Livestock Research for Rural Development 18 (11) 2006 Guidelines to authors LRRD News

Citation of this paper

Assessment of feeding urea ammoniated wheat straw on growth performance, feed intake and nutrient utilization in crossbred calves reared under stall-fed or grazing condition

A K Misra*, U R Mehra and R S Dass

Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar 243 122, U P, India
*Livestock Production and Management, Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad 500 059, India

akmishra@crida.ernet.in


Abstract

A study was conducted to assess the effect of feeding urea ammoniated wheat straw (UAWS) on growth rate, feed intake and nutrient utilization in crossbred calves reared under stall-fed or grazing condition. Sixteen male crossbred calves were divided into four groups of four calves each.  Two groups were maintained under stall-fed condition and offered untreated or urea ammoniated wheat straw while other two groups have 6 to 7 hour access to grazing and supplemented with untreated or urea ammoniated wheat straw. The calves of all the groups were provided their 25 % of their TDN requirement through de-oiled rice bran (DORD). This feeding practice continued for a period of 135 days.   

Significant improvement in dry matter intake was observed due to feeding of ammoniated wheat straw both under grazing as well as stall-fed condition. Ammoniation of the straw and access to grazing resulted in increases in live weight gain and in digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, crude protein, ether extract and cell wall constituents. 

Key words: Ammoniated wheat straw, crossbred calves, grazing, growth performance and nutrient utilization


Introduction

The important constraints in the productivity of livestock resources of India are inadequacy of feed and fodder resources. The cereal crop residues and agricultural by-products are the major feed resources for animal production in India. The major factor that limits animal production from these feed resources is nutritional imbalance (Misra et al 2006). They are low in nitrogen and high in fibre and lignin, characteristics that restrict intake and digestibility in animals (Smith 2002). Large numbers of animals are allowed for grazing on common property resources (CPRs) like village grazing lands, forestlands, village site, threshing grounds, roadsides, banks of river and canal, community waste/degraded lands in India. About one fifth of the households are dependent on CPR land for grazing of their livestock (NSSO 1999).

In Andhra province of India, 91 percent of households depend on grazing on common lands for an average of 35 percent forage supply (ISPA 1997). About 31 percent of livestock forage in India as a whole comes from common grazing resources (World Bank 1999). The quantum of forage obtained through grazing varies from region to region depending on the pressure on the grazing lands (Misra et al 1999). However, the productivity of animals maintained on grazing is greatly constraints due to low quantity and imbalanced quality of nutrients particularly energy and proteins. Efforts to improve production include supplementation to make up the deficient nutrient intake from grazing or to increase the intake of low quality pastures and crop residues under stall-fed conditions by facilitating optimum rumen fermentation (Devendra 1997; Misra et al 1999; Singh and Prasad 2002).

Urea ammoniation has been found to be most promising and practical chemical method for improving the nutritive value of crop residues (Yadav and Yadav 1989; Devendra 1997; Singh and Prasad 2002, Chenost and Kayouli 1997) for ruminants. It increases the palatability, digestibility and adds a significant amount of nitrogen into the straw (Singh and Prasad 2002; Verma et al 2006). Several studies (Misra et al 1999; Devendra 1997; Singh and Prasad 2002; Verma et al 2006) have reported significant increase in live weight gain of animals fed urea treated straw. Very few studies have been conducted to observe the effect of feeding urea treated straw on calves maintained under grazing conditions. The objective of the present study was, therefore, to assess the effect of feeding urea-ammoniated wheat straw (UAWS) on growth rate, feed intake and nutrient utilization in crossbred calves reared under stall-fed or grazing condition.


Materials and methods

The study area

The study was conducted at Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, situated at 170.6 m above MSL on 28022' N latitude and 79024' E longitude in the Northern upper Gangetic Plain of India, having an annual rainfall of 900-1200 mm. The region is having the deepest soil in India and constitutes the wheat and the rice bowls of India. Wheat and rice being the main cultivated crops, their straws form the basal diet of ruminants in the area and are fed throughout the year. During the study period, the mean minimum ambient temperature ranged from 6.95 to 13.29 0C and maximum temperature ranged from 21.88 to 29.84 0C, with an average ambient temperature of 17.20C. The relative humidity of the location during the experimental period ranged from 68.36 to 76.39 %. The total rainfall received during the experiment was about 74.2 mm.

Ammoniation of straw

Ammoniation of wheat straw was done with four per cent urea (w/w) and 40 per cent moisture for three weeks (ICAR 1985). Weighed amount of wheat straw was treated with urea solution (40 kg in 400 litre water per 1000 kg straw). This treated straw was packed in the cemented pit and finally the pit was sealed with black polythene sheet to develop anaerobic condition. The pit was opened after three weeks from one side to take out the straw. The average ambient temperature at the time of treatment of straw was 23.79 0C. Urea-ammoniated wheat straw was aerated for 24 hrs prior to feeding to facilitate the escape of free ammonia

Animals, treatment and feeding management

 The experiment was conducted on sixteen male crossbred calves (Holstein Friesian x Jersy x Haryana) of about 6-7 months of age with an average body weight of 64.6 kg. They were randomly divided into four groups of four calves each and were provided with 25 per cent of their TDN requirement through de-oiled rice bran (DORB) as per NRC (1989). The calves were maintained on the following feeding schedule:


Groups  Feed
WS Wheat straw ad libitum + 1 kg green maize + DORB
UWS Urea ammoniated wheat straw ad libitum + 1 kg green maize + DORB
WSG Wheat straw ad libitum + DORB + grazing on natural pasture
UWSG Urea ammoniated straw ad libitum + DORB + grazing on natural pasture

The amount of DORB varied from 650 to 950 g/calves/day depending upon the weight of the calves. It was adjusted at fortnightly interval to provide 25 % of the TDN requirement. The mineral mixture (2 kg) and common salt (1 kg) was fortified per 100 kg DORB.

The dominant grass species in roadside and natural pasture were Heteropogon contortus, Bothriochloa pertusa, Brachiaria mutica, Chloris barbata, Cynodon dactylon, Dichanthiam annulatum and Leucaena leucocephala. The calves were housed individually in well-ventilated clean and dry pucca pits. They were let loose for about 6-7 hours daily for exercise (WS and UWS) or grazing (WSG and UWSG). Proper health coverage and preventive measures were followed throughout the experimental period. All the calves were provided clean drinking water twice a day.

Growth and digestibility trial

A growth trial for a period of 135 days was conducted from November to March (winter season). At the end of 125 days feeding trial, six days conventional digestibility trial was conducted for stall-fed calves. Simultaneously for grazing calves, digestibility trial was conducted using faeces collection bags. Nutrients intake through grazing was determined by indirect method using acid insoluble ash (AIA) as an internal indicator (Shrivastava and Talapatra 1962). The calves were weighed at fortnightly intervals for two consecutive days during the feeding trial and at the beginning and end of the digestibility trial before offering the feed and water.

Analytical techniques

The feed and faeces samples were analysed for proximate principles (AOAC 1990). The cell wall constituents, acid detergent fibre (ADF) and neutral detergent fibre (NDF) were analysed using methods described by Goering and Van Soest (1970). Acid insoluble ash (AIA) was determined according to Van Keulen and Young (1977). Mineral extracts of feed, faeces and urine were prepared (AOAC 1990) and analysed for Ca and P (Talapatra et al 1940).

Statistical analysis

The data were subjected to analysis of variance for a 2*2 factorial design to determine the treatment effects and their interaction (Snedecor and Cochran 1981). The factors were access to grazing or not and feeding of untreated wheat straw or urea ammoniated wheat straw.


Results and discussion

Chemical composition

The average crude protein (CP) content of untreated wheat straw (UWS) was 2.97 %, which was raised to 9.65 % due to ammoniation with decrease in NDF and hemi-cellulose contents (Table 1).


Table 1.   Chemical composition of feed-stuffs (% on DM basis)

Particulars

Un treated wheat straw

Urea ammoniated wheat straw

Green maize

Pasture herbage

DORB

Organic matter

91.34

91.25

89.58

88.29

84.37

Crude protein

2.87

9.68

9.87

14.68

16.68

Crude fibre

42.71

42.47

25.91

24.33

11.18

Ether extract

1.17

1.13

1.92

2.54

0.40

Nitrogen free extract

44.59

37.97

51.88

46.74

56.11

Total carbohydrate

87.30

80.44

77.79

71.07

67.29

Neutral detergent fibre

80.04

78.73

55.47

73.03

52.53

Acid detergent fibre

53.77

55.17

33.10

39.70

22.43

Acid detergent lignin

6.86

6.89

5.33

5.65

5.44

Hemi-cellulose

26.27

23.56

22.37

33.33

30.10

Cellulose

46.91

48.28

22.77

34.05

16.99

Total ash

8.66

8.76

10.42

11.71

15.63

Acid insoluble ash

6.20

6.07

4.12

4.37

4.44

Calcium

0.37

0.38

0.66

0.89

0.31

Phosphorus

0.10

0.09

0.18

0.34

1.18


The crude fibre (CF) and ADL content remained unaltered whereas ADF and cellulose content were increased. The increase in CP content after ammoniation varied greatly in different studies. The low increase in CP content through ammoniation in the present study was may be due to drying of straw before feeding. Sundstol et al (1978) reported that one third of the added N is bound during ambient ammoniation of crop residues and the rest is lost when materials are aerated before feeding. Increase in ADF and cellulose content in ammoniated wheat straw might be due to solubilization of hemicellulose by the action of ammonia evolved from urea. The CP and NFE content of DORB were 16.7 and 55.1 %, respectively and constituted supplemental source of energy and protein. The CP content of pasture herbage was 14.7 %, which was about four times higher than that of wheat straw. The CF content of pasture herbage was about half than that of wheat straw, indicating that quality of pasture herbage was good.

Intake, digestibility and growth performance

Significant (P<0.01) improvements in live weight gain, DM intake and digestibility were observed due to feeding of ammoniated wheat straw both under grazing as well as stall-fed condition (Table 2).  Significant increases in growth rate,  DM intake and digestibility were also observed in the calves that had access to grazing, probably, because of stimulatory effects of the grass on rumen function as was demonstrated by Gutierrez and Elliott (1984). These researchers showed that, in stall-fed sheep,  supplementing  a basal diet of sisal (Agave fourcroydes) pulp with fresh pasture grass increased by almost 50% the digestibility of cellulose in the rumen as well as the DM intake. The beneficial effects on growth rate of ruminants by ammoniating cereal straws is well documented (Chenost and Kayouli 1997).


Table-2.   Mean values for DM intake, digestibility coefficients and growth rate in experimental calves

 

No grazing

Grazing

SEM

Probability

WS

UWS

WS

UWS

F1

F2

F1*F2

DM intake

De-oiled rice bran, g/d

672

672

693

714

12.39

NS

NS

NS

Green maize/pasture, g/d

312

312

1575

1566

45.70

*

NS

NS

UTWS/UAWS, g/d

1236

1556

772

900

61.75

**

*

NS

Total intake, kg/day

2.22

2.54

3.04

3.18

0.16

**

*

NS

Intake, % body weight

2.14

2.34

2.77

3.10

0.06

**

**

NS

Intake, g kg W0.75

68.22

75.59

89.18

103.32

1.92

**

**

NS

Digestibility of nutrients

Dry matter

52.39

54.31

59.19

62.05

1.33

**

NS

NS

Organic matter

55.87

59.11

63. 32

66. 08

1.15

**

*

NS

Crude protein

37.89

52.64

58.83

63.78

1.30

**

**

*

Crude fibre

49.67

59.39

56.85

61. 79

0.91

**

**

*

Ether extract

47.14

55.10

60.92

62.36

1.08

**

*

*

Neutral detergent fibre

40.40

56.36

59.58

63. 56

1.49

**

**

*

Acid detergent fibre

42.59

46.68

51. 88

56. 09

1.38

**

*

NS

Growth performance

Initial body weight, kg

64.5

64.7

64.5

64.7

2.39

NS

NS

NS

Final body weight, kg

105

110

118

124

3.15

*

*

NS

Growth rate, g day  -1

301

341

398

422

15.5

**

*

NS

F1: access to grazing or not; F2: feeding of wheat straw or urea ammoniated wheat straw; F1*F2: interaction; NS: non-significant, * significant at P< 0.05 and ** significant at P< 0.01



Conclusions


References

AOAC 1990 Official Methods of Analysis, 15th Edition. Association of Official analytical Chemist, Arlington, Virginia, USA

Chenost M and Kayouli C 1997 Roughage utilization in warm climates. FAO animal production and health paper 135. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome 1997. 226p. http://www.fao.org/ag/aga/agap/frg/Aphp135/aphp135.htm

Devendra C 1997 Crop residues for feeding animals in Asia: Technology development and adoption in crop/livestock system. In: Crop residues in sustainable mixed crop/livestock farming systems. (C Renard editor).CAB International, Oxen, UK. Pp.241-267

Goering H K and Van Soest P J 1970 Forage fibre analysis. USDA Agricultural handbook No. 379. pp 1-20

Gutierrez E and Elliott R 1984  Interaccion digestiva de la pulpa de henequen (Agave fourcroydes) y el pasto Estrella de Africa (Cynodon  plectostachyus) Alternativas y valor nutritivo de algunos recursos alimenticios destinados a produccion anima.   Informe Provisional No 16 Fundacion Internacional para la Ciencia: Stockholm

ICAR 1985 Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Final Report 1965-85. All India Coordinated Research Project on Utilization of Agricultural Byproducts and Industrial Waste Materials for Economic Rations for Livestock. ICAR, New Delhi, India

ISPA 1997 Livestock feeding situation in Andhra Pradesh: Options for improvement. Report No. 22/97. Indo Swiss Project, Andhra Pradesh, India

KumaranSuntharam V R, Jayasuria M C N and Perdok B B 1984 The effect of method of urea ammonia treatment on the subsequent utilization of rice straw by crossbred calves. Agricultural Waste 10: 195-201

Misra A K, Mehra U R and Dass R S 1999 Effect of feeding ammoniated straw and grazing on growth performance and nutrient utilization in crossbred calves. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 16: 149-159

Misra A K, Reddy G S and Ramakrishna Y S 2006 Participatory on-farm evaluation of urea molasses mineral block as a supplement to crossbred cows for dry season feeding in rain-fed agro-ecosystem of India. Livestock Research for Rural development 18 (2):   http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd18/2/misr18024.htm

NRC 1989 National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 6th revised edition, National Academy Press, Washington, DC

NSSO 1999 Common property resources in India. NSS 54 round 1998. National Sample Survey Organization, Govt. of India. New Delhi, India

Shrivastava V S and Talapatra S K 1962 Pasture studies in Uttar Pradesh: Detrmination of pasture consumption by grazing animals. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 15:161-166

Singh K and Prasad C S 2002 Potential of nutritional technologies in improving livestock productivity. In: Technology Options for Sustainable Livestock Production in India. Proceedings of the workshop on Documentation, Adoption and Impact of Livestock Technologies in India (Editors: P Birthal and P Parthasarthy Rao). ICRISAT-Patancheru, India.pp.132-146

Smith T 2002 Some tools to combat dry season nutritional stress in ruminants under African conditions. Proceedings of the final review meeting of an IAEA Technical Co-operation Regional AFRA Project IAEA-TeCDOC-1294

Snedecor G W and Cochran W G  1981 Statistical Methods, 8th Edition. Oxford and IBH Publication Co., Calcutta, India

Sundstol F, Coxworth E M and Mowat D N 1978 Improving the nutritive value of straw and other low quality roughage by treatment with ammonia. World Animal Review 26:13-21

Talapatra S K,  Roy S C and Sen K C 1940 The analysis of mineral constituents in biological materials. Estimation of phosphorus, chlorine, calcium, manganese, sodium and potassium in foodstuffs. Indian Journal Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry 10: 243

Van Keulen J and Young B A 1977 Evaluation of acid insoluble ash as naural marker in ruminant digestibility studies. Journal of Animal Sciences 44: 282-287

Verma A K, Singh P, Dass R S and Mehra U R 2006 Impact of feeding urea ammoniated and urea supplemented wheat starw on intake and utilization of nutrients in crossbred cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 76: 466-470

World Bank 1999 India: Livestock sector review: Enhancing growth and development. The World Bank and Allied Publishers, New Delhi, India

Yadav B P and Yadav I S 1989 Comparative study of ammoniated wheat and paddy straw on nutrient utilization and rumen fermentation in cattle. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition. 6: 215-222


Received 9 August 2006; Accepted 22 September 2006; Published 1 November 2006

Go to top