Livestock Research for Rural Development 32 (6) 2020 | LRRD Search | LRRD Misssion | Guide for preparation of papers | LRRD Newsletter | Citation of this paper |
The study was carried out to assess the effect of supplementation of mixed grass hay with browse-tree leaves on rumen fermentation, digestibly, N retention and growth and feed conversion of goats. Twenty four goats with initial body weight of 8.00 ± 0.41kg were housed individually and assigned to four treatment diets of mixed grass hay or hay (70%) supplemented with leaves (30%) of Paraserianthes falcataria, Moringa oliefera or Calliandra calothyrsus.
Apparent digestibility of DM, crude protein and crude fiber, and N retention were increased by browse-leaf supplementation. There were decreased population of rumen protozoa and increased rumen propionate when the grass hay was supplemented with leaves from the browse trees. These changes were reflected in higher feed intake and better growth and feed conversion as the basal diet of grass hay was supplemented with the leaves from the browse trees.
Keywords: Calliandra, growth, Moringa, nutrient retention, Paraserianthes, propionate, protozoa
The sustainability of ruminant livestock production in the tropics is faced with the problem of inadequate supply of year-round feeds. This nutritional constraint is probably the most pressing factor contributing to the low supply of animal protein to the human populace in Nigeria. The dry season is the most challenging limitation, characterized by insufficient feed of poor quality (Babayemi2007). Grasses in tropical regions are low in nitrogen and high in fibre especially during the dry season. This negative effect of nutritional status results in low performance in goats (Okoruwa 2019). It has been recognised that intake and efficient utilisation of fibrous feeds are influenced by the rate of rumen fermentation (Nouala et al 2006) and the balance of nutrients absorbed in the intestine. Improvement in the nutritive value, removal of nutritional limitations by rumen fermentation and balance supply of nutrients to host animals will result in improvement of goat productivity.
One of the feasible options to this feed shortage is the supplementation with concentrate mixtures that has resulted in increased feed intake in more intensive production systems as reviewed by Nouala et al (2006). However, these supplements are often not fed due to their unavailability and high cost of ingredients.
The global interest in multi-purpose trees as forage and feed supplement for ruminants has increased research on their nutritive value. Trees offer advantages over grasses in terms of higher dry matter yields and capacity to retain high-quality foliage under stress condition (Theng Kouch et al 2003). This may offer considerable potential for use in ruminant livestock production systems in Nigeria to alleviate and complement their low feed value of native pasture (Okoruwa 2019).Thus, research trends have been directed towards investigating alternative plant protein sources available in the rural communities to replace conventional feed sources that are associated with high cost and competitive demand as food for humans.
Browse trees such as Paraserianthes falcataria, Moringa oleifera and Calliandra calothyrsus can be an option to sustain better performance in goats without the use of expensive concentrate diets. It was reported by Norton (2003) that browse-tree leaves have high quality nutrients as well as medicinal attributes for feeding ruminants that make them potential replacements for conventional protein sources in goat production (Norton 1994).Therefore, the use of browse-tree leaves to supplement poor quality grasses can be one of the most productive and sustainable practices for increasing goat production in Nigeria. Hence, this study was planned to assess the effect of browse-tree eaf supplementation on digestibility, nutrient retention, rumen fermentation and performance of goats fed mixed grass hay.
The study was carried out at the Ruminant livestock Unit of the Teaching and Research Farm of Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma, Nigeria.
Mature fresh leaves of Paraserianthes falcataria (PL), Moringa oleifera (MO) and Calliandra calothyrsus (CC) were obtained daily from trees from around Ekpoma. The leaves were dried under shade for 5 days before use. Equal proportions of guinea grass and elephant grass were obtained within the farm. They were chopped, mixed together and air-dried under shade to 80-85% dry matter. Thereafter, they were stored in bags and kept in a dry area. The mixed grass hay was used as the sole diet for the control group, while combinations of the mixed grass hay and each of the three browse-tree leaves in a ratio of 70:30 (DM basis) were used in the other dietary treatment groups.
The four experimental diets were; MGHS (100% mixed grass hay), MGPF (70% mixed grass hay with 30% leaves of Paraserianthes falcataria), MGMO (70% mixed grass hay with 30% leaves of Moringa oliefera) and MGCC (70% mixed grass hay with 30% leaves of Calliandra calothyrsus).
Twenty-four West African dwarf male goats aged 8 to 9 months with initial average weight of 8.00 ± 0.41kg were housed in pens (two goats per pen). The feeding trial was arranged as a completely randomized design with four treatments each with 3 replicates (2 goats per pen per replicate). The goats were offered the diets twice daily at 8:00am and 4:00pm. The quantity of the diet offered to each goat was given at a rate of 5% dry matter basis of their body weight.The percentage ratio of the test leaves to the basal diet of mixed grass hay was used to determine the proportion of each plant leaf in the daily feed allowance offered to each goat. The quantity of feed provided was adjusted after every week according to live body weight change. The goats also had free access to water throughout the experimental period. The trial was conducted for 84 days exclusive of a 14-day adaptation period.
Daily feed offered was recorded and leftovers were collected in the morning of the next day to estimate voluntary feed intake.
Goats were weighed at the commencement of the trial (after the adaption period) and subsequently at weekly intervals.
At the end of the feeding trial, the goats were transferred into individual metabolic cages for collection of feces and urine. Records of daily feed offered, feed refusals, fecal and urinary outputs were kept for 7 days after 7 days of physiological adjustment to the cages. At the end of the study, fecal samples for each goat were bulked, mixed and about 10% of sub-sample was pooled and kept in plastic bags in the freezer (-20°C) for analysis. Urine sub-samples were collected in plastic bottles with 4 drops of diluted sulphur acid (10% H2SO4) to prevent loss of ammonia. Apparent digestibility and nitrogen retention were calculated based on DM consumed, feces and urine voided.
Rumen liquor samples were collected four hours post feeding using a stomach tube inserted to a depth of 110 –130cm through the oesophagus. The first portion (about 30ml) of the sample collected was discarded to reduce saliva contamination. The rumen pH was determined immediately using a digital pH meter. A fraction of the rumen liquor sample was stored in10% formal-saline prior to the direct microscopic counts of the rumen protozoa. The other fraction of rumen fluid was bulked for each animal and made free of coarse particles by straining through layers of cheese cloth. Thereafter, part of the filtrate was acidified with 1ml of a 5% (v/v) orthophosphoric acid solution and stored frozen in the air tight plastic container to measure total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration. Separate 10ml sub-samples were treated with 2ml of 25% meta-phosphoric acid and centrifuged at 584rpm for 15min for subsequent measurement of individual volatile fatty acids.
Samples of leaves, feeds and feces were analyzed following the procedures of AOAC (1990). Rumen VFA fractions were measured according to the procedures described by Mor et al (2019).
Data were subjected to descriptive statistics and analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the general linear model procedure of SAS (2000). Where significant treatment effects were found, means were separated by Duncan’s multiple range test (Steel and Torrie 1990). The linear model used for the analysis was as follows
Yij = U + Ai +eijk
Where;
Yijk = independent variable (intake, digestibility.......)
U = overall mean of the observed variable
Ai = effect due to ith treatment diets
eij = effect of random residual error
Table 1. Proximate composition of forage-trees and experimental diets (% DM except for dry matter which is on air-dry basis) |
||||||||
Browse-trees |
Diets |
|||||||
PF |
MO |
CC |
MGHS |
MGPF |
MGMO |
MGCC |
||
Dry matter |
77.8 |
75.9 |
76.5 |
87.2 |
85.4 |
83.6 |
84.7 |
|
Crude protein |
20.1 |
23.7 |
21.9 |
7.01 |
11.7 |
13.1 |
12.4 |
|
Crude fibre |
34.6 |
16.0 |
32.4 |
39.9 |
37.7 |
30.3 |
36.9 |
|
Ether extract |
5.41 |
4.86 |
3.82 |
1.02 |
2.77 |
2.56 |
2.14 |
|
Ash |
4.73 |
7.74 |
5.06 |
3.65 |
4.08 |
5.29 |
4.21 |
|
Nitrogen free extract |
35.2 |
47.7 |
36.8 |
49.4 |
43.7 |
48.7 |
44.4 |
|
Anti-nutritional compounds, % |
||||||||
Total tannin |
0.71 |
0.27 |
0.49 |
0.89 |
1.60 |
1.16 |
1.38 |
|
Condensed tannin |
0.37 |
0.09 |
0.27 |
0.27 |
0.64 |
0.36 |
0.54 |
|
Saponins |
0.19 |
0.31 |
0.42 |
0.43 |
0.62 |
0.74 |
0.85 |
|
Phytates |
0.08 |
0.22 |
0.29 |
0.69 |
0.77 |
0.91 |
0.98 |
|
PF = Paraserianthes falcataria, MO =Moringa oleifera, CC =Calliandra calothyrsus |
Apparent digestibility of DM, crude protein and crude fiber, and N retention were increased when the basal diet of grass hay was supplemented with the leaves from the browse trees (Tables 1 and 2).
Table 2. Mean values for apparent digestibility and nitrogen retention of goats fed grass hay alone or supplemented with leaves from browse trees |
|||||||
MGHS |
MGPF |
MGMO |
MGCC |
SEM |
p |
||
Digestibility, % |
|||||||
Dry matter |
65.8c |
69.9b |
72.4a |
71.8a |
3.04 |
0.024 |
|
Crude protein |
58.6d |
65.7c |
74.6a |
70.1b |
2.62 |
0.015 |
|
Crude fibre |
67.1b |
70.1a |
70.9a |
71.2a |
2.93 |
0.021 |
|
Nitrogen balance, g/d |
|||||||
N intake |
5.99b |
9.89a |
10.9a |
10.6a |
0.62 |
0.016 |
|
Fecal N |
2.63 |
2.82 |
2.60 |
2.62 |
0.11 |
0.013 |
|
Urinary N |
0.82c |
2.01a |
1.78b |
1.96b |
0.01 |
0.024 |
|
N-retention |
2.54b |
5.06a |
6.53ab |
6.02ab |
0.14 |
0.005 |
|
absc Means in the same row without common superscript differ at p<0.05 |
The increases in diet digestibilityand N retention were reflected in increased feed intake and growth rate and better feed conversion (Table 3).
Table 3. Mean values for feed intake, live weight change and feed conversion of goats fed a grass-hay basal diet supplemented with browse-tree leaves |
||||||
Treatments |
SEM |
p |
||||
MGHS |
MGPF |
MGMO |
MGCC |
|||
Feed intake, g/d |
276c |
304b |
324a |
319b |
1.82 |
0.004 |
Live weight, kg |
||||||
Initial |
8.52 |
8.40 |
8.37 |
8.35 |
0.07 |
0.012 |
Final |
10.5b |
11.0a |
11.4a |
11.2a |
0.81 |
0.083 |
LW gain, g/d |
28.3c |
37.1b |
43.3a |
40.7a |
0.36 |
0.019 |
Feed conversion |
9.75a |
8.19b |
7.48c |
7.84c |
0.28 |
0.031 |
absc Means in the same row without common superscript differ at p<0.05 |
The most important benefits from browse-leaf supplementation of the grass hay were the decrease in protozoal counts and the increases in rumen propionate (Table 4).
Table 4. Mean values for rumen parameters in goats fed a grass-hay basal diet supplemented with browse-tree leaves |
||||||
Treatments |
SEM± |
p |
||||
MGHS |
MGPF |
MGMO |
MGCC |
|||
Rumen pH |
6.41b |
6.72a |
6.85a |
6.77a |
0.18 |
0.082 |
Acetate, mol/100ml |
63.4a |
54.6b |
51.7c |
54.2b |
1.38 |
0.054 |
Propionate, mol/100ml |
19.3c |
22.1b |
24.3a |
23.4a |
0.73 |
0.003 |
Butyrate, mol/100ml |
5.70a |
3.24b |
2.01c |
3.09b |
0.08 |
0.021 |
Protozoa x10-5/ml |
8.53a |
5.04c |
6.15b |
6.21b |
0.06 |
0.026 |
absc Means in the same row without common superscript differ at p<0.05 |
Figure 1.
Anti-nutritional compounds (TT Total tannin, CT
Condensed tannin, Sap Saponins, Phy Phytates) in the three browse-tree leaves |
Figure 2.
Relationship between rumen protozoa and molar propionate
in rumen fluid of goats fed browse-tree leaves as supplement to grass hay |
Figure 3.
Relationship between rumen propionate concentration and live weight gain |
Figure 4.
Relationship between rumen propionate concentration and feed conversion |
The potential benefits in growth and feed conversion conferred on a diet of grass-hay by supplementation with browse-tree leaves (Table 3) are various. The leaves provide a source of nitrogen for growth of rumen bacteria that provide protein to the ruminant animal as well as enhancing diet digestibility (Table 2). Tannins in the tree leaves (Table 1) react with the protein in the tree leaves, protecting them from microbial attack, thus facilitating the rumen escape of some of the protein for more efficient enzymic digestion in the intestines (Barry and McNabb 1999). The tannins per seare toxic to rumen protozoa thus they indirectly create more space and nutrients for growth of bacteria (Li 2019). More importantly they reduce production of methane through direct inhibition of of methanogenic bacteria, which facilitates positive changes in the rumen fermentation as the hydrogen not taken up by methanogenic bacteria results in increased production of propionic acid, which is the major precursor of glucose for more improved growth and feed conversion (Preston and Leng 1987) as seen in the data in Figures 3 and 4.
AOAC 1990 Official Methods of Analysis. Association of official analytical chemist, 15thEdition (Khelrick, editor) Arlington pp 1230.
Babayemi O J 2007 In-vitro fermentation characteristics and acceptability by West African dwarf goats of some dry season forages. African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 6(10):1260 – 1265. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2007.000-2173
Barry T N and McNabb W C 1999 The implications of condensed tannins on the nutritive value of temperate forages fed to ruminants . British Journal of Nutrition, 81: 263-272
Li Y Zhang G Xu H Zhou S Dou X Lin C Zhang X Zhao H and Zhang Y 2019 Effects of replacing alfalfa hay with Moringa oleifera leaves and peduncles on intake, digestibility and rumen fermentation in dairy cows. Livestock Science, 220: 211-216
Mor P, Bals B, Kumar S, Tyagi N, Reen J K, Tyagi B, Choudhury P K and Pyagi A K 2019 Influence of replacing concentrate mixture with AFEX pellets on rumen fermentation, blood profile and acetamide content in the rumen of crossbred (Alpine x Beetle) female goats. Small Ruminant Research, 170: 109 – 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.10.016
Norton B W 1994 The nutritive value of tree legumes. In: forages tree legumes in Tropical Agriculture, Gutterridge, R. C. and H. M. Shelton (Eds) CAB International, UK. Pp: 177 – 191. https://betuco.be/coverfodder/Forage%20Tree%20Legumes%20in%20Tropical%20Agriculture%20FAO.pdf
Norton B W 2003 Tree legumes and dietary supplements. In: forage tree legumes in tropical agriculture .Gutteridge, R. C. and Shelton (Ed) CAB International Walling-ford Oxon, Pp 192 – 201
Nouala F S, Akinbamijo O O, Adewumi A, Hoffman E, Muetzel S and Becker K 2006 The influence of Moringa oleifera leaves as substitute to conventional concentrate on the in vitro gas production and digestibility of groundnut hay. Livestock Research for rural Development 18 (9). https://www.lrrd.cipav.org.co/lrrd18/9/noua18121.htm
Okoruwa M I 2019 Feed intake, relative preference index, rumen digestion kinetics, nutrient digestibility and live weight change of goats fed selected browse plants. "Livestock_Research_for_Rural_Development" Livestock Research for Rural Development . http://www.lrrd.org.lrrd31/4/odion31052.html.
Preston T R and Leng R A 1987 Matching livestock systems to available feed resources in the tropics and sub-tropics. Penambul Books, Armidale, Australia http://www.cipav.org.co/PandL/Preston_Leng.htm
SAS 2000 SAS users guide statistics, SAS Institute Inc. North Carolina (2000 Ed). Pp. 949
Steel R G D and Torrie J H 1990 Principle and procedure of statistics. A Biometrical approach 3rd edition. MacGraw Hill Book Company. New York, USA.
Theng Kouch, Preston T R and Ly J 2003 Studies on utilization of trees and shrubs as the sole feedstuff by growing goats; foliage preferences and nutrient utilization. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 15, Article #50. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd15/7/kouc157.htm
Received 16 April 2020; Accepted 28 April 2020; Published 1 June 2020