Livestock Research for Rural Development 22 (2) 2010 Guide for preparation of papers LRRD News

Citation of this paper

N fractionation, degradability, intestinal digestibility, and adequacy for ruminal microbial activity of cultivated legumes

M de J Marichal, M Carriquiry, L Astigarraga and A I Trujillo

Departamento de Producción Animal y Pasturas, Facultad de Agronomía,Universidad de la República, E. Garzón 780, 12900 Montevideo, Uruguay
marichal@fagro.edu.uy

Abstract

Differences in N fractionation, degradability of organic matter (OM) and N, forage adequacy for rumen microbial activity (estimated as the ratio between rumen available N and fermentable OM; RAN:FOM), and intestinal digestibility of rumen undegradable  protein (RUP) of birdsfoot trefoil, red clover, and alfalfa were evaluated. Within each legume specie, variations in phenological stages were studied. Nitrogen was partitioned into five fractions in accordance with  Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System. Three fistulated cows were used to evaluate ruminal degradation (nylon bag technique), and RUP intestinal digestibility (mobile bag technique).

 

Legumes differed (P<0.004) in chemical composition. The potentially degradable fraction (PDF), degradation rate (kd), and effective degradability (ED) of OM and N were similar among species, and birdsfoot trefoil presented the smallest (P<0.05) soluble fraction (SF) of OM and N. The RAN: FOM ratio was similar in the three legumes, and  intestinal digestibility of N tended (P<0.06)  to be different among species. 

 

Within each specie, a phenological stage effect (P<0.05) in chemical composition was detected. In the phenological stages evaluated, degradation kinetics of OM and N of the three legumes was similar. In birdsfoot trefoil and alfalfa, the EDOM and EDN were greater  (P < 0.04) in plants in vegetative stage than in bloom; meanwhile, in red clover the EDOM, but not EDN, was greater (P=0.023)  in vegetative stage. Vegetative forages tended (P < 0.06) to present the greatest RAN: FOM, and no phenological stages effect was detected in intestinal digestibility of RUP.

 

Results provide useful data for estimating protein supply to grazing ruminants. Research is needed to expand databases on N and OM characteristics of forages, in order to use accurately current feeding standards in grazing production systems.

Key words: alfalfa, birdsfoot trefoil, chemical composition, red clover


Introduction

As stated by Taweel 2006 “Grazing and grass-feeding production systems are regaining popularity and importance in the western world due to consumers’ demand, and concern on product quality, animal well-being, and landscape improvements. To maximize animal production from pasture-based systems in a cost-effective manner while sustaining the health, welfare of the animals, and the environment, it is important to maximize the efficiency of utilization of pastures.”   To efficiently convert plant biomass to animal products it is of special importance to accurately estimate feeding values of native, and cultivated pastures and forages. In current feeding systems for ruminants (AFRC 1993; NRC 1996; NRC 2001), feed nutrients are fractionated considering its ruminal fermentation, and postruminal digestion of undegraded fractions, and information on kinetics and extent of degradation of N, and organic matter (OM) in the rumen is required. However, in grazing conditions, limitations to use these feeding systems arise because reliable information on protein, and OM degradation characteristics of forages is lacking (Fulkerson et al 2007). In these systems, goals of rumen nutrition are to efficiently incorporate rumen degradable protein (RDP) to microbial protein, and to avoid production of ammonia in excess to that assimilated by microorganisms (Bach et al 2005).  Efficiency of utilization of RDP will mainly depend on feed fermentable energy which is usually the first limiting nutrient for microbial growth in pasture fed animals (Fulkerson et al 2007). In forages, the amount of OM fermented in the rumen will define the energy availability to rumen microbia, and OM fermentability will mainly depend on amounts of cell content carbohydrates, which are easily degraded in the rumen, and polysaccharides associated with cell wall whose degradation will depend on cell wall chemistry, and structure (Wilson and Hatfield 1997; Tas et al 2006). Rumen undegradable protein (RUP) contributes to the metabolizable protein pool depending on proportion of the RUP digested postruminally. In the AFRC (1993) system, as well as in the Beef level 1 (1996) and NRC Dairy (2001) standards, in situ methodologies are the main procedures adopted to estimate RDP and RUP, and digestibility of RUP. In level 2 of Beef model (NRC 1996), the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (CNCPS) was adopted, and chemically determined protein fractions are used. The sensitivity of the models to their respective inputs emphasizes the need to estimate protein characteristics of different species of pastures grown in different environments, and evaluated in various phenological stages, as those factors may determine wide variation in chemical composition, fermentation characteristics, extent of postruminal digestion, and would contribute to accurately predict or evaluate animal response (Kingston-Smith and Theodorou 2000; Schwab et al 2003; Tas et al 2006). The objectives of this study were to quantify differences in fractionation of N, degradability and degradation kinetics of OM and N, adequacy of forages for ruminal microbial activity, and intestinal digestibility of RUP of three cultivated legumes in different phenological stages.

 

Materials and methods 

All procedures in this study were conducted according to the Good Practice Guide for the Use of Animals in Research, Testing and Teaching of the Universidad de la República of Uruguay (Diario Oficial N° 25.467  2000).

 

Forages

 

Three legumes from a Research Project on Nutritional Evaluation of Grazed Forages were evaluated. Samples were obtained from experimental plots (0.75 ha) located in the Centro Regional Sur (34.5°S, 56°W) of the Facultad de Agronomía (Universidad de la República, Uruguay). Legumes were Lotus corniculatus, va. San Gabriel (birdsfoot trefoil), Trifolium pratense, va. LE 116 (red clover), and Medicago sativa, cv. Estanzuela Chaná (alfalfa), respectively,  seeded in may at rates of  17, 10, and 19 kg/ha,  fertilized at sow  with 30, 30 and 50  kg of P / ha,   and annually refertilized with 20 kg of P  /ha.  Monthly rainfall , and maximum and minimum temperatures for the experimental site during the period when legume samples were taken for nutrient analysis, are shown in Figure 1.  During three consecutive years, pastures  were harvested once they reached the grazing height (average 22 cm; range: 17 to 28 cm); as a result of this harvesting schedule,  10, 9 and 12 samples of birdsfoot trefoil, red clover, and alfalfa were obtained.



Figure 1.   Monthly rainfall (mm) and maximum and  minimum temperature (°C) for the site


Individual samples evaluated here were composited samples  obtained from daily cuts (7 d, mowing machine, approximately 5 cm above the soil level) of forages utilized in digestion, and intake trials with wethers (data not shown). Samples were dried at 60oC (48 h), ground in a Willey mill through a 2 mm screen, and stored for chemical analysis, and degradability and intestinal digestibility trials. At each harvest date, and previous to harvest, in each legume 50 stems were randomly selected to define the average phenological stage of herbage. Stems were cut with a manual scissor and  individually classified in a four stage numerical system. Maturity stages was assigned as follows:  maturity 1 =  no visible green buds, flowers or seed pods, maturity 2 = visible green buds but not flowers or seed pods, maturity 3 = visible flowers but no seed pods, and maturity 4 = visible green seed pods. Amount of stems in each stage was counted, and herbages were scored for phenological stage using the mean by count index (Kalu and Fick 1981). General descriptive maturity classifications were as follows: maturity 1 = vegetative; maturity 2 =  pre bloom; maturity 3 = bloom, and maturity 4 = seed pod.   Year and month of harvest, and phenological stages of pastures evaluated are presented in Table 1.


Table 1.  Year, month and season of harvest, and phenological stages of pastures evaluated

 Birdsfoot

 Red Clover

 Alfalfa

Harvest

PS***

Harvest

PS

 Harvest

PS

Yr*

Month

Season**

 

Yr

Month

Season

 

Yr

Month

Season

 

1

September

Winter

V

1

September

Winter

V

1

September

Winter

V

1

October

Spring

V

1

October

Spring

V

1

October

Spring

V

1

November

Spring

PB

1

November

Spring

PB

1

November

Spring

PB

1

December

Spring

PB

1

December

Spring

PB

1

December

Spring

PB

2

February

Summer

B

2

June

Autumn

V

2

February

Summer

PB

2

May

Autumn

B

2

August

Winter

V

2

May

Autumn

V

2

October

Spring

B

2

October

Spring

PB

2

August

Winter

V

2

December

Spring

B

3

July

Winter

V

2

October

Spring

B

3

January

Summer

B

 

August

Winter

V

2

December

Spring

PB

3

February

Summer

B

 

 

 

 

3

January

Summer

B

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

February

Summer

B

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

June

Autumn

V

* Yr : year; ** : southern hemisphere; ***  PS: Phenological stage; V: Vegetative;PB: Pre-bloom; B: Bloom


Chemical analysis

 

Dry matter (DM), ash, and nitrogen (Kjeldahl, lysine as standard, crude protein CP, N x 6.25) were determined according to AOAC (2007). Neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF) (both expressed in ash-free basis), and sulphuric acid lignin (lignin) were determined sequentially (Van Soest et al 1991). Neither sodium sulphite nor heat stable α-amylase were used in the neutral detergent solution. Non-fiber carbohydrates (NFC) were calculated by difference (NRC 2001).  Nitrogen was partitioned into five fractions (fractions A, B1, B2, B3, and C) in accordance with  Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (Sniffen et al 1992), and neutral detergent insoluble N (NDIN) were determined, using the procedures described by Licitra et al (1996) and Van Soest et al (1991) omitting sodium sulfite, and heat/stable α-amylase from the neutral detergent solution. Fraction A is non protein N (NPN), fraction B1 is rapidly degraded true protein, fraction B2  estimates the true protein with an intermediate degradation rate, and fractions B3 and C (acid detergent insoluble N, ADIN) represent, respectively, slowly degraded true protein and unavailable protein bound to cell wall.

 

In situ procedures: ruminal and intestinal incubations

 

Three dry Holstein cows with permanent rumen and T duodenal cannulas housed in individual  stalls were used to evaluate in situ disappearance kinetics of N and OM, and intestinal digestibility of undegraded protein. Animals were fed 10 kg DM of alfalfa hay (170 g CP/kg DM, 420 g NDF/ kg DM) in two meals (8 and 17 h), with free access to water and mineral salts (950g minerals /  kg, 125 g Ca / kg, 450 g NaCl/ kg, 4.0 ppm F, Ca:P = 2:1). Ruminal degradation kinetics of N and OM was studied using the nylon bag technique  (Ørskov and McDonald 1979). Polyester bags (14 × 9 cm; 50 ± 15 μm pore size; ANKOM Technology, Macedon, NY) with 3 g dried forage were incubated during  2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h in the rumen of each animal in two consecutive periods. Previous to incubation, bags were soaked 15 min in warm (39oC) water. Bags were placed simultaneously in the rumen immediately after the morning meal, and removed sequentially at designated times. After collected from rumen, bags were rinsed with cold water, and stored at -20oC. When thawed, bags were washed three times in washing machine (30 L, 30 bags per washing batch, 3 min), dried in a forced-air oven (60oC, 48h), and weighted. Six bags per forage sample were not incubated in the rumen, and manipulated as the incubated ones to obtain the zero h value. Residues of replicates per time within cow were pooled for N and ash analysis (AOAC 2007). Intestinal digestibility of rumen undegradable protein (RUP) was estimated by the mobile bag technique (Peyraud et al 1988). Fifteen nylon bags (6 x 7 cm, pore size 45 µm) per forage filled with 1.5 g, were soaked in warm water (39oC, 15 min), and incubated by 16 h in the rumen (30 bags/cow/day). After incubation, bags were placed (2.5 h) in acid pepsin-HCl solution (pH 2; 3 g pepsin/ L 0.1 N HCl) in water bath (39 oC), and shaked every 5 min. Afterwards, bags were introduced into the small intestine during the evening meal (17 h, 15 bags/cow/day,); each bag was carefully washed by chyme before introducing the following one. Bags were recovered from faeces the following day from 8 to 17 h, and bags appearing after 17 h were discarded. Recovered bags were rinsed under cold tap water, and frozen (-20 oC). Six bags per forage, previously soaked in warm water (39ºC), were incubated 16 h in cows rumen to estimate nitrogen available for postruminal digestion. Bags characteristics and manipulation were the same as described before. When thawed, bags were machine-washed (30 L, 60 bags/ washing batch, 3 cycles, 3 min), dried (60ºC, 48 h), weighted and stored for N analysis (AOAC 2007).

 

Calculations

 

The kinetics of N and OM disappearance from incubated bags with rumen incubation time (t; including zero values) was described for each animal using models of Ørskov and McDonald (1979) (Model 1,without lag time), and Dhanoa (1988) (Model 2,with lag time).

Model 1:   Disappearance (g/kg N or OM) = a + b x (1 – e–kdt)

Model 2:  Disappearance (g/ kg N or OM) = a + b x (1 – e–kd(t-L))

Constants a and b represent, respectively, the soluble fraction (SF, g/ kg N or OM) and the potentially degradable fraction (PDF, g/ kg N or OM) which disappears at a constant fractional rate (kd, /h) per unit of time (t), and L is a discrete digestion lag time (h). Degradation parameters were calculated using the no linear procedure with Marquardt method (PROC NLIN) (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). The non linear parameters a, b, kd, and L estimated by the model with the largest r2, were reported. Effective degradability (ED) was calculated using the following  equation:  

ED (g / kg  N or OM) = a + [b x kd/(kd + kp)] x e-kpL

where kp is the passage rate (0.06/ h).

To evaluate the adequacy of forages for ruminal microbial activity, the supply of rumen available N (RAN) per kg of fermentable organic matter (FOM) was calculated. The  RAN  and FOM were calculated according to  Bach et al (2005), and NRC (2001) using the following equations:

RAN (g / kg N) = 1.1 x N in forage (g /kg DM) x ED of N (g/ kg N)

FOM (g/ kg OM) = OM in forage (g/ kg DM) x ED of OM (g/ kgOM)

The intestinal digestibility of  RUP was calculated as the amount of N lost from intestinal incubated bags divided by the amount of N in the bags before intestinal passage, and was expressed as proportion of RUP (g/ kg RUP).

 

Statistical analysis

 

Data were analyzed in a complete randomized (chemical composition data), or a randomized block design (degradability, forages adequacy for ruminal microbial activity, and digestibility data) in a nested mixed model using a mixed procedure (PROC MIXED) (SAS Institute., Inc., Cary, NC) with degrees of freedom adjusted by the Kenward - Roger method. The model included specie, and phenological stage nested within specie as main effects, and animal (if corresponded) as random effect. Means were considered to differ when P < 0.05, and differences among means with P values between 0.05 and 0.10 were accepted as representing tendencies to differences. Pearson correlation between proportion  of CP as  fraction C, and  intestinal digestibility of RUP, was computed using a correlation procedure (PROC CORR) (SAS Institute., Inc., Cary, NC). Correlations were considered significant at P < 0.05.

 

Results  

Legumes

 

Chemical composition of legumes is presented in Tables 2.


Table 2. Chemical composition of legumes.

 

Birdsfoot trefoil

Red clover

Alfalfa

 

Level of

 n

10

9

12

MSE

significance

 

g/kg 

 

 

DM

262ab

227b

302a

23

*

 

g/kg DM

 

 

OM

881

867

851

16

NS

NDF

453

461

458

13

NS

ADF

  306a

 281b

  265b

8

**

Lignin

111a

83b

66c

5

***

NFC

168

120

133

19

NS

CP

212

244

211

13

NS

 

g/ kg N

 

 

NDIN

390a

420a

300b

19

***

A

119

152

185

24

NS

B1

114

87

94

20

NS

B2

364

315

426

26

NS

B3

290a

  350a

  220b

21

NS

C

111a

  100a

    80b

8

*

DM: Dry matter; OM: Organic matter; NDF: Neutral detergent fiber; ADF: Acid detergent fiber; NFC:

Non-fibrous carbohydrates; CP: Crude protein; NDIN: Neutral detergent Insoluble N; A: Non protein N ;

B1:rapidly degraded true protein; B2: true protein with intermediate degradation rate; B3: slowly

degraded true protein bound to cell wall; C: undegradable undigestible protein  bound to cell wall;

SEM : standard error of the mean; within effect evaluated,  means in the same row with different

letters differed at P < 0.05; ns: non-significant P>  0.05;*: P < 0.05; **: P < 0.01; ***: P <0.001


Differences (P<0.004) in ADF, lignin, and proportions of CP as NDIN, fractions B3 and C, were detected among species. Birdsfoot trefoil registered the greatest (P<0.04) ADF and lignin, and alfalfa presented the lowest (P<0.03) proportions of N as NDIN, fraction B3 and C. The three legumes presented most of its N as fractions associated with cell content proteins (fractions A + B1 + B2; 600, 550 and 710 g/kg N, for birdsfoot trefoil, red clover and alfalfa, respectively), presenting alfalfa the greatest value (P<0.002), and similar proportions of N as soluble N (fractions A + B1; 250 g/kg N, respectively). However, birdsfoot trefoil tended (P=0.075) to register the lowest NNP (fraction A) in soluble N (510, 640 and 660g/kg soluble N, for birdsfoot trefoil, red clover, and alfalfa, respectively).

 

Disappearance data of OM, and N did not show evidence of lag time and fitted t SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1he model of Ørskov and McDonald (1979) with r2 that exceeded 0.70 for all individual sample-cow curves. The PDF, kd , and ED of OM and N (Table 3) did not differ among species, and birdsfoot trefoil presented the smallest (P<0.05) SF of OM and N .


Table 3. Parameters of degradation,  and effective degradability of OM and N, adequacy for rumen activity, and intestinal digestibility of rumen undegradable protein of legumes.

 

Birdsfoot trefoil

Red clover

Alfalfa

MSE

Level of

 N

10

9

12

 

Significance

 

OM

 

 

SF, g/ kg OM

230b

290a

290a

16

*

PDF, g/ kg OM

480

513

451

28

NS

kd, /h

0.08

0.13

0.09

0.02

NS

ED, g/ kg OM

507

591

551

27

NS

 

N

 

 

SF, g/ kg N

370b

410ab

450a

20

*

PDF, g/ kg N

486

486

436

26

NS

Kd, /h

0.08

0.08

0.09

0.01

NS

ED, g/ kg N

650

671

697

20

NS

 

 

 

 

 

 

RAN/FOM, g /kg

55

59

56

4

NS

 

 

 

 

 

 

Int. Dig, g/ kg RUP

494

569

564

38

NS

P: phenological stage; V: vegetative; PB: pre-bloom; B: bloom; OM:organic matter; SF: soluble fraction; PDF: potentially e

degradabl fraction;  kd: degradation rate of  PDF ; ED: effective degradability; RAN/FOM: rumen available N/  Fermentable organic  matter;Int Dig:Intestinal digestibility; RUP: Rumen undegradable protein; SEM: standard error of the mean; Within effect evaluated,

Means in the same row with different letters  differed at P < 0.05 ;ns, non-significant P >  0.05; *, P < 0.05;  **, P < 0.01;***, P < 0.001.


Considering all individual samples, ranges of  EDOM and EDN  were, respectively  from 390 to 690, and 600 to 840 g/ kg, presenting all individual samples EDN greater  than 590 g/kg N,  but only 25% of them with EDOM greater than 600 g/kg OM. The forage adequacy for rumen microbial activity, estimated by the RAN: FOM ratio was similar in the three legumes (Table 3), and in most (87%) individual samples, values were greater than 42 g RAN/kg FOM. Considerable variation in the relationship between the RAN and FOM was observed when individual samples of the three legumes were considered (430 to 910, 310 to 630, and 440 to 740 g RAN / kg FOM in birdsfoot trefoil, red clover and alfalfa respectively). The intestinal digestibility of RUP of the red clover and alfalfa was similar, and tended  (P<0.06) to be greater than in birdsfoot trefoil (Table 3).  In alfalfa and red clover, 50 and 67%, of respectively individual samples presented intestinal digestibilities between 500 and 700 g/ kg RUP, whereas in birdsfoot trefoil, 60% of the pastures resulted in intestinal digestibilities lower than 500 g/ kg RUP. All samples considered, a significant and low negative correlation (r = - 0.35; n = 39; P<0.05) was established  between the intestinal digestibility of RUP and fraction C, explaining this fraction  12% of the total variation observed.

 

Phenological stage

 

In the three species, forages in vegetative stage presented the lowest (P<0.04) DM, ADF, and the greatest (P<0.03) CP. Additionally, in birdsfoot trefoil and alfalfa, forages in bloom presented the greatest (P<0.04) NDF, NDIN and fraction C (Table 4).


Table 4. Chemical composition of legumes at different phenological stages

 

Birdsfoot trefoil

Red clover

Alfalfa

SEM

Level of Significance

PS

V

PB

B

V

   PB

V

PB

B

 

 

n

2

2

6

6

3

5

4

3

 

 

 

g/kg

 

 

DM

175 b

320a

290a

174b

279a

235b

333a

 338a

39

*

 

g/kg DM

 

 

OM

892

891

861

865

870

864

854

836

26

NS

NDF

362c

455b

543a

440a

483a

400b

 423b

551a

21

***

ADF

245c

316b

359a

244b

318a

239b

270a

288a

13

***

Lignin

104

82

106

80

93

68

72

59

7

NS

NFC

201a

186a

117b

97

143

164a

 185a

81b

30

*

CP

280a

195b

160b

284a

203b

262a

205b

165b

20

***

 

 g/ kg N

 

 

NDIN

380b

350b

450a

440

400

290b

  250b

360a

30

*

A

141

204

130

151

147

173

223

226

39

NS

B1

118

119

94

111

101

131

105

94

33

NS

B2

363

330

332

298

353

410

427

317

41

NS

B3

326

258

316

351

286

223

173

261

33

NS

C

60b

  90ab

130a

90

110

  60b

    70ab

103a

10

**

DM: Dry matter; OM: Organic matter; NDF: Neutral detergent fiber; ADF: Acid detergent fiber;

NFC:  Non fibrous carbohydrates; CP: Crude protein; NDIN: Neutral detergent insoluble N; A: Non protein

SEM: standard error of the mean; within effect evaluated,   means in the same row with different

letters differed at P < 0.05; NS: non-significant P >  0.05;*: P < 0.05; **: P < 0.01; ***: P <0.001.


Within each legume specie, parameters of degradation of OM and N were similar in the different phenological stages (Tables 5).


Table 5. Parameters of degradation and effective degradability of OM and N, adequacy for rumen activity, and intestinal digestibility of rumen undegradable protein of legumes at different phenological stage.

 

Birdsfot trefoil

Red clover

Alfalfa

 

 

 PS

V

PB

B

V

PB

V

PB

B

 

Level of

n

2

2

6

6

3

5

4

3

SEM

Significance

 

OM

 

 

SF, g/ kg OM

259

230

221

283

227

307

257

256

28

NS

PDF, g/ kg OM

540

516

444

574

471

468

493

398

47

NS

kd, /h

0.09

0.08

0.07

0.1

0.14

0.1

0.07

0.08

0.02

NS

ED, g/ kg OM

580a

530ab

460b

620a

500a

590a

520ab

480b

30

*

 

N

 

 

SF, g/ kg N

363

497

349

398

424

467

455

463

35

NS

PDF, g/ kg N

551

416

462

515

444

434

434

384

51

NS

kd, /h

0.09

0.08

0.09

0.08

0.1

0.1

0.08

0.08

0.03

NS

ED, g/ kg N

690a

740a

610b

680

660

730a

700ab

670a

30

*

RAN/FOM, g /kg

60

63

43

64

55

63

53

53

5.6

*

Int  Dig, g/ kg RUP

411

613

459

583

555

571

637

484

58

NS

P: phenological stage; V: vegetative; PB: pre-bloom; B: bloom; OM:organic matter; SF: soluble fraction; PDF: potentially degradable fraction;  kd: degradation rate of PDF ; ED: effective degradability; RAN/FOM: rumen available N/ fermentable organic  matter; Int Dig:Intestinal digestibility; RUP: Rumen undegradable protein; SEM: standard error of the mean;
Within effect evaluated, means in the same row with different letters differed at P < 0.05; NS: non-significant P >  0.05; *: P < 0.05;  **: P < 0.01; ***: P < 0.001.


In birdsfoot trefoil and alfalfa, the ED of OM and N of plants in vegetative stage was greater  (P<0.04) than  forages in bloom; meanwhile, in red clover the ED of OM, but not of N, was greater (P=0.02) in the vegetative than in the prebloom stage. A trend (P<0.06) for phenological stages to affect RAN: FOM ratio was detected in birdsfoot trefoil and alfalfa (vegetative vs bloom), and red clover (vegetative vs prebloom) (Table 5). Phenological stages did not resulted in differences in intestinal digestibility of RUP (Table 5).

 

Discussion 

Legumes

 

The NDF, ADF, and lignin contents of the three legumes were in the range of values reported by Hoffman et al (1993), Mieres (2004), and Fulkerson et al (2007). Similar cell wall content was observed in legumes species with birdsfoot trefoil presenting the greatest lignification. The greatest ADF in birdsfoot trefoil may reflect the presence of tannins, because species of the Lotus genus produce condensed tannins, which may appear in the ADF as a result of oxidative polymerization during the drying of NDF residue in sequential fiber determination (Van Soest 1994). As the three legumes presented similar CP, the smaller NDIN in alfalfa than in birsdsfoot trefoil and red clover, suggested that this specie could present greater proportions of the most degradadable proteins (proteins of cell contents). This difference in NDIN between alfalfa and red clover  was also reported by Sanderson and Wedin (1989). The proportion of N as NDIN of the three species was greater than values reported by Sanderson and Wedin (1989), Coblentz et al (1998), Tedeschi et al (2001), and Faría-Mármol et al (2002). This may be partially explained by differences in drying procedure of forages, and the presence of α-amylase in the neutral detergent solution. It has been reported, (Valk et al 1996; NRC 2001) that oven drying of forages (as performed in this study) may increase NDIN of pastures (without affecting ADIN) as compared with freeze drying, and that the inclusion α-amylase (as reported by Sanderson and Wedin 1989, Coblentz et al 1998, and Faría-Mármol et al 2002) may have contributed to explain NDIN differences because the  inclusion of the enzyme in the neutral solution may decrease this fraction. In the cell wall of the three legumes, fraction C was smaller than fraction B3 suggesting that functional proteins predominated over structural ones. The greater fraction C in alfalfa than in birdsfoot trefoil and red clover could be associated with the lower lignin in alfalfa because fraction C is assumed to be structural N associated with lignin or lignin artifacts, reflecting this fraction differences in lignin concentration among species (Van Soest, 1994). 

 

In legumes,  SF, PDF, kd, and ED of OM  and N presented in this study were in good agreement with values reported elsewhere (Hoffman et al 1993; Niwinska et al 2005; Fulkerson et al 2007, 2008). The extent, and kinetics of OM degradation of forages in the rumen, will depend on content of NFC (which are almost instantly and completely degraded in the rumen), the rate and extent of degradation of cell wall polysaccharides (which depend on wall chemistry and anatomical structure of cells and tissues), and amount, and degradation kinetics of forage proteins (Wilson and Hatfield 1997; Tas et al 2006).  In this work, differences in EDOM and similarities in SF, PDF and  kd  of OM detected among legumes, seemed to be associated to kinetics of N degradation and not to variations in NFC or cell wall content and composition, because the same patterns in SF, PDF, kd, and ED of OM and N were observed. The greater SFN in alfalfa than in birdsfoot trefoil, may have responded to the greater proportion of N in cell content , and NPN in soluble protein in alfalfa, because the proportion of NPN and true protein in total N are factors associated with the susceptibility and accessibility of peptide bonds to microbial proteases (NRC 2001; Bach et al 2005).

 

The RAN:FOM ratio of most individual samples was greater than the optimal ratio (42 g of RAN/ Kg FOM)  proposed (Bach et al 2005) to achieve maximum efficiency of energy use, and maximum capture of N by rumen microorganisms. It could be expected than in the rumen of animals grazing these forages, there would be more N than the microbes could convert to protein, and ammonia in excess may be produced. The excess rumen N-NH3 may lead to reduce animal production because energy from forages will be used to convert ammonia to non toxic urea in the liver, and excrete it in the urine (Fulkerson et al 1998).

 

In this study, most (73%) of individual samples of the three legumes presented values of intestinal digestibility of RUP lower than tabular values (range: 650 to 700 g/ kg RUP; INRA, 1989; NRC, 2001), suggesting that tabular values could be overestimated. The trend for lower digestibility in birdsfoot trefoil than in alfalfa, could be associated to characteristics, and bioavailability  of N compounds escaping rumen fermentation. In this experiment birdsfoot trefoil presented greater fraction B3 and C, which are the main fractions expected to escape rumen fermentation. Fraction B3  estimates protein related to the  biosynthesis and modifications of cell wall components (functional proteins), and fraction C estimates proteins related to the architecture  of the cell wall (structural proteins) ,  being expected that structural proteins would be  less digestible than functional ones  (Kingston-Smith and Theodorou 2000; Cone et al 2006). Additionally, bioavailability of cell wall proteins will depend on their accessibility to digestive enzymes, what in turn will depend on amount, and characteristics of cell wall because these N compounds are embedded within the cellulose and hemicelluloses fibrils whose degree of lignification may vary. Then, the possible lower intestinal digestibility of RUP in birdsfoot trefoil than in alfalfa could have resulted from differences related to cell wall composition because birdsfoot trefoil presented similar NDF but greater ADF and lignin. Differences could also be associated to presence of tannins because Lotus genus are known for their high, and variable content of condensed tannins which interfere with digestibility of cell wall and protein, due to an incomplete release of protein bound to tannins in the lower gastrointestinal tract (Van Soest 1994; Marley et al 2005).

 

Phenological stage

 

The greater DM, NDF and ADF as though the less CP with greater proportion of N associated to cell wall (NDIN), particularly fraction C, between forages in vegetative, and pre bloom or bloom stages, reflected changes in cell metabolic activities, and amounts and characteristics of cell walls associated with advances in plants maturity (Jarrige et al 1995).

 

Phenological effects in ED of OM, and N appeared related to variations in content, and structure of cell walls, and fractions of N associated to cell wall, because the most mature forages presented the greatest NDF, ADF, NDIN, and fraction C. Similar differences in ED were reported in birdfoot trefoil, red clover, and alfalfa (Hoffman et al 1993; Elizalde et al 1999) although values observed in this study were lower than reported by these authors for forages (dried at 60oC) in similar phenological stages. The similar OM concentration but lowest EDOM  in the most  mature forages, suggested that animals grazing mature legumes would have less rumen fermentable energy than when grazing forages in vegetative stage; however, the lowest CP and EDN in the most mature forages would determine these forages could be more adequate than plants in vegetative stage, for microbial activity as result of a more adequate RAN:FOM ratio.

 

Conclusions 

Acknowledgments 

The authors wish to thank the R. Bentos, B.Cotro, P.de Oliveira, L.Dutra, J.Irigoyen, N.Machin, and S. Scremini for their assistance with measurements and care of experimental cows. This research was funded by the Comisión Sectorial de Investigación Científica (CSIC) of the Universidad de la República, Uruguay.

 

References 

AFRC 1993 Energy and Protein Requirements of Ruminants. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.

 

AOAC 2007 Official Methods of Analysis, 18th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists,  Washington, D.C.

 

Bach A, Calsamiglia S and Stern M D 2005 Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen. Journal of Dairy Science 88 E Supplement: E9-E21. http://jds.fass.org/cgi/reprint/88/e_suppl_1/E9

 

Coblentz W K, Fritz J O, Fick W H, Cochran  R C and  Shirley J E 1998 In situ dry matter, nitrogen and fiber degradation of alfalfa, red clover and eastern gamagrass at four maturities. Journal of Dairy  Science 81: 150-161 http://jds.fass.org/cgi/reprint/81/1/150

 

Cone J W, Van Gelder A H, Mathijssen-Kamman A A and Hindle V A 2006 Post-ruminal digestibility of crude protein from grass and grass silages in cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 128: 42-52.

 

Dhanoa M S 1988 On the analysis of dacron bag data for low degradability feeds.  Grass and Forage Science  43: 441-443.

 

Diario Oficial N° 25.467 Febrero 21 de 2000 1440-C a 1444-C, carillas N° 64 a 68. Dirección Nacional de Impresiones y Publicaciones Oficiales, Montevideo, Uruguay.

 

Elizalde J C,  Merchen N R and  Faulkner D B 1999 In Situ dry matter and crude protein degradation of fresh forages during the spring growth. Journal of Dairy Science  82: 1978–1990 http://jds.fass.org/cgi/reprint/82/9/1978

 

Faría-Mármol J, González J, Rodríguez C A and Alvir M R 2002 Effect of diet forage to concentrate ration on rumen degradability and post-ruminal availability of protein from fresh and dried lucerne. Animal  Science 74: 337-345. http://www.bsas.org.uk/Publications/Animal_Science/2002/Volume_74_Part_2/

 

Fulkerson W J, Slack K, Hennessy D W, Hough G M 1998 Nutrients in ryegrass (Lolium spp.), white clover (Trifolium repens) and kikuyu (Pennisetum clandestinum) pastures in relation to season and stage of regrowth in a subtropical environment. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 38: 227– 240.

 

Fulkerson W J, Neal J S, Clark C F, Horadagoda A, Nandra K S and   Brachia I 2007 Nutritive value of forage species grown in the warm temperate climate of Australia for dairy cows: Grasses and legumes. Livestock Production Science 107: 253-264.

 

Fulkerson W J, Horadagoda A,  Neal J S, Brachia I and Nandra K S 2008 Nutritive value of forage species grown in the warm temperate climate of Australia for dairy cows: Herbs and grain crops. Livestock Production  Science 114: 75- 83.

 

Hoffman P C, Sievert S J, Shaver R D, Welch D A and Combs D K 1993 In Situ Dry Matter, Protein, and Fiber Degradation of Perennial Forages. Journal of Dairy Science 76: 2632-2643. http://jds.fass.org/cgi/reprint/76/9/2632

 

INRA 1989 Ruminant Nutrition. Recommended Allowances and Feed Tables. Jarrige R (editor). John Libbey Eurotext, Paris-London-Rome.

 

Jarrige  R, Ruckebusch  Y, Demarquilly  C, Farce M H et  Journet M 1995 Nutrition des Ruminants Domestiques.  INRA, Paris, France.

 

Kalu B A  and Fick G W 1981 Quantifying morphological development of alfalfa for herbage quality. Crop Science 21:267-271.

 

Kingston-Smith A H and Theodorou M K 2000 Post-ingestion metabolism of fresh forage. Tansley Review No. 118. New Phytology 148: 37 – 55. http://www.jstor.org/pss/2588899

 

Licitra G, Hernández T M and Van Soest P J 1996 Standarization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and  Technology 54: 347-358.

 

Marley C L, Fychan R and Jones R 2005 Yield, persistency and chemical composition of Lotus species and varieties (birdsfoot trefoil and greater birdsfoot trefoil) when harvested for silage in the UK. Grass and Forage Science 61: 134–145.

 

Mieres J M 2004 Guía para la Alimentación de los Rumiantes. INIA Serie Técnica 142, Montevideo, Uruguay

 

National Research Council 1996 Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle.  Update 2000.  7th edition.  National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

 

National Research Council 2001 Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th edition.  National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

 

Niwinska B, Strzetelski J A, Kowalczyc J, Borowiec F and Domanki P 2005 The effect of phenological stage and season on nutritive value, chemical composition and nutrient digestibility of lucerne (Medicago  sativa L.) green forage in the  alimentary tract of cattle. Czech Journal of  Animal Science 50: 511–518. http://www.cazv.cz/attachments/CJAS_50_511-518.pdf

 

Orskov E R and Mac Donald I 1979 The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science 92: 499-507.

 

Peyraud J L, Genest-Rulquin C et Verite T R 1988 Mesure de la digestion de l´azote des aliments dans l´intestin des ruminants par la technique des sachets mobiles. 1. Evaluation de la quantité de matieres azotées indigestibles en sachet des principaux aliments. Reproduction, Nutrition, Development 27 Supplement 1: 129-130. http://rnd.edpsciences.org/index.php?option=article&access=standard&Itemid=129&url=/articles/rnd/pdf/1988/11/RND_0181-1916_1988_28_Suppl1_ART0039.pdf

 

Sanderson M A and Weddin W F 1989 Nitrogen in the detergent fibre fraction of temperate legumes and grasses. Grass and Forage Science 44:  159-168.

 

Schwab C G, Tylutki T P, Ordway R S, Sheaffer C and Stern M D 2003 Characterization of Proteins in Feeds. Journal of Dairy Science  86 (E. Supplement):  E88–E103. http://jds.fass.org/cgi/reprint/86/13_suppl/E88

 

Sniffen C J, O’Connor J D, Van Soest P J, Fox D G and Russell J B 1992 A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. Journal of Animal Science 70: 3562- 3577 http://jas.fass.org/cgi/reprint/70/11/3562

 

Tas B M, Taweel H Z, Smith H J, Elgersma A, Dijkstra J and Tamminga S 2006 Rumen degradation characteristics of perennial ryegrass cultivars during the growing season. Animal Feed Science and Technology 131: 102 –119.

 

Taweel H Z 2006 Improving dry-matter intake of perennial-ryegrass pasture by dairy cows In :Elgersma A, Dijkstra J and Tamminga S (editors). Fresh Herbage for Dairy Cattle, Springe, The Netherlands. pp 159-174.

 

Tedeschi L O, Pell A N, Fox D G and Llames C R 2001 The amino acid  profiles of the whole plant and of four plant residues from temperate and tropical  forages. Journal of Animal Science 79: 525-532. http://jas.fass.org/cgi/reprint/79/2/525

 

Valk H, Kappers I E and Tamminga S 1996 In sacco degradation characteristics of organic matter,neutral detergent fiber and crude protein of fresh grass  fertilized with different amount of nitrogen. Animal Feed Science and Technology 63:  63-87.

 

Van Soest P J,  Robertson J B and Lewis B A 1991 Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal  nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583-3597 http://jds.fass.org/cgi/reprint/74/10/3583

 

Van Soest P J 1994 Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. Cornell, USA, Cornell   University Press.

 

Wilson J R and Hatfield R D 1997  Structural and chemical changes of cell wall types during stem development: consequences for fibre degradation by rumen microflora. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 48: 165 – 180.



Received 31 October 2009; Accepted 14 December 2009; Published 7 February 2010

Go to top