Livestock Research for Rural Development 24 (2) 2012 | Guide for preparation of papers | LRRD Newsletter | Citation of this paper |
Two experiments were carried out to study effects of processing of cassava leaves on the solubility of the protein and on methane production when they were incubated with cassava root meal in an in vitro incubation with urea or potassium nitrate as source of NPN.
Experiment 1: The treatments in a 2*4 factorial arrangement in a randomized block design were: leaves or petioles of cassava, and form of processing (fresh, ensiled, sun-dried and oven-dried). Protein solubility was decreased by ensiling and with the severity of drying.
Experiment 2: The treatments in a 2*4 factorial arrangement in a randomized block design were: form of processing cassava leaves (fresh, ensiled, sun-dried and oven-dried) and source of NPN (urea or potassium nitrate). An in vitro incubation system was used to determine the effects of the treatments on methane production and substrate fermentation. The quantity of substrate was 12g DM to which was added 240 ml rumen fluid (from slaughtered buffalo) and 960 ml of buffer solution. The incubation was for 12 and 24h with measurements of gas production, percent methane, substrate fermented and methane produced per unit substrate fermented.
The gas production and methane percentage in the gas were increased with incubation time. The percentage of methane in the gas, and methane per unit substrate fermented were reduced when nitrate replaced urea as the NPN source and were lower for fresh and ensiled cassava leaves than for dried leaves at both 12 and 24h of incubation. Methane produced per unit of fermented DM was inversely related to protein solubility.
Key words: Climate change, gas production, greenhouse gases, hydrogen cyanide
Cassava is currently the third most important crop in Laos, after rice and maize. It is widely grown throughout the country by upland farmers but in small areas using local varieties and with very few inputs (CIAT 2001). The potential use of cassava foliage as an animal feed has been studied and described by several authors. Phuc et al (2001) investigated the use of cassava foliage as a feed for pigs and poultry. Ffoulkes and Preston (1978) reported the feeding of fresh cassava foliage as the only source of roughage and protein in diets for cattle based on molasses-urea. Van et al (2001) and Khang (2004) described the use of foliage of cassava as a protein source for small ruminants and cattle. The potential of cassava foliage as a protein source in ruminant feeds has not been fully exploited, probably because of the risk of toxicity resulting from the content of precursors of hydrogen cyanide (Wanapat 2001). However, it is known that the capacity to liberate HCN from cassava foliage is reduced by processing such as sun drying or ensiling (Khieu Borin et al 2005; Phengvichith and Ledin 2007).The role of cyanide as inhibitor of methanogenesis in sludge fermentation has been discussed by Gijzen et al (2000); Eikmanns and Thauer (1984); Smith et al (1985) and Cuzin and Labat (1992).
Cassava leaves are known to contain variable levels of condensed tannins; about 3% in DM according to Netpana et al (2001) and Bui Phan Thu Hang and Ledin (2005). Condensed tannins at moderate levels are known to have positive effects on the nutritive value of the feed by forming insoluble complexes with dietary protein, resulting in "escape" of the protein from the rumen fermentation (Barry and McNabb 1999). Numerous studies have also shown the potential of the tannin content in cassava leaves to play an anthelminthic role for the control of nematode parasites in ruminants (Seng Sokerya and Preston 2003; Neptpana et al, 2001; Khoung and Khang 2005). Condensed tannins (CT) are also reported to decrease methane production and increase the efficiency of microbial protein synthesis (Makkar et al 1995; Grainger et al 2009). Reductions of CH4 production by 13 to 16% were reported by Carulla et al (2005), Waghorn et al (2002), Grainger et al (2009) and Woodward et al (2004), apparently through a direct toxic effect on methanogens.
In a recent study, Ho Quang Do et al (2010, unpublished data) showed major effects of protein solubility on methane production in an in vitro incubation. Methane production was reduced by almost 50% when the protein source was fish meal (protein solubility 16.6%) compared with groundnut (protein solubility 76.2%) when sodium nitrate was the source of NPN and was 25% less when urea was the source of NPN.
The purpose of the present study was to determine the possible relationship between the solubility of the protein in cassava foliage and how this might affect methane production in an in vitro incubation, in which the NPN source was either potassium nitrate or urea.
It was hypothesized that the solubility of the protein in cassava leaves would be reduced by drying and that this would result in a reduced production of methane in an in vitro incubation with cassava root meal as energy source and potassium nitrate or urea as source of NPN.
The experiment was conducted in the laboratory of the Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Forest Resources, Souphanouvong University, Luang Prabang province, Lao PDR, from September to October 2011.
The experimental design was arranged as a random block design with a 2*4 factorial arrangement of the following treatments:
· Leaves
· Petioles
· Fresh
· Ensiled
· Sun-dried
· Oven-dried
Cassava foliage was collected from the Souphanouvong University campus. The samples were collected in the morning and immediately put into sealed plastic bags to avoid moisture loss.
Leaves and petioles were separated and chopped into small pieces around 0.5-1.0cm of the length and then ground through a 1mm sieve. Part of the material was sun-dried for 24h. Another part was dried in the oven for 24h at 80°C. For the ensiling treatment, the material was put in sealed plastic bags, and the air removed prior to storage at room temperature for 14 days.
Protein solubility was measured by weighing 3 g of samples (DM basis), followed by liquidizing and shaking in 100 ml of M NaCl for 3h. The suspension was then filtered through Whatman No. 4 filter paper and washed 3 times with distilled water. All the filtrate was then transferred to a kjeldahl flask for digestion, distillation and titration according to AOAC (1990). Protein solubility was calculated as the N content of the filtrate as a percentage of the N in the original sample.
Photo 1. The shaking |
Photo 2. The filtering |
Photo 3. The digestion |
Photo 4. The distillation |
Data were analyzed by the General Linear Model option in the ANOVA program of the Minitab software (Minitab 2000). Sources of variation in the model were: plant part, processing and interaction plant part*process and error.
The experiment was arranged as a 2*4 factorial of the following treatments in a random block design:
· Urea
· Potassium nitrate
· Fresh
· Ensiled
· Sun-dried
· Oven-dried
The basal substrate was cassava root meal.
Table 1. Ingredients in the substrate, g |
||||||||
|
FCL-U |
SCL-U |
OCL-U |
ECL-U |
FCL-KN |
SCL-KN |
OCL-KN |
ECL-KN |
Cassava root meal |
8.76 |
8.76 |
8.76 |
8.76 |
8.28 |
8.28 |
8.28 |
8.28 |
Fresh cassava leaf |
3.00 |
3.00 |
||||||
Ensiled cassava leaf |
|
|
|
3.00 |
|
|
|
3.00 |
Sun-dried cassava leaf |
3.00 |
3.00 |
||||||
Oven-dried cassava leaf |
3.00 |
3.00 |
||||||
Urea |
0.24 |
0.24 |
0.24 |
0.24 |
||||
KNO3 |
0.72 |
0.72 |
0.72 |
0.72 |
||||
Total |
12.0 |
12.0 |
12.0 |
12.0 |
12.0 |
12.0 |
12.0 |
12.0 |
The equipment and procedure was that used by Sangkhom Inthapanya et al (2011) (Photos 5 and 6).
Photo 5. The in vitro system | Photo 6. Gas production after fermentation |
The leaves of cassava were chopped into small pieces of around 0.5-1.0 cm of length), then ground (1mm sieve). They were mixed with cassava root meal and either potassium nitrate or urea (Table 1) prior to adding 0.96 liters of buffer solution (Table 2) and 240 ml of rumen fluid (obtained from a newly slaughtered buffalo in the village abattoir), and put in the incubation bottle which was then gassed with carbon dioxide. The bottles were incubated at 38 0C in a water bath for 12 and 24 h.
Table 2. Ingredients of the buffer solution |
|||||||
Ingredients |
CaCl2 |
NaHPO4.12H2O |
NaCl |
KCl |
MgSO4.7H2O |
NaHCO3 |
Cysteine |
(g/liter) |
0.04 |
9.30 |
0.47 |
0.57 |
0.12 |
9.80 |
0.25 |
Source: Tilly and Terry (1963) |
The gas volume and the percentage of methane in the gas (Crowcon infra-red analyser; Crowcon Instruments Ltd, UK) were recorded for the separate incubations after 12 and 24h. At the end of each incubation the residual DM in the incubation bottle was determined by filtering through cloth and drying (100°C for 24h) the residue.
The data were analyzed by the General Linear Model (GLM) option in the ANOVA program of the Minitab (2000) Software. Sources of variation in the model were: NPN source, leaves of cassava, interaction NPN*leaves and error.
On all processing treatments, the petioles had lower content of DM and of crude protein in the DM (Table 3).
Table 3. Dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP) in the diets |
||
|
DM, % |
CP in DM, % |
Fresh cassava |
||
Leaves |
31.8 |
23.4 |
Petioles |
25.8 |
16.8 |
Ensiled cassava |
||
Leaves |
28.2 |
21.2 |
Petioles |
17.6 |
15.9 |
Sun-dried cassava |
||
Leaves |
66.7 |
21.9 |
Petioles |
54.1 |
15.6 |
Oven-dried cassava |
|
|
Leaves |
92.6 |
21.6 |
Petioles |
85.2 |
16.0 |
The protein solubility decreased in the order: fresh, ensiled, sun-dried and oven-dried processing (Table 4; Figure 1). Petioles had lower values than leaves.
Table 4. Mean values of protein solubility of cassava leaves and petioles subjected to different forms of processing |
||||||
|
Fresh |
Ensiled |
Sun-dried |
Oven-dried |
SEM |
Prob. |
Leaves |
33.1 |
31.6 |
29.9 |
29.4 |
1.26 |
<0.001 |
Petioles |
25.2 |
21.1 |
22.0 |
21.0 |
1.26 |
<0.001 |
Figure 1. Protein solubility in leaves and petioles of cassava |
Gas production, per cent methane in the gas, substrate fermented and methane produced per unit substrate fermented were higher for 24 than 12h incubations and lower for nitrate than for urea (Figures 2-9).
Gas production was lower for fresh leaves than for ensiled or dried leaves when urea was the NPN source, but with no differences for processing with nitrate as NPN. Per cent methane in the gas was lower for fresh and ensiled leaves compared with dried leaves at 12h with a similar but less marked tendency for the 24 h incubation. The proportion of substrate fermented was higher for fresh and ensiled leaves compared with dried leaves for both nitrate and urea supplements and for both times of incubation. Methane produced per unit substrate fermented was lower for fresh and ensiled leaves than for dried leaves at both12 and 24h incubation, the differences being more marked for the shorter incubation time.
Table 5. Mean values of gas production, methane percentage in the gas, substrate solubilized and methane per substrate solubilzed according to process of cassava leaves and NPN source |
|
|||||||||
|
FCL |
ECL |
SCL |
OCL |
Prob. |
KNO3 |
Urea |
Prob. |
SEM# |
|
0-12 hours |
|
|||||||||
Gas production, ml |
744 |
938 |
1013 |
988 |
<0.001 |
669 |
1172 |
<0.001 |
28/20 |
|
Methane, % |
12 |
11 |
14 |
15 |
<0.001 |
12 |
14 |
<0.001 |
0.46/0.32 |
|
Methane, ml |
91.6 |
109 |
140 |
152 |
<0.001 |
78.2 |
168 |
<0.001 |
5.0/3.5 |
|
Digested, % |
49.7 |
51.6 |
45.1 |
45.1 |
<0.001 |
39.9 |
55.8 |
<0.001 |
0.90/0.64 |
|
Methane, ml/g substrate fermented |
15.7 |
17.7 |
25.9 |
28.1 |
<0.001 |
17.7 |
26.0 |
<0.001 |
1.1/0.77 |
|
0-24 hours |
|
|||||||||
Gas production, ml |
1075 |
1188 |
1138 |
1163 |
0.326 |
847 |
1434 |
<0.001 |
43/31 |
|
Methane, % |
16 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
<0.001 |
15 |
18 |
<0.001 |
0.36/0.25 |
|
Methane, ml |
170 |
194 |
193 |
213 |
<0.001 |
127 |
258 |
<0.001 |
7.8/5.5 |
|
Digested, % |
56.7 |
59.1 |
54.4 |
50.5 |
<0.001 |
46.7 |
63.7 |
<0.001 |
1.8/1.3 |
|
Methane, ml/g substrate fermented |
25.5 |
27.4 |
30.3 |
35.6 |
<0.001 |
24.8 |
34.5 |
<0.001 |
1.2/0.88 |
|
FCL: Fresh leaves;
ECL: Ensiled leaves; SCL: Sun-dried leaves; OCL: Oven-dried leaves
|
|
Figure 2. Effect of NPN source on gas production for 12h incubation time with fresh, ensiled, sun-dried and oven-dried cassava leaves | Figure 3. Effect of NPN source on gas production for 24h incubation time with fresh, ensiled, sun-dried and oven-dried cassava leaves |
Figure 4. Effect of NPN source on methane per cent in the gas for 12h incubation time with fresh, ensiled, sun-dried and oven-dried cassava leaves | Figure 5. Effect of NPN source on methane per cent in the gas for 24h incubation time with fresh, ensiled, sun-dried and oven-dried cassava leaves |
Figure 6. Effect of NPN source on substrate fermented for 12h incubation time with fresh, ensiled, sun-dried and oven-dried cassava leaves | Figure 7. Effect of NPN source on substrate fermented for 24h incubation time with fresh, ensiled, sun-dried and oven-dried cassava leaves |
Figure 8. Effect of NPN source on methane per unit substrate fermented for 12h incubation time with fresh, ensiled, sun-dried and oven-dried cassava leaves | Figure 9. Effect of NPN source on methane per unit substrate fermented for 24h incubation time with fresh, ensiled, sun-dried and oven-dried cassava leaves |
The higher methane production per unit of dry matter digested in dried cassava leaves compared with fresh and ensiled indicates that treatments that reduce cyanide concentrations (eg: sun or oven-drying) increase the amount of methane produced, which may be explained if cyanide inhibits the metabolism of acetate to methane and carbon dioxide as happens in sludge type fermentations (Gijzen et al 2000; Eikmanns and Thauer 1984; Smith et al 1985 and Cuzin and Labat 1992).
The original hypothesis that decreasing protein solubility would reduce methane production was disproved as the contrary effect was observed (Figure 10). It would appear that the effects of drying on cyanide release potential were more important than the slight differences in protein solubility brought about by drying.
Figure 10. Apparent relationship between protein solubility in cassava leaves and production of methane per unit substrate fermented |
The percentage of methane in the gas and quantity of methane produced per unit of fermented substrate was lower with fresh cassava leaves when compared with dried cassava leaves in an in vitro incubation with cassava root meal as energy source.
The gas production, percentage of methane in the gas and methane produced per unit substrate fermented, were reduced when nitrate replaced urea as the NPN source in the in vitro incubation
The authors expresses gratitude to the MEKARN project, supported by Sida, for financial support for this research. Special thanks are given to Mr Sengsouly Phongphanith who provided valuable help in the laboratory. We also acknowledge the Souphanouvong University, Faculty of Agriculture and Forest Resources, Department of Animal Science, for providing infrastructure support.
AOAC 1990 Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. AOAC, Washington, D.C.
Barry T T N and McNabb W W C 1999 The implications of condensed tannins on the nutritive value of temperate forages fed to ruminants. British Journal of Nutrition 81(4), 263-272.
Bui Phan Thu Hang and Ledin Inger 2005 Utilization of Melastoma (Melastoma affine, D. Don) foliage as a forage for growing goats with cassava (Manihot Esculenta, Crantz) hay supplementation. Proceedings International Workshop on Small Ruminant Production and Development in South East Asia (Editor: Inger Ledin), Hanoi, Vietnam, 2-4 March 2005. http://www.mekarn.org/procsr/hangctu.pdf
Carulla J E, Kreuzer M, Machmüller A and Hess H D 2005 Supplementation of Acacia mearnsii tannins decreases methanogenesis and urinary nitrogen in forage-fed sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56, 961-970.
CIAT 2001 Solutions that cross frontiers. Cassava production system. http://www.Ciat.cgiar. org/asia/cassava.htm
Diaz A, Avendan O M and Escobar A 1993g Evaluation of Sapindus saponaria as a defaunating agent and its effects on different ruminal digestion parameters. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Animal Production. Volume 5 (2) http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd5/2/cefe.htm
Ffoulkes D and Preston T R 1978 Cassava or sweet potato forage as combined sources of protein and roughage in molasses based diets: effect of supplementation with soybean meal. Tropical Animal Production. http://www.utafoundation.org/TAP/TAP33/ 331.pdf
Gijzen H J, Bernal E and Ferrer H 2000 Cyanide toxicity and cyanide degradation in anaerobic wastewater treatment. Water Research. Volume. 34, No. 9, pp. 2447-2454
Grainger C, Clarke T, Auldist M J, Beauchemin K A, McGinn S M and Waghorn G C 2009 Potential use of Acacia mearnsii condensed tannins to reduce methane emissions and nitrogen ). excretion from grazing dairy cows, Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 89, 241–251
Hess H D, Kreuzer M, Diaz T E, Lascano C E, Carulla J E, Solvia C R and Machmuller A 2003 Saponin rich tropical fruits affect fermentation and methanogenesis in faunated and defaunated rumen fluid, Journal Animal Feed Science and Technology. Volume 109, pp 79-94.
IPCC 2001 Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Technical Summary by Workgroup I of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climatic Change, Cambridge, UK, and Cambridge University Press.
Khang D N 2004 Cassava foliage as protein source for cattle in Vietnam. Agraria Doctoral thesis. Dept. of animal Nutrition and Management, SLU, Uppsala, Sweden.
Khieu Borin, Lindberg J E and Ogle R B 2005 Effect of variety and preservation method of cassava leaves on diet digestibility by indigenous and improved pigs. Animal Science 80 (3), 319-324.
Khuong L H and Khang D N 2005 Effect of fresh cassava foliage on growth and feacal nematoda egg counts in Sindhi x yellow cattle fed urea-treated rice straw basal diet. Workshop-seminar "Making better use of local feed resources" (Editors: T. R. Preston and B. Ogle) MEKARN-CTU, Cantho, 23-25 May, 2005.
Le Thuy Binh Phuong, Preston T R and Leng R A 2011 Mitigating methane production from ruminants; effect of supplementary sulphate and nitrate on methane production in an in vitro incubation using sugar cane stalk and cassava leaf meal as substrate. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 23, Article #22. Retrieved , from http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/2/phuo23022.htm
Ly J and Nguyen Van Lai 1997 Laboratory manual. http://www.mekarn.org/labman/Default.htm
Makkar H P S, Blu¨mmel M and Becker K 1995 In vitro effects of and interactions between tannins and saponins and fate of saponins tannins in the rumen, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. pp. 481–493.
Minitab 2000 Minitab Software Release 13
Netpana N, Wanapat M, Poungchompu O and Toburan W 2001 Effect of condensed tannins in cassava hay on fecal parasitic egg counts in swamp buffaloes and cattle. In: Proceedings International Workshop on Current Research and Development on Use of Cassava as Animal Feed. T R Preston, B Ogle and M Wanapat (Ed) http://www.mekarn.org/procKK/netp.htm
Phengvichith V and Ledin I 2007 Effects of supplementing gamba grass(Andropogon gayanus) with cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) hay and cassava root chips on feed intake, digestibility and growth in goats. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 20(5), 725-732.
Phommasack Outhen, T R Preston T R and Leng R A 2011 Effect of supplementation with urea or calcium nitrate and cassava leaf meal or fresh cassava leaf in an in vitro fermentation using a basal substrate of sugar cane stalk. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 23, Article #023. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/2/outh23023.htm
Phuc B H, Ogle B, Lindberg J E 2001 Nutritive value of cassava leaves for monogastric animals. In: Preston T R, Ogle B and Wanapat M (Editors.), International workshop on Current research and development on use of cassava as animal feed. July 23-24, 2001.. Khon Kaen University, Thailand. Pp. 23-24. http://www.mekarn.org/procKK/phuc.htm
Preston T R 2001 Potential of cassava in integrated farming systems. . International Workshop Current Research and Development on Use of Cassava as Animal Feed, Khon Kaen University, Thailand July 23-24, 2001. http://www.mekarn.org/procKK/pres.htm
Sangkhom Inthapanya, Preston T R and Leng R A 2011 Mitigating methane production from ruminants; effect of calcium nitrate as modifier of the fermentation in an in vitro incubation using cassava root as the energy source and leaves of cassava or Mimosa pigra as source of protein. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 23, Article #21. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/2/sang23021.htm
Seng Sokerya and Preston T R 2003 Effect of grass or cassava foliage on growth and nematode parasite infestation in goats fed low or high protein diets in confinement. MSc. Thesis, MEKARN-SLU
Tilley J M A and Terry R A 1963 A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18: 104.
Undersander D, Mertens D R and Theix N 1993 Forage analysis procedures. National Forage Testing. Association. Omaha pp 154.
Van D T T, Thanh M N T and Binh D V 2001 Cassava as small ruminant feed in the hilly and mountainous area of Bavi district. In: Preston T R, Ogle B and Wanapat M (Eds.), International workshop on Current research and development on use of cassava as animal feed. July 23-24, 2001. SIDA SARAC project. Khon Kaen University, Thailand. Pp. 23-24. http://www.mekarn.org/procKK/van.htm
Waghorn, G.C, Tavendale, M.H and Woodfield, D.R 2002 Methanogenesis from forages fed to sheep. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 64, 167–171.
Wanapat M 2001 Role of cassava hay as animal feed in the tropics. In: International Workshop Current Research and Development on Use of Cassava as Animal Feed, Khon Kaen University, Thailand July 23-24, 2001. http://www.mekarn.org/procKK/wana3.htm
Woodward S L, Waghorn G C and Laboyrie P 2004 Condensed tannins in birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) reduced methane emissions from dairy cows. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 64, 160–164.
Received 2 January 2012; Accepted 26 January 2012; Published 7 February 2012