Livestock Research for Rural Development 26 (4) 2014 Guide for preparation of papers LRRD Newsletter

Citation of this paper

Enzyme supplementation increases digestibility and N balance in growing pigs fed rice bran and ensiled taro foliage

Chhay Ty, Khieu Borin and T R Preston*

Center for Livestock and Agriculture Development.
Pras Teat village, Rolous commune, Kandal Stung district, Kandal province.
PO Box 2423 Phnom Penh 3, Cambodia
chhayty@celagrid.org
* Center for Research and Technology Transfer, Nong Lam University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of enzyme supplementation on digestibility and N balance in growing pigs fed fiber-rich diets based on rice bran and ensiled foliage of Taro (Colocacia esculenta). Eight crossbred (Large White x Local) castrate male pigs weighing 30.2±0.80 kg were allotted to a 2*2 factorial arrangement of four treatments in a double Latin Square. Each experimental period was of 12 days with collection of feces, urine and feed residues on the last 5 days of each period. The first factor was with or without enzyme supplementation and the second was grade of rice bran (fine or coarse). 

The fine rice bran was higher in crude protein (CP)  and lower in crude fiber (CF) than the coarse bran. Intakes of DM, taro foliage and CP were increased by enzyme supplementation on the coarse bran diet but there was no effect of enzyme in the diets with fine bran. Overall intakes were higher for fine than for coarse bran diets.   The apparent digestibilities of DM, OM, CP and CF were higher for fine rice bran diets compared with coarse rice bran. On the coarse bran diet enzyme supplementation increased the digestibiliity of DM, OM, CP and CF but had no effect in the diets based on fine rice bran.  N retention was increased by enzyme supplementation and by using fine compared with coarse rice bran.  There were no interactions among the treatments.

It was concluded that the nutritive value of rice bran-ensiled taro foliage diets for growing pigs is enhanced by supplementation with a mixed enzyme preparation and that the effect is greater on diets with higher content of crude fiber.

Key words: Taro foliage, fine rice bran, coarse rice bran, enzyme


Introduction

The main feed ingredient used by small scale farmers in Cambodia for raising pigs is rice bran, which is available throughout the country as a by-product from rice milling. It is rich in fiber and in non-starch polysaccharides (NSP) (Len et al (2007). These substances are indigestible in the small intestine but in the large intestine a variable fraction  will be fermented to short-chain fatty acids and thereby serve as a source of energy for the host (Lindberg 2014).  Lack of enzymatic capacity might be compensated for by supplementation of the diet with exogenous enzymes. The effect of using feed enzymes as supplements to pig diets has been investigated by several researchers, with promising results, as it was found that enzyme supplementation improved nutrient digestibility and growth performance, especially after weaning (Jensen et al 1998; Medel et al 2002;). Högberg and Lindberg (2004) also showed that, in weaned piglets, the supplementation of diets rich in fiber and NSP with  fibre-degrading enzymes increased organic acids in the ileum, ndicating an enhanced digestibility of fiber in the small intestine.

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of enzyme supplementation on digestibility and N balance in growing pigs fed fiber-rich diets based on rice bran and ensiled foliage of Taro (Colocacia esculenta).


Materials and Methods

Location

The experiment was carried out at the Center for Livestock and Agriculture Development (CelAgrid) located in Prah Theat village, Sangkat Rolous, Khan Dangkor, approximately 25 km from Phnom Penh city.

Treatments and design

The experimental design was a 2*2 factorial arrangement of 4 treatments within a double Latin square (Table 1).

The factors were:

The planned composition of the diets and the calculated proximate composition is shown in Table 2.

Table 1: Experimental layout
        Pigs        
  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Period Square 1 Square 2
1 FRB-Ez CRB-Ez FRB CRB FRB-Ez CRB-Ez FRB CRB
2 CRB FRB-Ez CRB-Ez FRB CRB FRB-Ez CRB-Ez FRB
3 FRB CRB FRB-Ez CRB-Ez FRB CRB FRB-Ez CRB-Ez
4 CRB-EZ FRB CRB FRB-Ez CRB-EZ FRB CRB FRB-Ez

Experimental periods were of 12 days duration: 7 days for adaptation to the new diets and 5 days for collection of feces, urine and feed residues.
Experimental feeds and feeding

Fine rice bran was purchased from a  modern rice mill, near Phom Penh city; coarse rice bran was purchased from a small rice mill in a nearby village. Taro foliage was harvested from natural ponds close to CelAgrid. Enzyme (Kemzyme V Dry) is a Malaysian product and was bought from an animal feed company in Phnom Penh, the cost of Kemzyme V Dry is 4.56$/kg. The enzyme (Kemzyme V Dry; contains Alpha amylase, Protease, Xylanase and Cellulase; © PT. Satwa Jawa Jaya, Indonesia) was used at a level of 5g/kg of the diet on DM basis. The taro foliage (leaves and stems) was chopped by hand in small pieces (about 2-3cm) and dried one-two days under sunlight in order to reduce the moisture content and then ensiled without adding any other ingredient and stored for one month before feeding to the pigs

The pigs were fed thrice daily with equal rations at 8:00 am, 12:00 am and 5:00 pm. Rice bran, salt; premix and enzyme were mixed together and offered first at levels equivalent to 20 g DM/kg body. Similar amounts of ensiled taro foliage (as DM) were then offered. Water was permanently supplied through low pressure nipples. The animals were weighed at the beginning of the trial and every 12 days.

Table 2: Ingredients in the diets and calculated composition

Ingredients, % in DM basis

FRB-Ez

CRB-Ez

FRB

CRB

Fine rice bran

49.5

0

50

0

Coarse rice bran

0

49.5

0

50

Ensiled taro foliage

49

49

49

49

Kemzyme V Dry*

0.5

0.5

0

0

Premix

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

Salt

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

Total

100

100

100

100

Calculated proximate composition in % DM

Crude protein

13.9

12.0

13.9

12.0

Organic matter

91.5

90.7

92.0

91.2

Crude fiber

28.8

31.2

28.9

31.3

* Kemzyme V Dry: Alpha amylase, Protease, Xylanase and Cellulase

Pigs and cages

Eight castrated male crossbred pigs (Large white x Local breed) of live weight 30.2±0.80 kg were housed in metabolism cages during the whole trial (48 days).

Data collection

Samples of feeds offered, refusals, urine and feces were collected every day and 5% of the amount  was stored at -40C until the end of each collection period of 5 days. A representative sample obtained from every treatment were mixed thoroughly by hand and then homogenized in a grinder for analysis of DM, OM, CP and CF. Urine was collected in a plastic bucket to which sulphuric acid was added to maintain the pH below 4.0 (20ml of concentrated H2SO4). The volume of urine was measured every day and 5% of the volume stored at -40C until the end of each period, when a sample was taken for analysis of N.

Chemical analyses

The DM content was determined by micro-wave radiation (Undersander et al 1993);  ash, CP (N*6.25) and CF were determined according to AOAC (1990). All analyses were performed in duplicate and were presented on a DM basis.

Statistical analyses

Analysis of variance was performed according to a double 4*4 Latin-square design using the general linear models of Minitab software (Minitab 2010). Sources of variation were enzyme, grade of rice bran, interaction between enzyme*grade of rice bran, animal, period and error. The model used was:

Yijkl= μ + Ei + Lj + Ei*Lj + Ak + Pl + eijkl

where Y = Dependent variable

μ = Overall mean

Ei = Enzyme effect

Lj = Rice bran grade

Ei*Lj = Interaction enzyme*rice bran grade

Ak = Animal effect

Pl = Period effect

eijkl = Random error


Results and discussion

Chemical composition

The fine rice bran was higher in CP and lower in CF than the coarse bran (Table 3). The chemical composition of the two grades of rice bran was similar to that reported by Chhay Ty et al (2009) who sieved rice bran by passing it through a plastic net with holes of 1 mm, to separate the fine and coarse particles.  The CP content of ensiled taro foliage was similar to that reported by Chhay Ty et al (2010).

Table 3: Chemical composition of feed ingredients (% DM basis except for DM which is on fresh basis)

 

Dry matter

Crude protein

Organic matter

Crude fiber

Fine rice bran

88.8±0.06

10.8±0.03

89.7±0.04

16.6±0.08

Coarse rice bran

89.0±0.11

7.22±0.03

88.1±0.02

21.4±0.10

Ensiled taro foliage

13.1±0.09

17.4±0.11

96.2±0.06

42.1±0.33

Kemzyme V Dry*

98.0

4.64

-

Premix

96.1

-

-

Salt

95.0

-

-

* Kemzyme V Dry: Alpha amylase, Protease, Xylanase and Cellulase

Feed intake

The ensiled taro foliage accounted for about 50% of the diet DM (Table 4).

Table 4: Mean values of feed intake for pigs fed with or without enzyme supplementation and two grades of rice bran with basal diet of the ensiled taro foliage

Rice bran (R)

Enzyme (E)

P -value

Ingredients on DM basis

Coarse

Fine

Without

With

SEM

R

E

Fine rice bran

0

708.5

357.6

350.9

4.16

-

-

Coarse rice bran

619

0

295

325

3.17

-

-

Ensiled taro foliage

596

669

615

650

3.37

-

-

Kemzyme

3.31

3.53

0

6.84

0.04

-

-

Premix

6.28

7.09

6.53

6.84

0.03

-

-

Salt

6.20

7.09

6.53

6.76

0.04

-

-

Total DM

1231

1395

1280

1346

6.36

<0.001

<0.001

DM, g/kg BW

37.3

43.2

39.2

41.2

0.17

<0.001

<0.001

Taro foliage, g/kg BW

18.1

20.7

18.9

19.9

0.09

<0.001

<0.001

Total CP, g/d

148.5

193.3

167.1

174.7

0.93

<0.001

<0.001

% in the diet DM as

Crude protein (N*6.25)

12.0

13.8

12.9

12.9

0.02

<0.001

0.739

Organic matter

90.9

91.7

91.5

91.1

0.02

<0.001

0.607

Crude fiber

31.2

28.6

29.9

29.9

0.05

<0.001

0.92

There were interactions between grades of rice bran and enzyme supplementation on intake (Table 5). Intake of DM, taro foliage and CP were increased by enzyme supplementation on the coarse bran diet but there was no effect in the diets with fine bran. However, overall intakes were higher for fine than for coarse bran diets.

Table 5 : Mean values of feed intake for pigs fed with or without enzyme supplementation and two grades of rice bran with basal diet of the ensiled taro foliage
  Coarse bran Fine bran    
  Without E With E Without E With E SEM P-value
Total DM 1164a 1300b 1400c 1393c 9 <0.001
DM, g/kg BW 35.5a 39.2b 43c 43.3c 0.23 <0.001
Taro foliage, g/kg BW 17.1a 19b 20.6c 20.8c 0.13 <0.001
Total CP, g/d 141a 156b 1934c 193c 1.31 <0.001
abc Means  within rows without common letter are different at P<0.05 
Fecal characteristics in pigs

The feces from the coarse rice bran diets were higher in DM and fiber and lower in nitrogen compared with those from the fine rice bran diets (Table 6). The concentration of nitrogen was lower in feces from the enzyme supplemented diets. The excretion of DM and water per unit DM intake was higher for coarse bran diets, and with tendencies to be higher in diets without enzyme supplement.

Table 6: Faecal characteristic of pigs fed with or without enzyme supplementation and two grades of rice bran with basal diet of the ensiled taro foliage

Rice bran (R)

Enzyme (E)

P-value

 

Coarse

Fine

Without

With

SEM

R

E

R*E

Feces parameter, % in DM

Dry matter

36.2

32.5

33.6

35.1

0.21

<0.001

<0.001

0.422

Organic matter

92.4

92.9

93.2

92

0.08

<0.001

<0.001

0.044

Nitrogen

1.67

2.3

2.24

1.73

0.02

<0.001

<0.001

<0.001

Crude fiber

28.3

22.3

25.9

24.7

0.34

<0.001

0.009

0.262

Fecal excretion, g/kg DM intake

Fresh material

1174

741

1256

912

29.2

<0.001

0.03

0.075

Dry matter

420

329

340

312

10.2

<0.001

0.158

0.043

Water

754

502

663

593

19.4

<0.001

0.012

0.105

Digestibility coefficients

The apparent digestibilities of DM, OM, crude protein and crude fibre were higher in fine rice bran diets compared with coarse rice bran (Table 7). These effects of dietary fiber level are well documented (Ndindana et al 2002; Giang et al 2003; Len et al 2007; Tran Thi Bich Ngoc et al 2007).

Enzyme supplementation did not affect apparent digestibility of DM)  but increased that of crude protein and crude fiber.  This result is similar to those reported by Medel et al (2002), Jensen et al (1998) and Högberg and Lindberg (2004).

Table 7: Apparent digestibility coefficients in pigs fed with or without enzyme supplementation and two grades of rice bran with ensiled taro foliage

Rice bran (R)

Enzyme (E)

P-value

 

Coarse

Fine

Without

With

SEM

R

E

Apparent digestibility, %

Dry matter

58.0

76.1

66.0

68.1

1.02

<0.001

0.159

Organic matter

57.4

75.9

65.5

67.9

1.04

<0.001

0.101

Crude protein

64.4

75.4

66.3

73.5

0.9

<0.001

<0.001

Crude fiber

62.0

81.1

70.0

73.1

0.91

<0.001

0.017

There were interactions between type of rice bran and enzyme supplementation (Table 8). On the coarse bran diet enzyme supplementation increased the digestibiliity of DM, OM, crude protein and crude fibre but had no effect in the diets based on fine rice bran. 

Table 8: Effect of enzyme (E) supplementation on digestibility coefficients in coarse and fine rice bran diets

Coarse bran

Fine bran

 

Without E

With E

Without E

With E

SEM

p

Dry matter

55.5a

60.5b

76.5c

75.6c

1.44

0.043

Organic matter

54.7a

60.2b

76.2c

75.6c

1.46

0.041

Crude protein

61.7a

67.1b

70.9c

79.9c

1.28

0.041

Crude fiber

59a

65.1b

81c

81.2c

1.29

0.025

abc Mean values within rows without common superscript differ at p<0.05

N balance

N retention was increased by enzyme supplementation and using fine compared with coarse rice bran (Table 9).  There were no interactions among the treatments 

Table 9: N balance of pigs fed with or without enzyme supplementation and two grades of rice bran with basal diet of the ensiled taro foliage

Rice bran (R)

Enzyme (E)

P-value

 

Coarse

Fine

Without

With

SEM

R

E

N balance, DM g/day

Intake

23.8

30.9

26.7

28

0.15

<0.001

<0.001

Feces

8.4

7.5

8.75

7.15

0.23

0.007

<0.001

Urine

3.83

4.21

4.16

3.87

0.13

0.04

0.116

N retention

g/day

11.5

19.2

13.8

16.9

0.33

<0.001

<0.001

% of digested N

74.4

81.3

75.3

80.4

0.89

<0.001

<0.001

% of N intake

48.3

61.7

50.5

59.5

1.08

<0.001

<0.001


Conclusions


Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the MEKARN project financed by Sida and to the Center for Livestock and Agriculture Development (CelAgrid), for providing resources for conducting this experiment.


References

AOAC 1990 Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 15th edition (K Helrick editor). Arlington pp 1230

Chhay Ty, Borin K and Preston T R 2009 Effect of processing taro foliage on growth of pigs fed two grades of rice bran. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 21, Article #200. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd21/11/chha21200.htm

Chhay T, Borin K and Preston T R 2010 Effect of Taro (Colocasia esculenta) leaf + stem silage and mulberry leaf silage on digestibility and N retention of growing pigs fed a basal diet of rice bran. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 22, Article #109. Retrieved August 22, 2012, from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd22/6/chha22109.htm

Giang H H 2003 Processing and utilization of sweet potato vines and roots for F1 crossbred fattening pigs. MSc thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.

Högberg A and Lindberg J E 2004 Influence of cereal non-starch polysaccharides and enzyme supplementation on digestion site and gut environment in weaned piglets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 116: 113-128.

Jensen M S, Bach Knudsen K E, Inborr J and Jakobsen K 1998 Effect of beta-glucanase supplementation on pancreatic enzyme activity and nutrient digestibility in piglets fed diets based on hulled and hulles barley varieties. Animal Feed Science and Technology 72: 329-345.

Len N T, Lindberg J E and Ogle B 2007 . Digestibility and nitrogen retention of diets containing different levels of fibre in local (Mong Cai), F1 (Mong Cai x Yorkshire) and exotic (Landrace x Yorkshire) growing pigs in Vietnam. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 91: 297-303.

Len N T, Hong T T T, Lindberg J E and Ogle B 2009 Comparison of total tract digestibility, development of visceral organs and digestive tract of Mong Cai and Yorkshire x Large White piglets fed diets with different fibre sources. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 93:181–191.

Lindberg J E 2014 Fiber effects in nutrition and gut health in pigs. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 5:15 http://www.jasbsci.com/content/5/1/15

Medel P, Baucells F, Gracia M I, Blas C and Mateos G G 2002 Processing of barley and enzyme supplementation in diets for young pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 95: 113-122.

MINITAB 2010 Minitab Reference Manual release 16.1.1.

Ndindana W, Dzama K, Ndiweni P N B, Maswaure S M and Chimonyo M 2002 Digestibility of high fibre diets and performance of growing Zimbabwean indigenous Mukota pigs and exotic Large White pigs fed maize based diets with graded levels of maize cobs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 97: 199-208.

Tran Thi Bich Ngoc, Ninh Thi Len and Ogle B 2007 Ileal and total tract digestibility in local (Mong Cai) and exotic (Landrace x Yorkshire) piglets fed low and high fibre diets, with or without enzyme supplementation. MSc Thesis, MEKARN-SLU

Tran Thi Bich Ngoc, Ninh Thi Len, Ogle B and Lindberg J E 2011 Influence of particle size and multi-enzyme supplementation of fibrous diets on total tract digestibility and performance of weaning and growing pigs. Animal Feed Science Technology 2011, 169:86–95.

Undersander D, Mertens D R and Theix N 1993 Forage analysis procedures. National Forage Testing Association. Omaha pp 154


Received 11 March 2013; Accepted 10 March 2014; Published 5 April 2014

Go to top