Livestock Research for Rural Development 35 (4) 2023 | LRRD Search | LRRD Misssion | Guide for preparation of papers | LRRD Newsletter | Citation of this paper |
This experiment investigated the effect of dried Leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala) and cassava (Manihot esculenta) leaves on feed intake, milk production, and milk composition of Holstein Friesian x Ankole crossbred cows. Three cows in early lactation, with initial milk production of 4 ± 1.20 kg/day and 359 ± 24 kg average live body weight, were randomly assigned to the experimental diet in a 3x3 Latin square design. Three 15-day experimental periods were adopted (1 to 10-day: diet adaptation and 11 to 15-day: data collection). Cows were fed on freshly chopped Guatemala grass diet supplemented with 1.25 kg DM of brewers’ spent grain (control). The experimental diets were similar to the control diet differing in the presence of dried Leucaena or cassava leaves, both at the inclusion rate of 20% of the basal diet intake. Total dry matter intake, nutrient intake, milk production, and milk composition showed significant variation among treatments. Cows supplemented with dried cassava leaves had higher total dry matter intake and organic matter intake. Leucaena significantly increased (p<0.001) daily milk production by 15% compared to cassava (3%). Leucaena had a higher milk fat content (38.44 g), while cassava and the control diet had higher milk protein (38.53 and 38.43 g), lactose (56.79 g and 56.111 g), and not-fat solids (102.41 g and 101.27 g). These results indicate that dried Leucaena and cassava leaves can be used as protein supplements for Guatemala grass basal diet for crossbred cows to improve milk production and quality.
Keywords: dairy cows, democratic republic of the congo, forage, nutrient intake, protein supplements
In the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), the integrated smallholder crop-livestock system is the dominant form of agricultural production (Maass et al 2012). Its production is the primary source of food and income for rural households. Its expansion is thus desirable in alleviating poverty and enhancing food security. Smallholder dairying is particularly important as milk produced provides nutrients and income to the households. Despite its importance, feed quantity and quality are inadequate and rarely meet the nutrient requirements of lactating crossbred cows, especially during the dry season (Maleko et al 2022). This is further exacerbated by the effects of rapid human population growth and the subsequent reduction in land available for pasture production, as well as climate change, negatively impacting pasture productivity shortage (Mugumaarhahama et al 2021). Consequently, inadequate nutrition of crossbred cows often culminates in substantial economic losses to the farmers due to low weight gain or milk production rates, poor body condition, reduced productive and reproductive performance, and susceptibility to pests and disease infestations (Gebreyowhans and Zegeye 2018). Alternative conventional supplements used by smallholder farmers, such as concentrates and agro-industrial by-products, are not readily available and, when available, are costly for most resource-poor smallholder farmers (Maass et al 2012; Mutwedu et al 2022). In response to this challenge, there is a need to provide alternative cheap-to-produce and locally available feed resources to supplement the feeds produced on smallholder farms.
Trees and shrubs are instrumental in delivering the triple-win strategy of enhancing livestock productivity, mitigating harsh climates in pastoral and agro-pastoral areas, and improving food security and rural livelihoods (Henry et al 2018). This strategy is attributed to their multiple roles in contributing to the welfare of the cattle farming communities; and mitigating climate change through biological nitrogen fixation, carbon sequestration, and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions (Pello et al 2021). Trees and shrubs are highly valued because of their high volume of biomass production, nutritional value, and adaptation to poor soil and harsh climatic conditions (Osuga et al 2011; Barwani et al 2022). Osuga et al (2008) reported that tender shoots, leaves, pods, twigs, and fruits of trees and shrubs are rich in proteins, vitamins, and minerals compared to natural pastures. Integrating trees and shrubs into animal diets improves palatability, feed intake, digestibility, and lactation performance (Derero and Kitaw 2018; Osuga et al 2011). Although the benefits of trees and shrubs such as Leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) De Wit) and cassava (Manihot esculenta Grantz) are well known and used by smallholder farmers in the tropics (Franzel et al 2014; Wanapat et al 2003), the studies focusing on the utilisation of Leucaena and cassava as cattle feeds, notably in the eastern DRC context, remain a significant literature gap.
Leucaena is a plant that potentially improves soil fertility, introduced to eastern DRC 20 years ago. It is mostly used in soil fertility management as a source of green manure. The plant has the propriety of colonizing a wide range of soils due to its early year-round flowering and fruiting, abundant seed production, self-fertility, seed coat, and ability to regrow after burning or on being cut. These characteristics make the plant survive and multiply on farms, thus availing its resources all year round, which can be used in supplementing ruminants. Leucaena leaves are highly palatable, digestible (50% to 70%), and nutritious (22% to 40% of CP) (Katunga et al 2014, Barwani et al 2022). These good nutritional characteristics make the leaves suitable for supplementation in ruminant diets and have been shown to increase milk production, fat, and protein contents (De Angelis et al 2021). Besides the Leucaena trees, cassava is also grown in the eastern DRC for its roots which constitute a staple food for more than 70% of the population, and its leaves are consumed throughout the year as a vegetable (Munyahali et al 2017). However, for household consumption, most farmers (80%) cut only the young leaves without petiole to avoid fibrous stuff, leaving the other parts of the leaves as mulch or lost during root harvest (Munyahali et al., 2017). Wanapat et al (2011) reported that cassava leaves at any stage of growth can still have good levels of protein (>14%), vitamins, minerals, low condensed tannins (1.5% to 4%); and can be used as a source of nutrients to dairy animals after removing the hydrocyanic acid (HCN) content. However, the information about the nutritional and feeding characterisation of Leucaena and cassava leaves is inadequately addressed, which constitutes an obstacle to its utilisation in feeding the crossbred cows in the study region. Furthermore, scientifically generated information is useful in developing livestock feeds and feeding management policies. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of supplementing Guatemala grass with dried Leucaena and cassava leaves as nitrogen sources on feed intake, milk production, and milk composition of lactating Holstein Friesian x Ankole crossbred cows in the eastern DRC. The study findings would enable policymakers and farmers to design appropriate intervention strategies to improve livestock productivity and serve as a benchmark for future research.
The experiment was conducted at the Catholic University of Bukavu research farm in Kabare, South-Kivu province, DRC. The study followed the national guidelines for the use and care of animals (license No: 55.00/99/IPPEL/SK/2021). Three lactating Holstein-Friesian x Ankole crossbred cows were randomly assigned to three dietary treatments in a 3 x 3 Latin square design. All cows had similar lactation characteristics, early lactation, third parity, average body weight (359 ± 24 kg), initial milk production (4 ± 1.2 kg/day), days-in milk (24 ± 9.02 days), and age were four years. The experiment lasted 45 days, divided into three 15-day experimental periods, which were periodized into 1 to 10-day (diets adaptation periods) and 11 to 15-day (data collection). Cows were fed on fresh Guatemala grass ad libitum and supplemented with 1.25 kg DM of fresh brewers’ spent grain as a basal diet (control). All cows were supplemented with dried Leucaena or cassava leaves at the inclusion rate of 20% of basal diet intake. The supplement was offered twice daily after milking (at 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.). All cows were housed in well-ventilated stalls and fed individually. Cows had free access to freshwater and mineral licks (Mineral block containing 37.79% Sodium, 1.96% Calcium, 0.32% Magnesium, 0.105% Iron, 0.023% Zinc, 0.018% Copper, 0.015% Manganese, 0.0015% Cobalt, 0.00099% Iodine, and 0.00049% Selenium). Fresh brewers’ spent grain was purchased every three days from Bralima company, Bukavu, DRC. Leucaena and cassava leaves were hand-harvested during the rainy season from smallholder farmers’ fields in Uvira territory, South-Kivu province, DRC. Plant production conditions are fairly similar in most smallholder systems ensuring minimum variation in the characteristics of the harvested herbage. Generally, leaves from Leucaena regrowth of about four months old were cut and dried under the shade, while the cassava leaves came from plants about ten months old. The cassava leaves were harvested and dried in the sun for three days to reduce the hydrocyanic acid content (Wanapat et al 2003). The dried leaves were put into sacks and stored properly for feeding. Guatemala grass regrowth of about five months old was collected from the Catholic University of Bukavu farm, chopped, and used in the experiment.
Feed offered and refusals were measured daily throughout the experimental period to determine daily dry matter intake. Leucaena, cassava, brewers’ spent grain, and Guatemala grass was sampled daily throughout the experimental period, compounded, and then shade-dried for subsequent chemical analysis at the Animal Nutrition Laboratory of the Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya. The samples were determined for dry matter (DM), ash, crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), and crude fibre (CF) according to methods described by Abdulrazak and Fujihara (1999). Milk production (kg) was collected daily and weighed using a Camry scale (Camry company, China). Milk samples were composited daily from morning and afternoon milking, refrigerated in an ice-packed cooler, and then stored. The milk samples were then analysed for milk composition (fat, protein, lactose, solids not-fat content) at the Microbiology Laboratory of the Université Evangélique en Afrique, Bukavu, DRC, using the Milk Analyser Lactostar 3510 (Funke Gerber, Germany).
Data on feed intake, milk production, and milk composition were analysed for two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) using R software for windows, version 4.1.3 (R Core Team 2022). Significant treatment means were separated using Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. The model used is presented below.
Yijt = µ+ Ci + Pj + Tt + Ɛijt
where Yijt = i … 3, j = 1 … 3, t = 1 …3; , overall mean; Ci , fixed cow effect; Pj fixed period effect; Tt , fixed treatment effect; ℇijt random residua error.
The results for the chemical composition of the feedstuff tested in this experiment are shown in Table 1. The organic matter content of the diets ranged from 78.5% in cassava to 87.2% in Leucaena. In this study, the CP content of Guatemala grass (10.9% DM) was higher than the 6.9% reported by Nivyobizi et al (2010) and 8.9% reported by Mtengeti et al (2006). This content was, however, comparable to the 11.8% reported by Maleko et al (2022). The plant and environmental factors can explain the fluctuation in the nutritional composition of Guatemala grass because its nutritional quality tends to degrade with maturity, which is also associated with a decrease in the proportion of leaves relative to stems, reducing forage intake (Perera and Perera 1994). The crude protein content of Leucaena was at 30.1% of the DM, which was higher than that of cassava. This content was within the range of 24 to 34% reported by Verdecia et al (2019) and low compared to the 40.1% DM reported by Barwani et al (2022). This trend was similar for ash, organic matter, and crude fibre. Conversely, cassava had a higher ether extract content (6.1%) than Leucaena (5.3%). The dried cassava leaves ether extract was comparable to the 5.9 to 6.2% range reported by Wanapat (2003). Leucaena and Guatemala grass had respective crude fibre levels of 12.9% and 12.7%, which were higher than cassava at 9.5% of the dry matter.
Table 1. Chemical composition (%) of the feedstuff used in the experiment |
|||||
Guatemala |
Brewers’ spent grain |
Leucaena |
Cassava |
||
Dry matter |
88.8 |
90.2 |
90.5 |
89.3 |
|
Dry matter (%) |
|||||
Ash |
9.10 |
3.30 |
11.6 |
10.9 |
|
Organic matter |
79.8 |
78.6 |
87.2 |
78.5 |
|
Crude protein |
10.9 |
8.50 |
30.1 |
21.7 |
|
Ether extract |
7.30 |
1.20 |
5.30 |
6.10 |
|
Crude fibre |
12.7 |
4.60 |
12.9 |
9.50 |
|
Cows fed on the control diet consumed an average of 7.87 kg DM of Guatemala grass compared to 6.84 kg and 7.37 kg DM consumed by cows supplemented with Leucaena and cassava, respectively (Table 2). Leucaena and cassava supplements had decreased (p<0.001) the DM intake of Guatemala grass. This can be explained by the bulkiness of the forages, leading to the substitution effect. Cows consumed similar amounts of dried Leucaena and cassava leaves. Cows consumed all the 1.25kg DM of the brewers’ spent grain offering. The average daily CP supplement intake was 0.98 kg for Leucaena compared to 0.78 kg for cassava. The average total DM intake per cow for the control diet was 9.12 kg. In this study, supplementing Guatemala grass with dried Leucaena and cassava leaves increased (p<0.001) total DM intake by 20% and 26%, respectively. Cassava results match that of Wanapat et al (2018), who reported that total DM intake in lactating crossbred cows was higher due to the good palatability of cassava silage which would be comparable to the dried leaves used in this study. The results for dried Leucaena leaves supplementation also agree with those of Stifkens et al (2022), who reported the increment in dry matter intake of beef steers on the Rhodes grass basal diet coupled with supplementation of an increased proportion of Leucaena hay.
Table 2. Average daily intake (kg) for Holstein Friesian x Ankole crossbred cows fed Guatemala grass and supplemented with dried Leucaena and cassava leaves |
||||||
Treatments |
SEM |
p > F |
||||
Control |
Leucaena |
Cassava |
||||
Dry Matter intake |
||||||
Tree and shrub supplements |
0.00b |
2.83a |
2.83a |
0.20 |
0.001 |
|
Guatemala grass |
7.87a |
6.84c |
7.37b |
0.18 |
0.001 |
|
Brewers’ spent grain |
1.25 |
1.25 |
1.25 |
0.00 |
- |
|
Total |
9.12c |
10.9b |
11.5a |
0.24 |
0.001 |
|
Organic matter intake |
||||||
Tree and shrub supplements |
0.00c |
2.73a |
2.49b |
0.18 |
0.001 |
|
Guatemala grass |
7.07a |
6.14c |
6.62b |
0.16 |
0.001 |
|
Brewers’ spent grain |
1.09 |
1.09 |
1.09 |
0.00 |
- |
|
Total |
8.16b |
9.97a |
10.2a |
0.22 |
0.001 |
|
Crude protein intake |
||||||
Tree and shrub supplements |
0.00c |
0.98a |
0.78b |
0.06 |
0.001 |
|
Guatemala grass |
1.07a |
0.93c |
1.01b |
0.02 |
0.001 |
|
Brewers’ spent grain |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.12 |
0.00 |
- |
|
Total |
1.19c |
2.03a |
1.91b |
0.06 |
0.001 |
|
Means within rows with different superscripts differ (p<0.05); SEM, standard error of means Prob > F probability value |
Feeding the cows on the control diet resulted in an average daily milk production per cow of 5.96 kg. Supplementing the cows with dried cassava and Leucaena leaves increased this amount by 3% and 15% of daily milk production (Table 3, Figure 1). This study showed that Leucaena supplements increased (p<0.001) daily milk production more than cassava. However, the increase in milk production in cows supplemented with dried cassava leaves did not differ from those fed on the control diet, as presented in Table 3 and Figure 1.
In contrast, Wanapat et al (2018) reported an increase in milk production when crossbred cows were supplemented with different levels of cassava top silage. With regard to the diet, the anti-nutritional content of cassava leaves (condensed tannins and hydrocyanic acid), their stage of maturity, means of supplementation, and the amount added would affect this milk production. For instance, the means of supplementation in this study were different from those of Wanapat et al (2018). This study used dried cassava leaves, while Wanapat et al (2018) supplemented cows with cassava top silage. It has been reported that silage plays a critical role in reducing anti-nutritional contents and improving the feed quality of tree and shrub legumes (Balehegn et al 2022), which could increase milk production in this study. The concentration of 5-9% of condensed tannins has been reported to form complexes with protein, reducing nutrient digestibility and feed intake and thus affecting livestock performances (Ebrahim and Negussie 2020). The current study recorded the highest milk production when Guatemala grass was supplemented with dried Leucaena leaves. This result confirms the high forage value of this species (Maasdorp et al 1999; Barwani et al 2022). Protein has been reported to be an important factor in maintaining the rumen environment of animals, thus stimulating DM intake and digestibility (Nguyen et al 2017). Therefore, supplementing Leucaena with a higher CP content (30.1%) in this study resulted in an improved intake of Guatemala grass, leading to higher milk production.
The milk composition of cows fed on the control diet was similar to those supplemented with dried cassava leaves but different (p<0.05) from cows supplemented with dried Leucaena leaves (Table 3). The milk fat content was higher from cows fed basal diet plus dried Leucaena leaves supplement than for the control diet and those on dried cassava leaves. Therefore, the average value of milk fat in this study is considered to be lower than that obtained by Nugroho et al (2019). This higher milk fat content from cows supplemented with dried Leucaena leaves could be attributed to its high crude fibre content (Table 1), which increases the molar proportion of acetate and butyrate in the rumen. Acetic and butyric acids are known as precursors of milk synthesis (Flores-Cocas et al 2021). Additionally, supplementing cows with dried Leucaena leaves in this study is also beneficial in maintaining crude fibre levels in the rumen.
The milk protein, lactose, and solids not-fat contents in cows fed on the control diet and cows supplemented with dried cassava leaves were higher (p<0.001) than those from cows supplemented with dried Leucaena leaves. Since cows supplemented with dried cassava and Leucaena leaves consumed an additional CP of 0.78 kg and 0.98 kg, respectively, it was expected that the lesser increase in milk protein and lactose contents would be realised from cows supplemented with dried Leucaena leaves. Unexpectedly, higher milk protein contents were recorded from cows supplemented with cassava leaves as well as from the control diet. In this study, dried Leucaena leaves had higher CP content which would help in the supply of amino acids and indirectly supported milk protein synthesis, thus increasing milk protein content. Kakengi et al (2001) reported similar results, whose supplementation of Leucaena to grazing crossbred cows increased milk production, weight gain, and enhanced milk composition but had no significant effect on milk protein.
In this study, the milk lactose content from cows fed a basal diet and supplemented with dried Leucaena leaves was similar to that of Osorio et al (2016). This study showed that supplementing Guatemala grass with dried Leucaena leaves on lactose content followed the same trend as milk production. It has been reported that lactose content in the milk is nearly stable and is, therefore, crucial for the volume of produced milk in the udder (Osorio et al 2016). Lactose acts as a water binder; more lactose synthesised leads to more amount of milk production. Milk production depends on the mammary synthesis of lactose because its osmoregulation of milk induces mammary absorption of water. Thus, the rate of lactose synthesis in the epithelial cells of the mammary gland serves as a major factor influencing milk volume production (Osorio et al 2016).
Table 3. Average daily milk production (kg) and milk composition (g) of Holstein Friesian x Ankole crossbred cows fed Guatemala grass supplemented with dried Leucaena and cassava leaves |
||||||
Treatments |
SEM |
p > F |
||||
Control |
Leucaena |
Cassava |
||||
Milk production |
5.96b |
6.83a |
6.13b |
0.44 |
0.001 |
|
Milk composition |
||||||
Fat |
29.9b |
38.4a |
28.2b |
1.40 |
0.002 |
|
Protein |
38.4a |
33.3b |
38.5a |
0.68 |
0.001 |
|
Lactose |
56.1a |
48.3b |
56.8a |
1.00 |
0.001 |
|
Solids-not-fat |
101a |
89.2b |
102a |
1.61 |
0.001 |
|
Means within rows with different superscripts differp<0.05); SEM, standard error of meansp > F probability value |
Figure 1.
Effect of supplements of leaf meals of cassava and Leucaena
on milk yield of cows fed a basal diet of Guatemala grass a Brewers grains |
The results indicate that supplementing Guatemala grass with dried Leucaena or cassava leaves increased total DM intake, milk production and improved milk quality. Leucaena and cassava, which establish easily and are found abundant in eastern DRC, can be used as sources of proteins and play a significant role in efficiently utilising Guatemala grass. Hence, according to our study, we recommend incorporating 20% of dried Leucaena or cassava leaves into the diet of Holstein Friesian x Ankole crossbred cows raised in the middle and highlands of eastern DRC.
The authors acknowledge the financial assistance from the Integrated Project for Agricultural Growth in the Great Lake regions (PICAGL), funded by the World Bank Group through the Government of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and implemented by the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) in South-Kivu and Tanganyika provinces.
We also wish to acknowledge the Catholic University of Bukavu farm workers for their cooperation and assistance during data collection.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Abdulrazak S A and Fujihara T 1999 Animal nutrition. A Laboratory Manual. Kashiwagi Printing Company, Matsue-shi, Japan, pp.44.
Balehegn M Ayantunde A Amole T Njarui D Nkosi B D Müller F L Meeske R Tjelele T J Malebana I M Madibela O R Boitumelo W S Lukuyu B Weseh A Minani E and Adesogan A T 2022 Forage conservation in sub-Saharan Africa: Review of experiences, challenges, and opportunities. Agronomy Journal, 114(1), 75–99.
Barwani D K Bacigale S B Kibitok N K Webala A W Gicheha M G Katunga D M and Osuga I M 2022 Nutritional characterization of eight trees and shrub used livestock feeds in the Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo.Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 34, Article #86. Retrieved October 21, 2022, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd34/10/3486issa.html
De Angelis A Gasco L Parisi G and Danieli P P 2021 A multipurpose leguminous plant for the mediterranean countries: Leucaena leucocephala as an alternative protein source: a review. Animals, 11(8), 1–16.
Derero A and Kitaw G 2018 Nutritive values of seven high priority indigenous fodder tree species in pastoral and agro-pastoral areas in Eastern Ethiopia. Agriculture and Food Security, 7(1), 1–9.
Ebrahim H and Negussie F 2020 Effect of secondary compounds on nutrients utilization and productivity of ruminant animals: A review. Journal of Agricultural Science and Practice, 5(1), 60–73.
Flores-Cocas J M Aguilar-Pérez C F Ramírez-Avilés L Solorio-Sánchez F. J Ayala-Burgos A J and Ku-Vera J C 2021 Use of rice polishing and sugar cane molasses as supplements in dual-purpose cows fed Leucaena leucocephala and Pennisetum purpureum. Agroforestry Systems, 95(1), 43–53.
Franzel S Carsan S Lukuyu B Sinja J and Wambugu C 2014 Fodder trees for improving livestock productivity and smallholder livelihoods in Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 6(1), 98–103.
Gebreyowhans S and Zegeye T 2018 Effect of dried Sesbania sesban leaves supplementation on milk yield, feed intake, and digestibility of Holstein Friesian x Zebu (Arado) crossbred dairy cows. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 51,949-955.
Henry B K Eckard R J and Beauchemin K A 2018 Review: adaptation of ruminant livestock production systems to climate changes. Animal, 12(2), 445-456.
Kakengi A M Shem M N Mtengeti E P and Otsyina R., 2001 Leucaena leucocephala leaf meal as supplement to diet of grazing dairy cattle in semiarid Western Tanzania. Agroforestry Systems, 52(1), 73–82.
Katunga M M D Muhigwa B J B Kashala K J C Kambuyi M Nyongombe N Maass B L and Peters M 2014 Agro-ecological adaptation and participatory evaluation of multipurpose tree and shrub legumes in mid altitudes of Sud-Kivu, DR. Congo. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 5, 2031–2039.
Maasdorp B V Muchenje V and Titterton M 1999 Palatability and effect on dairy cow milk yield of dried fodder from the forage trees Acacia boliviana, Calliandra calothyrsus, and Leucaena leucocephala. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 77, 49–59.
Maass B L Katunga M M D Chiuri W L Gassner A and Peters M 2012 Challenges and opportunities for smallholder livestock production in post-conflict South Kivu, eastern DR Congo. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 44(6), 1221–1232.
Maleko D Msalya G and Mtei K 2022 Effects of dry season supplementation of Calliandra calothyrsus leaf-meal mixed with maize-bran on dairy cattle milk productivity in the West Usambara Highlands, Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development, Voulme 34, Article #64. Retrieved December 21, 2022, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd34/8/3467male.html
Mtengeti E Kavana N Urio P and Shem M 2006 Chemical composition and fermentative quality of fodder grasses ensiled with derided fresh sugarcane crush. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 6, 157–165.
Mugumaarhahama Y Ayagirwe R B B Mutwedu V B Cirezi N C Wasso D S Azine P C and Karume K 2021 Characterization of smallholder cattle production systems in South-Kivu province, eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice, 11(4).
Munyahali W Pypers P Swennen R Walangululu J Vanlauwe B and Merckx R 2017 Responses of cassava growth and yield to leaf harvesting frequency and NPK fertilizer in South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo. Field Crops Research, 214, 194–201.
Mutwedu V B Bacigale S B Mugumaarhahama Y Muhimuzi F L Munganga B Ayagirwe R B B Nguezet P M D and Manyawu G 2022 Smallholder farmers’ perception and challenges toward the use of crop residues and agro-industrial byproducts in livestock feeding systems in Eastern DR Congo. Scientific African, 16.
Nguyen T T G Wanapat M Phesatcha K and Kang S 2017 Effect of inclusion of different levels of Leucaena silage on rumen microbial population and microbial protein synthesis in dairy steers fed on rice straw. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 30(2), 181–186.
Nivyobizi A Deswysen A Dehareng D Peeters A and Larondelle Y 2010 Nutritive value of some tropical grasses used by traditional small farms in the highlands of Burundi. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 42(4), 561–567.
Nugroho D F Suranindyah Y Y and Astuti A 2019 The effect of supplementation of Leucaena leucochepala leaf in Friesian Holstein cows ration on milk production and composition. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Volume 387, the 8 th international seminar on tropical animal production, 23-25 september 2019, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Osorio J S Lohakare J and Bionaz M 2016 Biosynthesis of milk fat, protein, and lactose: Roles of transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation. Physiological Genomics, 48(4), 231–256.
Osuga I M Abdulrazak S A Muleke C I and Fujihara T 2011 Effect of supplementing Rhodes grass hay (Chloris gayana) with Berchemia discolor or Zizyphus mucronata on the performance of growing goats in Kenya. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 96(4), 634–639.
Osuga I M Wambui C C Abdulrazak S A Ichinohe T and Fujihara T 2008 Evaluation of nutritive value and palatability by goats and sheep of selected browse foliages from semiarid area of Kenya. Animal Science Journal, 79, 582–589.
Pello K Okinda C Liu A and Njagi T 2021 Adaptation to climate change through Agroforestry in Kenya. Land, 10(4), 1–16.
Perera A N and Perera E R 1994 Nutritive value and ensiling characteristics of Guatemala grass harvested at different stages of maturity. Journal of the National Science Council of Sri Lanka, 3(22), 245–251.
R Core Team 2022 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.r-project.org
Stifkens A Matthews E M McSweeney C S and Charmley E 2022 Increasing the proportion of Leucaena leucocephala in hay-fed beef steers reduces methane yield. Animal Production Science, 62(7), 622–632.
Verdecia D M Herrera R S Ramírez J L Leonard I Bodas R Andrés S Giráldez F J Valdés C Arceo Y Paumier M Santana A Álvarez Y Mendez Y and López S 2019 Effect of age of regrowth, chemical composition and secondary metabolites on the digestibility of Leucaena leucocephala in the Cauto Valley, Cuba. Agroforestry Systems, 94(4), 1247–1253.
Wanapat M Phesatcha K Viennasay B Phesatcha B Ampapon T and Kang S 2018 Strategic supplementation of cassava top silage to enhance rumen fermentation and milk production in lactating dairy cows in the tropics. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 50(7), 1539–1546.
Wanapat M Boonnop K Promkot C and Cherdthong A 2011 Effects of alternative protein sources on rumen microbes and productivity of dairy cows. Maejo International Journal of Science and Technology, 5(1), 13–23.
Wanapat M 2003 Manipulation of cassava cultivation and utilization to improve protein to energy biomass for livestock feeding in the tropics. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 16(3), 463–472.