Livestock Research for Rural Development 29 (12) 2017 Guide for preparation of papers LRRD Newsletter

Citation of this paper

Enhancing farmers’ market power and income in the pig value chain; a case study in Bac Giang province, Vietnam

Le Thi Minh Chau, Philippe Lebailly1 and Tran Quang Trung

Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Gia Lam - Hanoi -Vietnam
ltmchau@vnua.edu.vn
1 Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liege, Belgium

Abstract

The pig sector annually contributes about 78 % of the total meat production in Vietnam. The government of Vietnam has implemented numerous policies to promote the development of the pig industry. It strongly emphasizes the production with little attention paid to marketing. Bac Giang is one of the provinces with the highest pig population in Vietnam. Pig production contributes up to 52% of the gross output of the livestock sector of the province. One of emerging problems is the majority of pig farmers are limited in market power and there is low income from pig production. This study aimed to analyse the pig value chain in Bac Giang province, identify main factors affecting farmers’ market power and income in the chain, and propose relevant policy implications to enhance farmers’ market power and income. It was found that pig collectors and pork retailers are the dominant players in the chain in terms of their strong influence on prices due to their coordination role in directing supply of pigs and carcass to market. Numerous factors affecting farmer’s market power and income are weak collective action of farmers in production, lack of collective marketing, volatility of pig price, lack of formal contract farming, consumers’ food safety concern, high price of feed and animal disease. Enhancing farmers’ market power depends on farmers and public authority’s involvement in the various strategies of implementation. Some policy implications focus on the improvement of farmer collective action and government actions related to supporting farmer collective action.

Key words: farmer collective action, pig production, marketing


Introduction

Livestock contributes about 19 % to the gross output of the agricultural sector and generates an important income source for farmers. The pig sector annually contributes about 78 % of the total meat production in Vietnam (GSO 2016). Pork is the most widely consumed meat product in Vietnam and consumer preference for fresh pork provides a degree of natural protection against imports (Tisdell et al 2009). It has created a special competitiveness for pig production in Vietnam. Presently, the pig sector has mostly operated in a small-scale of production units (Lapar et al 2011). Although the government of Vietnam has implemented numerous policies to support, invest in, and promote the development of the pig industry, it strongly emphasizes the production with little attention paid to marketing. Therefore, smallholders still face the risk of not being able to efficiently market their products or be able to secure the market for their products (Nga et al 2014; OECD 2015).

Located in the northern midlands of Vietnam, Bac Giang is one of the provinces with the highest pig population in Vietnam. The farmers annually raise about 1240 thousand pigs, contributing up to 58% of gross output of the livestock sector in Bac Giang. The Department of Agriculture and Rural Development of Bac Giang, a key player for formulating policies in agriculture, indicates that the majority of pig farmers have limited market power, which is a concerning problem (DARDBG 2015). Market power can be seen as the ability of producers to set the sale price of their products. Being able to set the sale price above the production cost, so as to reap a profit, is essential for farmers’ subsistence and development (Piggott et al 2000; MacDonald and Key 2012). Seen from a broader perspective, market power refers to the power to behave independently, to an appreciable extent, from one’s competitors, customers and, finally, consumers. Strategies for increasing farmers’ market power can be collective or individual. The collective strategies are market discipline aimed at managing the supply, pooling production to negotiate its sale collectively, and cooperative integration of the commodity value chain. The individual strategies entail searching for market niches and having direct access to consumers. “Collective for Food Strategy” of Belgium, a non-profit organization, suggests that strategies to improve farmers’ market power include: supply management, collective marketing, contract farming, and production differentiation and shortening the supply chain. Government action plays a decisive part in the implementation and effectiveness of the mentioned strategies (Danau et al 2011). An emerging question is how to enhance of farmers’ market power and income in the pig value chain, which hasn’t been explored so far in Vietnam. The present study aimed to analyse the pig value chain in Bac Giang province, identify the main factors affecting farmers’ market power and income in the pig value chain and propose relevant policy implications for enhancing farmers’ market power and income.


Methods

To obtain the research objectives, the following methods were employed in this study.

Sampling method

Bac Giang province consists of 9 districts and 1 city. Tan Yen and Lang Giang districts were selected as study sites because their pig production presently accounts for the highest proportion of pig production value of the whole province. Two representative communes in each district were chosen as study sites. There are 3 typical types of pig farm including a small-scale farm, a small-scale commercial farm and a large-scale commercial farm. The small-scale farm normally rears about 4-10 pig heads per year for family consumption and selling a small part. The small-scale commercial farms are owned by farmers producing from 10 to 300 pig per year and are predominant. Large- scale commercial farms producing more than 300 pigs per year are managed or owned by companies such as CP, Dabaco and Jave groups. There are few large-scale commercial farms in each commune.

This study focuses on small-scale commercial farms. Therefore, 120 small-scale commercial farms were selected randomly by using the list of pig farms in the study site provided by local staff. Pig collectors, slaughter men, pork wholesalers, pork retailers and consumers were selected based on introduction from farmers and involved persons. Ha Noi capital is an important market for pig farmers in Bac Giang. Collectors not only are from Bac Giang and Ha Noi but also from neighbouring provinces. The numbers of surveyed actors in the chain are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. The sources sampled for primary data collection

Actors

Bac Giang

Ha Noi

Other
provinces

Total

Farmer

120

120

Collector

5

5

3

13

Slaughter men

5

5

10

Wholesaler

5

5

10

Retailer

5

5

10

Data collection

Secondary data on pig production for the period 2010-2015 in Bac Giang were provided by the Department of Agricultural and Rural Development, and the Department of Statistics of Bac Giang province. Primary data were directly collected from farmers, collectors, slaughter men, wholesalers and retailers using structured questionnaires.

Data analysis

Both quantitative and qualitative analysis methods were applied for data analysis. Financial analysis was by the quantitative analysis method to analyse the pig value chain in Bac Giang province. The M4P (2008) approach emphasizes the importance of revenue, costs and profit. FAO (2005), GTZ (2007), Cadilhon (2015) and Hoang (2015) all stress revenue, intermediate cost, added value and profit. Some indicators applied in this study can be explained as follows:

Revenue = Output x Unit price

Intermediate cost = Cost of raw material + Cost of other inputs + Cost of services

Value added= Revenue - Intermediate cost

Income (Profit) =Value added- Depreciation -Tax, interest payment - Hired labour

In addition, the qualitative analysis method was also employed to identify the main factors affecting farmers’ market power and income in the pig value chain.


Results

Pig production in Bac Giang province

Pig production in Bac Giang has increased in response to the rise in consumer demand in Vietnam. In the period 2010-2015, the pig population increased significantly. Gross output of pig production accounted for about 60 % of gross output of livestock production (Table 2). As mentioned, pig production in Bac Giang comprises small-scale farms, small-scale commercial farms and large-scale commercial farms. At present, 70% of the pig population and 82 % of pork production are being produced by the small commercial scale farmers. The system of large-scale commercial farm, with high capital investment, high hygienic standards, and contract farming for production and product supply with companies (CP group, Dabaco, Java....) provides only about 18 % of pork in the market.

To promote pig production, the authorities in Bac Giang have implemented several policies relating to technical and financial support for improvement of pig breeding and prevention of disease. A policy for enhancing participation of small-scale commercial pig producers in the value chain has not generally been introduced.

Table 2. Pig production in Bac Giang province

Indicators

Unit

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Growth rate, %

Pig population

Head

1162349

1182649

1173120

1193608

1214541

1244151

1.36

Live weight

Tonnes

140308

145883.2

150396

156372

160566

164303

3.23

Gross output

Million* VND

3432205

3273102

6622464

6315473

5807741

6095570

12.27

Share in gross output
of livestock production

%

60

62.3

64.4

61.4

59.1

58.1

- 0.66

* 1 USD =22765 VND in the year 2016.
Source: BGSO 2016.

Socio-demographic analysis of farm households and production performance

The surveyed farm households have characteristics typical of the farm households of the Northern region of Vietnam, where Bac Giang is located (Table 3). Both the number of family members and available labour of the surveyed households are not much different among surveyed households. Women participate in all production activities. However, the heads of household normally are men. Men have better access to market information than women. Pig production was an important income source of farm households, accounting for about 67 % of household income. Annually household pig farms keeps about 85 pig heads. For the production system, farmers mostly decide on breeding and feeding based on their experience. Most of the pig farms are of low bio-security level and are facing many difficulties in the control of diseases.

Table 3. Socio-demographic of farm households and pig production performance

Indicators

Unit

Average

Standard deviation

Age of household head

Years

42.5

8.5

Education level of household head

Years of schooling

8.4

1.6

Household head as male

%

67

-

Family size

Persons

4.5

0.8

Number of family workers

Persons

2.5

0.7

Number of pigs

Head

85

56.5

Average live weight

kg/head

112

23

Total live weight

kg/year

8904

1130

Income from pigs

Million VND/year

169

30

Share of total income from pigs

%

67

-

Source: Survey 2016.

Map of pig value chain

In Bac Giang province, there are typically 4 marketing channels (Figure 1):  1: Farmer - Collector in Bac Giang - Slaughter men in Bac Giang - Retailer in Bac Giang - Consumer in Bac Giang; 2: Farmer - Slaughter men in Bac Giang - Retailer in Bac Giang - Consumer in Bac Giang; 3; Farmer - Collector in Bac Giang - Collectors in Ha Noi and other provinces - Slaughter men in Ha Noi - Wholesaler -Retailer- Consumer in Ha Noi; 4: Farmer - Collector in Ha Noi and other provinces - Slaughter men in Hanoi - Wholesaler - Retailer- Consumer in Ha Noi. The channel relating to the China market is also an important. However, the data are impossible to investigate fully. Therefore, four marketing channels are focused for analysis.

Figure 1. Map of pig value chain in Bac Giang province.
Source: Survey 2016
Farmers

Generally, farmers directly sell their products to collectors or slaughter men. Live pigs gathered by collectors in Bac Giang occupies the biggest share (66 %). Thus, the collector in Bac Giang plays a crucial role in distribution of famers’ products to market. The price of pork and live pigs is not set systematically on the websites of Bac Giang province. Most farmers independently operate their business. They do not have many choices to sell their products at a fair price because of the insufficiency of market information. The majority of farmers individually sell their live pigs to collectors and slaughter men without any formal contract. 78 % of the surveyed farmers reported that they are unsatisfied with their selling price. Consequently, farmers generally have very limited market power such as being able to set the prices of their products ; and have weak bargaining power in dealing with buyers.

Collector

Collectors living in Bac Giang are the dominant distributor of pigs delivered from the farm gate to the market. Itinerant collectors visit farmers' homes so as to buy pigs in low numbers of two or three, then they are sold at slaughter houses in Bac Giang. Some other collectors directly contact farmers to procure pigs and then sell them to the collectors from Ha Noi or from neighing provinces.

In the marketing system, there are many collectors who acr as dominant sources of price information and also exert significant influence on the price set in the market chain. Some collectors closely cooperate with each other to reduce the price bargaining power of the farmer. Example: The collector is the first person who contacts the farmer to buy pigs at the farm gate normally offering a low price for the pigs. The next collector is informed to offer a lower price than the first person has done. Finally, the price is decided by the first person. It is noted that exporting pigs from Vietnam to China through sub-border gates and paths linking the two countries is an unofficial export because China does not include Vietnam on its list of countries and territories from which it allows importing of pigs. The collectors who are engaged in the unofficial export of pigs to China are sometimes willing to buy pigs of any quality at a high price. When the pig price skyrockets, farmers rush to raise pigs. However, the pig price then drops as China stops importing pigs from Vietnam. China’s sudden closing of border gates for Vietnam’s agricultural products happens almost every year. However, farmers ’awareness of this problem apears to be limited. In 2016, collectors from Ha Noi and other provinces exported only 37 % of pig live weight from Bac Giang to China (Figure1). However, the pig price in Bac Giang is considerably affected by the export pig price in other provinces in the whole country to China.

Slaughter men

At present, slaughter houses in Bac Giang and in Ha Noi are mostly owned by the private sector and are manually operated with small-scale capacity, poor equipment and with low hygienic standards. In Bac Giang, the slaughter house owners also contribute greatly to the movement of pig and the risks of spreading diseases along the market supply chain because they buy pigs directly from the farmers and have poor facilities for proper slaughter of pigs. Also, there are no isolation or disinfection areas. Bac Giang authorities have encouraged the private sector to upgrade slaughterhouses with hygiene standards, slaughtering technology and appropriate location. Presently, the slaughterhouses are not well-qualified because of the required high capital investment. In addition, it is difficult to trace the origin of pork in such slaughterhouses because pigs are supplied from many collectors.

There are some differences in performance between slaughter men in the different pig supply channels. Slaughter men in Bac Giang process only 2-5 pigs per day but slaughter men in Ha Noi operate about 5-10 pigs per day. Slaughter men in Bac Giang work more closely with farmers and consumers than slaughter men in Ha Noi because the distance from slaughter house to farmers and to consumers in Bac Giang is shorter than that in Ha Noi. This characteristic could bring benefit for both farmers and consumers in Bac Giang. However, only 15 % of pig live weight is directly supplied to slaughter men in Bac Giang according to chain 2 (Figure 1).

Wholesaler

This actor buys pork from slaughterhouses and sells to retailers, processors, restaurants kitchens of schools and factories. This actor mostly operates in the city where there are many consumers. Wholesalers sell about 65-95 kg of pig carcasses per day. Wholesalers often transport meat without packing by motorcycle. Hygienic conditions are a major concern.

Retailer

Meat is sold to ultimate consumers through some channels, including wet markets and vendors in cities, towns and villages. Most wet markets are degraded and have poor facilities. A retailer in Bac Giang sells 20-30 kg of pig carcasses per day whereas retailers in Ha Noi deliver two times this quantity per day. Since preference for fresh pork from newly slaughtered pigs is still predominant among Vietnamese consumers, the importance of traditional market outlets for supplying fresh pork will likely remain, unless policies intended to modernize the retail food sector will eventually prohibit their continued existence. Retailers have daily access to information about the market price and also understand requirements of key markets such as urban markets. Therefore, both pig collectors and pork retailers play a coordinating role in moving supply from the farm to the end market, a function that gives them relative power over the other actors in the chain.

Distribution of added value along the pig value chain

Table 4. Distribution of value added along pig value chain

Indicators

Farmer

Collector in
Bac Giang

Collector in
other provinces

Slaughter
men

Whole-
saler

Retailer

Total

Channel 1  

Revenue

50520

55820

62820

71200

Intermediate cost

46730

52120

58620

65300

Value added

3790

3700

4200

5900

17590

Income

1960

2360

2280

4250

10850

Share of value added

22

21

23

34

Channel 2  

Revenue

51250

60350

71200

Intermediate cost

46730

52300

65300

Value added

4520

8050

5900

18470

Income

2690

6130

4250

13070

Share of value added

25

43

32

Channel 3  

Revenue

50520

55820

61320

67450

73250

80630

Intermediate cost

46730

52120

57240

63200

68460

74340

Value added

3790

3700

4080

4250

4790

6290

26900

Income

1960

2360

2440

2320

3170

4740

16990

Share of value added

14

13

15

16

18

24

Channel 4  

Revenue

50520

60560

67450

73250

80630

Intermediate cost

46730

55320

63200

68460

74340

Value added

3790

5240

4250

4790

6290

24360

Income

1960

3510

2320

3170

4740

15700

Share of value added

16

22

17

19

26

Unit of share of value added is percentage (%); Remaining items use VND/kg of live weight
Source: Survey 2016

Along the typical pig value chain (4) on average a farmer generates about 3790 VND/kg to 4520 VND/kg, accounting for a considerable part of total value added (14% to 25 % ) in the entire value chain. Value added generated by other actors and their shares in the entire value chains differ among actors in the same market and among actors in the different markets. However, the farmer gains the lowest income and retailers generate the highest income compared to other actors. Noticeably, it takes a farmer 3-4 months to finish their pig product, while other actors have more frequent or even daily transaction between slaughter men and retailer. In the chain (2), a farmer could earn the highest income. However, few farmers can access this chain and only a small quantity of pig is able to be sold. In the study site, the marketing chain is a long chain in which pigs pass through successive market intermediaries before reaching the final consumers. The longer the chain, the higher the price the consumers take and the less market information the farmers receive.

Factors affecting farmers’ market power and income

Farmers have suffered internal and external factors affecting their market power and income. Some of the main factors are as follows:

Weak collective action in production

Given the small scale of production, farmers face many diseconomies in purchasing inputs and obtaining market information. Thus, feed purchasing has been organized by small groups with 4-5 famers per group. Together they  purchase a relative large amount of feed directly from feed processing factories to get sales promotion. About 21% farmers have engaged in this activity and received a reduction of 9% of feed cost. Despite the benefit from collective action, collective action among farmers for various activities is difficult to organize, coordinate and manage. Establishing rules to guide the operations of the groups, securing commitments on the part of the group members to abide by collectively agreed rules, monitoring and enforcing compliance with rules are some challenges. As a result, many farmers are not involved in collective groups. Collective production activities (breed purchasing, technical and veterinary service) are difficult to be implemented currently.

By better collective action, smallholders may be in a better position to reduce transaction costs of accessing inputs and outputs, to obtain the necessary market information, to secure access to new technologies, and tap in to high value markets, allowing them to compete with larger scale farmers and agribusiness (Stockbridge et al 2003). In addition, there is evidence that collective action can help smallholders reduce barriers to entry into markets by improving their bargaining power with buyers and intermediaries (Markelova et al 2009; Gya et al 2014).

Lack of collective marketing

In Bac Giang, farmers individually cannot supply sufficient volume to their buyers. The problem of asymmetry in the sales and the volume of purchases partly leads to low barging power. On the other hand, many buyers prefer to work with groups as these are better able than individual farmers to provide a stable supply of quality product. This finding is similar as reported by Vorley et al (2007).

Evidence from many countries shows that collective marketing reduces the cost of getting the product to the markets, improves the bargaining power of farmers and enables smallholders to access services that private sector or government would/could not provide. To improve bargaining power, smallholders need access to information about pricing structure, availability of substitutes, quality requirement and consumer preferences (Komarudin et al 2006). For collective marketing to be successful, it has to start at production level and even possibly at input procurement (Nyikahadzoi et al 2010).

Volatility of pig price

In the last few years, the pig price has fluctuated from 45000 to 52000 VND/kg. When prices are high, farmers tend to produce more and thus to create conditions of over production for the following year, this is the condition for price decreases. In addition, the price of live pigs often falls due to disease outbreak. After 2-3 months, the pig price then gradually increases. In addition, pig price in Bac Giang is also affected by  the export price of pigs from other provinces in the whole country. Thus, the export of pigs to China leads to price volatility in Bac Giang. Price volatility causes the deregulation of pig markets and affects farmers’ market power in other ways. Volatility is also harmful for consumers, since today's pig price increases are usually passed on to consumers, whereas price decreases are passed on to them less systematically (Kroll 2010).

Lack of contract farming

Contract farming is useful in a context of fluctuating commodity prices. In Bac Giang, only some large commercial producers have formal contracts for supply with companies such as food processing companies and supermarkets. Most farmers don’t have any formal contract for their output, because most of them individually operate in small-scale with low ability to implement contract farming. On the individual level, farmers’ dependence on buyers limits their bargaining power and can increase other risks. Although contract farming can reduce certain risks, the contracts themselves are a source of risks for farmers, basically because of their weak bargaining position vis-à-vis their buyers. Banding together in farmer organization to engage in collective bargaining over contracts is an important way for farmers to counter the imbalance in the two parties bargaining strength (Danau et al 2011).

Consumers’ food safety concern

In the rural area of Bac Giang province, all consumers buy pork in the village market. In Bac Giang city and Ha Noi capital, a lot of potential consumers may buy pork from Bac Giang. Recently, consumers are increasingly concerned about food safety. Similar to the finding of Nga et al (2015), the main issues of concern are use of antibiotics and beta-agonist, with residues exceeding the permitted levels and unhygienic conditions at the point of sale. These issues relate to health of consumers. In the wet market, quarantine stamping of pork is quickly verified by veterinary staff, but few consumers believe in  qualification of quarantine stamping because of lack of traceability of pork.The average pork price is about 11000 VND/kg. Consumers in Bac Giang city and Ha Noi capital are willing to pay for safe pork with a higher price (about 25 % over current price). Despite strong preference of fresh pork, many of them have selected imported meats in supermarkets. The consumers’ concern on pork quality should be widely disseminated to the farmers to improve their production and market power in the domestic market.

High price of inputs

Farmers mainly use purchased industrial feeds accounting for about 74% of the production cost. The heavy reliance on imported ingredients by feed processing factories such as soybeans and maize, and high import taxes have been considered as the main causes leading to the high feed price. Given the higher price of complete feeds, the change in raw material input costs easily is passed on to farmers. Weak management in the locally owned feed sector also causes a high transaction cost of feed supply which increases the price of feed. Moreover, price of breeding pigs and sale price of pig have the same directional change at the same time. High input prices directly affect producers’ income, especially when the pig price does not increase sufficiently to cover the increased costs.

Animal disease

In Bac Giang, common diseases frequently occur in small-scale pig farms such as foot and mouth disease, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome, classical swine fever, porcine high fever disease, and swine influenza. Farmers predominantly treat pig diseases by themselves and rarely use veterinary services because they try to reduce their production cost. Several government support programs for disease prevention have been implemented. However, pig disease always threatens farmers due to lack of an appropriate practice in disease prevention, disease treatment, surveillance of both veterinary staff at the village and farmer level. The veterinary system is mainly a passive surveillance, reacting to disease problems.


Conclusions


Acknowledgments

This study has been implemented in relation to the ÉLAN postdoctoral grants. The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from Academie de Recherche et D’Enseignement Superieur (ARES) of Belgium. The authors also acknowledge the support for the research from the Department of Rural Economy- Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liege Belgium and the Faculty of Accounting and Business Management, Vietnam National University of Agriculture.


References

BGSD (Bac Giang Statistical Department) 2016 Bac Giang Statistics Year Book, 2015. Statistics Publishing House. Hanoi, Vietnam.

Cadilhon J J 2015 Costs and value added calculation in livestock value chains - A technically robust process. REVALTER Project Seminar, 7, January, 2015. Hanoi, Vietnam.

Danau A, Flament J and Steen D V D 2011 Choosing the right strategies for increasing farmers’ market power. NGO-DE Project ‘Agrifood policies and regional integration: putting European-African solidarity into practice’ (EuropeAid/124803/C/ACT/RUE).

DARDBG (Department of Agriculture and Rural Development of Bac Giang) 2015 Annual report of agriculture sector of Bac Giang province.

FAO 2005 Commodity chain analysis-Financial analysis. EASYPol, Module. Retrieved October 5, 2016, from http://www.fao.org/easypol/output .

GSO (General Statistics Office) 2016 Statistics year book, 2015. Statistics publishing house. Hanoi, Vietnam.

GTZ 2007 Value Links Manual: The methodology of value chain promotion (1st ed.).

Gyau A, Franzel S, Chiatoh M, Nimino G and Owusu K 2014 Collective action to improve market access for smallholder producers of agroforestry products: key lessons learned with insights from Cameroon’s experience. Journal of Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2014, 6: 68-72.

Hoang V V 2015 Value chain analysis and competiveness assessment of Da xanh Pemelo sector in Ben Tre, Vietnam. Journal of Asian Social Science; Vol. 11, No. 2; 2015.

Komarudin H, Siagian Y and Oka N P 2006 Linking collective action to non -Timber forest product market for improved local livelihoods: Challenges and opportunities, paper presented in Research workshop on Collective action and market access for smallholders, 2-5 October 2006, Cali, Colombia.

Kroll J C 2010 Talk at the conference ‘CAP 2013 – Reshaping the CAP to respond to the European and international challenges of our times’ held in Brussels on 27 October 2010 by the European Coordination of Via campesina (ECVC).

Lapar M L, Toan N N, Staal S, Que N N and Tuan N D A 2011 The pork value chain in Vietnam: Emerging trends and implications for smallholder competitiveness. Presentation at the 55th annual conference of the Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society (AARES), Melbourne, Australia, 9-11 February 2011. Nairobi, Kenya: ILRI.

M4P 2008 Making value chains work better for the poor: A tool book for practitioners of value chain analysis (3rd ed.). Making markets work better for the poor (M4P) Project, UK Department for international development (DFID), Agricultural Development International, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.

MacDonald J M and Key N 2012 Market Power in Poultry Production Contracting? Evidence from a farm survey. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 44, 4 (November 2012): 477- 490.

Markelova H, Meinzen-Dick R, Hellin J and Dohr S 2009 Collective action for smallholder market access. Journal Food Policy 34 (2009) 1-7.

Nga N T D, Lapar M L, Unger F, Hung P V, Ha D N, Huyen N T T, Long T V and Be D T 2015 Household pork consumption behaviour in Vietnam: Implications for pro- smallholder value chain upgrading. Conference on International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development. Tropentag 2015, Berlin, Germany September 16-18, 2015.

Nga N T D, Ninh H N, Hung P V and Lapar M L 2014 Smallholder pig value chain development in Vietnam: Situation analysis and trends. Project report. Nairobi, Kenya: International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI).

Nyikahadzoi K, Siziba S, Sagary N, Njuki J and Adekunle A A 2010 Promoting effective collective marketing in the context of integrated agricultural research for development in Sub Saharan Africa. Learning Publics Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Studies. Vol 2 (1). 82- 97.

OECD 2015 Agricultural policies in Vietnam 2015. OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved October 5, 2016, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264235151-en .

Piggott R, Griffith G and Nightingale J 2000 Market power in the Australian -Food chain: Towards a research agenda. A report for the rural industries research and development corporation. No 00/150.

Stockbridge M, Dorward A and Kydd J 2003 Farmer organizations for market access: Learning from success. Briefing paper. Wye College, University of London, UK.

Tisdell C, Lapar M L, Staal S and Que N N 2009 Natural protection from international competition in the livestock industry: Analysis, examples and Vietnam's pork market as a Case-Economic Theory, Applications and Issues. Working paper No. 59. School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.

Vorley B, Fearne A and Ray D (Eds.) 2007 Recovering market: A place for small-scale producers in Modern Agrifood chain? Gower Publishing Limited, Hamphsire, England.


Received 22 August 2017; Accepted 20 October 2017; Published 1 December 2017

Go to top