Livestock Research for Rural Development 20 (supplement) 2008 | Guide for preparation of papers | LRRD News | Citation of this paper |
An on-farm trial experiment was carried out in Treang district, Takeo province from June to September 2006. Twenty female cattle were allocated to five levels of sun-dried cassava foliage (0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1 % of body weight in DM basis) to evaluate the growth response when fed a basal diet of untreated rice straw plus a rumen supplement. The heifers were tethered alongside the feed trough in each household, where they had free access to the experimental diet and water. The heifers were provided rumen supplement (mainly urea, sulphur and other minerals) at 0.25% body weight and ad libitum rice straw. The design was a completely randomized design (CRD) with four replications of each treatment.
The intake of the leaf component of the cassava was 90% of the offer but only 45% of the offer level of petiole was consumed. The total intake of DM and crude protein intake increased according to the intake of cassava foliage. Daily weight gain increased from 201 to 402 g/day and feed conversion was better with increasing levels of protein from sun-dried cassava foliage in the diet. The responses were linear over the range of cassava crude protein intakes from 0 to 1.6 g/kg live weight.
It is concluded that supplementation with sun dried cassava foliage stimulated the growth performance of cattle and that the response was linear over the range from 0 to 1.6g cassava crude protein/kg live weight.
Key words: Bypass protein, feed intake, grazing, on-farm trial, response curve, rumen supplement
Similar with other developing countries in the region, large ruminants in Cambodia depend on natural pasture and crop residues, mainly rice straw. These are of low digestibility and usually imbalanced in essential nutrients which contribute to low feed intake (Schiere and Ibrahim 1989). Supplements are required to improve rumen microbial fermentation and therefore the performance of the host animals (Dixon and Egan 1987). Inadequate nutrition in cattle has often caused economic loss to the farmers because their animals loose weight and body condition, resulting in reduced reproductive capacity and increased susceptibility to diseases and parasites (Leng 1997).
Early work with fresh cassava leaves showed that it could be the sole source of supplementary protein and roughage in diets for fattening cattle based on liquid molasses-urea (Ffoulkes and Preston 1978). When used as a supplement to untreated rice straw the growth rates in 'local "yellow" cattle were increased threefold by supplementing them with fresh cassava foliage (Seng Mom et al 2001). Ho Quang Do et al (2002) reported a curvilinear increase in N retention in goats when fresh cassava leaves replaced grass as the supplement to ammoniated rice straw.
In Cambodia, cassava (Manihot esculenta) is usually planted by the farmers with the main purpose of root harvesting and the leaves are left in the field. It has been shown that this residue can be a valuable source of protein for feeding to many kinds of animals (Preston 2001). When farmers harvest cassava root, the leaves are still a good quality protein feed for cattle particularly in the dry season. This situation can give an opportunity for farmers to get more benefit by collecting the cassava leaves for cattle feeding. Therefore, it is important to promote ways of maximizing the use of this valuable crop. Wanapat et al (1997) have drawn attention to the potential of cassava foliage made into hay, which combined leaves, stems and petiole, as a feed for ruminants. Added to this, cassava foliage contains condensed tannins (Wanapat et al 1997), which when fed to buffaloes in form of sun dried hay (Netpana et al 2001; Granum et al 2002) and goats (Seng Sokerya and Preston 2003) in fresh form has been reported to reduce nematode egg counts.
In view of the potential of cassava foliage as a supplement for ruminant animals, there is a need to promote research with this feed for cattle in the Cambodia situation.
The experiment was carried out in villages in Treang district, Takeo province which is about 80 km south of Phnom Penh city. The experiment was conducted for 3 months from June to September, 2006 excluding adaptation and organizing period.
In Treang district, Takeo provice, CelAgrid has been implementing a cattle project financed by Heifer International Cambodia. The aims of the implementation are to improve cattle management and feeding. Twenty farmers (including women householders) were selected for the study to evaluate the response to sun-dried cassava foliage. Beside these farmers, seven other farmers joined in the study to serve as controls using the traditional system of un-supplemented free grazing treatment. The selection of the farmers was based on:
The experimental design was a "production function" to evaluate the growth response of cattle to increasing levels of sun-dried cassava foliage when fed untreated rice straw plus a "rumen supplement". One female animal per household (n=20) was allocated to one of 5 levels of sun dried cassava foliage (0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1 % of body weight in DM basis). The design was a completely randomized design (CRD) with 4 replications of each treatment.
The individual treatments were
- RC0: Rice straw + rumen supplement at 0.25% body weight
- RC0.25: Rice straw + rumen supplement 0.25% body weight + sun dried cassava foliage 0.25% body weight (in DM)
- RC0.50: Rice straw + rumen supplement 0.25% body weight + sun dried cassava foliage 0.50% body weight (in DM)
- RC0.75: Rice straw + rumen supplement 0.25% body weight + sun dried cassava foliage 0.75% body weight (in DM)
- RC1: Rice straw + rumen supplement 0.25% body weight + sun dried cassava foliage 1% body weight (in DM)
The heifers were vaccinated against Foot and Mouth Disease before starting the experiment. They were from 1.5 to 2 years of age with an average live weight of 174 kg live weight. Twenty heifers were tethered alongside the feed trough (Photo 1) in each household, where they had free access to the experimental diet.
|
Photo 1. Individual animals tethered to the feed trough in each household |
The sun-died cassava foliage was fed first at about 7.00 am. The rumen supplement and rice straw were fed 2 times per day in the morning (8:00h) and afternoon (16:00h). Water was available the whole day. The seven "control" heifers were kept under traditional farmer management of free grazing and no supplementation.
The cassava foliage was bought from farm households situated along the riverside in Kandal province, at the time of harvesting the roots. It was taken to CelAgrid for drying. The cassava leaves plus petioles were separated from the hard stem and sun dried by spreading on a plastic sheet placed on the ground. The duration of sun drying was 3 to 5 days until the leaves become crisp (>85%DM). After sun drying, the foliages were stored in bags and transported to the study site in Takeo province.
The ingredients for the rumen supplement (Table 1) were bought at the local market and mixed by the farmers participating in the study (Photo 2). After mixing, it was kept by each farm household and fed to the cattle at the rate of 0.25% of body weight per day. Rice straw was bought from farmers in the study area. It was from rice grown under rain-fed conditions.
Table 1. Composition of the rumen supplement |
|
Ingredient |
% (fresh basis) |
Sugar palm syrup |
27 |
Water |
13 |
Rice bran |
33.5 |
Urea |
13 |
Diammonium phosphate |
3 |
Salt |
5 |
Lime |
5 |
Sulfur |
0.5 |
|
|
Feeds offered and refused were recorded daily and weighed to measure daily feed intake. Representative samples of feeds offered and refused were collected for chemical analysis. The live weight was taken at the beginning of the study and then every 2 weeks until the end of the trial (Photo 3).
|
|
Faecal samples were collected directly from the rectum of each animal once at the beginning of the experiment and after every 2 week interval to check the nematode egg count.
The feeds offered and refused were analyzed for DM using microwave radiation (Undersander et al 1993) and N following the Kjeldahl procedure as outlined by AOAC (1990). For faecal egg counts, 4 g of representative samples of faeces were ground and mixed with 56 ml of floatation fluid (a saturated salt solution in water). A sub sample was transferred to both compartments of a McMaster counting chamber and allowed to stand for 5 minutes. All helminth eggs were counted under a microscope at 10x10 magnification and multiplied by 50 to yield the eggs per gram of faeces (Hansen and Perry 1994).
Data for feed intake, growth and feed conversion were analyzed
by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the General Linear Model
procedure of MINITAB software (Version 13.31 2000). Sources of
variation were levels of sun dried cassava foliage and error.
Regression analysis was used to relate the independent variable
(levels sun dried cassava foliage) with the dependent variables
(live weight gain, feed intake and feed conversion).
There were no signs or symptoms of disease or toxicity in the animals during the experiment. Animals were in good healthy and it was observed that the skin became brighter in colour towards the end of the experiment, especially in the treatments with highest offer levels of cassava foliage. The changing appearance of the skin observed in this study may have been due to the effect of the protein supplementation enhancing the expression of immunity against internal and external parasite (Leng R A. personal communication).
The chemical composition of the components of the sun-dried cassava foliage, and of the rumen supplement, are shown in tables 2 and 3.
Table 2. Mean values for chemical composition of feed ingredients |
||
|
% DM |
N*6.25, % in DM |
Whole sun dried cassava foliage |
87 |
18.8 |
Sun dried cassava leaves |
88.7 |
23.4 |
Sun dried cassava petiole |
86.3 |
9.7 |
Rumen supplement |
70.6 |
39.6 |
The crude protein level in the cassava leaves was almost three times higher in the leaves than in the petioles. It was lower than in the studies of Wanapat (2003) and Vongsamphanh and Wanapat (2004) where the values reported were 23.6% and 27.3% in DM. These higher values could be because these authors harvested the foliage 3 months after planting, whereas the sun-dried cassava foliage in this study was collected at root harvesting. The nutritive value of cassava foliage has been shown to be affected by variety, location, soil type and other environmental conditions as well as the method of chemical analysis (Seerley 1972).
The DM and crude protein of the rice straw varied slightly among the different households (Table 3). The mean overall values were 87.1% DM and 5.41% crude protein.
Table 3. Mean values for chemical composition of rice straw in the different house-holds |
||
Family name |
% DM |
N*6.25, % (in DM) |
Mr. Banh Keo |
85.6 |
5.8 |
Mr. Chham Kosal |
85.5 |
4.9 |
Mrs. Eth Sarom |
87.5 |
5.1 |
Mr. Im Ean |
88.0 |
5.1 |
Mr. Khat Youn |
88.3 |
4.9 |
Mr. Kim Cho |
86.3 |
5.7 |
Mr. Kong Thol |
87.5 |
4.9 |
Mr. Moa Khon |
88.4 |
5.7 |
Mrs. Moa Yat |
85.7 |
5.8 |
Mr. Ngan Thy |
85.8 |
5.7 |
Mrs. Nhem That |
86.3 |
5.7 |
Mrs. Nhem Theoun |
87.3 |
5.7 |
Mr. Ni Chivo |
87.5 |
4.9 |
Mrs. Oam Rani |
86.6 |
4.9 |
Mrs. Om Yen |
88.0 |
5.1 |
Mrs. Sok Chanthy |
88.0 |
5.8 |
Mrs. Sok Mali |
88.3 |
5.1 |
Mrs. Sok Min |
85.9 |
5.8 |
Mrs. Thou Ka |
86.8 |
5.8 |
Mrs. Yong Thuch |
87.8 |
5.7 |
Mean±SD |
87.1±1.01 |
5.41±0.39 |
The actual intake of the supplements was lower than the planned offer levels (Table 4; Figure 1).
Table 4. Actual intake of sun dried cassava foliage compared with planned levels |
|||||
Planned, % of body weight (DM) |
0 |
0.25 |
0.5 |
0.75 |
1 |
Actual intake,% body weight (DM) |
0 |
0.18 |
0.34 |
0.55 |
0.73 |
Intake as % amount offered |
|
|
|||
Cassava leaf |
0 |
96.7 |
95.7 |
94.9 |
96.0 |
Cassava petiole |
0 |
40.1 |
30.3 |
44.2 |
39.4 |
Cassava crude protein, g/g total CP in diet |
0 |
0.16 |
0.26 |
0.38 |
0.43 |
|
Figure 1. Mean values for intake of diet ingredients as % of amount offered according to the offer level of sun-dried cassava foliage |
The heifers selected the cassava leaves in preference to the petioles, such that intakes of the former were 90% of the offer levels while for the latter it was less than 45% of offer levels. The low acceptability of the sun-dried petioles may be due to the effect of drying (rather hard in texture) or the lower protein content. In this study, leaves and petioles were sun-dried without chopping. In contrast, when feeding fresh cassava foliage managed by repeated harvesting there was no selection (personal observation) against the petioles. The cattle consumed petioles, leaves and soft stems but refused the hard stems.
There were no significant effects of cassava foliage intake on DM and crude protein intake of rice straw and rumen supplement (Table 5).
Table 5. Mean values for feed intake and crude protein intake of heifers fed rice straw with levels of sun dried cassava foliage |
|||||||
Planned levels of cassava, % of live weight (DM basis) |
SEM |
P |
|||||
0 |
0.25 |
0.5 |
0.75 |
1 |
|||
Dry matter intake, g/day | |||||||
Rice straw |
4295 |
4156 |
4538 |
3967 |
4336 |
224 |
0.49 |
Rumen supplement |
315 |
293 |
303 |
258 |
309 |
18.5 |
0.26 |
Cassava |
0 |
323 |
621 |
994 |
1305 |
|
|
Total |
4609c |
4772c |
5462bc |
5219bc |
5950ab |
234 |
0.001 |
DMI, g/kg LW |
25.6 |
27.0 |
30.1 |
29.2 |
32.8 |
1.97 |
0.14 |
Crude protein intake, g/day |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Rice straw |
245 |
223 |
243 |
213 |
224 |
16.7 |
0.62 |
Rumen supplement |
125 |
116 |
120 |
102 |
122 |
7.32 |
0.26 |
Cassava |
0 |
64.7 |
127 |
196 |
261 |
|
|
Total |
369d |
404cd |
490bc |
511b |
608a |
20.8 |
0.001 |
However, total intake of DM and crude protein intake increased according to the intake of cassava foliage (Figures 2 and 3).
|
|
|
Figure 3. Mean values for intake of crude protein from the different dietary ingredients according to intake of intake of crude protein from sun-dried cassava foliage |
The total DM increased by 30% and the crude protein by 65% at the highest level of cassava foliage. The proportion of dietary crude protein from sun dried cassava foliage was 40% of the total crude protein intake at the highest level of supplementation (Figure 4).
|
Figure 4. Mean values for percentage of dietary crude intake from the different ingredients according to intake of crude protein from sun-dried cassava foliage |
The effect of the sun-dried cassava foliage in increasing the total DM intake in this study is in agreement with reports by Vongsamphanh and Wanapat (2004), who supplemented rice straw with cassava hay in a study with cattle, and by by Ho Quang Do et al (2002) who supplemented fresh cassava foliage to goats fed ammoniated rice straw. The positive linear trend in total DM intake in response to the supplementary cassava foliage protein (Figure 5) is in accordance with the thesis outlined by Leng and Preston (1976) and by IAEA (2002) that the selected protein supplement should not reduce intake and utilization of the basal diet but instead have potential to enhance them.
|
Figure 5. Relationship between sun-dried cassava foliage intake and DM intake |
There were major differences in live weight gain between the heifers fed rice straw and rumen supplement (without cassava foliage) and those on un-supplemented free grazing (Figure 6).
|
|
The rumen supplement provided nutrients for rumen microbes (ammonia, sulphur, phosphorus and other minerals) that can correct deficiencies of these nutrients in poor quality feeds such as rice straw. It cannot be concluded that the difference was due only to the rumen supplement as the grazing areas were extremely limited due to the land being used for the rice crop. The daily weight gain of the cattle fed only rumen supplement and straw in this experiment was higher than in the study of Seng Mom et al (2001); however, there were differences in the breeds which were larger and of Zebu type in our study compared with the smaller "Yellow" breed of cattle used by Seng Mom et al (2001).
Daily weight gain increased and feed conversion was better with increasing levels of protein from sun-dried cassava foliage in the diet (Table 6).
Table 6. Mean values for live weight and conversion of heifers fed rice straw with levels of sun dried cassava foliage |
|||||||
Live weight, kg |
Planned levels of cassava, % of live weight (DM basis) |
SEM |
P |
||||
0 |
0.25 |
0.5 |
0.75 |
1 |
|||
Initial |
175 |
166 |
170 |
168 |
166 |
8.88 |
0.93 |
Final |
191 |
189 |
196 |
192 |
199 |
9.24 |
0.93 |
Final# |
185 |
192 |
195 |
193 |
202 |
3.50 |
0.058 |
Daily gain, g/day |
201b |
266ab |
282ab |
278ab |
402a |
33.0 |
0.01 |
Feed DM conversion |
25.1 |
18.4 |
20. |
18.8 |
15.0 |
2.39 |
0.09 |
# Adjusted for differences in initial weight |
The responses (Figures 7,8 and 9) were linear over the range of cassava crude protein intakes recorded in the experiment (from 0 to 1.6 g crude protein/kg live weight).
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 9. Relationship between intake of crude protein from sun-dried cassava foliage and DM feed conversion |
The improved growth rates and feed conversion in this study are in agreement with the reports of Seng Mom et al (2001) and Ho Quang Do et al (2001), who used fresh cassava foliage as a supplement for cattle fed rice straw and Moore (1976) who gave cassava foliage to steers fed Pennisetum purpureum with varying levels of cassava foliage.
Le Huu Khoung and Duong Nguyen Khang (2005) reported a linear increase in live weight gain in "Sindhi*Yellow" cattle fed fresh cassava foliage as a supplement to urea-treated rice straw. The maximum response of 60% was less than the 200% response in our study probably because the rate of cassava foliage supplementation was higher (1.6 g/kg live weight compared with 1.0 g/kg live weight in the study of Le Huu Khoung and Duong Nguyen Khang (2005). The response in the experiment of Seng Mom et al (2001) was 400% for cassava foliage protein at 1.3 g/kg live weight compared with the control.
The results of this study, together with the numerous reports in the literature, indicate strongly that the beneficial effect in ruminants of the protein in cassava foliage is due to its "bypass" or "escape" properties presumably because of the binding effect on the protein of the tannins present in this forage (Wanapat et al 1997). In an in vitro study, Promkot and Wanapat (2003) estimated that the rumen undegradable protein (assumed to be bypass protein) as percent of total protein in cassava hay was 52.7 compared with 50.4 for cottonseed meal (considered to be one of the best sources of bypass protein according to Preston and Leng 1987) and 35 for leucaena leaf meal
The numbers of nematode eggs in the faeces were extremely low both in the supplemented cattle and those on free grazing with no obvious tendencies due to date of sampling or supplementation (Table 7).
Table 7. Nematode egg counts/g of faeces in the heifers fed rice straw and sun-dried cassava foliage or on free grazing |
||||||
Sample date |
Crude protein from cassava foliage, g/kg live weight |
Free grazing |
||||
0 |
0.37 |
0.69 |
1.09 |
1.43 |
||
6/27/2006 |
275 |
188 |
238 |
200 |
425 |
243 |
7/11/2006 |
138 |
150 |
225 |
150 |
188 |
143 |
7/25/2006 |
238 |
250 |
275 |
375 |
175 |
193 |
8/8/2006 |
150 |
125 |
466 |
213 |
225 |
171 |
8/22/2006 |
213 |
100 |
325 |
163 |
288 |
171 |
9/5/2006 |
163 |
88 |
225 |
88 |
150 |
179 |
9/19/2006 |
200 |
75 |
138 |
100 |
163 |
229 |
Based on the results of this research it is concluded that:
The authors are grateful to the MEKARN project, financed by the Sida-SAREC agency and assistants Mr. Pek Samnang and Chea Chheangly for their technical help. Thanks are also due to 27 farmers in Treang District, Takeo province, who shared their experiences and participated actively in this study.
AOAC 1990 Official Method of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 15th edition (K Helrick editor). Arlington pp 1230
Dixon R M and Egan A R 1987 Strategies for utilization fibrous crop residues as animal feeds, Paper presented to the 7th AAFARR workshop, Chaing Mai, Thailand
Ffoulkes D and Preston T R 1978 Cassava or sweet potato forage as combined sources of protein and roughage in molasses based diets: effect of supplementation with soybean meal. Tropical Animal Production (3): 186-192 http://www.utafoundation.org/TAP/TAP33/3_3_1.pdf
Granum G, Wanapat M, Wachirapakorn C and Pakdee P 2002 The effect of cassava hay supplementation on weight change, dry matter intake, digestibility and internal parasites in swamp buffaloes (bubalus bubalis) and cattle (bos indicus). In: Proceedings of Agriculture Conference, Narasuan University, Pitsanuloke, Thailand, July 26-30.
Hansen Jørgen and Perry Brian 1994 The epidemiology diagnosis and control of helminth parasites of ruminants. A Handbook, International Laboratory for Research on Animal Diseases, ILRAD, Nairobi, Kenya http://www.fao.org/Wairdocs/ILRI/x5492E/x5492E00.htm
Ho Quang Do, Vo Van Son, Bui Phan Thu Hang, Vuong Chan Tri and Preston T R 2002 Effect of supplementation of ammoniated rice straw with cassava leaves or grass on intake, digestibility and N retention by goats. Livestock Research for Rural Development (14) 3: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd14/3/do143b.htm
Ho Quang Do, Vo Van San and Preston T R 2001 Blocks or cakes of urea-molasses as supplement for Sindhi x Yellow cattle fed rice straw and cut grass or cassava foliage. In: Proc. International Workshop on Current Research and Development on Use of Cassava as Animal feed. (Editors: T R Preston, B Ogle and M Wanapat), organized by Khon Kaen University and SIDA-SAREC, Sweden. July 23-24, 2001 http://www.mekarn.org/procKK/do.htm
IAEA 2002 Development and Field Evaluation of Animal feed supplementation Packages. Proceeding of the final review meeting of an IAEA Technical co-operation regional AFRA project. Vienna 2002 IAEA http://www-naweb.iaea.org/nafa/aph/public/iaea-tecdoc-1294.pdf
Le Huu Khoung and Duong Nguyen Khang 2005 Effect of fresh foliage on growth and faecal nematode egg counts in Sindhi X Yellow cattle fed urea-treated rice straw basal diet. In: Proceedings of Regional seminar workshop on livestock based sustainable farming systems in the lower Mekong Basin. (Editors: T R Preston and B Ogle) organized by Cantho University, Vietnam and Sida-SAREC, Sweden. May 23-25, 2005 http://www.mekarn.org/proctu/khan18.htm
Leng R A 1997 Tree foliage in ruminant nutrition. http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/w7448e/w7448e00.htm
Leng R A and Preston T R 1976 Sugarcane for cattle production: present constraints, perspectives and researchpriorities. Tropical Animal Production 1: 1-22 http://www.utafoundation.org/TAP/TAP11/tap1_1a.pdf
Moore C P 1976 The utilization of cassava forage in ruminant feeding. International Seminar on Tropical Livestock Products, 8-12 March, Acapulco, Mexico.
Netpana N, Wanapat M, Poungchompu O and Toburan W 2001 Effect of condensed tannins in cassava hay on fecal parasitic egg counts in swamp buffaloes and cattle. In: Proceedings International Workshop on Current Research and Development on Use of Cassava as Animal Feed. T R Preston, B Ogle and M Wanapat (Editors) http://www.mekarn.org/procKK/netp.htm
Preston T R 2001 Potential of cassava in integrated faming systems. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Current Research and Development on Use of Cassava as Animal feed. (Editors: T R Preston, B Ogle and M Wanapat), organized by Khon Kaen University and SIDA-SAREC, Sweden. July 23-24, 2001 http://www.mekarn.org/procKK/pres.htm
Preston T R and Leng R A 1987 Matching Ruminant Production System with Available Resource in the Tropic and Subtropics. Penambul Books: Armidale, P.O.Box 512, Armidale, New South Wales 2350, Australia.
Promkot C and Wanapat M 2003 Ruminal degradation and intestinal digestion of crude protein of tropical resources using nylon bag technique and three-step in vitro procedure in dairy cattle. Livestock Research for Rural Development (15) 11. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd15/11/prom1511.htm
Schiere J B and Ibrahim M N M 1989 Feeding of urea-ammonia treated rice straw. A compilation of miscellaneous reports produced by the Straw Utilization Project (Sri Lanka): 9. 101
Seerley R W 1972 Utilization of cassava as a livestock feed. Pages 99-130 in Literature review and research recommendations on cassava, edited by C H Hendershott et al, AID Contract no. csd/2497. University of Georgia, Athens, USA.
Seng Mom, Preston T R, Leng R A and Meulen Uter 2001Response of young cattle fed rice straw to supplementation with cassava foliage and a single drench of cooking oil. Livestock Research for Rural Development (13) 4. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd13/4/seng134.htm
Seng Sokerya and Preston T R 2003 Effect of grass or cassava foliage on growth and nematode parasite infestation in goats fed low or high protein diet in confinement. Livestock Research for Rural Development (15) 8: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd15/8/kery158.htm
Undersander D, Mertens D R and Theix N 1993 Forage analysis procedures. National Forage Testing Association. Omaha pp 154
Vongsamphanh P andWanapat M 2004 Comparison of cassava hay yield and chemical composition of local and introduced varieties and effects of levels of cassava hay supplementation in native beef cattle fed on rice straw. Livestock Research for Rural Development 16 (8): http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd16/8/vong16055.htm
Wanapat M 2003 Manipulation of cassava cultivation and utilization to improve protein to energy biomass for livestock feeding in tropic. Asian-Austalasian Journal of Animal Science 16: 463-472
Wanapat M, Pimpa O, Petlum A and Boontao U 1997 Cassava hay: A new strategic feed for ruminants during the dry season. Livestock Research for Rural Development (9) 2: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd9/2/metha92.htm