Livestock Research for Rural Development 17 (2) 2005 | Guidelines to authors | LRRD News | Citation of this paper |
A study was conducted to determine the optimum number of eggs to be incubated under a broody hen of given size and to compare hatchability of eggs and performance of chicks when different numbers of eggs were set under hens of different sizes. Two classes of broody hens, weighing 800-950 g (WC 1) and 950-1100 g (WC 2), were used to incubate 8, 11, 14 and 17 eggs under the traditional method in rural conditions of Bangladesh. Hatching eggs, from parents (Rhode Island Red ♂ × Fayoumi♀), average of 41.3 ± 2.77 (SD) g and with a shape index of 66%, were set under the hens.
No differences were found in hatchability rate (%) of fertile eggs among the different egg numbers and between the hen weight classes. Number of eggs had no effect on survivability of chicks, but hens of WC 1 had higher chick survivability (95.4%) compared to WC 2 (87.4%). Broody hens had a 40% reduced feed intake (wheat grain) and body weight loss of 12% during the incubation period. Weight gain of chicks during last 4 weeks and 8 weeks of rearing (fed on a commercial diet) .were highest in case of 8 eggs (404 g), lowest with 17 eggs (329 g) and medium with 11 or 14 eggs (370 and 361 g respectively) of incubation. Feed efficiency was the same for all birds; it was high during the brooding period. During 8 weeks of rearing total feed consumption was reduced with the increased number of chicks.
The current study demonstrates conclusively that the statement 'The smaller the broody hens the lower the incubating capacity' may not be true. Indigenous broody hens have the capacity of incubating (87.2% hatchability on fertile eggs) up to 17 eggs weighing an average of 41g. Small broody hens could protect the chicks better from predators, thereby increased chick survivability up to 95.4% compared to big hens (87.4%). However, the incubation of 14 eggs by broody hens will be more profitable to farmers of Bangladesh.
Key Words: Broody hens, eggs, hatchability, incubation, survivability of chicks
In Bangladesh, traditionally indigenous hens are used both for egg production and subsequent hatching of eggs. Although broodiness is a hindrance for good egg production (Pampin and Ruiz 1998), the broody hen is doing a great job to hatch the chicks at very low costs. The broody hen is appropriate for the households as a hen can incubate two or three clutches of eggs in a year. The broody hen is also the best trainee for their offspring in showing them how to look for feeds and to tackle adverse situations i.e. finding protection from predators. In most cases people probably put more eggs than the hens are able to hatch. A significant number of eggs have probably been lost in the country by this way. The matter is important, as egg production from indigenous chicken is only 35 to 45 eggs per year (Bulbul et al 1983). Khan (1983) found that the indigenous fowl lays 50-80 eggs per year on average. So we should not allow any leakage to spoil a lot of eggs, which may subsequently reduce the total number of chickens. By optimizing the hatching capacity, the chicken population as well as number of healthy chickens could be increased markedly. The indigenous hens have small body size of around 1,140 g (Huque 1993). The size of hens and number of eggs set under each hen might influence the hatchability of eggs and the subsequent successful rearing of chicks (Haque et al 1991). An investigation was therefore designed to observe the effects of placing different numbers of eggs under hens of a given size to optimize the number of eggs to set for getting the maximum number of chicks and their performance in the early life of rearing period under rural conditions of Bangladesh.
The experiment was carried out at Taragonj Upazilla, 40 km north of Rangpur District, Bangladesh. It was performed under the activities of Participatory Livestock Development Project (PLDP). A survey was first conducted to investigate the availability of a sufficient number of broody hens as well as the interest of the farmers.
Broody hens were chosen from two villages primarily by asking the farmers and later they were set on dummy eggs. The hens showing nesting behavior for 3 to 4 days were selected for the experiment. Using the dummy eggs is also a good way to synchronize and settle down all the hens to sit at a fixed time. At the beginning, 16 broody hens were selected, and two weeks later another 16 hens were found in the same way. Care was taken that the hens were in good health and had all their normal feathers. Broody hens were categorized into two classes: weighing 800-950 g as WC1 and 950-1100 g as WC2. The age of the broody hens ranged from 1 to 4.5 years, assumed by the farmers. The hens were set in the afternoon (3-6 pm) with the original hatching eggs replaced by dummy eggs. The hens were usually allowed to come off their eggs at least once every day and to stay as they wanted usually 5 - 30 minutes. The sitting birds were provided with clean water twice daily in a plastic drinker, adequate amounts of whole grains (wheat) in a plastic feeder placed about 3 ft from her nest. Every day grain was supplied was weighed, and residuals were also weighed to determine the feed consumption of the birds.
To free the birds from the lice, the hens were thoroughly dusted 4 days prior to setting the hens, with Neguvon (0.3%) mixed with ash i.e. 3 g Neguvon powder was mixed with 1 kg of ash. If lice appeared on a chicken during incubation, liquid Ivomec was also used by applying 2 drops on the neck of the hen. A local traditional method (rural people usually burn the hatching nest and all its materials immediately after incubation) was applied to free the hens from the ecto-parasites sulsuli(Dermanyssus gallinae) if they appeared on the broody hen and her newly born offspring. Sinduri (F. trombiculidae) is another kind of ecto-parasite. It is of a red color and generally lives in a cluster, mainly thoracic region of chickens of any age. A mixture of malathion (0.4%) was sprayed manually on Sinduri-affected places of birds (Permin and Hansen 1998).
The average size of the eggs used for incubation was 41.3±2.77 g, of 5 days of age and shape index 66% with clean, good, strong shell texture, collected from parents Rhode Island Red (RIR) × Fayoumi (Fy). The offspring of those parents is locally called Sonali. Shape index (%) was calculated as the ratio of width and length of the egg multiplied by 100. The standard shape index is 73-80% (Kosenko et al 1985)
After collection from the Government poultry farm, eggs were carried about 2 km by rickshaw, carefully kept in plastic cages and placed with the smaller end down in a well-ventilated room for 4 days. On the 5th day, the selected eggs were carried to the research area about 40 km by bus and rickshaw and then kept for 2 to 3 hours before they were set under the hens.
A bamboo basket with the size of base 25 cm, height 18 cm, width up 40 cm (PLDP model) was filled to a half portion with ashes. Over the ashes, fine soft straws were placed and later pressed down to make a hollow for placing the eggs. The hen was then gently seated on the eggs and left undisturbed in a quiet corner usually under the bed (Banergee 1992).
Photo 1: Newborn chicks with their mother on the nest |
To examine the infertile eggs and dead embryos in the shell (embryonic mortality), eggs were candled on the 7th and 14th day of incubation with a Candler box made of wood and torch light, making the house dark by closing the door and other openings. Infertile and other eggs with dead embryos were removed on the 14th day.
Chicks were brooded and reared by the same hen that incubated them. They were confined in a day shelter, locally called Polo (base 70 cm, height 45 cm, open top 20 cm) up to one month of age and then they were let out for one hour from the beginning of the 2nd month with 1 hour increase in each subsequent week up to 2 months of age. At night the chicks with the hen were kept in a night shelter, locally called Khacha (base 60 cm, height 45 cm, open top 20 cm) approved by PLDP model. The floor space, of day shelter and night shelter was 1.54 m2 and 1.13 m2 respectively, and was the same for different numbers of (8 to 17) chicks with the hen.
The broody hen was provided with a commercial layer mash feed (100 g/day), restricted for her in a separate feeder, and the chicks with a layer starter feed ad libitum in a plastic feeder. The diet for the chicks contained (manufacturer supplied information) Metabolizable energy 11.9 to 12.3 MJ/kg and crude protein 19%, crude fiber 3%, crude fat 4%, lysine 1%, methionine 0.4%, calcium 1% and available phosphorous 0.45%.
Photo 2: Newborn chicks | Photo 3. Rearing chicks in day shelter |
During the feeding time, mother and chicks were confined in separate cages, so as not to share the feeds of one another. After they had been fed completely, the mother was allowed to come into the chicks' shelter, where they could drink clean water together. The allowance of a bird was divided into two, one portion supplied in the morning between 8.00 and 10.00 am and the rest was given in the afternoon between 2.00 and 3.30 pm. The chicks were vaccinated for Newcastle disease at 5 and 20 days and for Gumburo disease at 14 and 28 days of age according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Hen and chicks were examined for health and parasites every week.
The recorded and calculated variables were for a 2 (WC) * 4 (ENG) factorial experiment with multiple observations per cell (4 hens per combination) repeated in two periods, analyzed using analysis of variance by GLM procedure of SAS software (SAS , Version 8.2). An analysis of variance was performed to partition variances into: Weight class (WC) of hens, Egg number groups (ENG), Period, WC*ENG and errors for comparison of different variables. When the interaction between WC and ENG was found to be non-significant, the interaction was deleted and finally analysis was performed for WC, ENG and period. Differences for all significant effects were tested using Duncan's Multiple Range Test. Assumptions for the analysis were evaluated using residual plots and Shapiro-Wilks test for normality. A significance level of 5% was used.
In this trial, there was good uniformity in the weight of the broody hens, egg weight, shape index of egg and fertility rate (%) among ENG (Table 1). Although fertility rate was very close to the significant level (P=0.057), this did not affect the hatchability, as true hatchability rate (%) was calculated on fertile eggs. Fertility rate of crossbred Sonali (RIR*Fy) ranging from 83 to 94.4%, almost coincided with the results reported by Kicka et al (1978), who obtained the highest fertility 92.3% in RIR*Fy. Hatchability rate on fertile eggs ranged from 85.8 to 87.4%, whereas Kicka et al (1978) reported 72.2% of hatchability of crossbreds of RIR*Fy. Since RIR and Fayoumi are different breeds, a certain level of heterosis could be expected from their cross. Hatchability was increased by 5 to 20 % in most crosses reported by Byerly et al (1934). Here the shape index of egg was 66%, under the long index, <73% (Kosenko et al 1985) that is 9.6% less than the lower limit of the standard index, which might be a reason for overall reduced hatchability. In Morocco, Benabdeljelil et al (2001) found 64-78% hatchability, incubated by the local 'Beldi' hen weighing about 1.2 to 1.4 kg, a finding that is lower than that of this study. Although both are native chickens, hatchability may vary due to different environments in the countries. Also the weight of the Beldi chicken was higher, but hatchability was lower than in the present study. In this study average hatchability on total eggs set was 76.8±2.44%, which is supported by Rodriguez (2001) in Cambodia, who observed that hatchability in local Khmer hens was 74.5±7.4% from total wt of eggs 441g (10.8 eggs) weighing 41.0 g per egg. However, even though average egg weight was almost the same (41.3 g), egg numbers set were different in our study. The author did not mention weight of the broody hens. There is a tendency to decrease the hatchability with the higher weight of broody hens found in this study of WC1(87.1%) and WC2 (86.6%), where upper weight class hens had apparently a little lower hatchability.
Table 1. Different parameters regarding hatching performance |
|||||||||
Variable |
WC |
Egg Numbers Groups (ENG) |
Mean |
PooledSEM |
P-values of |
||||
E1 (8) |
E2 (11) |
E3 (14) |
E4 (17) |
WC |
ENG |
||||
Body weight of broody hens, g |
1 |
853 |
860 |
873 |
884 |
867 |
8.47 |
0.001*** |
0.77 |
2 |
1039 |
1034 |
1017 |
1045 |
1034 |
|
|
|
|
Mean |
946 |
947 |
945 |
964 |
|
|
|
|
|
Egg weight, g |
1 |
41.1 |
40.8 |
41.0 |
41.3 |
41.1 |
0.14 |
0.18 |
0.41 |
2 |
40.7 |
41.3 |
41.6 |
41.7 |
41.4 |
|
|
|
|
Mean |
40.9 |
41.1 |
41.3 |
41.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Egg shape index, % |
1 |
67.0 |
66.0 |
66.0 |
65.0 |
66.0 |
0.002 |
0.31 |
0.92 |
2 |
64.0 |
66.0 |
65.0 |
67.0 |
66.0 |
|
|
|
|
Mean |
66.0 |
66.0 |
65.0 |
66.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fertility rate, % |
1 |
87.5 |
84.1 |
91.1 |
95.6 |
89.6 |
1.73 |
0.38 |
0.057 |
2 |
81.2 |
81.8 |
92.9 |
91.2 |
86.8 |
|
|
|
|
Mean |
84.4 |
83.0 |
92.0 |
93.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
True hatchability rate, % |
1 |
85.6 |
85.0 |
88.5 |
89.2 |
87.1 |
2.28 |
0.90 |
0.99 |
2 |
88.1 |
86.6 |
86.4 |
85.2 |
86.6 |
|
|
|
|
Mean |
86.8 |
85.8 |
87.4 |
87.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Chick’s survivability, % |
1 |
100 |
100 |
88.6 |
92.9 |
95.4 |
2.06 |
0.045* |
0.77 |
2 |
88.7 |
83.5 |
93.0 |
84.7 |
87.4 |
|
|
|
|
Mean |
94.4 |
91.8 |
90.8 |
88.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
WC (Weight Class of Hens) 1- 800-950 g, 2 - 950-1100 g; *P<0.05, *** P<0.01, SEM- Standard Error Mean; No difference between period P>0.05, Interaction only for Shape Index (P=0.002) |
Table 1 shows that 8% more chicks survived in WC1 than in WC2 (P=0.045). A probable explanation is that broody hens of lower weight, may also be at lower age, are more smart, active, run first, and more clever to teach the chicks how to protect themselves from the predators than the hens of higher weight. There was a trend to decrease the survivability with the increased number of chicks, as it is easier to take care of few chicks for mother hens. Only 9% (27 out of 310) chicks died due to various reasons of which 56% (15) were due to predators, 22% (6) to accidents, 15% (4) to nutritional diseases and 7% (2) were beaten. Azizul and Reza (1990) reported the mortality of upgraded birds was 13.63% under village conditions of Bangladesh, which is higher than in the present findings (9%). Semi-scavenging rearing systems may have caused the lower mortality rate in this study. Swan (1999) also agreed that chicken losses due to predators are high in the PLDP areas of Bangladesh. Predation is the ultimate fate of most chicks and growers (Wickramaratne et al 1994). Mongoose was mainly (87%) responsible for killing birds. If bushes or paddy crops were near to the farmer's house, the mongoose hid there and took the chicks away when they came to search for feed. During the crop season farmers should be advised to confine the chicks and give them household wastes, or what they are able to supply in the day shelter. Because loosing the birds by predators is a much greater economical loss than the reduced weight of birds due to lack of food.
Broody hens, belonging to different ENG and WC, consumed the same amount of feed (Table 2) during the incubation period. Feed intake was influenced by the 2 weeks interval period of hatching, probably due to variation in temperature and interaction between hen weight classes and egg numbers.
Table 2. Feed (wheat grain) consumption (g/hen/d) by broody hens during incubation |
|||||||||
Feed intake |
WC |
Egg Numbers Groups (ENG) |
Mean |
Pooled SEM |
P- values of |
||||
E1 (8) |
E2 (11) |
E3 (14) |
E4 (17) |
WC |
ENG |
||||
Week 1 |
1 |
52.9 |
68.5 |
58.2 |
63.8 |
60.8 |
2.54 |
0.94 |
0.82 |
|
2 |
67.0 |
61.1 |
61.0 |
55.7 |
61.2 |
|
|
|
|
Mean |
60.0 |
64.8 |
60.0 |
59.7 |
|
|
|
|
Week 2 |
1 |
50.9 |
49.2 |
56.7 |
66.7 |
55.9 |
2.05 |
0.07 |
0.49 |
|
2 |
70.2 |
67.0 |
54.2 |
59.1 |
62.6 |
|
|
|
|
Mean |
60.5 |
58.1 |
55.5 |
62.8 |
|
|
|
|
Week 3 |
1 |
62.2 |
69.7 |
67.2 |
65.0 |
66.0 |
2.05 |
0.62 |
0.59 |
|
2 |
66.9 |
65.3 |
55.0 |
69.5 |
64.2 |
|
|
|
|
Mean |
64.6 |
67.5 |
61.1 |
67.3 |
|
|
|
|
WC (Weight Class of Hens) 1- 800-950 g, 2 - 950-1100 g , SEM- Standard Error Mean; At week 2, difference found in period (P=0.016) and Interaction also found (P=0.022) |
In week 3, it was observed that birds of all ENG and WC increased their feed intake meaning that they spent less time in the nest compared to weeks 1 and 2. This is also justifying the fact that the temperature requirement at the end stage of incubation is less "as the embryo nears full development, the heat produced in its body increases" (Oluyemi and Roberts 1979). An adult laying hen consumes about 115 g whole grain in a confined system (Boorman and Freeman 1979). Broody hens for this study consumed an average of 70 g feed i.e. reduced their feed intake by 40%, which disagrees with the report of Zadworny et al (1988) who found 63% reduced feed intake in Japanese dwarf bantam hens, Chabo. Weight loss of broody hens was on average 118g (12%) by the end of incubation.
Table 3 illustrates that during the last 4 weeks and for the whole period E1 gained the highest body weight, E2 and E3 were intermediate and E4 the lowest (P=0.027). Body weight gain tends to be lower with an increased number of chicks.
Table 3. Weight Gain of chicks incubated by broody hens |
|||||||||
Variables |
WC |
Egg Numbers Groups (ENG) |
Mean |
Pooled SEM |
P- values of |
||||
E1 (8) |
E2 (11) |
E3 (14) |
E4 (17) |
WC |
ENG |
||||
Week 1-4 |
1 |
130 |
127 |
127 |
134 |
130 |
3.85 |
0.25 |
0.57 |
|
2 |
137 |
123 |
117 |
109 |
121 |
|
|
|
|
Mean |
134 |
125 |
122 |
121 |
|
|
|
|
Week 5-8 |
1 |
273 |
267 |
237 |
216 |
248 |
7.54 |
0.28 |
0.027* |
|
2 |
268 |
223 |
242 |
200 |
233 |
|
|
|
|
Mean |
271a |
245ab |
239ab |
208b |
|
|
|
|
Week 1-8 |
1 |
403 |
394 |
363 |
349 |
378 |
8.86 |
0.16 |
0.023* |
|
2 |
405 |
345 |
359 |
308 |
354 |
|
|
|
|
Mean |
404a |
370ab |
361ab |
329b |
|
|
|
|
WC (Weight Class of Hens) 1- 800-950 g, 2 - 950-1100 g , *P0.05; SEM- Standard Error Mean; Interaction not found and No difference between period P>0.05. |
The weight gain is mainly related to the feed consumption and feed efficiency, which depend on the physiological condition of the birds, climatic changes and other factors. Body weight of chicks of RIR*Fy cross in this study was higher than reported by El-Magharby et al (1975), who observed the highest average 8-week weight was 299g, attained by birds of RIR male and Fy female. However, the conditions were different.
Chicks of different ENG and WC utilized the feed equally (P>0.05) during the first 4 wks (2.9 to 3.4 and 2.9 to 3.2 respectively), the last 4 weeks (3.2 to 3.6 and 3.4 to 3.5 respectively), and even during whole period (3.1 to 3.4 and 3.2 to 3.4 respectively). But apparently, E3 and for first 4 wks WC 1 utilized the feed slightly better. In brooding period (first 4 weeks) feed conversion was better than in the growing period (last 4 weeks). Haque et al (1999) found that feed conversion ratio in RIR and Fayoumi was 4.9 and 4.7 respectively in the brooding period (0-5 weeks) and 4.9 and 5.7 in the growing period (6-17 weeks) under the confinement system. The present trial gets the support from them indirectly, because this was conducted under a semi-scavenging system and feed intake from the scavenging was not counted and these are crossbred birds getting superiority of their parents in all aspects. The result showed that chicks kept on low stocking density consumed more feed than those on high stocking density. Various stocking densities (5-17 birds) were reared in the same size of day and night shelter, and birds on high stocking density were more competitive. As a result, they also might have wasted more feed. Consequently, weak birds would not be able to take the same amount of feed and became weaker. In the same scavenging area, hens with few chicks got more feed than hens with more chicks.
In only 6% (2 out of 32) broody hens with chicks, ecto-parasites D. gallinae were observed just after incubation. If anyone touches the nest or birds, instantly it spreads over the body. The farmers killed them by burning the nest and all the materials. The effect of other parasites was not assessed but control measures applied were appreciably effective.
Photo 4: The ecto-parasite (F. Trombiculidae) affected the thoracic region of chicken
As feed cost is the main cost for rearing the birds, the total costs get higher as the chick number increases because other factors remain constant (Table 4). Feed costs accounted for an average of 52.5% of the total costs in this trial, whereas for commercial rearing, feed costs account for 60-65% of the total costs. About 7.5 to 12.5% feed costs are saved because of the scavenging areas. The cost (€ 5.8 per dose) of Gumburo disease vaccine could be reduced if the farmers of the same community start to incubate and rear chicks by the broody hens at the matching period.
Table 4. Cost benefit analysis estimated for chick production by broody hens |
|||||
Sources |
Items |
Egg Numbers Groups (ENG) |
|||
E1 (8) |
E2 (11) |
E3 (14) |
E4 (17) |
||
Expenditure |
Materials Cost (TK.) |
72.5 |
72.5 |
72.5 |
72.5 |
|
Eggs cost , 3 TK./egg |
24 |
33 |
42 |
51 |
|
Vaccination & Medication, 4 TK./b |
28 |
32 |
44 |
52 |
|
Feed cost/hen (TK.) for 3 wks |
11.7 |
12.0 |
11.1 |
11.1 |
|
Feed intake (Kg/chick) for 8 wks |
1.4 |
1.3 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
|
Feed cost for all chicks (TK.) |
129 |
137 |
160 |
189 |
|
Total cost for all birds (TK.) |
265 |
286 |
329 |
375 |
|
Cost/bird (TK.) |
37.8 |
35.7 |
29.9 |
28.8 |
|
Hatched birds |
7 |
9 |
12 |
15 |
|
Survived birds |
7 |
8 |
11 |
13 |
Total Income (TK.) |
|
315 |
320 |
440 |
455 |
Net profit (TK.) |
|
50(€ 0.8) |
34(€ 0.5) |
111(€ 1.7) |
80(€ 1.2) |
Net profit/b (TK.) |
|
7.1 |
4.3 |
10.1 |
6.2 |
Cost for Materials ( Nest Tk. 16, Day shelter Tk 35 , night shelter Tk 50, feeder Tk 26, waterer Tk 18) needed is 145 Tk, but that can be used for 2 batches; It is assumed that every family has hens; 1€= 66 TK, TK=Taka (Bangladesh currency); Vaccination and Medication include BCRDV, Gumburo, Neguvon, Ivomec etc; Price Tk 45/bird in E1, Tk 40/bird in E2, Tk 40/bird in E3, Tk 35/bird in E4 |
Every farmer has at least 2 to 4 hens, and these could be synchronized for setting using the dummy eggs. Otherwise, it is quite impossible to use the imported expensive vaccine for the farmers. The concerned NGO can also help them. Net profit seems to be very little (€1.7 or Tk 111), but usually a key rearer in the PLDP model is supposed to use 4 broody hens from which they can earn nearly € 6.8 (Tk 444). The profitability may rise if they keep and take care of their birds up to sexual maturity.
To determine the length of period between end of incubation and fist lay 18 broody hens were observed. It was found that the average interval period was 52 days, ranging from 37 to 93 days. This phase is necessarily taken by the hen to gain the weight loss and other physiological normal state for starting laying again.
Hens usually came off their nest once a day for a few minutes. Among the 19 broody hens, most of them were closely observed for two days. It was found that they spent time outside the nest of 14 minutes, ranging from 4 to 30 minutes. Most of the hens left their eggs for around 10 minutes. They liked to come off before noon (from 7.30 am to 12.10 pm), with a peak observed from 8.00 to 10.30 am.
Indigenous broody hens have the capacity of incubating (87.2% on fertile eggs) up to 17 eggs weighing in average 41.3g.
The statement 'The smaller the broody hens, the lower the incubating capacity' may not be true.
Based on this experiment we can conclude that the small broody hens are just as efficient as the bigger ones. Broody hens of lower weight can protect the chicks better from the predators, thereby increasing chick survivability up to 95.4%.
Incubating 14 eggs by broody hens may be more profitable to farmers of Bangladesh, compared to 8, 11 and 17 eggs.
This field research in Bangladesh was performed for the partial fulfillment of the MSc degree from The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Denmark. The first author would cordially like to thank DANIDA and the Danish Embassy for providing the required grants. Appreciation is extended to the Network for Smallholder Poultry Development, KVL for organizing and implementing the MSc. course. Finally thanks are extended to the PLDP project and women who hosted the experiments and participated in the work.
Azizul H M and Reza A 1990 A comparative study of the performance of exotic bird and indigenous birds under village condition. M.Sc. Thesis, Department of poultry science, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
Banergee G C 1992 Poultry. Third edition. Oxford and IBH publishing Co. PVT. Ltd. New Delhi, pp. 57-58, 71.
Benabdeljelil K, Arfaoti T and Johnston P 2001 Traditional poultry farming in Morocco. Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the Association of Institution for Tropical of Tropical Veterinary Medicine PP. 138.
Boorman K N and Freeman B M 1979 Food intake regulation in poultry. British Poultry Science Ltd, Edinburgh pp. 445-469.
Bulbul S M, Davis C H, Preston T R, Haque Mand Sadullah M 1983 More protein for the undernourished through a village poultry project. Proceeding of Maximum livestock production from minimum land, held at Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh.
Byerly T C, Knox C W and Jull M A 1934 Some genetic aspects of hatchability. Poultry Science, 13:330.
El-Magharby M M, Madhkor Y H and Kamar G A R 1975 Effect of different types of crossing on the growth of chickens. Agricultural Research Review 53: 6,97-104
Haque M E, Hamid M A, Howlider M A R and Huque Q M E 1991 Performance of native chicks and hens reared together or separately under rural conditions of Bangladesh. The Bangladesh Veterinarian 8:11-13.
Haque M E, Howlider M A Rand Huque Q M E 1999 Growth performance and meat yield characteristics of native naked neck and their crosses with exotic hens. Journal of Applied Animal Research 16: 81-86.
Huque Q M E 1993 Indigenous animal species conservation versus intensive production in Bangladesh. Asian Livestock xviii 10: 132-137.
Khan A G 1983 Improvement of deshi bird (part-2). Poultry Advisor 16: 67-68.
Kicka M A M, Stino F K Rand Kamar G A R 1978 Genetical studies on some economical traits of chickens in the subtropics. Animal Breeding Abstract 46: 12.
Kosenko N, Kovalenko Aand Sapronova N 1985 Selecting fowls for egg shape and egg shell quality. Animal Genetics, Ptitsevodstvo 10:28-29.
Oluyemi J A and Roberts F A 1979 Poultry Production in Warm Wet Climates. The Macmillan Press Ltd. London and Basinstoke pp. 33, 41.
Pampin M and Ruiz C 1998 Characterization of semi-rustic fowls. Broodiness. Revista Cubana de Ciencia Avicola 22:1,69-71.
Permin A and Hansen J W 1998 Epidemiology, diagnosis and control of poultry parasites.FAO Animal Health Manual 4: 151-152. FAO, Rome
Rodriguez Lylian 2001 Strategies to improve village poultry production in SE Asia; increasing the brooding capacity of local Khmer hens managed in a semi-scavenging system. UTA Foundation Cambodia (unpublished data)
SAS SAS Institute Inc What's new in SAS software for version 8.2, Cary, NC.
Swan S E J 1999 The Poultry development strategy of the participatory livestock development project in Bangladesh. Poultry as a Tool in Poverty Eradication and Promotion of Gender Equality, Proceedings of a workshop PP. 129
Wickramaratne S H G, Gunaratne S P, Chandrasiri A D N and Roberts J A 1994 Chick mortality in scavenging village chickens in Sri Lanka. Proceedings of the 7th AAAP Animal Science Congress, Bali, Indonesia, II: 71-72.
Zadworny D, Shimada K, Ishida H, Sumi C and Sato K 1988 Changes in plasma levels of prolactin and estradiol, nutrient intake, and time spent nesting during the incubation phase of broodiness in Chabo hen (Japanese bantam). Gen Comp Endocrinol, Sep 71(3):406-12.
Received 24 August 2004; Accepted 25 November 2004; Published 1 February 2005