of the diet or altered palatability and digestibility. Nurmi et al (2018) and Ahiwe et al 2018 emphasized that metabolizable energy levels strongly influence feed intake in broilers. The findings are also consistent with those of Prayogi (2007) and Ayed et al (2015), who reported that increasing oil inclusion levels reduced voluntary feed intake. Despite this reduction, BWG and FCR were not significantly affected (p > 0.05), suggesting that broilers were able to maintain growth and feed efficiency through more effective nutrient utilization from the energy-dense diets. However, it is important to note that FCR did not improve, indicating efficient but not enhanced nutrient assimilation.

In the overall period (1–35 days), feed intake was significantly lower ( p < 0.01) in treatments receiving higher kepayang oil and lysine levels. This reduction may reflect the improved nutrient density and utilization efficiency of the diets. Once the birds’ energy and amino acid requirements were met, feed intake naturally declined. These findings are in agreement with El-Bahr et al (2021) and Prayogi (2007), who noted a similar pattern of decreased intake in high-energy or lysine-supplemented diets. BWG and FCR remained unaffected (p> 0.05), indicating that reduced intake did not compromise growth performance. Nonetheless, the absence of improvement in FCR reinforces the interpretation that while birds consumed less, they maintained—not enhanced—growth efficiency.

The absence of significant effects on BWG, feed intake and FCR across all periods is consistent with Kiani et al (2017), who found no performance response to canola oil and lysine inclusion across different growth phases. However, it contrasts with Alcicek et al (2004), who observed performance improvements with herbal essential oils. The current findings suggest that while kepayang oil and lysine supplementation do not impair broiler performance, they may not provide additional benefits under nutritionally balanced conditions. It is also possible that interactions between high levels of dietary lipids and amino acids with other feed components may have modulated nutrient availability, minimizing their efficacy.

Carcass traits and internal organ

Carcass data (Table 4) showed that both slaughter weight and carcass weight were significantly increased (p < 0.05) in birds receiving higher levels of kepayang oil and lysine. This suggests improved growth and nutrient assimilation potentially driven by enhanced energy and amino acid availability. These findings are in agreement with Poorghasemi et al (2013), who demonstrated that mixed fat sources (tallow and vegetable oils) improved carcass yields in broilers. However, the carcass yield (relative carcass weight) was not significantly affected (p > 0.05), likely due to proportional increases in other body components such as internal organs, bone, or fat mass. This explanation aligns with Konieczka et al (2021), who reported no effect of lysine inclusion on carcass yield despite increased body weight in turkeys.

Table 4. Effect of treatments on slaughter weight, carcass weight and carcass relative weight

Parameters

T1

T2

T3

T4

SEM

p - value

Slaughter weight (g)

943.44a

956.44a

1001.48b

947.30a

26.54

0.01

Carcass weight (g)

647.48a

657.96ab

697.46b

649.28a

24.36

0.03

Carcass relative weight (%)

68.63NS

68.80NS

69.69NS

68.49NS

1.80

0.79

Note: NS: Non Significant different. Different letters in the same row showed differences p<0.05

In contrast to the improved carcass traits, most internal organ parameters (lengths of the duodenum, jejunum, ileum; weights of the liver, gizzard, proventriculus and pancreas) in Table 5 were unaffected by the dietary treatments. These traits are often more closely associated with genetic factors, bird age and health status rather than dietary fat or lysine levels. However, there was a trend toward significant reduction in heart weight was observed (p = 0.057). This may suggest a localized nutrient imbalance or altered tissue distribution in response to high dietary supplementation. Excessive levels of kepayang oil and lysine may disrupt the balance of other essential nutrients, leading to reduced development of certain organs, including the heart. This highlights the need for cautious formulation to avoid oversupplying nutrients that may interfere with physiological development.

Table 5. Effect of treatments on the internal organ characteristics of broiler chickens

Parameters

T1

T2

T3

T4

SEM

p -value

Duodenum (cm)

27.40NS

27.20NS

26.00NS

26.60NS

1.63

0.56

Jejenum (Cm)

76.90NS

74.40NS

75.50NS

78.50NS

4.25

0.74

Ileum (Cm)

72.30NS

74.50NS

72.60NS

69.70NS

6.46

0.74

Liver (g)

26.84NS

26.65NS

26.45NS

24.40NS

3.06

0.63

Heart (g)

5.39a

5.45ab

6.27b

6.12ab

0.46

0.057

Gizard (g)

22.89NS

23.41NS

25.20NS

23.48NS

2.42

0.56

Pankreas (g)

3.33NS

3.47NS

3.74NS

3.37NS

0.53

0.66

Proventriculus (g)

8.20NS

6.76NS

7.63NS

6.18NS

1.17

0.08

Abdomen Fat (g)

15.97NS

21.70NS

18.82NS

20.82NS

4.90

0.36

Note: NS: Non Significant different. Different letters in the same row showed differences p<0.05

Abdominal fat deposition was not significantly affected by dietary treatments. This result may reflect a complex balance between energy intake, expenditure and metabolic regulation. Even with higher energy density in the diet, broilers may have maintained energy equilibrium, thereby preventing excess fat accumulation. Similar observations were made by Sterling et al (2006), who found no significant changes in abdominal fat with increased lysine supplementation. This outcome contrasts with findings from Crespo and Esteve-Garcia (2002) and González-Ortiz et al (2013), who noted reduced abdominal fat in birds fed diets rich in unsaturated fatty acids (e.g., linseed oil). The absence of a similar response in this study could be due to differences in the fatty acid composition of kepayang oil, which may not influence lipid metabolism to the same extent as omega-3-rich oils.

Numerous studies have explored the effects of oil types and levels on broiler performance and carcass traits. Palm oil, for instance, increases palmitic and oleic acids in muscle tissue, improving meat stability (Saminathan et al 2022), whereas oils high in erucic acid (e.g., rapeseed oil) have been associated with reduced performance (Attia et al 2020). Insect oil and essential oils from garlic or lemongrass have also shown positive effects on performance and immunity (Benzertiha et al 2019; Elbaz et al 2022). The current study contributes to this body of knowledge by demonstrating that supplementation with kepayang oil and lysine—particularly at the highest level (T3)—can enhance slaughter and carcass weights without negatively impacting feed efficiency or most physiological parameters.


Conclusion

Supplementing broiler diets with kepayang (Pangium edule Reinw) oil and graded levels of lysine affected performance outcomes and carcass characteristics. The inclusion of 6 % kepayang oil and 1.2 % lysine reduced feed intake without compromising growth or feed conversion, while the combination of 4 % kepayang oil with 0.8 % lysine (T3) was optimal for improving slaughter and carcass weights. Internal organ development and abdominal fat deposition remained unaffected, indicating no adverse effects on health parameters. These findings support the use of kepayang oil, particularly when combined with appropriate lysine levels, as a promising alternative energy and amino acid source in broiler nutrition strategies aimed at improving carcass yield without compromising performance.


Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to the Faculty of Animal Science, University of Jambi, for providing facilities and funding. Special thanks are extended to the technical staff and students who assisted during the feeding trial and data collection.


References

Ahiwe EU, A A Omede, M E B Abdallh and PA Iji 2018 Managing dietary energy intake by broiler chickens to reduce production costs and improve product quality. Animal Husbandry and Nutrition. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.76972.

Al-Abdullatif A, Hussein E, Suliman G, Akasha M, Al-Badwi M, Ali H and Azzam M 2023 Evaluating rice bran oil as a dietary energy source on production performance, nutritional properties and fatty acid deposition of breast meat in broiler chickens. Foods. 12, 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12020366.

Alçiçek A, M Bozkurt and M Çabuk 2004 The effect of a mixture of herbal essential oils, an organic acid or a probiotic on broiler performance. South African Journal of Animal Science, 34 (4):217-222. http://www.sasas.co.za/Sajas.html

Attia Y A, Abd El-Hamid EAH, Nagadi S A, de Oliveira M C, Bovera F and Habiba H I 2019 Dietary distilled fatty acids and antioxidants improve nutrient use and performance of Japanese male quails. Animal Science Papers and Reports. 37:65–74. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23000.03846

Attia Y A, Al-Harthi M A and Abo El-Maaty H M 2020 The effects of different oil sources on performance, digestive enzymes, carcass traits, biochemical, immunological, antioxidant and morphometric responses of broiler chicks. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, 181. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00181 Frontiers

Ayed H B, Attia H and Ennouri M 2015 Effect of oil supplemented diet on growth performance and meat quality of broilerchickens. Advanced Techniques in Biology and Medicine, 4, 156. DOI: 10.4172/2379-1764.1000156

Baiăo N C and Lara L J C 2005 Oil and fat in broiler nutrition. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science,7(3), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2005000300001

Benzertiha A, Kierończyk B, Rawski M, Kołodziejski P, Bryszak M and Józefiak D 2019 Insect oil as an alternative to palm oil and poultry fat in broiler chicken nutrition. Animals, 9(3), 116. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9030116

Cakrawati D 2006 Pengaruh Pra Fermentasi dan Suhu Maserasi terhadap Beberapa Sifat Fisikokimia Minyak Kasar Kluwak. Skripsi. Fakultas Teknologi Industri Pertanian, Jurusan Teknologi Industri Pangan, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung.

Crespo N and Esteve-Garcia E 2002 Nutrient and fatty acid deposition in broilers fed different dietary fatty acid profiles. Poultry Science, 81, 1533–1542. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.10.1533.

El-Bahr S M, Shousha S, Alfattah M A, Al-Sultan S, Khattab W, Sabeq I I, Ahmed-Farid O, El-Garhy O, Albusadah K A, Alhojaily S and Shehab A 2021 Enrichment of broiler chickens’ meat with dietary linseed oil and lysine mixtures: Influence on nutritional value, carcass characteristics and oxidative stress biomarkers. Foods, 10, 618. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10030618.

Elbaz A M, Ashmawy E S, Salama A A, Abdel-Moneim A E, Badri F B, Thabet H A 2022 Effects of garlic and lemon essential oils on performance, digestibility, plasma metabolite and intestinal health in broilers under environmental heat stress. BMC Veterinary Research. 12;18(1):430.doi:10.1186/s12917-022-03530-y.

Fauzi Y Y, E Widyastuti, I Satriawibawa dan R Hartono 2008 Kelapa Sawit: Budi Daya, Pemanfaatan Hasil dan Limbah, Analisis Usaha dan Pemasaran. Penebar Swadaya, Jakarta.

González-Ortiz G, Sala R, Cánovas E, Abed N and Barroeta A C 2013 Consumption of dietary n-3 fatty acids decreases fat deposition and adipocyte size, but increases oxidative susceptibility in broiler chickens. Lipids. 48, 705–717. DOI: 10.1007/s11745-013-3785-3

Kiani A, S D Sharifi, S Sharifi and Ghazanfari 2017 Influence of canola oil and lysine supplementation diets on growth performance and fatty acid composition of meat in broiler chicks. International Journal of Biological, Biomolecular, Agricultural, Food and Biotechnological Engineering, 11(2):95-102.

Konieczka P, Mikulski D,Ognik K, Ju ́skiewicz J, Zdu ́nczyk Z and Jankowski J 2021 Increased dietaryinclusion levels of lysine are more effective than arginine in supportingthe functional status of the gut in growing turkeys. Animals, 11,2351. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082351.

Mardhotillah A B A, H Darmawan, I H dan, L C Hsia 2020 Djunaidi Pengaruh penggunaan lemak sapi, minyak kelapa dan minyak kedelai dalam pakan terhadap performa produksi ayam pedaging. Buana Sains 20(1):1-6. DOI:10.33366/bs.v20i1.1891.

National Research Council 1994 Nutrient Requirements of Poultry: Ninth Revised Edition, 1994. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/2114.

Nájera-Pedraza O G, M A Mellado-Bosque, J E García-Martínez, JA Encina-Domínguez, J Salinas-Chavira 2023 Replacement of conventional vegetable oil with granulated fats of palm oil (prilled fats and calcium soaps) in broiler chicken diet: performance and carcass traits. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science. 25 (2). ISSN 1516-635X 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2022-1694

Nurmi A, N Harahap and M A Santi 2018 Performance of broilers and native chickens fed with unfermented and fermented arenga waste. Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 01, No. 02, p:96 – 104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32734/injar.v1i2.311

Poorghasemi M, A Seidavi, A A A Qotbi, V Laudadio and V Tufarelli 2013 Influence of dietary fat source on growth performance responses and carcass traits of broiler chicks. Asian-Australas Journal of Animal Science. 2013 May; 26(5): 705–710. DOI:10.5713/ajas.2012.12633

Poorghasemi M, Seidavi A, Qotbi AAA, Chambers J R, V Laudadio, V Tufarelli 22015 Effect of dietary fat source on humoral immunity response of broiler chickens. European Poultry Science.79. doi: 10.1399/eps.2015.015

Prayogi H S 2007 Pengaruh penggunaan minyak kelapa dalam ransum terhadap konsumsi pakan, peningkatan bobot badan, konversi pakan dan karkas broiler periode finisher. Ternak Tropika Journal of Tropical Animal Production, Vol. 6 No. 2 p: 18-27. https://ternaktropika.ub.ac.id/index.php/tropika/article/view/140

Saminathan M, Mohamed W N W, Noh 'M, Ibrahim NA, Fuat M A, Ramiah S K 2022 Effects of dietary palm oil on broiler chicken productive performance and carcass characteristics: a comprehensive review. Tropical Animal Health Production.17;54(1):64. doi: 10.1007/s11250-022-03046-5.

Siqueira J C, Sakomura N K, Dourado L R B, Ezequiel J M B, Barbosa N A A and Fernandes J B K 2013 Diet formulation techniques and lysine requirements of 1- to 22-day-old broilers. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science. V:15 No.2, p: 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2013000200008.

Sterling K, Pesti G and Bakalli R 2006 Performance of different broiler genotypes fed diets with varying levels of dietary crude protein and lysine. Poultry Science. 85, 1045–1054. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.6.1045.

Thirumalaisamy G, J Muralidharan, S Senthilkumar, R H Sayee and M Priyadharsini 2016 Cost-effective feeding of poultry. International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, Vol. 5, No 6, 3997 – 4005.