Livestock Research for Rural Development 32 (8) 2020 LRRD Search LRRD Misssion Guide for preparation of papers LRRD Newsletter

Citation of this paper

Effect of species on macro and micro mineral composition of some forages with respect to sheep requirements

Cagrı Ozgür Ozkan, Adem Kamalak and Kadir Yilmaz1

Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam, Kahramanmaras, Turkey
akamalak@ksu.edu.tr
1 Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam, Kahramanmaras, Turkey

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of species on the macro and mineral profiles of some forages used for small ruminant animal in Turkey. Calcium contents of forages varied from 22.9 to 1.5 g/kg DM with highest being for Medicago sativa and lowest for Sinapsis arvensis. Phosphorus contents of varied widely from 1.5 to 4.6 g/kg DM with highest being for Polyganum aviculara and lowest for Convulus arvensis. Magnesium contents of forages ranged from 2.1 to 7.9 g/kg DM with highest being for Polyganum aviculare and lowest for Plantago lanceoata. Potassium contents of forages ranged between 12.3 to 26.0 g/kg DM, the lower value corresponding to Vicia lentis and the higher to Malva sylvestris. There were also significant differences among forages in terms of sodium content which ranged between 0.3 to 4.9 g/kg DM, the lower value corresponding to Polyganum aviculare and the higher to Rumex crispus. There were significant differences among forage species in terms of Iron contents which varied between 188.0 to 2885.0 mg/kg DM, the lower value corresponding toLathyrus sativus and the higher to Rumex crispus. There were significant differences among forages in terms of Zn contents which varied between 27.0 to 84.0 mg/kg DM, the lower value corresponding to Trifolium repens and the higher to Polyganum cognatum. Copper contents of forages varied widely from 13.0 to 23.5 mg/kg DM with highest being for Malva sylvestris and Rumex crispus and lowest for Sanguisorba minor. Manganese contents of forages varied from 38.5 to 93.5 mg/kg DM with highest being for Sinapsis arvensis and lowest for Medicago sativa. Forage species had a significant effect on the macro and micro mineral profiles of hays. All forages had a significant amount macro and micro minerals to support the growth and production of lamb and sheep.

Key words: macro mineral, micro mineral, sheep, forage


Introduction

Native pasture consists of different plant species and provides not only energy and protein but also minerals for ruminant animals in the most parts of world. Deficiency and excess of minerals may cause poor performance in ruminants. There is need for the information about mineral contents of forages before recommendation of specially formulated mineral supplement can be made (Gazanfar et al. 2011). A lot of research have been conducted to determine the chemical composition, metabolisable energy and organic matter digestibility of plants grown in native pasture in Turkey (Kaplan et al 2014; Ceylan and Kamalak 2019; Durmaz and Kamalak 2019; Akbay et al. 2020), whereas much less effort has been diverted into minerals even though they also affect forage quality and may decrease feed intake when levels are low (Provenza, 1995). Macro and micro minerals may have also important role as a structural function in bones, as electrolytes in body fluids, as integral components of enzymes and other biologically important compounds (Bourne and Orr 1988).

The information about macro and micro mineral compositions of forages from different species grown in native pasture can be used in preventing some diseases associated with mineral deficiency and in formulation of diet to achieve the optimum performance of grazing small ruminant animals. Therefore the aim of the current study was to determine the effect of species on the macro and mineral composition on the forages grazed by small ruminant animals in Turkey.


Materials and methods

Forage samples

Forages were collected at flowering stage in May, 2018 by hand in the campus of Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Kahramanmaras, Turkey (Figure 1). The collected sample of species were pooled and dried under shed until the constant weight. The soil of the study area is classified as Inceptisols which was formed on a colluvial serpentine-limestone parent material (Yilmaz et al 2000).

Figure 1. Location of Kahramanmaras Province in Turkey (Wikipedia)


Figure 2. Mean monthly air temperature and rainfall distribution in Kahramanmaras in 2018

Dried forage samples were ground using a laboratory mill with 1 mm screen size for mineral analysis. Forage samples were subjected to wet-ashing process with hydrogen peroxide following three different steps. Firstly forage samples were kept at 145 ºC 75% microwave power for 5 minutes. Secondly forage samples were kept at 80 ºC 90% microwave power for 10 minutes. Finally forage samples were kept at 100 ºC 40% microwave power for 10 minutes in a wet-ashing unit (speed wave MWS-2 Berghof products + Instruments Harresstr.1. 72800 Enien Germany) resistant to 40 bar pressure (Mertens 2005a). After wet-ashing, macro and micro mineral contents of forage samples were analyzed using Inductively Couple Plasma Optical Emission Spectrophotometer (Perkin-Elmer, Optima 2100 DV, ICP/OES, Shelton, CT 06484-4794, USA) (Mertens 2005b). All mineral analysis was carried in duplicate.

Statistical analysis

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the effect of species on the macro and mineral composition on the forage samples. Significance between individual means was identified using the Tukey’s multiple range tests. Mean differences were considered significant at P<0.05.


Result and discussion

Macro mineral profile of some forages

The macro mineral profiles of some forage species are given in Table 1. Species had a significant effect on the macro mineral profiles. Calcium contents of forages varied from 22.9 to 1.5 g/kg DM with highest being for Medicago sativa and lowest for Sinapsis arvensis.

NRC (1985) suggested that calcium contents in the range of 0.2 and 0.82 % of DM are adequate for lamb and sheep at gestation and lactation stages respectively. As can be seen from Table 1, except for Sinapsis arvensis, calcium contents of forage species studied in the current study were higher than the upper value reported by NRC (1985). Ca contents of Medicago sativa, Vicia sativa and Lathyrus sativus obtained in the current experiment was consistent with the values reported by Feedipedia (2020).

Phosphorus contents of varied widely from 1.5 to 4.6 g/kg DM with highest being for Polyganum aviculara and lowest for Convulus arvensis. NRC (1985) suggested that phosphorus contents in the range of 0.16 and 0.38 % of DM are adequate for lamb and sheep at most production stages. As can be seen from Table 1, phosphorus contents of forage species studied in the current study were higher than the lower value reported by NRC (1985).

P contents of Medicago sativa, Vicia sativa and Lathyrus sativus obtained in the current experiment was consistent with the values reported by Feedipedia (2020).

Magnesium contents of forages ranged from 2.1 to 7.9 g/DM with highest being for Polyganum aviculare and lowest for Plantago lanceoata. NRC (1985) suggested that the minimum requirement of magnesium should be 0.12, 0.15 and 0.18 g/kg DM for growing lamb, pregnant and lactating ewe respectively. As can be seen Table 1, magnesium contents of forage species were higher those suggested by NRC (1985) for growing lamb, pregnant and lactating ewe. Mg contents of Medicago sativa and Vicia sativa obtained in the current experiment was consistent with the values reported by Feedipedia (2020).

Potassium content of forages ranged between 12.3 to 26.0 g/kg DM, the lower value corresponding to Vicia lentis and the higher to Malva sylvestris. Although potassium content of diets for lamb growth should be more than that 0.5 % of DM, the potassium content of diets for lactating sheep should be in the range of 0.7-0.8 of DM (NRC 1985). As can be seen Table 1, potassium contents of forages were higher those suggested by NRC (1985) for lamb and sheep. K content of Medicago sativa obtained in the current experiment was consistent with the values reported by Feedipedia (2020).

There were also significant differences among forages in terms of sodium content which ranged between 0.3 to 4.9 g/kg DM, the lower value corresponding to Polyganum aviculare and the higher to Rumex crispus. The sodium contents in the range of 1 to 4 g/kg DM are adequate for sheep at most production stages (Underwood 1981). Although sodium contents of forages such as Plantago lanceoata, Sinapsis arvensis, Lathyrus sativus, Trifolium repens, Malva sylvestris and Rumex crispus fell into this range, sodium contents of the other forages studied in the current experiment was lower than this range. Therefore it is likely that sodium deficiency will occur with sheep consuming forages such as Medicago sativa, Vicia lentis, Astragalus hamosus, Polyganum cognatum, Polyganum aviculare, Vicia sativa, Sanguisorba minor and Convulus arvensis from different species. Na content of Medicago sativa obtained in the current experiment was consistent with the values reported by Feedipedia (2020).

Table 1. Effect of species on the macro mineral composition (g/kg DM) of forages(n=2)

Macro minerals

Ca

P

Mg

K

Na

Medicago sativa

22.9b

3.0c

2.8fg

18.1bc

0.5e

Vicia lentis

14.6cd

2.4ef

2.8fg

12.3c

0.5e

Plantago lanceoata

31.5a

1.9g

2.1h

15.6c

6.0a

Astragalus hamosus

15.4cd

2.4ef

2.5gh

17.6bc

0.7ed

Polyganum cognatum

18.6bc

2.7d

3.8d

14.0c

0.6ed

Polyganum aviculare

12.1de

4.6a

7.9a

16.5bc

0.3e

Sinapsis arvensis

1.5f

4.2b

3.0ef

25.8a

1.1d

Lathyrus sativus

9.6ee

2.2ef

2.3gh

18.8 abc

1.7c

Vicia sativa

11.1de

2.7d

2.7fg

16.7abc

0.8ed

Trifolium repens

13.3de

3.0c

2.5gh

19.0abc

1.9c

Sanguisorba minor

11.9de

2.2ef

4.4c

15.4c

0.4e

Malva sylvestris

14.5cd

4.4ab

3.5de

26.0a

1.8c

Convulus arvensis

13.8de

1.5h

2.4gh

14.4c

0.3e

Rumex crispus

18.6bc

3.0c

5.6b

23.2ab

4.9b

SEM

1.143

0.067

0.139

1.865

0.136

p

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

abc Column means with common superscripts do not differ at p <0.05

Micro mineral profile of some forages

The micro mineral profiles of forages are given in Table 2. Species had also a significant effect on the micro mineral profiles of forages. There were significant differences among forage species in terms of Iron contents which varied between 188.0 to 2885.0 mg/kg DM, the lower value corresponding to Lathyrus sativus and the higher to Rumex crispus. NRC (1985) suggested that 30 mg /kg DM is adequate to meet the dietary iron requirements for all classes of sheep. On the other hand, a maximum tolerable level of Fe has been indicated as 500 mg Fe/kg DM (NRC 1980). As can be seen from Table 2, although Fe contents of most of forages studied in the current experiment was lower than a maximum tolerable level, the Fe contents of Plantago lanceoata and Rumex crispus were higher than that reported by NRC (1985). Fe content of Medicago sativa was lower than that reported by Feedipedia (2020).

There were significant differences among forages in terms of Zn contents which varied between 27.0 to 84.0 mg/kg DM, the lower value corresponding to Trifolium repens and the higher to Polyganum cognatum. Although Zn requirement of lamb for growth is 20 mg/kg DM, Zn requirement of sheep at most production stages is 33 mg /kg DM. The Zn contents of forages are higher than the adequate level of Zn. Therefore sheep grazing on these forages is not likely to suffer from zinc deficiency. Zn content of Medicago sativa was higher than that reported by Feedipedia (2020).

Table 2. Effect of species on the micro mineral composition (mg/kg DM) of forages (n=2)

Micro minerals

Fe

Zn

Cu

Mn

Medicago sativa

457.5ef

37.0fg

15.0ab

38.5h

Vicia lentis

396.5f

36.0fgh

19.5ab

52.0de

Plantago lanceoata

1187.5b

76.0b

16.0ab

54.5cde

Astragalus hamosus

382.5fg

42.5def

17.5ab

72.0b

Polyganum cognatum

593.5c

84.0a

18.5ab

61.0c

Polyganum aviculare

494.5e

61.5c

18.0ab

48.5def

Sinapsis arvensis

519.0de

60.50c

15.5ab

93.5a

Lathyrus sativus

188.0i

45.5d

15.5ab

39.5gh

Vicia sativa

311.5gh

33.5ghi

14.0b

47.5efg

Trifolium repens

285.0h

27.0i

14.5ab

39.5gh

Sanguisorba minor

530.5de

30.0hi

13.0b

40.5fgh

Malva sylvestris

502.5de

58.0c

16.0ab

40.0fgh

Convulus arvensis

586.0c

43.0de

23.5a

56.0cd

Rumex crispus

2885.0a

39.0defg

23.5a

78.0b

SEM

21.200

1.742

2.360

2.070

p

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

abc Column means with common superscripts do not differ at p<005

Copper contents of forages varied widely from 13.0 to 23.5 mg/kg DM with highest being for Malva sylvestris and Rumex crispus and lowest for Sanguisorba minor. It is very difficult to give the exact dietary copper requirement of sheep since there are some factors affecting dietary copper requirement of sheep. There are considerable differences among sheep breeds in terms of efficiency in absorbing copper from feedstuffs. On the other hand, the amount of molybdenum in feedstuffs also effect of the dietary copper requirement of sheep. High level of molybdenum in feedstuffs induces the copper deficiency. However the copper contents of forage species is adequate for sheep since the copper contents of forage species higher than that (7-23 mg/kg DM) recommended by NRC (1985). Therefore, Cu contents of forages were higher those suggested by NRC (1985) for sheep. Cu content of Medicago sativa was higher than that reported by Feedipedia (2020).

Manganese contents of forages varied from 38.5 to 93.5 mg/kg DM with highest being for Sinapsis arvensis and lowest for Medicago sativa. Although exact dietary requirement of manganese for sheep is not known, 20 mg/kg DM of manganese should be adequate for sheep at most production stages (NRC 1985). Therefore manganese contents of forages studied in the current experiment were considerable higher than adequate level for sheep at most production stages. Mn content of Medicago sativa was lower than that reported by Feedipedia (2020).


Conclusions


References

Akbay F, Erol A and Kamalak A 2020 The effect of different harvesting period on the chemical composition, methane production and condensed tannin content of fenugreek grass ( Trigonella foenum- graecum). KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature, 23 (6): 1663-1668. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.688749

Bourne R A and Orr R M 1988 Animal physiology and nutrition. In: R.J. Halley and R.J. Soffe (eds). The Agricultural Notebook. Blackwell Scientific Publication. Oxford, UK.

Ceylan E and Kamalak A 2019 Effect of different harvest stage on chemical composition,in vitro gas and methane production of cotton thistle ( Onopordum acanthium). Journal of Adnan Menderes University Agricultural Faculty, 16(1): 13-18 https://doi.org/10.25308/aduziraat.448250

Durmaz K and Kamalak A 2019 Effect of harvest stage on the chemical composition, in vitro gas and methane production of Bituminaria bituminosa. Anadolu Journal of Agricultural Sciences 34(1): 102-106 https://doi.org/10.7161/omuanajas.440508

Feedipedia 2020 FAO, accesed on 08 July 2020; https://www.feedipedia.org/

Gazanfar S, Latif A, Mirza I H and Nadeem M A 2011 Macro-minerals concentrations of fodder tree leaves and shrubs of district Chakwal, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 10(5):480-484. http://docsdrive.com/pdfs/ansinet/pjn/2011/480-484.pdf

Kaplan M, Kamalak A, Ozkan C O and Atalay A I 2014 Effect of vegetative stages on potential nutritive value, methane production and condensed tannin content of Onobrychis caput-galli hay. Harran University Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 3(1) 1-5 https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/308473

Mertens D 2005a AOAC official method 922.02. In: Horwitz, W., Latimer, G.W. (Eds.), Plants Preparation of Laboratory Sample. Official Methods of Analysis, 18th ed. AOAC-International Suite, Gaitherburg, MD, USA, (Chapter 3), pp. 1–2.

Mertens D 2005b AOAC official method 975.03. In: Horwitz, W., Latimer, G.W. (Eds.), Metal in Plants and Pet Foods. Official Methods of Analysis, Official Methods of Analysis, 18th ed. AOAC International Suite, Gaitherburg MD, USA, (Chapter 3), pp.3.4

NRC 1980 Mineral tolerance of domestic animals. National Academy of Sciences. Washington, D.C.

NRC 1985 Nutrient requirements of sheep. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

Provenza F D 1995 Postingestive feedback as an elementary determinant of food preference and intake in ruminants. Journal Range Management, 48(1):2-17. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9c5c/b3269903d6c8ad4c5564ce2f9ea3b289d49b.pdf

Underwood E J 1981 The Mineral Nutritio of Livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux. Slough, UK.

Yılmaz K, Gundogan R, Demirkıran A R 2000 Pedogenesis and classification of soils in Kahramanmaras Province, Turkey. International Symposium on Desertification, ISD, Proceedings p: 517-524. Konya, Turkey.