Livestock Research for Rural Development 29 (3) 2017 | Guide for preparation of papers | LRRD Newsletter | Citation of this paper |
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of fresh and sun-dried cassava leaves together with biochar on methane production in an in vitro rumen incubation of molasses-urea as basal substrate. The design was a 2*2 factorial in CRD with 4 treatments and 4 replications. The factors were processing of cassava leaves: fresh and sun-dried; and with or without biochar (1% of substrate DM). Total gas and percent methane in the gas were measured at intervals of 12 and 24h.
Methane as a proportion of the gas and as a function of substrate fermented was reduced when fresh rather than dried cassava leaf was the protein source and when biochar was added to the substrate.
Keywords: cyanide, greenhouse gas, HCN, methanogenesis
Ruminant animals are a major source of total anthropogenic methane emissions producing an estimated 80 million tonnes of methane annually accounting for 33% of anthropogenic emissions of this greenhouse gas (Beauchemin et al 2008).
Successful mitigation of ruminant GHG emission is challenging technically but is made even more difficult because of the rising demand for milk and meat (Steinfeld et al. 2006). Thus it is important to study ways of maintaining good animal performance but with reduced levels of methane. The challenge is to increase the production of meat and milk from ruminants without increasing, and preferably reducing, methane emissions.
The foliage of cassava (Manihot esculenta, Crantz) has been shown to be an effective source of bypass protein for stimulating growth rates of fattening cattle (Ffoulkes and Preston 1978; Sath et al 2008) and sheep (Ho Quang Do et al 2002) and growth and milk production of goats (Thanh et al 2013; Dung et al 2010). It is widely cultivated in all tropical counties and is thus a logical forage to provide the additional protein required in diets high in fermentable carbohydrate and urea. Cassava leaves are known to contain variable levels of condensed tannins; about 3% in DM according to Netpana et al (2001) and Bui Phan Thu Hang and Ledin (2005), which are reported to decrease methane production and increase the efficiency of microbial protein synthesis (Makkar et al 1995; Grainger et al 2009). Reductions of methane production by 13 to 16% were reported by Carulla et al (2005), Waghorn et al (2002) and Woodward et al (2004), apparently through a direct toxic effect on methanogens.
According to MAF (2013) the total planted area of cassava in Lao PDR is 43,975 ha, with an average root yield of 24tonne/ha, which in 2013 increased to 45,185 ha and an average yield of 28 tonne/ha (Tin Maung Aye 2015). Fresh foliage yields of cassava managed as a semi-perennial forage crop in Cambodia with repeated harvests at 50 to 70 day intervals and fertilized with biodigester effluent were 20 tonnes/ha (Preston et al 2000).
Biochar is the residue when fibrous biomass is carbonized at high temperatures. It has been shown to play an active role in systems involving microbial fermentation (Lehmann and Joseph 2009). It is believed that the biochar, which is highly porous, may also act as “habitat” for biofilms that facilitate the functioning of consortia of micro-organisms and their nutrients (Leng et al 2012a).
The purpose of the present study was to determine the effects on methane production in an in vitro rumen fermentation when biochar was combined with either fresh or sun-dried cassava leaves provided as supplements to a basal substrate of molasses-urea.
Methane production would be reduced when a basal substrate of molasses-urea in an in vitro rumen incubation was supplemented with biochar as a source of biofilm, and by fresh compared with sun-dried cassava leaves as a source of bypass protein.
The experiment was conducted in the laboratory of the Faculty of Agriculture and Forest Resource, Souphanouvong University, Luang Prabang province, Lao PDR, from November to December 2015.
Four treatments were arranged as a 2*2 factorial in completely randomize design with 4 replications. The factors were:
· Fresh (FC) or dried (DC) cassava leaves
· Biochar at 0 (NBio) or 1% (Bio) of the substrate DM
The basal substrate was molasses with 3% urea in DM (Table 1).
Table 1. The ingredients in the substrates (g DM) |
||||
FCBio |
FCNBo |
DCBio |
DCNBio |
|
Molasses |
8.0 |
8.2 |
8.0 |
8.2 |
Fresh cassava leaf |
3.6 |
3.6 |
||
Dried cassava leaf |
3.6 |
3.6 |
||
Biochar |
0.12 |
0.12 |
||
Urea |
0.24 |
0.24 |
0.24 |
0.24 |
Total |
12 |
12 |
12 |
12 |
Recycled water bottles (capacity 1500 ml) were used for the fermentation and collection of the gas (Photo 1). A hole was made in the lid of each of the bottles, which were inter-connected with a plastic tube (id 4mm). The bottle receiving the gas had the bottom removed and was suspended in a larger bottle (2 liter capacity) partially filled with water, so as to collect the gas by water displacement. The bottle that was suspended in water was calibrated at 50 ml intervals to indicate the volume of gas.
Photo 1. The in vitro system |
The cassava leaves were chopped into small pieces and milled in a coffee grinder either fresh or after drying in an oven at 105 °C for 24 h,. They were then mixed with urea. A representative sample of the mixtures (12 g DM) (Table 1) was put in the fermentation bottle to which was added 0.96 liters of buffer solution (Table 2) and 240 ml of rumen fluid (obtained from a newly slaughtered buffalo in the town abattoir), prior to displacing the air with carbon dioxide. Each junction of the connecting tube with the bottles was covered by "plasticine" (modelling clay) to ensure a gas-tight seal (Photo 2). The bottles with substrate were then incubated at 38°C in a water bath for 24h.
Table 2. Ingredients of the buffer solution |
|||||||
Ingredients |
CaCl2 |
NaHPO4.12H2O |
NaCl |
KCl |
MgSO4.7H2O |
NaHCO3 |
Cysteine |
(g/liter) |
0.04 |
9.30 |
0.47 |
0.57 |
0.12 |
9.80 |
0.25 |
Source : Tilly and Terry (1963). |
Gas production was estimated by water displacement. The percentage of methane in the gas was measured by infra-red sensor (Crowcom Instruments Ltd, UK), after 12 and 24h of fermentation. At the end of the incubation the total gas volume and total methane production were calculated. Residual insoluble DM from the substrate was determined by filtration through cloth (Photo 2) and drying the residues at 100°C for 24h.
Photo 2.The substrate residue filtered through cloth |
The data were analyzed by the General Linear Model (GLM) option in the ANOVA program of the Minitab Software (version13.2) (Minitab 2000). Sources of variation in the model were: cassava leaf, biochar, interaction cassava leaf*biochar and error.
Gas production was lower, as was percent methane in the gas, when fresh rather than dried cassava leaves was the protein source; and when biochar was added to the substrate (Table 3; Figures 1-2).
DM mineralized was reduced when fresh rather than dried cassava leaves were the protein source, and tended (p = 0.055) to be reduced when biochar was added to the substrate (Table 3; Figures 3 and 4).
Methane production per unit substrate DM mineralized was reduced by fresh compared with dried cassava leaves and by biochar (Figures 5 and 6).
Table 3. Mean values of gas production, percent methane in the gas and DM mineralized in an in vitro system |
|||||||
Cassava leaves |
p |
Biochar |
p |
SEM |
|||
Fresh |
Dried |
Biochar |
No biochar |
||||
Gas production, ml |
|||||||
0-12h |
1006 |
1194 |
<0.001 |
1056 |
1144 |
0.013 |
21.3 |
12-24 |
1725 |
1825 |
0.015 |
1750 |
1800 |
0.183 |
25.0 |
Total 24h |
2731 |
3019 |
<0.001 |
2806 |
2944 |
0.025 |
38.0 |
Methane, % |
|||||||
0-12h |
17.9 |
21.3 |
<0.001 |
18.9 |
20.3 |
0.029 |
0.39 |
12-24h |
21.9 |
26.3 |
<0.001 |
23.1 |
25.0 |
0.007 |
0.41 |
Total CH4, ml |
558 |
732 |
<0.001 |
607 |
683 |
<0.001 |
7.82 |
DM mineralized, % |
68.1 |
76.2 |
<0.001 |
70.9 |
73.4 |
0.055 |
0.84 |
Methane, ml/g DM mineralized |
69.6 |
81.7 |
<0.001 |
72.7 |
78.7 |
0.001 |
1.02 |
Figure 1. Effect of drying cassava leaves on gas production (0-24h) |
Figure 2. Effect of biochar on gas production (0-24h) |
Figure 3. DM mineralized was lower when fresh rather than dried cassava leaves were the protein source | Figure 4. DM mineralized was lower when biochar was added to the substrate. |
Figure 5. Methane produced per unit
substrate mineralized was lower for fresh rather than dried cassava leaves | Figure 6 . Methane produced per unit
substrate mineralized was lower when biochar was added to the substrate. |
The reduced production of methane in an in vitro rumen incubation when fresh leaves replaced dried leaves is in agreement with a previous study by Sangkhom et al (2012) when cassava root was the carbohydrate substrate and cassava leaves were used fresh or after sun- or oven-drying. The mechanism for the reduction in methane with fresh leaves is that: (i) drying the cassava leaves reduces the liberation of HCN (Phuc et al 1996; Phoung et al 2012a,b); and (ii) it is the liberated HCN which inhibits methanogenesis (Smith et al 1985; Gijzen et al 2000).
The effect of biochar in reducing methane production has been reported in in vitro rumen incubation systems (Leng et al 2012a; Seengsouly and Preston 2016a), and in growing cattle (Leng et al 2012b; Sengsouly and Preston 2016b). Leng (2012a) ascribes this effect of the biochar to its role as support for biofilms which facilitate rumen microbial ecosystems including those that reduce methanogenesis.
The percent methane in the gas and methane produced per unit substrate mineralized was: lower for fresh than for sun-dried cassava leave; and lower with added biochar.
This research was done by the senior author as part of the requirements for the MSc degree in Animal Production "Improving Livelihood and Food Security of the people in Lower Mekong Basin through Climate Change Mitigation" in Cantho University, Vietnam. The authors acknowledge support for this research from the MEKARN II project financed by Sida.
AOAC 1990 Official methods of chemical analysis, Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (15th ed) Washington DC.
Beauchemin K A, Kreuzer M, O'Mara F and McAllister T A 2008 Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 21-27.
Bui Phan Thu Hang and Ledin Inger 2005 Utilization of Melastoma (Melastoma affine, D. Don) foliage as a forage for growing goats with cassava (Manihot Esculenta, Crantz) hay supplementation. Proceedings International Workshop on Small Ruminant Production and Development in South East Asia (Editor: Inger Ledin), Hanoi, Vietnam, 2-4 March 2005. http://www.mekarn.org/procsr/hangctu.pdf
Carulla J E, Kreuzer M, Machmüller A and Hess H D 2005 Supplementation of Acacia mearnsii tannins decreases methanogenesis and urinary nitrogen in forage-fed sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 961-970.
Dung N T, Binh D V, Mui N T and Preston T R 2010 Effect of cassava hay supplementation on milk production in lactating goats. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 22, Article #45. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd22/3/dung22045.htm
Ffoulkes D and Preston T R 1978 Cassava or sweet potato forage as combined sources of protein and roughage in molasses based diets: effect of supplementation with soybean meal. Tropical Animal Production Volume 3, Number 3 http://www.cipav.org.co/TAP/TAP/TAP33/3_3_1.pdf
Gijzen H J, Bernal E and Ferrer H 2000 Cyanide toxicity and cyanide degradation in anaerobic wastewater treatment. Water Research. Volume. 34, No. 9, pp. 2447-2454
Grainger C, Clarke T, Auldist M J, Beauchemin K A, McGinn S M and Waghorn G C 2009 Potential use of Acacia mearnsii condensed tannins to reduce methane emissions and nitrogen excretion from grazing dairy cows, Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 89, 241–251
Ho Quang Do, Vo Van Son, Bui Phan Thu Hang, Vuong Chan Tri and Preston T R 2002 Effect of supplementation of ammoniated rice straw with cassava leaves or grass on intake, digestibility and N retention by goatsLivestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 14, Article #29. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd14/3/do143b.htm
Lehmann J and Joseph S (Editors) 2009 Biochar for Environmental Management; Science and Technology. Earthscan, London, EC1N 8XA, UK, Sterling,VA 20166-2012, USA
Leng R A, Inthapanya S and Preston T R 2012a Biochar lowers net methane production from rumen fluid in vitro. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 24, Article #103. Retrieved August 22, 2016, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/6/sang24103.htm
Leng R A, Preston T R and Inthapanya S 2012b Biochar reduces enteric methane and improves growth and feed conversion in local “Yellow” cattle fed cassava root chips and fresh cassava foliage. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 24, Article #199. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/11/leng24199.htm
Makkar H P S, Blummel M and Becker K 1995 In vitro effects of and interactions between tannins and saponins and fate of saponins tannins in the rumen. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. pp. 481–493.
MAF 2013 Crop statistic year book, Ministry of Agriculture, Lao PDR
Minitab 2000 Minitab Software Release 13.2
Netpana N, Wanapat M, Poungchompu O and Toburan W 2001 Effect of condensed tannins in cassava hay on fecal parasitic egg counts in swamp buffaloes and cattle. In: Proceedings International Workshop on Current Research and Development on Use of Cassava as Animal Feed. T R Preston, B Ogle and M Wanapat (Ed) http://www.mekarn.org/procKK/netp.htm
Phanthavong V, Viengsakoun N, Sangkhom I and Preston T R 2015 Effect of biochar and leaves from sweet or bitter cassava on gas and methane production in an in vitro rumen incubation using cassava root pulp as source of energy. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 27, Article #72. Retrieved February 22, 2016, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd27/4/phan27072.html
Phongphanith S, Preston T R and Leng R A 2016 Effect of water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) and cassava leaf meal (Manihot esculenta Crantz) with or without biochar on methane production in an in vitro rumen incubation using ensiled or dried cassava root meal as source of carbohydrate. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 28, Article #112. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd28/6/seng28112.htm
Phuc B H N, Ogle R B, Lindberg J E and Preston T R 1996 The nutritive value of sun-dried and ensiled cassava leaves for growing pigs. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 8, Article #30. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd8/3/phuc83.htm
Phuong L T B, Khang D N and Preston T R 2012 Effect of NPN source, level of added sulphur and source of cassava leaves on growth performance and methane emissions in cattle fed a basal diet of molasses. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 24, Article #70. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/4/phuong24070.htm
Phuong L T B, Preston T R and Leng R A 2012 Effect of foliage from “sweet” and “bitter” cassava varieties on methane production in in vitro incubation with molasses supplemented with potassium nitrate or urea. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 24, Article #189. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/10/phuo24189.htm
Preston T R, Rodriguez Lylian and Khieu Borin 2000 Associations of cassava and legume trees as perennial forage crops for livestock. Workshop-seminar "Making better use of local feed resources" January, 2000. SAREC-UAF (Editors: T R Preston and R B Ogle). UAF, Ho Chi Minh City , Vietnam
Sangkhom I, Preston T R, Khang D N and Leng R A 2012 Effect of method of processing of cassava leaves on protein solubility and methane production in an in vitro incubation using cassava root as source of energy. Livestock Research for Rural Development.Volume 24, Article #36. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd24/2/sang24036.htm
Sath K, Borin K and Preston T R 2008 Effect of levels of sun-dried cassava foliage on growth performance of cattle fed rice straw. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 20, supplement. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd20/supplement/sath2.htm
Sengsouly P and Preston T R 2016a Effect of rice-wine distillers’ byproduct and biochar on growth performance and methane emissions in local “Yellow” cattle fed ensiled cassava root, urea, cassava foliage and rice straw. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 28, Article #178. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd28/10/seng28178.html
Sengsouly P and Preston T R 2016b Effect of rice-wine distillers’ byproduct, biochar and sweet or bitter cassava leaves on gas production in an in vitro incubation using ensiled cassava root as substrate. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 28, Article #190. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd28/10/seng28190.html
Smith M R, Lequerica J L and Hart M R 1985 Inhibition of methanogenesis and carbon metabolism in Methanosarcina sp. by cyanide, Journal of Bacteriology, 162, 67-71. http://jb.asm.org/content/162/1/67.full.pdf+html
Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales R, and Haan C 2006 Livestock’s long shadow. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
Thanh T X, Hue K T, Anh N N and Preston T R 2013 Comparison of different forages as supplements to a basal diet of chopped cassava stems for growing goats. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 25, Article #7. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd25/1/than25007.htm
Tilley J M A and Terry R A 1963 A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18: 104.
Tin Maung Aye 2015 Cassava production in Lao PDR and Myanmar. hhttp://rightslinklao.org/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2015/10/03TinAyeWTC2015.pdf
Vongkhamchanh B, Inthapanya S and Preston T R 2015 Methane production in an in vitro rumen fermentation is reduced when the carbohydrate substrate is fresh rather than ensiled or dried cassava root, and when biochar is added to the substrate. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 27, Article #208. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd27/10/bobb27208.html
Waghorn G C, Tavendale M H and Woodfield D R 2002 Methanogenesis from forages fed to sheep. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 64, 167–171.
Woodward S L, Waghorn G C and Laboyrie P 2004 Condensed tannins in birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) reduced methane emissions from dairy cows. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 64, 160–164.
Received 21 November 2016; Accepted 5 February 2017; Published 1 March 2017