Livestock Research for Rural Development 32 (11) 2020 | LRRD Search | LRRD Misssion | Guide for preparation of papers | LRRD Newsletter | Citation of this paper |
Broiler-chickens were fed for 56 days on diets in which dried cassava pulp replaced maize at levels of 0, 20, 40 and 60%cof the diet.
There were 7% linear decreases in growth rate and feed efficiency as cassava root pulp meal replaced maize at 60% of the diet. The heart and kidneys were enlarged as maize was replaced by cassava pulp.
Keywords: feed conversion, HCN, heart, kidney
The search for alternative feed resources in livestock production, particularly for poultry, has been a major concern of animal researchers. Maize remains the first-choice energy source for livestock, while soybean meal is the chief plant protein source, particularly for monogastric animals. The price of these ingredients has increased beyond their economic use in poultry diets. Thus, many small and medium poultry farms in Nigeria are finding it difficult to remain in business.
Maize production in Africa represents about 7.5% of the world production. The largest Africa producer is Nigeria with 11 million tonnes in 2019, followed by South Africa, Egypt and Ethiopia. Africa imports nearly as much maize as it produces with Nigeria importing about 200,000 metric tonnes in 2017 increasing to 400,000 metric tonnes in 2018 and 2019 (Table 1).
Table 1. Maize importation in Nigeria in the last 8 years |
||
Market Year |
Imports |
Growth Rate |
2012 |
200,000 |
100.00 % |
2013 |
200,000 |
0.00 % |
2014 |
150,000 |
-25.00 % |
2015 |
200,000 |
33.33 % |
2016 |
650,000 |
225.00 % |
2017 |
200,000 |
-69.23 % |
2018 |
400,000 |
100.00 % |
2019 |
400,000 |
0.00 % |
Source: FAS/USDA 2019 |
Within the past 20 years or more, Nigeria remains the largest producer of cassava in the world estimated at about 37 million metric tonnes in 2012 out of the total world production of over 280 million metric tonnes (FAO 2013). In 2017, Nigeria produced 59 million tonnes making her the world’s largest producer (approximately 20% of the global production) with a 37% increase in the last decade (IITA 2017). Cassava root upon processing generates a lot of byproducts/wastes which include pulp, peel, seivate, leaves and discarded root tubers. Cassava pulp is the waste generated from cassava root processing for the extraction of starch.
The process of starch granule-cassava pulp separation is achieved by crushing of the cells and separation of the granules from other insoluble matter (adhering dirt and cell-wall material) including the preparatory operations of washing and peeling the roots, rasping them and straining the pulp with the addition of water. The residual pulp which is separated from the starch in the screening process is used as animal feed. This product is considered a byproduct of the cassava starch industry and represents about 10 percent by weight of the cassava roots.
This waste which is often drained as effluent by the factory constitutes an environmental hazard to the factory as well as the host community with consequential effect on human health arising from the repugnant odour from its decomposition. The evacuation of this waste also constitutes additional overhead cost on the factory which affects their revenue. This waste remains not fully exploited in broiler chicken diets.
It is hoped that the use of cassava pulp in broiler chicken diets will help mitigate the environmental concerns and health challenges arising from the dumping and decomposition of the waste. It will also stem the demand for maize as the sole energy source in broiler chicken diets with additional advantage of improving poultry farmers’ income.
Cassava pulp used for this study was collected fresh from a local cassava processing factory. The pulp was sun-dried with regular turning for about 5 days on a tarpaulin spread on a concrete floor. The dried pulp was milled using hammer mill and stored in cool dry place prior to use.
The dried cassava pulp was analyzed for proximate composition as described by AOAC (2002). . Cyanide was determined was by the method of Rao et al (1997), tannin was determined according to Makkar and Goodchild (1996) and oxalate by the method of Baker and Silverton (1985).
The experimental design was a completely randomized block with cassava pulp meal substituted for maize at 0 (control), 20, 40 and 60% levels (Table 2).
One hundred and twenty day-old broiler chicks were randomly distributed to each of the 4 diets which were fed ad-libitum for a period of 56 days. Cool water was served at all times. Records of daily feed intake and group weight changes were taken throughout the experimental period.
Feed intake was calculated as the difference between the feed given and the quantity of feed remaining after removing foreign material. Feed conversion ratio was calculated as feed consumed/live weight gain.
After 56 day, 3 birds from each replicate were chosen at random, weighed, starved overnight, weighed again, stunned, sacrificed and bled and the dressed carcasses eviscerated. The organs measured were heart, lung, liver, spleen, kidney, gizzard and the intestinal length. All the organs measured were expressed in g/kg live weight while the dressed carcass and eviscerated weights were expressed as % live weight. Blood was collected into EDTA bottles for haematological determination; other blood samples were collected into sterile bottle without EDTA for serum biochemical determination using commercial kits (Reflectron® Plus 8C79 (Roche Diagnostic, GombH Mahnheim, Germany).
Data collected were subjected to analysis of variance procedure using SAS (2002) version 9.1. Means were compared using the appropriate option of the same statistical software.
Table 2. Gross composition of diets in which maize was substituted by cassava pulp meal |
||||||||
Feed |
Cassava pulp meal, % in the diet |
|||||||
0 |
20 |
40 |
60 |
0 |
20 |
40 |
60 |
|
Broiler starters |
Broiler finisher |
|||||||
Maize |
52.53 |
42.03 |
31.53 |
21.01 |
55.59 |
44.47 |
33.35 |
24.24 |
Cassava pulp meal |
- |
10.50 |
21.00 |
31.52 |
- |
11.12 |
22.24 |
33.35 |
Soybean meal |
22.50 |
22.50 |
22.50 |
22.50 |
21.42 |
21.24 |
21.24 |
21.24 |
Groundnut cake |
14.17 |
14.17 |
14.17 |
14.17 |
11.94 |
11.94 |
11.94 |
11.94 |
Fish meal |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
4.50 |
4.50 |
4.50 |
4.50 |
Bone meal |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
Oyster shell |
0.50 |
0.50 |
0.50 |
0.50 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
Premix |
0.25 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
0.20 |
0.20 |
0.20 |
0.20 |
Lysine |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
DL- Methionine |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
Salt |
0.30 |
0.30 |
0.30 |
0.30 |
0.35 |
0.35 |
0.35 |
0.35 |
Vegetable oil |
2.50 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
2.50 |
2.70 |
2.70 |
2.70 |
2.70 |
Compared with maize, cassava pulp had lower crude protein and ether extract but higher crude fiber and ash content (Table 3).
Table 3. Chemical composition of cassava pulp compared with maize |
||
Proximate composition, g/100g |
Cassava pulp |
Maize # |
Dry matter, % |
88.6 |
|
Crude protein |
3.95 |
9.4 |
Crude fibre |
20.0 |
2.5 |
Ether extract |
3.35 |
4.3 |
Ash |
4.12 |
1.4 |
Nitrogen free extract |
57.2 |
|
Phytochemical components |
||
Cyanide CN-, mg/kg |
23.9 |
|
Tannin, g/100g |
0.08 |
|
Oxalate, mg/kg |
269 |
|
There were linear trends in performance criteria of the broilers as maize was replaced by cassava pulp (Table 4; Figures 1-3). Feed intake increased, weight gain decreased and feed conversion increased as cassava pulp replaced maize in the diet. At the highest levels of substitution of maize by cassava pulp, the performance indices were reduced by about 7%
Table 4. Performance of broiler chickens fed increasing levels of cassava pulp meal substituting maize |
|||||||
Cassava pulp meal, % in the diet |
SEM |
p |
|||||
0 |
20 |
40 |
60 |
||||
Live weight/bird |
|||||||
Initial, g |
50.3 |
50.5 |
50.5 |
50.4 |
0.52 |
0.91 |
|
Final, kg |
2.37a |
2.37a |
2.31b |
2.27b |
0.06 |
<0.04 |
|
Daily gain, g |
41.4a |
41.4a |
40.3b |
39.6b |
0.04 |
<0.03 |
|
Feed intake, g/d |
100 |
101 |
102 |
103 |
1.99 |
0.69 |
|
Feed conversion |
2.42 |
2.45 |
2.54 |
2.60 |
0.21 |
0.35 |
|
abcd Means without common superscripts along the same row differ at p< 0.05 |
Figure 1.
Effect of replacing maize with cassava root pulp on feed intake of broilers |
Figure 2.
Effect of replacing maize with cassava pulp on weight gain of broilers |
Figure 3.
Effect of replacing maize with cassava pulp on feed conversion of broilers |
The dressed carcass as percent of live weight was not affected by dietary levels of carcass pulp; however, the eviscerated carcass as percent of live weight showed a negative trend as cassava pulp in the diet was increased (Table 5).The weights of heart and kidney showed an increase relative to live weight as cassava pulp levels in the diet were increased.
Table 5. Carcass evaluation (% live weight) and organ description (g/kg live weight) of broiler chickens fed increasing levels of cassava pulp meal substituting maize |
|||||||
Cassava pulp, % in the diet |
SEM |
p |
|||||
0 |
20 |
40 |
60 |
||||
Carcass attributes |
|||||||
Dressed % of LW |
86.3 |
85.2 |
84.6 |
84.6 |
0.81 |
0.29 |
|
Eviscerated % of LW |
76.2a |
76.9a |
75.2a |
73.9b |
0.72 |
0.02 |
|
Relative organ weights, g/kg LW |
|||||||
Heart |
3.78b |
4.16a |
4.22a |
4.19a |
0.39 |
<0.03 |
|
Lung |
5.83 |
5.83 |
5.85 |
5.89 |
0.19 |
0.14 |
|
Liver |
18.0b |
18.1b |
18.2b |
18.5a |
0.44 |
<0.04 |
|
Spleen |
1.16 |
1.17 |
1.17 |
1.16 |
0.18 |
0.11 |
|
Kidney |
4.32b |
4.42b |
4.42b |
4.63a |
0.31 |
<0.02 |
|
Gizzard |
18.8 |
19.7 |
19.8 |
20.4 |
0.62 |
0.39 |
|
Intestinal length, mm |
2094 |
2204 |
2233 |
2230 |
6.03 |
0.31 |
|
ab Means without common superscripts along the same row are different at P< 0.05 |
Among the haemato-biochemical variables only aspartate transaminase was related to increasing cassava pulp in the diet (Table 6).
Table 6. Haemato-biochemical of broiler chickens fed increasing levels of cassava pulp meal substituting maize |
||||||
Cassava root pulp, % in the diet |
SEM |
p |
||||
0 |
20 |
40 |
60 |
|||
Haematological indices |
||||||
Packed cell volume, % |
33.1 |
32.1 |
32.1 |
32.3 |
0.36 |
0.54 |
Red blood cell counts, 109/ml |
3.50 |
3.44 |
3.35 |
3.49 |
0.21 |
0.15 |
Hb, g/dL |
10.9 |
10.4 |
10.2 |
10.6 |
0.26 |
0.31 |
Serum chemistry |
||||||
Total serum protein, g/dL |
3.87 |
3.85 |
3.79 |
3.85 |
0.11 |
0.42 |
Cholesterol, mg/dL |
132 |
132 |
131 |
132 |
1.21 |
0.63 |
ALT, u/l |
1.74 |
1.75 |
1.76 |
1.76 |
0.12 |
0.87 |
AST, u/l |
238b |
247ab |
255a |
256a |
4.06 |
<0.03 |
ab Means without common superscripts along the same row differ at p< 0.05 |
The negative trends in performance traits, with increasing levels of cassava pulp replacing maize, were relatively small (about 7% lower weight gain and poorer feed conversion at the maximum (60%) degree of replacement of maize by cassava pulp) and probably reflected the increased levels of fiber in cassava pulp compared with maize (Table 3). The detoxification of the cyanogenic precursors in the cassava pulp (Table 3) would have a metabolic cost to the birds as reflected in enlargement of the heart and kidneys with increasing levels of cassava pulp in the diet. The detoxification of HCN requires sulphur either from methionine-cystine or elemental sulphur in the diet.
In any event, the small negative response (7%) due to cassava pulp replacement of maize should be viewed against: (i) the relative costs (maize is more expensive than cassava); and (ii) cassava pulp, as a by-product of starch manufacture, may have a negative cost if it is otherwise wasted, causing pollution. From the environment standpoint, much of the maize used in Africa is imported and its production in, and transport from, importing countries is associated with a loss of biodiversity and major emissions of greenhouse gases. Replacing imported maize by locally produced cassava can thus be interpreted as a contribution to the global strategy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and loss of biodiversity.
Including cassava root pulp at 60% of a broiler diet, replacing maize, led to:
AOAC 2002 Association of Analytical Chemist. Official Method of Analysis. 18th edition. Washington DC., USA www.aoac.org
Baker F J and Silverton R E 1985 Introduction to Medical Laboratory Technology, 6th Ed., Butterworth, England, pp: 304-346
FAO 2013 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation, downloaded from http://fao.org/3/a-at582e www.fao.org
FAO 2017 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation, www.fao.org
FAS/USDA 2017 Foreign Agricultural Service/United States Department of Agriculture, Oilseeds: World Markets and Trade, USDA, Washington, D.C., USA https://www.fas.usda.gov
FAS/USDA 2019 Foreign Agricultural Service/United States Department of Agriculture https://www.fas.usda.gov
IITA 2017 International Institute for Tropical Agriculture www.iita.org
IITA 2019 International Institute for Tropical Agriculture www.iita.org
Makkar H P S and Goodchild A V 1996 Quantification of Tannins: A Laboratory Manual. International Center of Agricultural Research in Dry Areas, Aleppo, Syria IV + 25pp.
Rao A C, Maya M M, Duque M C, Tohume Allen A C and Bonierable M W 1997 AFLP analysis of relationships among cassava and other Manihot species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 95 (5-6): 741-750. http://www.academia.edu DOI:10.1007/s001220050620
SAS 2002 Statistical Analysis System version 9.1 SAS Institute Inc., Cary https://www.scirp.org