Livestock Research for Rural Development 21 (11) 2009 | Guide for preparation of papers | LRRD News | Citation of this paper |
The study was conducted in Ikenne Local Government area in Ogun State to determine the socio-economic characteristics of smallholder goat and sheep farmers as well as the health and nutrition practices employed in their livestock management. One hundred respondents were interviewed using structured questionnaires and participatory rapid appraisal approach to obtain data.
Results show that 70% of the respondents were females, with no formal education (65%) and in their middle ages. Disease incidences reported were 26% diarrhea, 20% helminthiasis, 30% pneumonia, 18% ectoparasite and 15% sudden death. Ninety one percent of the respondents treated their animals with herbs and only 8% consulted with a veterinarian. All respondents fed their animals with kitchen waste and 74.7% fed cassava peels at least once a day. Concentrate and mineral supplement were not included in the diet of the animals. The smallholder sheep and goat farmers were encouraged to adopt improved livestock management practices to increase their productivity.
Key words: Disease, feeding pattern, livestock, management
Goats play an important socio-economic role in the rural areas, where most of the resource poor farmers in Africa live. The role of goats in traditional areas has been highlighted (Wilson 1988). Small ruminants have been reported to form an integral part of the cultural life and system of Nigeria's peasantry (Ajala 2004). The structure of the Nigerian livestock industry is such that 80-90% of the nation's livestock lies in the hand of small holders or other traditional groups (Olaloku 1999). According to Momoh and Ochaba (2002), subsistence animal agriculture is the main contributor to the meat industry in Nigeria. This consists of small herds and flocks in the rural, urban and peri-urban areas. According to Njoku’s (2005) statistics revealed that 99.75% of cattle, 99.97% of goats, 99.84% of sheep, 90.75% of pigs and 86.17% of chickens are traditionally managed. These figures indicate that more than half of Nigeria's livestock is managed traditionally. Any effort to raise the level of meat production in the country must take into consideration these farming communities. Shaib et al (1997) stated that there is a pressing need to increase the production of domestic animals, which are conventional sources of animal protein, such as the small ruminants, to overcome the acute shortage of animal protein in the diet of the average Nigerian.
The major problems of livestock production in Nigeria include housing, health and feeding (Doma et al 1999) According to Ajala (2004), high incidence of diseases is one of the major constraints associated with small ruminant production.
Jawara (1990) posited that the economic losses resulting from stunted growth, debility, poor reproductive performance or death in affected animals are unquantifiable.
The detrimental role which parasitic diseases play in livestock production has been emphasized (Lamorde 1996). Losses are due to mortality, lowering of reproductive rate, weight loss and increased cost of production due to additional veterinary bills. Animals in discomfort or pain are likely to be less productive than their healthy counterparts. Maintaining livestock in good state of health is a very important aspect of livestock production. Nutrition is also important because the gains of selective breeding, proper management and disease control can only be realized with an adequate plan of nutrition. It was therefore, the aim of this study to assess the health and nutrition practices among the smallholder livestock farmers. This paper also reports the socio-economic characteristics of the farmers in Ikenne Local Government Area, Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria.
The study was carried out in Ikenne Local Government Area (LGA) of Ogun State in Nigeria. The area lies along latitude 6o.43'E and longitude 6o. 51'N of the equator in the south western part of Nigeria. The annual rainfall is 1,500 mm and the mean annual temperature and sunshine is about 27oC and 2100-2350 hrs respectively, depending on the season. Primary data were collected from respondents who were selected by simple random sampling technique.
Two towns were selected from the five towns in Ikenne LGA. These are Ikenne-Remo and Ilishan-Remo and two wards with high concentration of small ruminants were selected from the two towns. A structured questionnaire and participatory rapid appraisal technique (Paris 1994) were used for data collection. The data obtained were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Seventy percent (70%) of the farmers were females (Table 1).
Table 1. Socio-economic characteristics of the smallholder goat and sheep farmers in Ikenne LGA |
|
Characteristics |
Percentage |
Age, Year |
|
20-40 |
17 |
41-60 |
49 |
60 and above |
34 |
Sex |
|
Male |
30 |
Female |
70 |
Marital Status |
|
Married |
96 |
Single |
4 |
Educational Status |
|
University Education |
10 |
Secondary School Education |
25 |
No formal Education |
65 |
Occupation |
|
Civil Servant |
9 |
Trading |
57 |
Artisan |
34 |
Average flock size |
|
Goat, mean |
3.96 |
Sheep, mean |
3.0 |
This is similar to observations reported elsewhere ( Sumberg and Cassaday 1985; Oladele 2001). Results also indicated that all respondents were adults and majority of them were within the age bracket of 41-60 years. This observation could be attributed to rural-urban migration of young men for white collar jobs. Ninety- six percent (96%) of total respondents were married - indicating that small holder livestock production in the area is common among married couples. Majority of the respondents (65%) had no formal education. All respondents had other occupations alongside livestock production. This agrees with the findings of Odeyinka and Okunmade (2005) that smallholder livestock production is a part time business. Dar et al (1996) stated that small ruminant production offers prospect in augmenting the dwindling supply of meat and milk in the country by providing additional income to families of smallholders and optimizing utilization of farm resources. The mean flock size for goat was 3.9 while for sheep it was 3. Gefu et al (1994) reported a mean flock size per household of 2.4 and 6.2 for sheep and goat in Anambra State. Adu et al (2004) also reported that 72.6% of the respondents sampled had herd size below ten. The low herd size may be due to financial constraints, large amount of labor required for operation of large herd size, lack of access to farmland and the part- time nature of the business.
The common diseases affecting the flock are presented in Table 2.
Table 2. Prevalent diseases and animals health management practices in Ikenne LGA |
|
Observations |
Percentage |
Common diseases |
|
Diarrhea |
26 |
Helminthiasis |
20 |
Nasal Discharge (Kata) |
30 |
Ectoparasites |
18 |
Sudden Death |
15 |
Consulted with a Veterinarian |
8 |
Used Herbs |
91 |
Herb type |
|
Spondias mombin “Efinrin” |
80 |
Ocimum basilium “Ewe Iyeye” |
20 |
The diseases encountered were diarrhea , helminthiasis, ectoparasite, pneumonia and sudden death. This corroborated the findings of Otesile et al (1983); Obudu et al (1995); Otchere et al (1987) that helminthiasis, pneumonia, bacteria enteritis (diarrhoea) and "kata" were responsible for over 83.3% of the total cause of death in goats in Nigeria. Majority of the respondents did not have housing units for the animals. Goats and sheep slept within the premises of the household at night. Similar observations were reported in Oyo state by Odeyinka and Okunmade (2005). The animals usually slept on bare ground and this makes them susceptible to ectoparasites infestation and pneumonia. The cases of sudden death may be due to snakebites, consumption of poisonous plants or acute diseases. From the survey, only 8% of the respondents consulted with a veterinarian regarding the health of their animals, while majority of the farmers (91%) used herbs for treating their animals. Asafa et al (2004) reported that majority of the goat raisers employed the local means for treating their animals, such means include the application of used engine oil in the treatment of mange and the dropping of oil on the digits of animals infected with foot rot. Their survey revealed high cost of medication as the major reason why traditional methods were sought after. Farmers in Ikenne-Remo and Ilisan-Remo used herbs to treat their animals. Leaves of Spondias mombin were used in the treatment of delayed parturition and poor milking by providing leaves for the goats to chew. Ocimum basilium leaves mixed with water plus table salt was administered orally to animals with diarrhea and Carica papaya seed was used for the treatment of worms.
Table 3 shows the feeding pattern in smallholder livestock production in the study area.
Table 3. Feeding pattern in smallholder livestock production in Ikenne LGA |
|
Characteristics |
Percentage |
Feed offered |
|
Cassava peels |
74.7 |
Maize starch residue |
4.0 |
Kitchen waste /feed left over |
100 |
Cassava/ cocoyam |
4.0 |
Cut and carry forage |
17.3 |
Mineral supplement |
|
Fed mineral supplement (No) |
100 |
Concentrate |
|
Fed concentrate (No) |
100 |
Feed sources |
|
Purchased from the market |
6.2 |
Farm/ kitchen left over |
76.5 |
Cut and carry forage |
17.3 |
Feed availability |
|
Available |
54.4 |
Readily available |
41.0 |
Not available |
4.0 |
Frequency of feeding |
|
Once |
54.2 |
Twice |
14.1 |
Thrice |
12.6 |
Irregular |
19.1 |
Supplied water |
100 |
Livestock attendant |
|
Livestock owner |
78.3 |
Family members |
21.7 |
Results show that all respondents fed their livestock with kitchen wastes and 74.7% fed cassava peels. This may be because these feed resources are readily available. The study area is a community noted for the processing of cassava, hence availability of cassava peels from the farm and homes of the producers. Only (4.0 %) fed their livestock with maize starch residues. This may indicate that maize is less processed and consumed in the area. A few respondents (4.0 %) also fed cassava or cocoyam as livestock feed. Cocoyam and cassava form part of the staple food of members in the sampled area. Therefore, competition between man and animals make these feedstuffs less available and more expensive to be used as livestock feed. The animals were neither given concentrate nor mineral supplements. The Semi- intensive system of management was the most common method of production among respondents, as the animals were allowed to scavenge during the day with kitchen waste or cassava peels given at nighttime or in the morning. Most of the respondents fed their animals’ daily and water was provided. Family labor was mostly employed in the management of the animals. These findings agree with Nweke and Ezumah (1988) that family labor and other resources are largely provided by household members. It was observed that the animals were not provided with proper housing and scavenging was a common practice. According to Obinne (1996), most of the small - scale livestock producers (69%) did not realize much income from raising livestock, probably because about 92% did not adopt improved livestock management practices.
The participatory rapid appraisal revealed poor management such as poor housing and feeding, no health care program and no improved breed to upgrade their animals. Some of the strengths in the study area include their use of family labor, the availability of grasslands, availability of cassava peels and the West African dwarf breed that are well adapted to the environment.
The results showed that the smallholders raise their livestock under a system similar to the semi-intensive management system.
Livestock diseases were treated by local methods using herbs and local materials.
The livestock feed were mainly grasses, kitchen and farm wastes.
The management indicates a low input system, which invariably yields a low output.
There is a need to improve the management practices by introducing modern methods such as veterinary care, provision of housing units for the animals, and the inclusion of concentrates, vitamins and minerals supplement in their diet in order to boost livestock production.
Adu A O, Famuyide O O, Adejoba O R, Oladele O I, Adeogun, M O, Ojo M O and Sobowale M I 2004 Demographic characteristics as correlates of sustained adoption of livestock technologies in Oyo State. Tropical Journal of Animal Science 7 (2) 51-59
Ajala M K 2004 Household decision-making in the production of small ruminants in Giwa Local Government Area of Kaduna State of Nigeria. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Nigerian Society of Animal Production. Sokoto, Nigeria. pp 399 - 402
Asafa A R, Adesehinwa A O K, Dairo F A S 2004 An Assessment of the Production Systems and Productivity of Ruminant Livestock in Ikorodu Local Government Area of Lagos State. In: Proceedings of 9th Annual Conference of Animal Science Association of Nigeria. pp. 220-222
Dar W D, Faylon P S, Le-Jambre L F 1996 Small Ruminant Development in the Philippines, Sustainable Parasite Control in Small Ruminant: An International workshop sponsored by ACIAR, held in Bogar, Indonesia. pp. 75-81
Doma U D, Mohammed L K and Umeh A P 1999 Observation of small holder sheep and goat management practices in old Bauchi State. Tropical Journal of Animal Science 2(2)123-130
Gefu J O, Adu I F, Alawa C B I, Magaji S O 1994 Characteristics of smallholder sheep and goat management practices in South East Nigeria: Observation from Anambra State. Nigeria Journal of Animal Production 21(1&2):127-134
Jawara D K 1990 Animal disease as a factor limiting economic development in Africa. George C Poppensiek Lecture. Cornell Veterinary 80: 17 -25
Lamorde A G 1996 The role of Veterinarians in a developing economy. Nigerian Veterinary Journal (Special edition) 1: 106-111
Momoh O M and Ochaba A O 2002 Herd structure of smallholder goat production in Otukpo L.G.A. of Borno state, Nigeria. Tropical Journal of Animal Science 5(2): 53-57
Njoku P C 2005 Development of quality assurance in Nigeria Livestock Industry. A paper presented at the 10th Annual Conference Animal Science Association of Nigeria Ado Ekiti 12-14
Nweke F I and Ezumah H C 1988 Cassava in African Farming and food systems: Implications for use in livestock feeds. In: cassava as livestock feed in Africa. Hahn S K, Reynoids L and Egbunike G N (Editors) IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria. Pp 7-15 http://www.fao.org/Wairdocs/ILRI/x5458E/x5458e04.htm
Obinne C P O 1996 Adoption of Improved livestock Management Innovations in Nigeria: The Benue State Experience. Outlook on Agriculture 25(2) 119-122
Obudu C E, Adedeji O S and Otesile E B 1995 Incidence and causes of mortality in goats on the University of Ibadan Teaching and Research Farm. A retrospective study. Israel Journal of veterinary Research 50: 29-83
Odeyinka A M and Okunmade G K 2005 Goat production in Oyo State. A case study of Ogbomoso town. Nigeria Journal of Animal Production 32(1)108-115
Oladele O I 2001 Gender analysis of livestock production among enclave dwellers in Ogun state: In :Proceedings of 6th Annual Conference of Animal Science Association of Nigeria. pp. 203-305
Olaloku E A 1999 Sustainable animal production for self-sufficiency in the 21st century. In Animal science at the University of Ibadan: The way forward.25th Anniversary Commemorate Brochure. De-Ayo pub. Ibadan. pp 29-44
Otchere E O, Ahmed H U, Adenowo T K, Kallah M S, Bawa E K, Olorunju S A S and Voh A A 1987 Northern Nigeria sheep and goat production in the traditional Fulani agro pastoral sector of Northern Nigeria. World Animal Review 64: 50-53
Otesile E B , Kasali O B, Nzekwu C K N 1983 Mortalities in goats on the University of Ibadan Teaching and Research Farm. Bulletin of Animal Health and Production in Africa 31:282-284
Paris T 1994 Obtaining data on gender and intra household issues. In Tools for field: The methodologies handbook for gender analysis in Agriculture. USA, Kumanian Press. Pp 80-94
Shaib B A, Aliyu A and Bakshi. J B 1997 Nigeria National Agricultural Research Strategic Plan 1996-2010. Department of Agricultural Sciences, Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Abuja.
Sumberg J E and Cassaday K 1985 Sheep and goats in the humid west Africa . Workshop on small ruminant production system in humid zone of west Africa. Ibadan, Nigeria 23-26 January 1983. ILCA. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Pp 3-5
Wilson R T 1988 Small Ruminant Production Systems in Tropical Africa. Small Ruminant Research 1: 305-325
Received 20 June 2009; Accepted 15 September 2009; Published 1 November 2009