Livestock Research for Rural Development 22 (3) 2010 | Notes to Authors | LRRD Newsletter | Citation of this paper |
Genetic structure and diversity were investigated by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers in three Tunisian sheep breeds. These breeds were: Barbarine, Queue Fine de l’Ouest and D’man. The DNA samples were isolated from 160 animals from the three breeds. Twenty random primers were used for this study.
Only 9 primers produced clearly polymorphic and reproducible bands. Level of polymorphism varied from 71.42 to 88.88 per primer and from 75.43 to 83.02 per breed. Genetic variation in studied breeds was measured with three indices (Nei’s gene diversity, Shannon’s information and level of polymorphic loci) and showed that the highest diversity was found in the exotic D’man breed while the lowest diversity was obtained for both the Barbarine and Queue Fine de l’Ouest native breeds. The inter breed similarity indices and the UPGMA dendrogram, based on genetic distance clearly separated the three breeds. The closest relationship was observed between Tunisian Barbarine and Queue Fine de l’Ouest breeds. The AMOVA analysis indicated that the largest part of the genetic variability (97.86%) originated from differences among individuals within breeds.
Key Words: Breed; genetic diversity; random amplified DNA marker; sheep
Sheep populations represent the most important domestic livestock species in Tunisia and constitute the principal source of meat. There are several breeds reared under different ecological zones and production systems. The first most important (2555600 heads) (Ministry of Agriculture and hydraulic resources 2006) is the Barbarine (BR), locally known as “Nejdi” or “fat tailed sheep”. The BR is a meat breed widespread in the country (mostly in the middle) and is traditionally managed under extensive production systems. It is a sprig of the population with big tail originating from the Asian steppes that has been implanted in the country since the Punic time. The second most important (1264500 heads) breed (Ministry of Agriculture and hydraulic resources 2006) is the Queue Fine de l’Ouest (QF) known as “Bergui” or “Western Fine Tail”, which is a dual purpose (for milk and meat production) breed. The latter originates from Algeria, where is known as “Ouled Djellal”, and is essentially found in the western region of Tunisia. The black of Thibar “noire de Tiber” is the third breed. The latter is specialized in meat production and is solely found in the Béja region, in the north of the country, and is managed in a relatively more intensive production system. The Black of Thibar breed was the result from crossing of the western Fine Tail and the Merino of Arles at the beginning of the XXth century (Khaldi 1984). Finally, a new exotic meat breed was introduced from Morocco the last decade into the Tunisian oasis, named D’man (DM), and is known by its high prolificacy (Rekik et al 2002).
Production performances of Tunisian breeds are limited compared to those of their counterparts reared in temperate countries. These limited performances may not only be explained by breeds’ genetic potentials but also traditional management practices. On the other hand, local breeds are well adapted to the rather difficult conditions (harsh climatic conditions, poor-quality food, etc.). These unique characteristics are results of the evolutionary forces and their interactions over long periods of time. However, resistance and adaptation capabilities might have been reduced because of intermixing, sub-structuring and/or consequent genetic drift in these sheep population over time. Therefore, the investigation of genetic diversity and similarity between and within breeds is necessary to provide useful genetic information essential for developing effective management plans for the conservation and improvement of these genetic resources. Furthermore, there is a worldwide recognition of the need for the conservation of livestock diversity (FAO 1995) and for the genetic characterization of breeds and populations including their genetic differentiation and relationships.
Genetic analysis of livestock species can be performed by the use of polymorphic markers such as restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) and microsatellites (Rincon et al 2000, Dalvit et al 2008). However, their use is limited since designation of these genetic markers is expensive, technically demanding and is time consuming (Williams et al 1990, Appa Rao et al 1996, Beuzen et al 2000). Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) assay which uses short oligonucleotide primers of arbitrary sequence to amplify genomic DNA by PCR enables an approach for identifying polymorphic and genetic markers (Williams et al 1990, Cushwa and Medrano 1996). These markers have been used for genotype identification (Welsh et al 1991, Tinker et al 1993), construction of genetic maps (Tingey and Del Tufo 1993, Maddox and Cockett 2007), analysis of the genetic relationships within and between plant species (Salhi-Hanachi et al 2006), and measurement of genetic diversity of many crop plants (Hussein et al 2005, Saker 2005). The RAPD technique has also been used in analysis of genetic variations between different breeds of fish (Ambak et al 2006), chicken (Okomus and Kaya 2005), ducks (El Gendy and Helal 2005, Gholizadeh et al 2007), cattle (Lee et al 2000, Parejo et al 2002, Devrim and Kaya 2006, Hassen et al 2007), buffaloes (Saifi et al 2004, Abdel-Rahman and Elsayed 2007), goat (Rahman et al 2006, Blundell and Felice 2006, Yadav and Yadav 2007) and sheep (Paiva et al 2005, Devrim et al 2007, Okumus and Mercan 2007, Kumar et al 2008 , Mahfouz and Othman 2008, Kunene et al 2009).
Genetic diversity of indigenous sheep breeds in Tunisia has not been sufficiently studied. The objective of this study was to provide information at the molecular level about genetic structure and diversity of some Tunisian breeds reared in the south-west of Tunisia, employing RAPD-PCR molecular markers.
Sheep breeds (BR, QF and DM) from the Gafsa and Tozeur regions in the south west of Tunisia were used in this study (Figure 1). They included BR and QFG (the letter G refers to Gafsa) populations in Gafsa and DM and QFT (the letter T refers to Tozeur) populations in Tozeur.
|
|
Blood samples were collected from adult and presumably unrelated animals of both sexes. Before collecting blood samples from animals, owners were asked if there were apparent relatedness among sampled animals to avoid sampling rams and their progenies. Only one sample from small flocks (flock size < 10) and a maximum of three samples from large flocks (flock size >= 10) were taken. A total of 160 individual samples were collected on all populations (40 for BR,40 for DM,40 for QFG and 40 for QFT).
Whole blood was collected from the jugular vein into 8 ml Vacutainer tubes containing the K3EDTA anticoagulant. Blood samples were kept cold at 4°C. DNA extraction was carried out using two DNA purification Kit, “Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit” (Promega Corporation, Madison, USA) and “blood DNA Preparation Kit” (Jena Bioscience, Loebstedter, Jena, Germany) on 3 ml of total blood. DNA concentration and purity was determined using a UV spectrophotometer at 260 and 280 nm optical densities.
A panel of 20 decamer arbitrary primers synthesized from Operon Technologies (Operon Technologies Inc., Alameda, Calif., kits OPE) was screened using DNA samples of each breed. Only 9 primers were selected based on their distinct polymorphism and revealing a pattern with identifiable amplified band. The sequence guanine and cytosine (GC) contents of selected oligonucleotide primers are given in Table 1.
Table 1. Characteristics of selected primers |
||
Primer |
Primer sequence |
GC content, % |
OPE1 |
CCCAAGGTCC |
70 |
OPE2 |
GGTGCGGGAA |
70 |
OPE4 |
GTGACATGCC |
60 |
OPE5 |
TCAGGGAGGT |
60 |
OPE7 |
AGATGCAGCC |
60 |
OPE8 |
TCACCACGGT |
60 |
OPE9 |
CTTCACCCGA |
60 |
OPE10 |
CACCAGGTGA |
60 |
OPE13 |
CCCGATTCGG |
70 |
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out in 25 µl reaction mixtures containing 2µl of template DNA (~50 ng), 200 µM each of dNTPs, 0.5µM of each primer, 1.5mM MgCl2, 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, USA), 2.5 μL of 10 X Taq DNA Polymerase buffer. MilliQ sterilized water was added to complete the total (25 µl) volume.
Amplification of DNA was carried out using T personal thermocycler (Biometra). Polymerase chain reaction cycling conditions were: initial denaturation for 5 min at 94°C, followed by 40 consecutive cycles. Each cycle included denaturation at 94°C for 25 seconds, annealing at 35°C for 35 seconds and extension at 72°C for 1 min. Theses cycles were followed by a final extension of 5 min at 72°C.
The amplification products were separated by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gels in 0.5x TBE buffer in the presence of ethidium bromide (0.5µg/µl) for 2.5 hours at 100 V. A 1 Kb DNA (Promega® USA) was used as molecular size marker. The RAPD patterns were visualized by UV illumination and the images of each gel were photographed for documentation and further analysis.
All amplified and reproducible bands were scored for their presence (1) or absence (0) in the RAPD profile of individuals from all studied breeds. The scores were then pooled for constructing a single data matrix. The statistical analysis of RAPD data was performed using the computer program POPGENE (version 1.31) (Yeh et al 1999). Genetic diversity was estimated by number and percentage of polymorphic loci, genetic diversity of Nei (1973) and Shanon’s information index. Genetic similarity and genetic distance were calculated on the basis of Nei’s (1972) method of genetic identity and genetic distance, respectively. Relationships among the studied breeds were analyzed by generating dendrogram using Nei genetic distance matrices (1972) with UPGMA (Unweighted Pair Group Method of Arithmetic Means) technique. Finally, analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was used to split the variance between and within analyzed breeds using WINAMOVA (version 1.55) software (Excoffier 1993). To ensure that the amplified DNA bands originated from genomic DNA and not primer artifacts, negative control was carried out for each primer/breed combination. No amplified was detected in control reaction. All amplification product were found to be reproducible when reaction were repeated using the same reaction conditions.
Nine of twenty primers (45%) were successfully amplified polymorphic bands among the studied breeds. Figure 2 and Table 2 summarize amplification results with polymorphic primers.
|
|
|
Table 2. Amplification results for used primers in the studied Barbarine, Queue fine de l’Ouest and D’man sheep breeds from Tunisia |
|||
|
Total of amplified bands |
Polymorphic bands across all sampled animals |
% Polymorphism |
OPE1 |
7 |
5 |
71.4 |
OPE2 |
8 |
6 |
75 |
OPE4 |
5 |
4 |
80 |
OPE5 |
6 |
5 |
83.3 |
OPE7 |
7 |
6 |
85.7 |
OPE8 |
8 |
6 |
75 |
OPE9 |
5 |
4 |
80 |
OPE10 |
9 |
8 |
88.9 |
OPE13 |
4 |
3 |
75 |
Total |
59 |
47 |
79.6 |
The number of bands amplified with these primers ranged from 4 to 9 and had sizes ranging from 200 to 2050 bp. A total of 59 loci were amplified, out of which 47 (79.66%) were polymorphic with an average of 5.44 bands per primer. The maximum number of fragment bands were produced by the primer OPE10 (9) with 88.9% polymorphism while the minimum number of amplified bands was recorded for the OPE13 primer with 75 % polymorphism. Gene diversity index, Shanon’s index and the level of polymorphism per breed and for all the sampled animals are given in Table 3.
Table 3. Estimates of genetic variability by breed and for all sampled animals |
|||
Breeds |
Nei’s gene diversity |
Shanon’s index |
Proportion of polymorphic loci |
BR |
33.7 |
49.0 |
81.1 |
QFG |
33.1 |
47.9 |
77.4 |
QFT |
33.1 |
47.5 |
75.5 |
DM |
36.1 |
51.9 |
83.0 |
All sampled animals |
42.8 |
61.7 |
83.1 |
BR: Barbarine, QFG: Queue Fine de l’Ouest in Gafsa, QFT: Queue Fine de l’Ouest in Tozeur; and DM: D’man |
Nei’s gene diversity in BR, QFG, QFT and DM populations were 33.7, 33.1, 33.1 and 36.1, respectively. The average gene diversity was 42.8 across all sampled populations, whereas Shanon’s index values were 48.9, 47.8, 47.5 and 51.9 for BR, QFG, QFT and DM, respectively; with an overall populations mean value of 61.6. Genetic distance and genetic identity ranged from 0.05 to 0.29 and from 0.74 to 0.95, respectively (Table 4).
Table 4. Nei’s genetic distance (below diagonal) and genetic identity (above diagonal) among sheep breeds based on RAPD analysis |
||||
Population |
BR |
QFG |
QFT |
DM |
BR |
0.000 |
0.849 |
0.866 |
0.757 |
QFG |
0.163 |
0.000 |
0.952 |
0.761 |
QFT |
0.144 |
0.049 |
0.000 |
0.743 |
DM |
0.248 |
0.273 |
0.297 |
0.000 |
BR: Barbarine, QFG: Queue Fine de l’Ouest in Gafsa, QFT: Queue Fine de l’Ouest in Tozeur; and DM: D’man |
The highest genetic distance was found between QFT and DM breeds, whereas the lowest distance was observed between the two sub- populations of the QF breed (QFT and QFG). Genetic distance between native breeds was lower than that observed between Tunisian and exotic breeds. On the other hand, genetic identity was the highest between the QFT and QFG sub- populations (I = 0.95) and the lowest between QFT and DM breeds (I = 0.743).
The UPGMA dendrogram, based on Nei’s genetic distance, depicts the relationship among the investigated sheep breeds (Figure. 3).
|
|
The dendrogram revealed the existence of three branches indicating the separation of the populations studied into three breeds while the QFG and QFT were clustering together as a unique breed. The BR and QF breeds had a close genetic relationship whereas DM breed was distinctly different from other breeds.
The ANOVA analysis (Table 5) showed that approximately 2.1 % of the genetic variability in the analyzed animals is due to differences among breeds and that the largest part of that variability (97.9%) is due to differences within breeds.
Table 5. Analysis of molecular variance for the studied Barbarine, Que fine de l’Ouest and D’man sheep breeds |
|||||
Source of variation |
df |
Sum of squares |
Variance components |
% of total variance |
Fixation indice ΦST |
Among breeds |
3 |
23,7 |
0,3 |
2,1 |
0,021*** |
Within breeds |
156 |
12,6 |
12,6 |
97,9 |
|
***: P<0.001 |
|
|
|
|
|
A higher and significant differentiation characterize individuals between population (Φ-statistic = 0.021; P<0.001 after 1000 permutations).
Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) developed by Williams et al (1990) was proved to be a powerful tool in different genetic analyses. This approach detects DNA polymorphisms based on amplification using single DNA fragments. They are specific and quick and do not require previous DNA sequence information (Williams et al 1990, Ragot and Hoisington 1993). In this study, only 9 primers out of 20 primers, screened using DNA samples from BR, QF and DM sheep breeds, generated reproducible and distinct RAPD profiles and were used to evaluate genomic variability due to their clear RAPD bands for each of the investigated breeds. Similar results were found by others investigating sheep diversity by RAPD technique, According to Ali (2003) , 5 from 19 primers used to investigate genetic similarity among four Egyptian breeds generated polymorphic and reproducible bands. Likewise, Yadav and Yadav (2007) used a total of 40 primers to study genetic diversity in six breeds of Indian goats, but they found only 10 primers that generated polymorphic bands. Primers screened varied in the extent of information they generated with some producing highly polymorphic patterns whereas others produced less polymorphic products. The polymorphism found within breeds varied between primers and breeds. In this study, a relatively highly proportion of the total bands amplified from the 9 selected primers were polymorphic. Level of polymorphism varied from 71.4 to 88.9 per primer and from 75.4 to 83.0 per breed. These observations revealed comparatively high level of genetic variation between sheep breeds. Similar levels of polymorphism were reported by earlier on sheep populations (Paiva et al 2005, Devrim et al 2007, Mahfouz and Othman 2008) and also in goat populations (Blundell and Felice 2006).
Gene diversity is an appropriate measure of genetic variability with in a population. The genetic variation in the studied breeds is illustrated by Nei’s gene diversity, Shannon’s information and level of polymorphic loci (Table 3). The highest means of heterozygosity, Shanon’s index and level of polymorphism were found in the DM breed while the lowest values were found in the QF breed (QFG and QFT sub- populations). These results indicate that the greatest diversity was found in the exotic DM breed indicating a high level of heterozygosity. Inversely, the two native breeds (BR and QF) showed the least genetic diversity or variation (higher similarity) among its individuals indicating low heterozygosity levels. Low genetic variability may be caused by selection practices in farms from where samples were collected. Populations showing higher intra-breed similarity and lower proportion of polymorphic loci are likely to have less heterozygosity, i.e. possess lower level of genetic variation compared to those showing less intra-breed similarity and high proportion of polymorphic loci. In other words, genotypes having higher similarity have more homozygous groups (Yasmin et al 2006). Similar results were reported by Mahfouz and Othman (2008) in five Egyptian sheep breeds and by Paiva et al (2005) in Brazilian hair sheep breeds.
The inter breed similarity indices and the UPGMA dendrogram, based on genetic distance, depict the relationship among the investigated sheep breeds, separate clearly the three breeds. The closest relationship was observed between native Tunisian breeds (the BR and QF breed) while this relationship was loose between Tunisian and exotic breeds. The exotic breed (DM) has a different geographic origin, different reproductive performance and different morphologic appearance. On the other hand, the close relationship observed between native breeds may be explained by a possible cross migration in the past between these two breeds. This cross migration may have occurred because of short geographic distances between areas where BR and QF breeds are distributed. Migration has a great effect on the reduction of genetic differentiation between populations (Laval et al 2000). There is a significant genetic structure within breeds (Table 5) with an average of 97.9 % suggesting a low migration rate or exchange of animals between studied breeds. These results corroborate the clusters observed in the dendrogram of the three sheep breeds and suggest that there is a population substructure defined by breeds and subgroups of the breeds.
This study highlights the usefulness of RAPD assay for determining genetic variation in different sheep populations and for estimating genetic distances between breeds.
Knowledge of genetic distance among animals and breeds, and genetic diversity/structure within breeds could be useful for conservation of genetic resources.
Thus, it is possible to implement adequate mating schemes between genetically distant animals in order to maintain the genetic diversity and decrease probable fertility and consanguinity problems related to increase inbreeding rates detected in Tunisian sheep breeds.
Data presented here are the first report of genetic variation inside Tunisian sheep populations, described at the molecular level.
We consider this work as a first step in molecular characterization of Tunisian sheep population, thus, it is recommended to extend the panel of samples and primers in the future.
We are grateful to the farmers who permitted us to obtain blood samples from their sheep. We also wish to express our sincere gratitude to Miss Ben Dhifi Monia and Miss Smaoui Faten for their kind helpe. This work was funded by the collaboration of Research Center in Oases Agriculture and Faculty of Sciences of Gafsa.
Abdel-Rahman S M and Essayed E H 2007 Genetic Similarity Among the Three Egyptian Water Buffalo Flocks Using RAPD-PCR and PCR-RFLP Techniques. Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences. 3(5): 351-355. http://www.insinet.net/rjabs/2007/351-355.pdf
Ali B A 2003 Genetics similarity among four breeds of sheep in Egypt detected by random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2: 194-197: http://academicjournals.org/ajb/manuscripts/manuscripts2003/julymanuscripts2003/Ali/Ali.htm
Ambak M A, Bolong A A, Ismail P and Tam B M 2006 Genetic variation of snakehead fish (Channa striata) populations using random amplified polymorphic DNA. Biotechnology 5(1): 104-110: http://scialert.net/qredirect.php?doi=biotech.2006.104.110&linkid=pdf
Appa-Rao K B C, Bhat K V and Totey S M 1996 Detection of species-specific genetic markers in farm animals through random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD). Genetic Analysis: Biomolecular Engineering 13: 135–138
Beuzen N D, Stear M J and Chang K C 2000 Molecular markers and their use in animal breeding. The Veterinary Journal 160: 42–52
Blundell R and Felice A E 2006 Detection of new genomic Landmarks in the Maltese goat using RAPD PCR. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 5(7): 602-607: http://www.medwelljournals.com/fulltext/java/2006/602-607.pdf
Cushwa W T and Medrano J F 1996 Applications of the random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) assay for genetic analysis of livestock species. Animal Biotechnology 7 (1): 11–31
Dalvit C, De Marchi M, Dal Zotto R, Zanetti E, Meuwissen T and Cassandro M 2008 Genetic characterization of the Burlina cattle breed using microsatellite molecular markers. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 125: 137–144
Devrim A K, Guven N K A and Kocamis H 2007 A study of genomic polymorphism and diversity in sheep breeds in northeastern Anatolia. Small Ruminant Research 73: 291–295
Devrim A K and Kaya N 2006 An Investigation on DNA Polymorphism of the Cattle Breeds in the Province of Kars by RAPDPCR Technique. Revue de Médecine Vétérinaire 157(2): 88-91: http://www.revmedvet.com/2006/RMV157_88_91.pdf
El-Gendy E A, Helal M A, Goher N H and Mostageer A 2005 Molecular characterization of genetic biodiversity in ducks, using RAPD-PCR analysis. Arabic Journal of Biotechnology 8(2): 253-264
Excoffier l 1993 Analysis of Molecular Variance. Version 1.55. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Switzerland (1993).
FAO 1995 Global Project for the Maintenance of Domestic Animal Genetic Diversity (MoDAD)-Draft Project Formulation Report FAO Rome, Italy.
Gholizadeh M, Mianji G R and Ghobadi A 2007 Measurement of within and between genetic variability in Duck breeds by RAPD markers. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 10(6): 982-985: http://scialert.net/qredirect.php?doi=pjbs.2007.982.985&linkid=pdf
Hassen F, Bekele E, Ayalew W and Dessie T 2007 Genetic variability of five Indigenous Ethiopian cattle breeds using RAPD markers. African Journal of Biotechnology 6: 2274-2279: http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB/PDF/pdf2007/4Oct/Hassen%20et%20al.pdf
Hussein, M H, Saker M M, Moghaieb R E A and Hussein H A 2005 Molecular characterization of salt tolerance in the genomes of some Egyptian and Saudi Arabian barely genotypes. Arabic Journal of Biotechnology 8(2) : 241-252
Khaldi G 1984 Variations saisonnières de l’activité ovarienne, du comportement de l’œstrus et de la durée de l’anoestrus post partum des femelles ovines de race Barbarine. Influence du niveau alimentaire et la présence du mâle. Thèse de doctorat d’état des sciences, Académie de Montpellier: 168p
Kumar S, Kolte A P, Ydav B R, Kumar S, Arora A L and Singh V K 2008 Genetic variability among sheep breeds by random amplified polymorphic DNA-PCR. Indian Journal Biotechnology 7: 482-486: http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/2368/1/IJBT%207%284%29%20482-486.pdf
Kunene N W, Bezuidenhoutb C C and Nsahlaic I V 2009 Genetic and phenotypic diversity in Zulu sheep populations: Implications for exploitation and conservation. Small Ruminant Research 84:100–107
Laval G, Iannuccelli N, Legault C, Milan D, Groenen M A M, Giuffra E, Anderson L, Nissen P E, Jorgensen C B, Beeckman P, Geldermann H, Foulley J L, Chevalet C and Ollivier, L 2000 Genetic diversity of eleven European pig breeds. Genetic selection and evolution 32: 187–203: http://www.gse-journal.org/articles/gse/pdf/2000/02/g0205.pdf
Lee J S, Lee C H, Nam D H, Jung Y J and Jung Yeo S 2000 A Genetic Marker for the Korean Native Cattle (Hanwoo) Found by an Arbitrarily Primed-Polymerase Chain Reaction (AP-PCR). Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 33(3): 208-212: http://www.jbmb.or.kr/jbmbonline/2000_003/302.pdf
Maddox J F and Cockett N E 2007 An update on sheep and goat linkage maps and other genomic resources. Small Ruminant Research 70: 4–20.
Mahfouz R E and Othman O E 2008 Genetic Variation Between Some Egyptian Sheep Breeds Using RAPD-PCR. Research Journal of Cell and Molecular Biology 2(2): 46-52: http://www.insipub.com/rjcmb/2008/46-52.pdf.
Ministry of Agriculture and Hydraulic Rsources 2006 General direction of studies and agricultural Developpement. Enquête sur les structures des exploitations agricoles (2004-2005)
Nei M 1972 Genetic distances between populations. American Naturalist 106: 283–292
Nei M 1973 Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 70: 3321-3323: http://www.pnas.org/content/70/12/3321.full.pdf
Okumus A and Kaya M 2005 Genetic similarity by RAPD between pure lines of chickens. Journal of Biological Sciences 5(4): 424-426: http://scialert.net/qredirect.php?doi=jbs.2005.424.426&linkid=pdf
Okumus A and Mercan L 2007 Genetic variation at Karayaka sheep herds based on random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. Biotechnology 6(4): 543-548: http://scialert.net/qredirect.php?doi=biotech.2007.543.548&linkid=pdf
Paiva S R, Silvério V C, Egito A A, McManus C, Faria D A, Mariante A S, Castro S R, Albuquerque M S M, and Dergam J A 2005 Genetic variability of the Brazilian hair sheep breeds. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 40 (9): 887-893: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/pab/v40n9/a08v40n9.pdf
Parejo J C, Padilla J A, Rabasco A, Sansinforiano M E and Martinez-Trancon M 2002 Population structure in the endangered Blanca Cacerena bovine breed demonstrated by RAPD analysis. Genes and Genetic System 77: 51-58: http://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/ggs/77/1/51/_pdf
Ragot M and Hoisington D A 1993 Molecular markers for plant breeding: Comparison of RFLP and RAPD genotyping costs. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 86: 965-984
Rahman M A, Rahman S M M, Jalil M A, Sarder N U and Rahman M M 2006 Molecular characterization of Black Bengal and Jamuna Pari goat breeds by RAPD markers. American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences 1 (2): 17-22: http://www.scipub.org/fulltext/AJAV/AJAV1217-22.pdf
Rincon G, D’Angelo M, Gagliardi R, Kelly L, Llambi S and Postiglioni A 2000 Genomic polymorphism in Uruguayan Creole cattle using RAPD and microsatellite markers. Research Veterinary Sciences 69: 171–174
Rekik M, Lassoued, N and Yacoubi C 2002 Reproductive performances in ewe lambs of the Queue Fine de l’Ouest breed and their D’Man crosses following synchronisation. Small Ruminant Research (45) 75-78.
Saifi HW, Blushan B, Kumar S, Kumar P, Patra B N, and Sharma A 2004 Genetic identity between Bhadawari and Murrah breeds of Indian buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) using RAPD-PCR. Indian journal of Biotechnology 7: 491-495: http://nopr.niscair.res.in/bitstream/123456789/2351/1/IJBT%207(4)%20491-495.pdf
Saker M M 2005 Mapping RAPD and SSR markers linked to net blotch resistance gene in barley. Arabic Journal of Biotechnology 8(2): 369-378: http://www.acgssr.org/BioTechnology/V8N2July2005/Full_Paper/32.pdf
Salhi-Hanachi A, Chatti K, Saddoud O, Mars M, Rhouma A, Marrakchi M and Trifi M 2006 Genetic diversity of different Tunisian fig (Ficus carica L.) collections revealed by RAPD fingerprints. Hereditas 143: 15-22: http://www.figs4fun.com/Links/FigLink255.pdf
Tingey S V and Del Tufo J P 1993 Genetic analysis with random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Plant Physiology 101: 349-352 http://www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/reprint/101/2/349
Tinker N A, Fortin M G and Nather D E 1993 Random amplified polymorphic DNA and pedigree relationships in spring barley. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 85: 976-984
Welsh J, Petersen C and Clelland M M 1991 Polymorphisms generated by arbitrary primed PCR in the mouse: application to strain identification and genetic mapping. Nucleic Acids Research 19: 303-306.
Williams J G K, Kubelik A R, Livak K J, Rafalski J A and Tingey S V 1990 DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Research 18 (22): 6531–6535.
Yadav A and Yadav BR 2007 Molecular Genetic variation in Indian goats. Journal of Biological Sciences 7(2): 364-368: http://scialert.net/qredirect.php?doi=jbs.2007.364.368&linkid=pdf
Yasmin S, Islam S, Nasiruddin K and Alam S 2006 Molecular characterization of potato germplasm by random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Biotechnology 5(1): 27-31: http://www.bdresearchpublications.com/client/upload/1200819354/1200819354.pdf
Yeh F C, Yang R-C, Boyle T B J, Ye Z-H, Mao J X 1999 POPGENE Version 1.32, the User-friendly Shareware for Population Genetic Analysis. Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Centre, University of Alberta, Canada http://www.ualberta.ca/~fyeh/
Received 3 November 2009; Accepted 29 January 2010; Published 1 March 2010