Livestock Research for Rural Development 26 (12) 2014 Guide for preparation of papers LRRD Newsletter

Citation of this paper

Assessment of nutritional status of cattle in Rwanda: A case of Huye District

K Nishimwe, P Sserumaga, R Manishimwe, M Byukusenge, R Habimana and F Bareba1

School of Veterinary Medicine - College of Agriculture, Animal Sciences and Veterinary Medicine,
University of Rwanda, PO Box 57 Nyagatare, Rwanda
kiziton2000@yahoo.fr
1 School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Resources - College of Veterinary Medicine Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Uganda

Abstract

Animal feeding is a major factor in the success of cattle farming especially in Rwanda where livestock remains a pillar of the national economy. The study was designed to assess the nutritional status of cattle in the District of Huye through biochemical parameters that can be measured. We conducted the study during the period of June until August 2012.

 Glucose, total protein, calcium, urea and cholesterol were measured in a sample of 100 cattle randomly selected in the said District. The energy parameters (glucose and cholesterol) showed values ​​in the range of physiological values ​​considered with 2.83 + 0.53 mmol /l and 2.21+ 1.15 mmol /l respectively. Regarding the nitrogen parameters (urea and total protein), the study showed they were below physiological values of 2.55 + 1.63 mmol /l for urea and 44.61 + 17.39 g /l for total protein. The only mineral parameter measured (calcium) showed no change over the physiological range, with 2.4 + 0.87 mmol /l. In conclusion, this situation reflects the state of undernourishment in the study area which can be detrimental to productivity and health of cattle.

Key words: calcium, cholesterol, cow, glucose, nitrogen, pregnancy rate, protein


Introduction

Agriculture and livestock keeping represent the main activity of the rural population in Rwanda. The cattle represent the largest percentage of livestock (NSIR 2013) and constitute a source of protein and revenue for the population. Many programmmes to improve the cattle breeds have been initiated by the Rwandan government to optimize the production, in order to fight against poverty, malnutrition and providing manure (Minagri 2014).

Despite all efforts, the livestock sector is lagging behind because it is essentially based on a herd consisting largely of local indigenous breeds with weak growth performance (Asizua et al 2009). The productivity of indigenous cattle is low as a result of poor genetic potential, poor management practices, harsh environmental conditions, nutritional inadequacies, and diseases (Obese et al 2013, Wakhungu et al 2006, Bishop and Pfeiffer 2008).

The other major obstacle to the development and intensification of animal production in developing countries is an inadequate feed supply (Westhuizen et al 2004), aggravated by the partial and imperfect knowledge of certain physiological norms of animals (Habtamu et al 2010).

Diet is a major factor of success or failure in reproduction because it provides the cow all the energy, protein and minerals needed to meet its maintenance needs during gestation and production (Obese et al 2013).

Like in other regions of Africa, the principal source of feeds is pasture with feed supplementation often limiting in quality and quantity (Ocen 1999) that result into poor body condition, weight loss, low milk yield and perturbation of resumption of ovarian cycle (Damptey et al 2014 ).

There is a real need to assess the nutritional status of these indigenous cattle. Some blood metabolite can be used as indicators of health status (Ndlovu et al 2007, Ate et al 2009, Gwaze et al 2010). Blood glucose, α_-hydroxy butyrate, non-esterified fatty acids and cholesterol are indicators of energy status. Total proteins and urea can be also used for measuring protein status in cattle on different feeding regimes and seasons while calcium, phosphorus and magnesium have a high diagnostic value in determining the nutritional status of animals due to their low variability in blood (Ndlovu et al 2007).

Measurement of these parameters provide a practical diagnostic tool for evaluating pathological conditions in live animals or for monitoring the health status of animals (Verheyen et al 2007).

This study aims at investigating the influence of age, lactation and gestation on nutritional status of cattle in Huye District, a rural area, located in the Southern province of Rwanda using blood variables as indicators for nutritional status of grazing cattle.

The determination of these blood metabolites could then provide an understanding of the impact of nutritional status on health status, and thus guide in the development of management strategies for livestock production improvement.


Methodology

The District of Huye is one of eight Districts in the Southern Province of Rwanda. It is composed of fourteen sectors with approximately 265,446 inhabitants in an area of 581.5 Km2. The cattle population increased from 3,700 in 2004 to about 60,000 heads in 2007 as a result of the "One cow per poor family one" programme. The semi-intensive system is predominating in which the use of agricultural and forage crops products is important. There are also some intensive farms where animals are kept in pens and also benefit from the forage at will and concentrate. (Monographie de Huye 2007).

The study included 100 cows selected randomly from the eight sectors of the District including 39 local breeds and 61 cross breeds. Fourteen cows were pregnant while 86 were not during the period of June until August 2012. Young were cows considered as those who have less than 18 months and adults, more than 18 months.

The blood sample was taken by puncture either at the jugular vein or on the caudal vein after confining the animal and disinfection at the place of sampling.

The collected blood was put in an icebox while waiting to be transported to the laboratory at ISAE-Busogo. Once in the laboratory, the blood was centrifuged at 3500 rev / min for 15 minutes and then decanted serum was collected using a pasteur pipette and placed in hemolysis tubes and stored frozen at -80 ° C until at the time of analysis. The kits used in all dosages obtained from ROCHE COMPANY ND. The analyses were performed according to Lambert-Beer's law and the resulting colouration was measured by spectrophotometry.

Pregnancy was diagnosed by rectal palpation after 3 months of gestation by the veterinarian of the district.

All the collected data were recorded and processed in SPSS 15.0 for the statistical analysis of the results. The test of Pearson Chi Square was used to find statistical significance of differences (P<0.05). The reference values ​​used in this work were reported by Sawadogo (1998).


Results

The general nutritional status

The general nutritional status as shown in Table 1 demonstrates that urea and total protein were below the physiological value considered while cholesterol, blood glucose and calcium are within the reference standards used.

Table 1 : The nutritional status of all cattle sampled

Blood component

Average

Reference values
(Sawadogo 1998)

Urea

Total Proteins

Cholesterol

Glucose

Calcium

2.55 + 1.63 mmol/l

44.6 + 17.4 g/l

2.21 + 1.15 mmol/l

2.83 + 0.53 mmol/l

2.4 + 0.87 mmol/l

3.8 – 6.5 mmol/l

59.5 – 80 g/l

2.3 – 6 mmol/l

2.6 – 4.9 mmol/l

2.22 – 2.7 mmol/l

Nutritional status and gestation

Table 2 shows the number of pregnant and non-pregnant animals (including young cows) and the metabolites whether the level is below, within or above the range of the reference value considered. P compares the number of pregnant and non-pregnant between low, normal and high for each category of parameter.

Table 2 : the influence of nutritional status on gestation of all animals

Parameter

Pregnant

Non Pregnant

p

Urea

Low (< 3.8 mmol/l )

11

65

0.92

Normal(3.8-6.51 mmol/l )

3

21

Total

14

86

Cholesterol

Low (< 2.3 mmol/l)

8

53

0.98

Normal (2.3-6 mmol/l)

6

33

Total

14

86

Glucose

Low (<2.6 mmol/l)

4

41

0.001

Normal (2.6-4,9 mmol/l)

8

45

High (>4.9 mmol/l)

2

0c

Total

14

86

Total
proteins

low (<59.5 g/l)

9

66

0.50

Normal (59.5-80 g/l)

5

20

Total

14

86

Calcium

Low (<2.22 mmol/l)

5

31

0.94

Normal (2.22-2.7 mmol/l)

4

28

High (>2.7 mmol/l)

5

27

Total

14

86

Nutritional status and lactation

The number of animals depending on the number of lactation and the corresponding levels of metabolites are shown in Table 3.Three categories of lactation number were chosen with 0 (no milk), 1 (first lactation), 2 (second lactation) and 3 (third lactation and older). P compares the number of lactation between low, normal and high for each category of parameter.

Table 3 : The influence of nutritional status on number of lactation

Parameter

Number of lactation

Total

p

   

1

2

3

4

   

Urea

Low (< 3.8 mmol/l )

39

24

9

4

76

0.21

Normal (3.8-6.51 mmol/l )

18

3

2

1

22

Total

57

27

11

5

100

Cholesterol

Low( < 2.3 mmol/l)

43

11

6

1

61

0.004

Normal (2.3-6 mmol/l)

14

16

5

4

39

Total

57

27

11

5

100

Glucose

Low (<2.6 mmol/l)

25

14

5

1

45

0.14

Normal (2.6-4.9 mmol/l)

32

13

6

4

55

Total

57

27

11

5

100

Total
protein

Low ( <59.5 g/l)

48

19

6

2

75

0.04

Normal (59.5-80 g/l)

9

8

5

3

25

Total

57

27

11

5

100

Calcium

Low (<2.22 mmol/l)

23

10

3

0

36

0.54

Normal (2.22-2.7 mmol/l)

19

8

3

2

32

High (>2.7 mmol/l)

15

9

5

3

32

Total

57

27

11

5

100

Nutritional status and age

Table 4 the nutritional status as affected by age. P compares the age of cow (+/- 18 months) between low, normal and high for each category of the parameters measured.

Table 4 : the influence of the nutritional status on the age of animal

Age

Total

p

   

<18 months

>18 months

   

Urea

Low (<3.80 mmol/l )

17

59

76

0.11

Normal (3.8-6.51 mmol/l )

10

14

24

Total

27

73

100

Cholesterol

Low (< 2.3 mmol/l)

19

42

61

0.09

Normal (2.3-6 mmol/l)

8

31

39

Total

27

73

100

Glucose

Low (<2.6 mmol/l)

8

37

45

0.09

Normal (2.6-4.9 mmol/l)

19

36

55

Total

27

73

100

Total protein

Low( <59.5 g/l)

23

52

75

0.33

Normal (59.5 – 80 g/l)

4

20

24

High (>80 g/l)

0

1

1

Total

27

73

100

Calcium

Low (<2.22 mmol/l)

10

26

36

0.95

Normal(2.22-2.7 mmol/l)

8

24

32

High (>2.7 mmol/l)

9

23

32

Total

27

73

100


Discussion

Energy status

Glucose is an essential molecule, providing energy for cellular metabolism and milk production (Vagneur 1992). Cattle derive their energy needs from volatile fatty acids produced as a result of microbial fermentation in the rumen. The mean glucose of all the analyzed samples was 2.83 + 0.53 mmol / l (Table 1) and it was within the range of the reference value considered (2.6 to 4.9 mmol / l) as reported by Sawadogo (1998). In pregnant cows, the average blood glucose was comparable to that found by other authors (Mouliom et al 2013 and Amahoro 2005) but lower than that obtained by Sawadogo(1998). This is due probably to the increasing glucose utilization by developing fetus (Miettinen 1991). The cholesterol reflects the capacity of the animal to mobilize body fat reserves (Miettinen 1991). The reference values considered are between 2.3 to 6 mmol/l (Sawadogo 1998). In this study, there was hypocholesterolemia (with a mean of 2.21 + 15 mmol/l) in all animals sampled. According to some authors (Ndlovu et al 2007, Bergman 1990, Adamu et al 2008) there is a relationship between the level of total cholesterol in the blood and the energy deficit (Vagneur 1992). This state of generalized hypocholesterolemia in this study could be explained by a reduced nutrient intake (Rosenberger 1979). The same situation can be further explained largely by the investigation period which was from June to August characterized by a dry season with little or no-concentrate supplementation. During this period, pasture, the only food source available, is often deficient in many nutrients. The low nutrient content of tropical forages limits the growth of heifers and delays puberty compared to heifers receiving 100% of the recommended protein intake (Kaur and Arora 1995).

Nitrogen status

Blood urea nitrogen is the best biochemical parameter to monitor the nitrogen nutritional status (Moubi 2004). The concentration of urea is a specific and sensitive indicator of the nitrogen as it varies instantaneously regardless of the physiological state of the animal (Manston et al 1975). The mean urea was 2.55 + 1.63 mmol /l in all the samples analyzed (Table 1), less than 3.08- 6.5 mmol/l of the reference values considered (Sawadogo, 1998). This hypo-uremia is also indicative of the investigation period characterized by dryness and lack of food availability. The values of crude protein in grasses decrease from on average 90-110 g crude protein/kg of grasses to 40-50g/kg during the dry season (Kamalzadeh et al 2009).

The mean total protein in our study was 44.61 + 17.39 g/l (Table 1), which is below the physiological limit considered (59.5 to 80 g/l) (Sawadogo 1998). The total protein is dependent on the values of albumin and total globulins. It will therefore be low or high depending on the concentrations of these two parameters. Unfortunately, albumin could not be assayed during this study.

Kanyandekwe (2005) noted a positive correlation between ketosis and significant hypo globulinemia reflecting a reduced immunity in ketotic cows. Other authors have found that clinical ketosis is associated with depressed immunity in animals (Weaver 1987). With the hypo proteinemia noted during this study, this would mean that animals sampled had probably immune deficiency.

Mineral status

Calcium is a component of the skeleton and cofactor of many enzymes; it is also involved in muscle contractility. It allows the transmission of nerve impulses. Calcium concentrations from this study indicate an average of 2.40 + 0.52 mmol/l for all animals sampled (Table 1). These average values for calcium are consistent with those of other authors (Ndlovu et al 2007, Rosenberger 1979). Calcium is one of the constituents of the body that is subject to homeostasis; and the existence of bone calcium reserves explains the late onset of signs of calcium deficiency. The results of the study (36.8 % of cows had hypocalcemia) are consistent with those of Habumuremyi study (2007) who found that 34% of cows had hypocalcemia.

Nutritional status and state of pregnancy

The parameters that are subjected to homeostasis (glucose and calcium) did not show a significant difference between pregnant and non-pregnant cows (Table 2). Nevertheless, the observed energy deficit leads to reduced steroidogenesis, and thus a reduction in circulating levels of progesterone and estrogen, causing impaired reproductive performance (Beam and Buttler 1997, Villa-godoy et al 1988). Nitrogen deficits occurring in early gestation penalize the survival of the embryo and fetal development due to a deficiency of essential amino acids (Kaur and Arora 1995).

Nutritional status and lactation

The survey showed that the majority of samples were young animals (57%) compared 43% who were lactating with 27% in first lactation. This confirms a dietary deficiency discussed above and which has many implications for the reproductive performance of cows. However, an overall protein deficiency delays the onset of first estrus and first postpartum ovulation and decreases the insemination success rate (Paragon 1991), plus a predisposition to metabolic diseases due to negative energy balance. In cows with negative energy balance, only 16.7% of first ovulations are accompanied by manifestations of estrus, against 60% for cows in positive balance (Spicer et al 1990).

Nutritional status and age

Both young and adult animals had a situation of reduced nutrient intake. A poor diet, particularly a diet deficient in energy causes growth retardation in heifers because the onset of puberty is strongly linked with body weight, rather than age. Nitrogen deficiency during the growth of heifers results in a low average daily gain (ADG) and a later puberty. In addition, a post-pubertal weight loss substantially affects conception rates (Paragon 1991).


Conclusion


References

Adamu S, Ige A A, Jatau I D, Neils J S, Useh N M, Bisalla M, Ibrahim N D G, Nok A J, and Esievo K A N 2008 Changes in the serum profiles of lipids and cholesterol in sheep experimental model of acute African trypanosomosis. African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 7 (12): 2090-2098,

Amahoro E 2005 Contribution à l’étude du profil métabolique des vaches laitières dans les fermes laitières intensives periurbaines de Dakar (Cas des fermes de Wayembam et de niacourab). Thèse :Méd. Vét. Dakar ; 35

Asizua D, Mpairwe D, Kabi F, Mutetikka D and Madsen J 2009 Growth and slaughter characteristics of Ankole cattle and its Boran and Friesian crossbreds. South African Journal of Animal Science, Vol. 39, (Supplement 1): 81-85

Ate I U, Rekwot P I, Nok A J and Tekdek L B 2009 Serum electrolyte values of cows during third trimester of pregnancy and early lactation in settled cattle herds in Zaria, Northern Nigeria . African Journal of Biomedical Research. Vol. 12:125-130

Beam S W and Buttler W R 1997 Energy balance and ovarian follicle development prior to the first ovulation post-partum in dairy cows receiving three levels of dietary fat. Biology of Reproduction 56, 133-142.

Bergman E N 1990 Energy contributions of volatile fatty acids from the gastrointestinal tract in various species. Physiological Reviews. Volume 70(2):567-90.

Bishop and Pfeiffer 2008 Factors effecting reproductive performance in Rwandan cattle. Tropical Animal Health and Production. Volume 40(3): 181-4

Damptey J K, Obese F Y, Aboagye G S, Ayim-Akonor M and Ayizanga R A 2014 Blood metabolite concentrations and postpartum resumption of ovarian cyclicity in Sanga cows. South African Journal of Animal Science. Vol. 44, No 1: 10-17

Gwaze F R, Chimonyo M and Dzama K 2010 Relationship between Nutritionally-related Blood Metabolites and Gastrointestinal Parasites in Nguni Goats of South Africa. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science.Vol. 23, No. 9 : 1190 – 1197

Habtamu L, Kelay B, and Sheferaw D 2010 Study on the reproductive performance of Jersey cows at Wolaita Sodo dairy farm, Southern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Veterinary Journal. 14 (3) 53-70

Habumuremyi S 2007 Evaluation des déficiences minérales dans les élevages bovins en périphérie de la ville de Bobo-Dioulasso, au Burkina-Faso. Thèse: Médecine. Vétérinaire.: Dakar; N°43

Kamalzadeh A, Koops W J and Kiasat A 2009 Effect of qualitative feed restriction on energy metabolism and nitrogen retention in sheep. South African Journal of Animal Science 2009, 39 (1) 30-38

Kanyandekwe C 2005 Relation entre la cétose et les marqueurs biochimiques dans le sang chez les vaches laitières en production intensive dans les fermes de Wayembam et Niacourab. Thèse :Médecine.Vétérinaire: Dakar ;N°34

Kaur H and Arora S P 1995 Dietary effects on ruminant livestock reproduction with particular reference to protein. Nutrition Research Reviews. 8, 121-136.

Miettinen P V 1991 Correlation between energy balance and fertility in Finnish dairy cows. Acta. Veterinaria Scandinavica. 32, 189-196.

Minagri (Ministère de l’agriculture et de l’elevage) 2008 One Cow per Poor Family Pro-gram “GIRINKA”. Retrieved July 7, 2014 http://www.minagri.gov.rw/index.php?id=28

Monographie du district de Huye., 2007 Imihigo y’akarere y’ umwaka 2006. HUYE (Rwanda) : 22 pages, Retrieved March 3, 2013 from http://www.huye.gov.rw/uploads/media/imihigo_2006_01.pdf

Moubi B M 2004 : Contribution à la connaissance de la fertilité des vaches Holstein et métisses au Sénégal: Cas de la ferme de Niacoulrab. Thèse: Médecine Vétérinaire.: Dakar; 15 : 93 pages

Mouliom M M, Sow A, Kalandi M, Mpouam S E, Ouedraogo G A and Sawadogo G J 2013 : Analyse du profil protéique chez des vaches zébus Gobra artificiellement inséminées au Sénégal. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences. 7(2): 780-789

Ndlovu T, Chimonyo M, Okoh A I, Muchenje V, Dzama K and Raats J G 2007: Assessing the nutritional status of beef cattle: current practices and future prospects. African Journal of Biotechnology. Volume 6 : 2727-2734

NSIR: National Statistical Institute of Rwanda 2013: Statistical Year Book, Retrieved June 1, 2013 from http://www.statistics.gov.rw/publications/statistical-yearbook-2013

Obese F Y, Acheampong D A and Darfour-Oduro K A 2013 : Growth and reproductive traits of Friesian x Sanga crossbred cattle in the Accra plains of Ghana. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development. Volume 13

Ocen G W 1999: Feeding strategies for sustainable cattle production on Swazi nation land. UNISWA Journal of Agriculture. Volume 8:31-38

Paragon B M 1991 : Qualité alimentaire et fécondité chez la génisse et la vache adulte : importance des nutriments non énergétiques. Bulletin des GTV (Groupements Techniques Vétérinaires) 91, 39-52

Rosenberger G 1979 : Examen clinique des bovins.― Maison Alfort : Edit. du Point vétérinaire.― 526p.

Sawadogo G J 1998 : Contribution à l’étude des conséquences nutritionnelles sub -sahéliennes sur la biologie du Gobra au Sénégal. Thèse Doctorat Institut National Polytechnique, Toulouse

Spicer L J, Tucker W B and Adams G D 1990 : Insulin-like growth factor I in dairy cows: relationship among energy balance, body condition, ovarian activity, and estrus behavior. J. Dairy Sci. 73, 929-937.

Vagneur M 1992: Biochimie de la vache laitière. Supplément technique de la dépêche vétérinaire. 28 :33p

Verheyen A J M, Maes D G D, Mateusen B, Deprez P, Janssens G P J, de Lange L and Counotte G 2007 : Serum biochemical reference values for gestating and lactating sows. The Veterinary Journal, 174, 92 – 98.

Villa-godoy A, Hughes T L and Emery R S 1988 : Association between energy balance and luteal function in lactating dairy cows. Journal Dairy Science.71, 1063-1072.

Wakhungu J W, Badamana M S and Olukoye G A 2006 : Productivity of Indigenous and Exotic Cattle on Kenya Ranches. The Kenya Veterinarian. Volume 30 (1) : 28-34

Weaver L D 1987: Effects of nutrition on reproduction in dairy cows. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice. 3, 513-521.

Westhuizen R R, Westhuizen J and Schoeman S J 2004 : Genetic relationship between feed efficiency and profitability traits in beef cattle. South African Journal of Animal Science. Vol. 34 (Supplement 2): 50-52


Received 17 October 2014; Accepted 16 November 2014; Published 1 December 2014

Go to top