Livestock Research for Rural Development 19 (9) 2007 | Guide for preparation of papers | LRRD News | Citation of this paper |
Two experiments were carried out to study the effect of duration of wilting (0, 24 or 48 h) on HCN content of leaves from "sweet" and "bitter" varieties of cassava and on their nutritive value for pigs as measured by digestibility and N balance. In the first experiment, the duration of wilting was 0, 24 or 48 h. In the second experiment, the leaves from the bitter and sweet varieties were fed to pigs, either fresh or after 24 h wilting, as the only supplementary source of protein in diets based in broken rice and sugar palm juice.
The bitter variety was
higher in DM, N and HCN than the sweet variety. However, there were significant
interactions between variety and time of wilting. DM increased and HCN decreased
at a faster rate in the bitter than in the sweet variety. Wilting cassava leaves
for up to 48 h reduced HCN content to minimal values, the rate of decrease being
more pronounced in the bitter than in the sweet variety, with no differences
between varieties after 48 h. There were no differences in the nutritive value
for pigs, between bitter and sweet varieties, nor were there benefits from
wilting for 24 hours, as measured by apparent digestibilities of DM, crude
protein and crude fibre, and by N retention. The fresh cassava leaves provided
about 20% of the diet DM, which resulted in HCN intakes of from
3.08 to 3.19 mg/kg LW for the diets with fresh cassava leaves, and from 1.85 to
2.16 when the leaves were wilted 24 h.
It is concluded that amino acid imbalance, levels of cell wall constituents and condensed tannins are more important than HCN levels in limiting the usefulness of cassava leaves for pigs.
Key words: Cassava leaves, HCN, varieties, wilting
Varieties of cassava are traditionally designated as "bitter" or "sweet" considered to reflect different levels of cyanogenic glucosides, the precursors of the highly toxic cyanic acid (HCN). Normally, the roots of the sweet variety are used for human consumption and are boiled before being eaten. The bitter variety is considered to require some additional form of processing, such as sun-drying, before it is used as animal feed. Cassava leaves have been claimed to be a very important component of integrated farming systems in tropical countries (Preston 2001). In this connection, some constraints to cassava utilization in pig feeding, such as the cyanogenic glucosides present in the plant (Gómez and Valdivieso 1985; Ravindran and Ravindran 1988) can be neutralized successfully after ensiling (Ravindran 1992, Chhay Ty et al 2001) and sun drying (Bui Huy Nhu Phuc et al 1996). However, these methods can be time-consuming and in the case of sun-drying are difficult in the rainy season. Wilting under a roof promises to be a simpler and more reliable procedure.
The aim of this study was to study
the effects of wilting under a roof on the content of HCN in two local cassava
varieties, characterized by being either "sweet" or "bitter", and to evaluate
possible effects on digestibility and N retention in growing pigs.
The experiments were conducted in CelAgrid (Centre for Livestock and Agriculture Development), which is located in Kandal village, Rolous commune, Kandal Steung districk, Kandal province in Cambodia in June 2006. During the study, the mean temperatures in the shade were 29 0C (8.00am), 34 0C (12.00am) and 30 0C (6.00pm)
Two local varieties of cassava, one considered to be "bitter" (supposedly high in HCN precursors) and the other "sweet" (low in HCN precursors) were planted in the experimental cropping area of CelAgrid. Fertilization was with effluent from a biodigester loaded with pig manure. Both varieties were harvested after 2-2.5 month's growth when they had reached about 1.2m in height. Following removal of the petioles and stems, a representative sample of the leaves from each variety was analyzed immediately for content of HCN, DM, N and water-extractable DM and N. About 5 kg of fresh leaves of each variety were then chopped finely and a sample taken and analyzed immediately for HCN and DM. The remaining chopped leaves were spread out in a layer of 5 cm in the open air and left to wilt for 48 hours. At 4 hour intervals during the daytime the leaves were turned to facilitate exposure to sunlight. Samples were taken after 24 and 48 hours to determine HCN, DM and water extractable DM and N.
|
|
|
|
There were six treatments with two varieties and three methods of processing
Varieties
S: Sweet
B: Bitter
Wilted
W0: not wilted
W24: wilted 24 hours
W48: wilted 48 hours
|
|
|
|
DM was determined by microwave radiation (Undersander et al 1993). N was determined according to AOAC (1990) procedures and water extractable DM and N following the method of Ly and Preston (1997). The HCN was determined by titrating with AgN03 after boiling the sample in chloroform and reaction with 0.1N KOH.
The data were subjected to analysis of variance according to the general linear model of the Minitab software (Minitab 2000). Sources of variation were: varieties, wilting time, interaction varieties*wilting time and error.
The experiment was done with four castrated male pigs (Local*Large White) weighing on average 20 kg. The four treatments in a 2*2 factorial within a 4*4 Latin square arrangement (Table 1) were:
Varieties
Wilting
Table 1. Experimental layout |
||||
Period/Pig |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
0hSC |
24hSC |
0hBC |
24hBC |
2 |
24hBC |
0hSC |
24hSC |
0hBC |
3 |
0hBC |
24hBC |
0hSC |
24hSC |
4 |
24hSC |
0hBC |
24hBC |
0hSC |
The pigs were housed in metabolism cages, installed in an open stable and constructed so as to facilitate the quantitative collection of faeces and urine. The characteristics of the cages have been described elsewhere (Chhay Ty et al 2003). Each experimental period consisted of 12 days, of which the first seven days were for adaptation to the diets followed by another five days for collection of faeces, urine and feed refusals.
The daily dry matter (DM) allowance was calculated at 4-5% of the body weight according to observation of the intake (Table 2) and was divided between the cassava leaves (fresh or wilted 24 hours), broken rice (offered at 2% of live weight) and sugar palm juice (offered at 1% of live weight (all on DM basis).
Table 2. Planned composition of diets (DM basis) |
||||
|
0hSC |
24hSC |
0hBC |
24hBC |
Broken rice |
40 |
40 |
40 |
40 |
Sugar palm syrup |
20 |
20 |
20 |
20 |
Cassava leaves |
39.5 |
39.5 |
39.5 |
39.5 |
Salt |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
Total |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
% DM |
48.3 |
55.1 |
48.5 |
55.0 |
% of DM |
||||
OM |
75.1 |
75.1 |
74.5 |
74.5 |
Crude protein |
13.9 |
13.9 |
14.7 |
14.7 |
Crude fibre |
4.26 |
4.26 |
4.06 |
4.06 |
HCN, mg/kg DM |
108 |
42.3 |
134 |
52.9 |
Leaves from both cassava varieties were harvested every day beginning 3 months after planting. Stems and petioles were removed from the leaves, which were then chopped into small pieces and offered immediately (0h) to the pigs or were wilted in the shade for 24 h, after chopping. Broken rice was purchased from the local rice mill and sugar palm juice was purchased from the market.
The pigs were fed thrice daily with approximately equal rations at 8:00 am, 12:00 am and 3:00 pm. Water was permanently supplied through drinking nipples.
The animals were weighed at the beginning of the trial and every 12 days. Feed refusals and faeces were collected every day and were kept frozen in plastic bags until analysis. A representative sample (10% of amount voided) was obtained from every animal. At the end of each period, samples of feed refusals and faeces were mixed thoroughly by hand and then homogenized in a coffee grinder, prior to taking representative samples that were analyzed for DM, N, crude fibre, HCN and ash.. Urine was collected in a plastic bucket to which sulphuric acid was added to maintain the pH below 4.0 (10% of concentrated H2SO4). The volume of urine was measured every day and 10% preserved until the end of each period when the samples were mixed together and analyzed for N.
Chemical analyses of the feed ingredients and faeces were undertaken following the methods of AOAC (1990) for ash, N and crude fibre (Table 3).
Table 3. Chemical characteristics of the ingredients of the diets |
||||||
|
Cassava leaves |
Broken rice |
Sugar palm juice |
|||
0h SC |
24h SC |
0h BC |
24h BC |
|||
DM, % |
23.9 |
41.2 |
24.4 |
40.9 |
89.0 |
14 |
As % of DM |
|
|||||
Ash |
6.48 |
6.48 |
6.25 |
6.25 |
4.50 |
- |
OM |
93.5 |
93.5 |
93.8 |
93.8 |
95.5 |
- |
N |
4.4 |
4.4 |
4.7 |
4.7 |
1.22 |
- |
Crude protein |
27.5 |
27.5 |
29.4 |
29.4 |
7.62 |
- |
Crude fibre |
10.8 |
10.8 |
10.3 |
10.3 |
- |
- |
HCN, mg/kgDM |
273 |
107 |
338 |
134 |
- |
- |
The DM content was determined using the microwave method of Undersander et al (1993). The N content of urine was determined by the AOAC (1990) procedure. Fresh and wilted cassava leaves were analyzed for HCN by the procedure of AOAC (1990).
The data were subjected to analysis of variance according to the general linear model of the Minitab software (Minitab 2000). Sources of variation were: pigs, period, variety, wilting time, interaction between varieties*wilting time and error.
The bitter variety was higher in DM, N and HCN than the sweet variety (Table 4), on the basis of the average of all wilting times,.
Table 4. Mean values for chemical characteristics of leaves from sweet and bitter cassava varieties at 0, 24 and 48 h wilting time (main effects) |
|||||||||
|
Wilting , h |
SEM |
Prob |
Variety |
SEM |
Prob |
|||
0 |
24 |
48 |
Bitter |
Sweet |
|||||
DM, % |
25.9 |
52.7 |
76.0 |
0.49 |
0.001 |
54.3 |
48.8 |
0.39 |
0.001 |
N, % in DM |
4.57 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
4.74 |
4.41 |
0.03 |
0.001 |
HCN, mg/kg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In fresh |
111c |
41.6b |
12.1a |
1.68 |
0.001 |
67.6 |
42.3 |
1.37 |
0.001 |
In DM |
427 |
80.2 |
15.9 |
3.51 |
0.001 |
209 |
139 |
2.86 |
0.001 |
abc Means without common letter are different at P<0.05 |
However, there were significant interactions between variety and time of wilting (Table 5).
Table 5. Mean values for chemical characteristics of sweet and bitter cassava varieties at 0, 24 and 48 h wilting time (individual treatments) |
||||||||
|
Sweet |
Bitter |
SEM |
Prob |
||||
0 |
24 |
48 |
0 |
24 |
48 |
|||
DM, % |
25.2a |
53.7b |
67.5c |
26.7a |
51.6b |
84.5d |
0.69 |
0.001 |
N, % in DM |
4.57 |
- |
- |
4.74 |
- |
- |
0.03 |
0.012 |
HCN, mg/kg |
||||||||
Fresh |
87.8a |
28.4b |
10.9cf |
135d |
54.9e |
13.3cf |
2.38 |
0.001 |
DM |
349a |
52.8b |
16.1cf |
505d |
108e |
15.7cf |
4.96 |
0.001 |
abcdef Means without common letter are different at P<0.05 |
DM increased (Figure 1) and HCN decreased (Figure 2) at a faster rate in the bitter than in the sweet variety.
Figure 1. DM content of
cassava leaves from sweet |
Figure 2. HCN content of
cassava leaves (in DM) from sweet |
The proportions of the DM and the N extracted by washing (Table 6; Figure 3) did not differ between varieties but decreased markedly with increased time of wilting.
Table 6. Water extractable DM and N on different wilted time and variety of cassava leaves |
|||||||||
Water-extractable DM and N, % |
Wilted time |
|
|
Variety |
|
|
|||
0 |
24 |
48 |
SEM |
Prob |
Bitter |
Sweet |
SEM |
Prob |
|
DM |
55.9 |
46.7 |
31.1 |
0.75 |
0.001 |
43.9 |
45.2 |
0.61 |
0.37 |
N |
54.9 |
36.3 |
20.1 |
0.82 |
0.001 |
36.9 |
37.3 |
0.67 |
0.40 |
|
Figure 3. Water extractable
DM and N in cassava leaves from sweet |
DM intake was not affected by variety nor by wilting (Table 7).
Table 7. Mean values for intake of intake of feeds and HCN by pigs fed fresh or wilted cassava leaves from sweet and bitter varieties (main effects) |
|||||||
|
Wilting, h |
Variety |
|
Prob |
SEM |
||
0 |
24 |
Prob |
Bitter |
Sweet |
|||
Intake, g DM/day |
|
|
|
|
|||
Broken rice |
532 |
512 |
0.07 |
542 |
501 |
0.001 |
7.83 |
Sugar palm juice |
271 |
271 |
0.42 |
273 |
268 |
0.001 |
0.46 |
Cassava leaves |
214 |
258. |
0.004- |
244 |
228 |
0.29 |
4.29 |
Total DM |
1016 |
1041 |
0.74 |
1059 |
998 |
0.18 |
13.4 |
g/ kg body weight |
36.0 |
37.1 |
0.12 |
36.6 |
36.4 |
0.11 |
0.48 |
Crude protein, g/day |
93.0 |
109 |
0.001 |
101 |
101 |
0.96 |
4.7 |
As % of diet DM |
9.46 |
10.6 |
0.002 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
0.95 |
0.25 |
Intake, HCN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mg/day |
77.0 |
53.5 |
0.001 |
66.8 |
63.6 |
0.47 |
3.07 |
mg/kg LW |
3.13 |
2.01 |
0.001 |
2.67 |
2.47 |
0.23 |
0.24 |
However, there were significant interactions between variety and wilting, with higher intakes when sweet cassava leaves were fed fresh and lower values when the leaves were wilted for 24 h (8). Overall intakes of the cassava leaves accounted for some 20% of the diet DM (Figure 4), which was only about half of the planned proportions of 39.5% (Table 3). As a result the crude protein content of the diets (9.5 to 10.6% in DM) was lower than what has been indicated as the optimum (12 to 14% in DM) for growing pigs of 20 kg live weight fed diets in which all the supplementary protein is from vegetative sources (Thim Sokha et al 2007).
|
Figure 4. Proportions of
dietary ingredients that were consumed by pigs fed |
The intakes of HCN, as dietary concentrations and per unit live weight of the pigs (Table 7), were reduced by wilting but did not differ between bitter and sweet varieties. There were no interactions between the effects of wilting and variety for these traits (Table 8).
Table 8. Mean values for intake of feeds, DM, crude protein and HCN, by pigs fed fresh or wilted cassava leaves from sweet and bitter varieties (individual treatments) |
||||||
|
Wilting, 0 h |
Wilting, 24 h |
SEM |
Prob |
||
Bitter |
Sweet |
Bitter |
Sweet |
|||
DM, g/day |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broken rice |
534 |
530 |
549 |
473 |
7.83 |
0.001 |
Sugar palm juice |
274 |
267 |
273 |
269 |
0.46 |
0.001 |
Cassava leaves |
200 |
228 |
289 |
228 |
15 |
0.004 |
Total |
942 |
975 |
1031 |
937 |
18.9 |
0.001 |
g/ kg body weight |
35.4 |
36.6 |
37.9 |
36.2 |
0.68 |
0.04 |
Crude protein, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
g/day |
88.1 |
98.1 |
114 |
104 |
4.7 |
0.04 |
As % of diet DM |
9.26 |
9.65 |
10.8 |
10.4 |
0.35 |
0.25 |
HCN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
mg/day |
76.0 |
77.9 |
57.6 |
49.4 |
4.35 |
0.26 |
mg/kg DM LW |
3.19 |
3.08 |
2.16 |
1.85 |
0.17 |
0.55 |
Coefficients of apparent digestibility were not affected by wilting nor by variety (Table 9).
Table 9. Mean values for apparent digestibility in pigs fed fresh or wilted cassava leaves from sweet and bitter varieties (main effects) |
||||||||
|
Wilting, h |
Variety |
SEM |
|
||||
0 |
24 |
Prob |
Bitter |
Sweet |
Prob |
|
||
Apparent digestibility, % |
|
|
|
|
||||
Dry matter |
92.7 |
91.7 |
0.16 |
91.6 |
92.8 |
0.063 |
0.47 |
|
Organic matter |
90.3 |
89.1 |
0.17 |
88.9 |
90.4 |
0.098 |
0.63 |
|
Nitrogen |
73.3 |
72.1 |
0.64 |
70.6 |
74.7 |
0.11 |
1.84 |
|
Crude fiber |
68.0 |
69.9 |
0.54 |
66.0 |
71.9 |
0.07 |
2.23 |
|
N balance, g/day |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intake |
14.9 |
18.4 |
0.001 |
16.1 |
16.2 |
0.96 |
0.53 |
|
Faeces |
3.92 |
4.63 |
0.077 |
4.64 |
3.91 |
0.065 |
0.28 |
|
Urine |
4.26 |
5.14 |
0.034 |
4.27 |
5.13 |
0.039 |
0.28 |
|
N retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g/day |
6.71 |
7.62 |
0.24 |
7.21 |
7.12 |
0.91 |
0.55 |
|
% of N intake |
44.1 |
40.7 |
0.34 |
42.8 |
42.0 |
0.81 |
2.53 |
|
% of N digested |
58.9 |
55.0 |
0.29 |
59.0 |
54.9 |
0.26 |
2.62 |
|
Intake of N was higher, as was urinary excretion, for 24 h wilting compared with fresh leaves but there were no differences in N retention. Variety had no effect on the N balance components and there were no interactions between wilting and variety (Table 10).
Table 10. Mean values for apparent digestibility in pigs fed fresh or wilted cassava leaves from sweet and bitter varieties (individual treatments) |
||||||
|
Wilting, 0 h |
Wilting, 24 h |
SEM |
Prob. |
||
Bitter |
Sweet |
Bitter |
Sweet |
|||
Apparent digestibility, % |
||||||
DM |
92.5 |
92.9 |
90.6 |
92.8 |
0.68 |
0.18 |
OM |
90.1 |
90.5 |
87.8 |
90.4 |
0.90 |
0.24 |
Crude protein |
70.8 |
75.8 |
70.4 |
73.7 |
2.60 |
0.75 |
Crude fibre |
64.0 |
72.0 |
68.1 |
71.8 |
3.2 |
0.50 |
DM Intake g/kg LW |
35.4 |
36.6 |
37.9 |
36.2 |
0.68 |
0.04 |
N balance, g/day |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intake |
14.1 |
15.7 |
18.2 |
16.6 |
0.75 |
0.04 |
Faeces |
4.07 |
3.78 |
5.22 |
4.04 |
0.39 |
.26 |
Urine |
3.91 |
4.60 |
4.63 |
5.65 |
0.35 |
.64 |
N retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
g/day |
6.10 |
7.31 |
8.31 |
6.93 |
0.77 |
.097 |
% of N intake |
42.4 |
45.8 |
43.3 |
38.1 |
3.6 |
0.23 |
% of N digested |
58.1 |
59.8 |
59.9 |
50.0 |
3.7 |
0.12 |
According to the study of Du Thanh Hang (1998), it is convenient to wilt cassava leaves one day before ensiling as this helps to reduce the HCN content. It is known that the destruction of cell wall structures by different methods favors the intracellular reaction of linamarase with the cyanogenic glucosides present in cassava, thus contributing to a rapid HCN elimination from the material (Ravindran 1992). It has been suggested that 100 mg HCN/kg feed, as indicated by the Council of the European Community (Gómez 1991), should be the permissible maximum level. However, there is no clear evidence concerning the supposedly toxic levels of HCN for pigs. In fact, neither in growing-fattening pigs (Du Thanh Hang and Preston 2005; Chhay Ty and Preston 2005, 2006; Sarwat et al 1988) nor in breeding sows (Tewe and Maner 1981) are there reports of death of animals caused by ingestion of fresh cassava leaves.
The reported toxic levels of HCN (mg/kg live weight) for pigs are variable among different authors. Proposed toxic levels are 1.4 (Getter and Baine 1938), 2.1 to 2.3 (Johnson and Ramond 1965), 4.4 (Butler 1973) and 3.5 (Tewe1992). In the present study the HCN intakes were from 3.08 to 3.19 mg/kg LW for the diets with fresh cassava leaves, and from 1.85 to 2.16 when the leaves were wilted 24 h. The HCN intakes on the diets with fresh cassava leaves are at the high end of the levels reported to be toxic in pigs. However, there were no symptoms of ill-health and no apparent relationship between intake of HCN and production response as measured by DM intake and N retention. These findings are supported by the results of Du Thanh Hang and Preston (2005) and Chhay Ty and Preston (2005, 2006) that production responses in pigs fed fresh cassava leaves are not related with levels of ingestion of HCN.
It is suggested that other factors limiting usefulness of cassava leaves for pigs, of greater importance than HCN levels, are the well-known amino acid imbalance in cassava leaves (Eggum 1970) and the relatively high proportion of cell wall constituents (González et al 1999) and condensed tannins (Reed et al 2006). This hypothesis is supported by the report of improved growth rate and feed conversion in pigs, when fresh cassava leaves were mixed with equal parts of fresh water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) foliage (Chhay Ty and Preston 2006), as water spinach protein is relatively richer in methionine-cystine, and there is a lower content of fibre, compared with cassava leaves. Du Thanh Hang et al (2007 Missing) also reported improved production performance of pigs when diets with 20% fresh cassava leaves (DM basis) were supplemented with 0.2% DL-methionine.
The proportion of the DM extracted
from dried samples after 90 minutes in a semi-automatic washing machine has been
found to be a good predictor of N retention in goats fed a range of tree
foliages (Daovy et al 2007). However, such a relation was not apparent in the
present study, where the marked decrease in the water extractable DM as wilting
time increased (Experiment 1; Figure 3), was not reflected in the performance of
the pigs in Experiment 2 when N retention was not affected by wilting time.
The senior author would like to
express his gratitude to the International Foundation for Science (IFS), for
financing the research as part of the project B 3759-1 and to the Center for
Livestock and Agriculture Development (CelAgrid), for providing resources for
conducting the experiments.
AOAC 1990 Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 15th edition (K Helnick editor) Arlington pp 1230.
Bui Huy Nhu Phuc, Nguyen van Lai, Preston T R, Ogle B and Lindberg J E 1995 Replacing soya bean meal with cassava leaf meal in cassava root diets for growing pigs. Livestock Research for Rural Development 7 (3) http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd7/3/9.htm
Butler G W 1973 Physiological and genetic aspects of cyanogenesis in cassava and other plants, Chronic cassava toxicity. Proceedings of the Interdisciplinary Workshop, London England, 29-30 January 1973. IDRC -010e, pp. 65-71
Chhay Ty, Ly J and Rodríguez Lylian 2001 An approach to ensiling conditions for preservation of cassava foliage in Cambodia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 13:http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd13/2/chha132.htm
Chhay Ty and Preston T R 2005 Effect of water spinach and fresh cassava leaves on growth performance of pigs fed a basal diet of broken rice. Livestock Research for Rural Development.Volume 17, Article #76. Retrieved , from http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd17/7/chha17076.htm
Chhay Ty and Preston T R 2006 Effect of different ratios of water spinach and fresh cassava leaves on growth of pigs fed basal diets of broken rice or mixture of rice bran and cassava root meal; Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 18, Article # 27. Retrieved, from http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd18/4/chha18057.htm
Daovy Kongmanila, Preston T R and Ledin Inger 2007 Chemical composition, digestibility and intake of some tropical foliage species used for goats. MSc Thesis, MEKARN-SLU http://www.mekarn.org/MSC2005-07/thesis07/daov2.htm
Du Thanh Hang 1998 Ensiled cassava leaves and duckweed as protein sources for fattening pigs on farms in Central Vietnam. Livestock Research for Rural Development 10(3) http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd10/3/hang2.htm
Du Thanh Hang and Preston T R 2005 The effects of simple processing methods of cassava leaves on HCN content and intake by growing pigs. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 17, Article No. 99. http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd17/9/hang17099.htm
Eggum O L 1970 The protein quality of cassava leaves. British Journal of Nutrition 24:761-769
Getter A O and Baine J 1938 Research on cyanide detoxification. American Journal of Medical Science. pp. 185-189
Gómez G G 1991 Use of cassava products in pig feeding. Pigs News and Information 12:387-390
Gómez G and Valdivieso M 1985 Cassava foliage: chemical composition, cyanide content and effect of drying on cyanide elimination. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 36:433-441
González D A, González C, Díaz I, Ly J and Vecchionacce H 1999 Determinación de la digestibilidad de nutrientes de dietas de follaje de yuca amarga (Manihot esculenta Crantz) y aceite de palma (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) en cerdos. Revista Computadorizada de Producción Porcina 6(1):
Johnson R M and Ramond W D 1965 The chemical composition of some Tropical food plants: Manioc.Tropical Science 7, pp. 109-115.
Ly J and Preston T R 1997 An approach to the estimation of washing losses in leaves of tropical trees. Livestock Research for Rural Development (9) 3: http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd9/3/ly931.htm
MINITAB 2000 Minitab Reference Manual release 13.31.
Preston T R 2001 Potential of cassava in integrated farming systems. In: International Workshop on Current Research and Development on Use of Cassava as Animal Feed. (Editors: T R Preston and Metha Wanapat) Khon Kaen University, Thailand. http://www.mekarn.org/procKK/pres.htm
Ravindran V 1992 Preparation of cassava leaf products and their use in animal feeding. In: Roots, tubers, plantains and bananas in animal feeding (D H Machin and S Nyvold, ed.) FAO Animal Producction and Health Paper 95. Rome. p 111-126 http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/003/T0554E/T0554E08.htm
Ravindran V and Ravindran G 1988 Changes in the nutritional composition of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) leaves during maturity. Food Chemistry 27:299-239
Reed J D, McDowell R E, van Soest P J and Horvath P R J 2006 Condensed tannins: A factor limiting the use of cassava forage. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages 213 - 220
Sarwat S R, Katak S N and Kategile J A 1988 Performance of growing-finishing pigs when given diets containing fresh cassava leaves and roots. East African Agriculture and Forestry Journal. 53:111-115
Tewe O O 1992 Detoxification of cassava products and effects of residual toxins on consuming animals. In: Roots, tubers, plantains and bananas in animal feeding. (D. Machin and S. Nyvold, editors) FAO Animal Production and Health Paper No 95. Rome p 81-98 http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/T0554E/T0554E06.htm
Tewe O O and Maner J H 1981 Performance and patho physiological changes in pregnant pigs fed cassava diets containing different levels of cyanide. Research in Veterinary Science. 30:147-150
Thim Sokha, Preston T R and Khieu Borin 2007 Effect of different protein levels derived from mixtures of water spinach and fresh sweet potato vines in basal diets of broken rice or cassava root meal and rice bran for growing pigs. MSc. Thesis. Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
Undersander D, Mertens D R and Theix N 1993 Forage analysis procedures. National Forage Testing Association. Omaha pp 154.
Received 22 July 2007; Accepted 17 August 2007; Published 5 September 2007