Livestock Research for Rural Development 29 (10) 2017 | Guide for preparation of papers | LRRD Newsletter | Citation of this paper |
This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of dietary chive supplementation on growth performance, hematological and biochemical blood parameters, and fecal E.coli of growing chickens. One-day-old chickens (Noi Lai breed; n=120) were allocated to a completely randomized design with four replicates of four levels of fresh chives: 0, 1, 1.5 and 2% in the diet (DM basis).
There were linear improvements in growth rate and feed conversion of the chickens as the level of chives in the diet increased from 0 to 2% (DM basis) of the diet. There were no effects of chive supplementation on hematological and biochemical indices in blood. E. coli were shown to be susceptible to chive extracts (MIC test); however, supplementation with chives at up to 20g/kg diet DM had no apparent effect on fecal E. coli counts. It is suggested that chives could be considered as a prebiotic for natural growth promotion in chickens.
Key words: antimicrobial, E. coli, feed conversion, MIC, prebiotic
Anti-microbial compounds are commonly used to control disease and to promote growth of poultry. However, the use of antibiotic growth promoters was banned by the European Union on 1st January 2006, due to the risks of drug resistance in pathogenic bacteria. Many studies have been done to find alternatives to antibiotics in animal diets ( Guo et al 2000; Hertrampf 2001; Humphrey et al 2002) through the use of extracts of herbs and plants.
Chive is the common name of Alliumschoenoprasum L, belonging to the Allium species and Alliaceae family, and is in the list of plants proposed as feed additives in animal production. Allium species (garlic, onions, leeks and chives) contain organo-sulfur compounds such as the amino acids cysteine and methionine, γ-glutamyl peptides and especially S-substituted cysteine sulphoxides in varying amounts and proportions, corresponding to their flavor (FEEDAP 2005). Chives are herbaceous perennials with a strong onion or garlic scent, easy to grow and commonly used as afood additive and present in every Vietnamese kitchen. Chives have been well known for their medicinal properties, but there is very little information emphasizing their effect on growth performance of chickens.
The aims of this research were to evaluate the effect of increasing levels of dietary chives on feed intake, growth performance, blood parameters, and parasite infection in local chicken, The effects of a chive extract on E.coli were also studied.
The study was conducted on a farm in Binh Thuy ward, Cantho city and in the Veterinary Department of Cantho University, Vietnam, from June to September 2016.
Day-old chicks (Noi Lai breed; n = 320) were allocated in groups of 20 (equal male and female) to a completely randomized design with 4 treatments and 4 replicates. The experiment lasted 14 weeks. All birds were vaccinated against infectious diseases and had free access to feed and water. For the birds fed the control CH0 diet, their drinking water was diluted with Terra-colivet (Vemedim Corporation, Vietnam). This additive contained colistin, oxytetraxycline, vitamin A, D, E, K, B2, B 5, B6, B12, PP, Na, K and dextrose).
The treatments were:
CH0: Basal diet with medicated water
CH1: Basal diet + 1% chives
CH1.5: Basal diet + 1.5% chives
CH2: Basal diet + 2% chives
The level of chives was based on their content of DM (9.2%). During the starter phase, the birds were fed the same basal diet. Introduction of the treatments (Table 1) began when the chicks reached 2 weeks of age. Fresh, whole chives (Photo 1) were purchased from a farm and chopped prior to adding them to the diets (Photo 2).
To evaluate the effects of dietary chives on blood, 64 birds were randomly selected (16 birds in each treatment) at the end of the experiment for hematology and plasma lipid analysis. Blood samples were taken from the wing vein in the morning before feeding using sterilized syringe and needles and EDTA anticoagulant-treated test tubes. The counts of red blood cells (RBC) and white blood cells (WBC) were determined by a hemocytometer method using the Natt-Herrick solution; hematocrit values were measured by microhematocrit methods (Kececi et al 1998).
To measure total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and HLD-cholesterol and triglycerides, plasma was collected by centrifugation at 3000 x g for 15 minutes. Measurements were done according to the colorimetric method using a biochemistry analyser (Siemens Advia 1200).
Pooled cloacal swab samples (n=160) from 16 chickens were collected. The swab samples were and kept at 4oC until microbiological examination. Bacteria were cultured in TBX medium (Tryptone-Bile X-glucuronide agar, Merck) at 37oC for 24 h. The results were reported as number of E. coli per gram of feces.
Parasite eggs in feces (from hookworm, ascarid, whipworm, tapeworm and coccidia) were tested by the Modifed Wisconsin Sugar Centrifugal-Flotation Method, according to Pittman et al (2010).
To confirm the antimicrobial activity, clean fresh chives were extracted by sterile distilled water in a 2:10 ratio; the mixtures were filtered through Whatman No. 4 filter paper and stored at 4oC in a refrigerator until use. Ten E. coli colonies isolated from the chickens were used to determine the MIC of chive extract, according to the micro-dilution Broth method.
Photo 1. Preparing chives before feeding |
Photo 2. Mixing chopped chives with the experimental feed |
The basal diet and chives were analyzed for dry matter, crude protein, crude fiber, ether extract, calcium and phosphorus according to the methods of AOAC (1995).
Feed intake was recorded daily and live weight weekly. At the end of the study, measurements were made of: red and white blood cells and levels in blood of hematocrit, cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides.
The data were analysed using the General Linear Model procedure in Minitab (2001).
Table 1. Composition of the diets |
|||
Feed ingredients, % |
Starter |
Finisher |
Chives |
Rice bran |
12.1 |
12.5 |
|
Maize |
60.0 |
64.1 |
|
Soybean meal |
22.0 |
20.0 |
|
Fish meal |
3.00 |
0.00 |
|
Dicalcium phosphate |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
Vitamin premix |
0.31 |
0.31 |
|
Tra fish oil |
1.50 |
2.00 |
|
Choline chloride |
0.05 |
0.05 |
|
Composition (% as fed) |
|||
Dry matter |
88.1 |
87.5 |
9.24 |
Crude protein |
18.5 |
16.1 |
16.2# |
Ether extract |
3.90 |
4.04 |
7.03# |
NDF |
13.1 |
13.5 |
|
Crude fibre |
2.41 |
2.17 |
|
Ash |
5.70 |
3.16 |
|
Calcium |
0.71 |
0.39 |
|
Available phosphorus |
0.41 |
0.20 |
|
Lysine |
0.91 |
0.79 |
|
Methionine |
0.34 |
0.33 |
|
# As percent of DM |
Photo 3. Chicks during starter phase | Photo 4. Feeding system |
There was a curvilinear effect (R2 = 0.99) on DM intake with the optimum observed for 1.5% of chives in the diet (Table 2; Figure 1). Growth rate was improved with a linear trend (R2 = 0.96) and DM feed conversion by a curvilinear trend (R2 = 0.92), as the level of chives in the diet was increased from 0 to 2% of diet DM (Table 2; Figures 1-3).
The initial increase in feed intake could be attributed to the smell/taste from the sulfur-containing components in chives that are thought to stimulate gustatory impulses (Bautista et al 2005). Gonzalez et al (2010) considered that the increase in feed intake observed with feeds containing onion came from the sweet taste and flavour attributed to the content of bispropenyl disulphide. Aditya et al (2017) also reported that onion ( Allium cepa) extract increased feed intake of chickens. However, the decline in feed intake with more than 1.5% of chives implies there is a limit to the sensory response with too high a concentration in the diet leading to reduced intake.
Table 2. Mean values for feed intake, growth rate and feed conversion |
|||||
Chives, % of diet DM |
SEM |
||||
0 |
1.0 |
1.5 |
2.0 |
||
Feed intake, g/d |
59.8 |
63.8 |
65.2 |
64.6 |
1.01 |
Live weight, g |
|||||
Initial |
346 |
340 |
346 |
349 |
|
Final |
1521 |
1571 |
1615 |
1628 |
|
Daily gain |
16.8 |
17.6 |
18.0 |
18.4 |
0.33 |
DM conversion |
3.92 |
4.11 |
4.00 |
3.91 |
0.09 |
Figure 1. Effect of dietary chives on feed intake | Figure 2. Effect of dietqary chives on live weight gain | Figure 3. Effect of dietary chives on DM feed conversion |
Part of the response in live weight gain induced by supplementation with chives could be the result of the increased feed intake. However, the feed intake response was curvilinear and decreased with more than 1.5% of chives in the diet (Figure 1). In contrast, the live weight gain response was linear (Figure 2) resulting in a positive response in DM feed conversion as the concentration of chives was increased from 1.0 to 2% of the diet DM (Figure 3).
Stajner et al (2004) and Rattanachaikunsopon et al (2008) postulated that the better growth performance of chickens fed chives may be related to the pharmacological effects from diallyl sulfides, flavonoids, vitamin C and carotenoids present in the chives. However, there was no evidence for this in the present study as there were no consistent effects of chive supplementation on hematological and biochemical parameters (Table 3). There were differences in tryglyceride levels in blood but these showed no consistent relationship with level of chives in the diet. Ademola et al (2009) found that supplementation of broiler chicken with garlic or ginger, alone or as a mixture, did not influence red blood cell counts or haemoglobin. Jimoh et al (2012) also reported that haematological parameters of broilers were not influenced by Allium sativum (garlic) dietary supplementation.
The chickens were healthy on all the diets with only one death (from coccidiosis) on each of the CH0, CH1 and CH1.5 diets.
Table 3. Mean values for hematological and biochemical parameters |
||||||
|
CH0 |
CH1 |
CH1.5 |
CH2 |
SEM |
p |
Hematological parameters |
||||||
RBC, 106/mm3 |
3.35 |
3.2 |
3.53 |
3.33 |
0.37 |
0.85 |
WBC (103/mm3) |
21.5 |
21.1 |
20.3 |
20.67 |
1.19 |
0.89 |
Hematocrit (%) |
35.44 |
32.88 |
34.56 |
32.25 |
2.05 |
0.68 |
Biochemical parameters (mmol/liter) |
||||||
Cholesterol |
2.87 |
2.73 |
2.20 |
2.80 |
0.24 |
0.30 |
HDL- Cholesterol |
1.033 |
1.067 |
0.933 |
0.867 |
0.14 |
0.72 |
LDL- Cholesterol |
1.50 |
1.27 |
1.07 |
1.27 |
0.26 |
0.71 |
Triglycerides |
0.70a |
0.83a |
0.43b |
0.50b |
0.08 |
0.04 |
a-c
Means in the same row for each parameter with
different superscripts are different at P<0.05
according to |
There were no differences among treatments in E.coli counts in feces, and no evidence of parasite eggs in the intestines (Table 4).
Table 4. Fecal E. coli and parasite eggs |
||||||
|
CH0 |
CH1 |
CH1.5 |
CH2 |
SEM |
P |
E. coli (log CFU/g) |
6.46 |
6.63 |
7.02 |
6.11 |
0.37 |
0.42 |
Hookworm eggs |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
||
Whipworm eggs |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
Tapeworm eggs |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
Coccidia Oocysts |
+ |
- |
- |
- |
||
The test for antimicrobial activity showed that E. coli was susceptible to chive aqueous extracts (Table 5). The MIC of E. coli was in the range 25 -100 mg/ml (Table 4), indicating that chive extracts possess antibacterial potency.
Table 5. Minimal inhibitory concentration of chive extract on E. coli |
|
MIC (mg/ml) |
% |
25 |
10 |
50 |
50 |
100 |
40 |
This study was supported by the Sida-financed project, MEKARN II. We thank the Department of Veterinary Medicine, Agriculture and Applied Biology College, Cantho University for providing facilities and a friendly environment to work. The authors are grateful to T R Preston for advice in writing this paper.
Ademola SG, Farinu GO and Babatunde GM 2009 Serum lipid growth and haematological parameters of broilers fed garlic, ginger and their mixture. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 5(1): 99-104.
Aditya1 S, Ahammed M and Jang S H Ohh S J 2017 Effects of dietary onion (Allium cepa) extract supplementation on performance, apparent total tract retention of nutrients, blood profile and meat quality of broiler chicks. Asian-Australas Journal Animal Science Vol. 30, No. 2:229-235 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.16.0553.
AOAC 1990 Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Virginia, 15th edition.
Bautista DM, Movahed P, Hinman A, Axelsson H, Sterner O, Högestätt ED, Julius D, Jordt SE and Zygmunt P 2005 Pungent products from garlic activate the sensory ion channel TRPA1. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(34): 12248–12252.
FEEDAP 2005 Study on the assessment of plants/herbs, plant/herb extracts and their naturally or synthetically produced components as “additives” for use in animal production. CFT/EFSA/FEEDAP/2005/01. https://www.food.gov.uk/sites/default/.../acaf0816annexvi.pdf
Gonzalez M E, Anthon G E and Barrett D M 2010 Onion cells after high pressure and thermal processing: Comparison of membrane integrity changes using different analytical methods and impact on tissue texture. Journal of Food Science2010; 75:426-32.
Guo F, Kwakkel R P and Verstegen M W A 2000 The use of Chinese herbs as alternative for growth promoters in broiler diets. Proceedings of XII World’s Poult. Cong., 20-24 Aug., 2000, Montreal, Canada.
Hertrampf J W 2001 Alternative antibacterial performance promoters. Poultry International vol 40 No 1, 50-52.
Humphrey B D, Huang N and Klasing K C 2002 Rice expressing lactoferrin and Iysozyme has antibiotic-like properties when fed to chicks. Journalof Nutrition 132, 1214-1218.
Jimoh A A, Olorede B R, Abubakar A, Fabiyi J P, Ibitoye E B, Suleiman N and Garba S 2012 Lipids profile and Haematological Indices of Broiler Chickens fed Garlic (Allium sativum) - Supplemented Diets. Journal Veterinary Advances 2012, 2(10): 474-480.
Kececi O, Oguz H, Kurtoglu V, Demet Ö 1998 Effects of polyvinylpolypyrrolidone, synthetic zeolite and bentonite on serum bio- chemical and haematological characters of broiler chickens during aflatoxicosis. British Poultry Science 39: 452-458.
Rattanachaikunsopon P and Phumkhachorn P 2008 Diallyl Sulfide Content and antimicrobial activity against food-borne pathogenic bacteria of chives (Allium schoenoprasum). Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 72, 2987–2991 http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1271/bbb.80482?needAccess=true
Stajner D, Canadanovic-Brunet J and Pavlovic 2004 A. Allium schoenoprasum L., as a natural antioxidant. Phytotherapy Research 18, 522–524.
Pittman JS, Shepherd G, Thacker BJ and Myers G H 2010 Modifed technique for collecting and processing fecal material for diagnosing intestinal parasites in swine. Journal of Swine Health Prodution 2010;18(5):249–252.
Received 10 August 2017; Accepted 25 September 2017; Published 3 October 2017