Citation of this paper |
Two experiments were conducted to find out the effect of cassava foliage compared with grass on the growth rate and parasite infestation of growing goats. 12 crossbred goats, treated with Ivermectin before starting, were used in experiment 1 which lasted 80 days. There were 3 treatments according to the source of forage (Cassava alone, Cassava + Grass [50:50 percent in DM] and Grass alone) as supplement to a basal diet of brewer's grains. Experiment 2 was with 16 local goats allocated to 3 treatments with no initial injection of Ivermectin (Cassava alone, Cassava + Grass [50:50 percent in DM] or Grass alone) and a 4th treatment of grass alone with injection of Ivermectin at the start. In this experiment the basal diet was wheat bran. In both experiments, the forage supplement supplied about 50% of the diet DM.
The goats given diets containing cassava foliage had faster growth and better feed conversion. EPG were either lower on cassava-supplemented diets compared with the grass alone (Experiment 1) or declined with time from high initial values (Experiment 2). DM digestibility was apparently depressed on the cassava, compared with the grass, diets but this negative nutritional effect appeared to be more than compensated by the much higher protein intakes with cassava.
It is suggested that the better performance on the cassava diets was due to the higher protein intake and that the protective action against nematode parasites was due to the content of condensed tannins.
Drug resistance has become an important issue in small ruminant husbandry when anthelmintics are applied at high levels and increasing frequency and with inappropriate doses (Pandey et al 2001; Chartier et al 2001; Chandrawathani et al 1999). The use of natural substances is becoming preferable and may offer better control than using chemical compounds to treat parasitised animals (Orr, No date and Chandrawathani 2001). This seems more appropriate, more practical and sustainable for the smallholder farmers as the use of natural substances is the traditional way of dealing with diseases in rural areas in developing countries.
Condensed tannins are secondary plant compounds that have inhibitory effects on digestive processes (Barry and McNabb 1999). However, goats can tolerate high levels (up to 2.7 g/kg live weight) without suffering ill effects (Silanikove et al 1996) and have superiority in dealing with tannin better than the sheep (Narjisse et al 1995). There are also reports that at high concentrations they have anthelmintic properties against nematode parasites (Khan Diaz-Hernandez 2000; Butter et al 2000). However, nutritional level especially with protein is considered to be an important factor in conferring resistance to parasites (Nolan 1999). Additional protein supplementation enhanced parasite control as well as giving beneficial responses in production (Knox 1996). It has been observed that drenching with anthelmintic did not result in better growth if the nutritional level also was not improved (Pralomkarn et al 2001), as there was no significant difference in growth rate between control and drenched animals. The interaction between these two factors was suggested to be investigated under lower nutritional conditions such as in a village farm situation.
Cassava foliage is relatively rich in condensed tannins (Wanapat et al
1997), and feeding it in the form of sun-dried hay has been reported to reduce
faecal egg counts in grazing buffaloes (Netpana et al 2001; Granum et al
2003). When goats housed on slatted floors in full confinement were fed fresh
cassava foliage as a forage supplement to brewer's spent grains, growth rates
were faster and faecal egg counts much lower than when cut grass was the
supplement (Seng Sokerya and Rodríguez 2001).
On the basis of the above observations the objectives of
the present study were:
1.
To determine the source of infection from internal parasites in confined
goats
2.
To find out the direct
effect of condensed tannin in cassava foliage on nematode parasites
3.
To evaluate the effect
of the protein level on the growth rate and parasite infestation of goats
receiving cassava foliage (expected to inhibit parasite infestation) or grass
(a potential source of infestation).
The experiments were conducted from April to October 2002 at the ecological farm of the University of Tropical Agriculture (UTA), situated in the campus of the Royal University of Agriculture, about 12 km from Phnom Penh the capital of Cambodia. This region is located in a monsoon tropical climate where mean air temperature is in the range of 33 to 40 °C in April to May and 20 to 29 °C from June to December.
The goats were confined individually in
wooden pens with 1*1.5 m floor area, fitted with raised slatted floors
about 1.2 m higher from the ground in a building with open sides and a thatch roof.
The feeders are situated on the outside of the pen, where the animals can put
their head to eat or drink. This also facilitates the feeding and collection of
feed residues (Photo 1).
|
|
|
Photo 1: The goat house and feeders |
The three treatments were different forages, or combinations of forages, as
supplements to a basal diet of Brewer's spent grains. The supplements were:
G: Cut natural grass
C: Cassava foliage
GC: A mixture of grass and cassava foliage (50:50 DM basis)
There were four replications in a randomized block design (CRD), after
blocking the animals on the basis of live weight and sex. The experimental
period was 80 days.
12 crossbred Bach Thao goats (6 males and 6 females) were
used in this experiment with the average body weight of 20 kg for males and 16 kg for the female goats,
and between 5 to 8 months of age. All the animals were selected from the
goat herd in the Ecological farm of UTA. They were treated with Ivermectin
(MERIAL, Merck, Sharp and Dohme, BV, Netherlands), before starting the
experiment
to be sure that they were free from parasites. There was an
adaptation period of one week before starting the experiment to accustom the
goats to the housing and the feeding system.
In this case, 4 treatments were arranged in a CRD design using 16 goats and
a basal diet of wheat bran. The treatments were:
C: Cassava foliage
CG: Mixture of grass
and cassava foliage (50:50 DM basis)
G: Grass
Gt: Grass + injection
of Ivermectine at the beginning of the experiment.
Thus 3 treatments followed those in Experiment 1 (but without anthelmintic), while the 4th treatment (Gt) was the same as "G" but with injection of the anthelmintic (Ivermectin). The basal diet of brewer's grain was also replaced by wheat bran which has a lower protein content to allow a better observation on the effect of the supplementation. The animals in each treatment were blocked according to EPG level in the beginning of the trial. The highest fecal egg count animals were allocated to the cassava treatment (C), and the lower ones to the grass treatments (Table 1). There were 4 replications (individual animals) in each treatment and the experimental period was 70 days.
Table1:
Blocking of individual goats at the start of experiment
|
|||||||||||||||
|
C |
|
|
CG |
|
|
G |
|
|
Gt |
|
||||
Goat |
EPG |
Goat |
EPG |
Goat |
EPG |
Goat |
EPG |
||||||||
2 |
5000 |
9 |
7950 |
1 |
600 |
4 |
0 |
||||||||
6 |
1400 |
10 |
4400 |
3 |
600 |
8 |
0 |
||||||||
7 |
2150 |
12 |
3400 |
5 |
550 |
11 |
0 |
||||||||
14 |
1400 |
13 |
1400 |
15 |
900 |
16 |
0 |
||||||||
Average
|
2488±856 |
|
4288±1371 |
|
663±80 |
|
0 |
||||||||
Sixteen female goats of the local breed were used. The body
weights were in the range of 8 to 12 kg and the ages between 3 and 5 months of
age. All the animals were purchased from local goat farms in the area around Phnom Penh
city (Theng Kouch et al 2003). In this experiment, a longer period of
adaptation (21 days) was necessary because the goats on the "C" and
"CG" treatments were slow to adapt to the cassava foliage.
Brewer’s spent grain was used as the basal diet at a restricted level, of
50% of the expected ad libitum intake, which was estimated to be about 4% of
liveweight on dry matter basis (Peacock 1996). The supplements were foliage
from cassava, cut natural grasses or the mixture of the two given on a
50:50 (DM basis) ad libitum. The feeds were offered 2 times per day in the
morning about 10 am and in the afternoon about 3 pm. Water was always
available. Cassava foliage was harvested daily from semi-perennial plots in the
ecological farm of UTA. The foliage (leaves, petioles and green stems) was from
re-growths harvested regularly at 50 to 80 day intervals (Preston et al
2001), the hard stems being cut about 50cm from the ground for the first
harvest and 5 to 10cm from the point of the first cutting for the next harvest.
The natural grasses were collected in the field around the area of the
ecological farm every day in the morning before feeding. The fresh brewer’s
grain was received every two weeks from the local brewery and was immediately
ensiled in closed concrete containers to preserve it from rancidity.
Feeding and management were similar to the procedures used in Experiment 1,
except that wheat bran replaced the Brewer’s grain and the feeding level was
restricted to 200 g (air-dry basis) daily. The wheat bran was received monthly
from the local wheat factory and kept in feed storage at the Ecological farm.
Live weight was
recorded at the beginning, every 10 days and at the end of the experiment. The amounts of feed offered and refused were
measured and recorded daily, separately for the basal diet and the
supplements. Representative samples
of feeds offered and refused were analysed for dry matter by micro-wave
radiation (Undersander et al 1993) and nitrogen content (AOAC 1990). The
cassava foliage was analysed for the concentration of HCN (AOAC 1990) and
condensed tannins (Burns 1971). After weighing the animals, faecal samples were
taken directly from the rectum to determine the concentrations of the
parasite eggs (EPG).
EPG counting
procedure: 4 g of faecal sample were ground and mixed with 56 ml of flotation fluid (a
saturated salt solution in water). After filtering through a “tea strainer”, a
sub-sample was transferred to both compartments of a McMaster counting chamber
and allowed to stand for 5 minutes. All helminth eggs were counted under a
microscope at 10x magnification and multiplied by 50 to yield the EPG (Eggs per
gramme) of faeces (Hansen and Perry 1994).
The measurements were similar to those employed in Experiment 1. In
addition, at the end of the trial, one goat from each treatment was
slaughtered to determine the total worm burden in the intestinal gut. The eggs
in the faeces were cultured to identify the species of the infective larva
using the faecal sample from the slaughter animals. Digestibility of dry
matter, organic matter and nitrogen was determined by taking samples of feed,
feed residue and faeces over 5 days at the end of the trial, bulking them
to obtain representative samples, which were then analysed for acid
insoluble ash using the method of Van Keulen and Young (1977). The
faeces samples were taken from voided excreta under the individual pens.
All the experimental data were subjected to analysis
of variance (ANOVA) by using the General Linear Model (GLM) of the MINITAB
software (Release 13.31, 2000). The model was:
Yi
= µ+ Ti + ei
where
Yi
= Dependent variable
µ = overall mean
Ti
= treatment effect
ei
= random error
The data for composition of the feed ingredients (Table 2) are similar to reports in the literature (FAO 2003). Values for HCN on representative samples of cassava foliage were 653 mg/kg of DM. There was more DM and less N in feed residues than in feed offered with differences being greatest for cassava and least for the Brewer's grains. On the "C"and "CG" treatments the goats first consumed the leaves of the cassava, and then part of the petioles and green stems (Table 3).
Table 2: Chemical composition of feed ingredients |
||||
|
DM, % |
N, % in DM |
||
|
Offer |
Residue |
Offer |
Residue |
Brewer's spent grain |
|
|
|
|
Range |
21.7-30.67 |
20.8-32.2 |
3.26-4.76 |
2.66-4.99 |
Average |
24.7±0.84 |
24.6±1.41 |
3.90±1.52 |
3.88±0.30 |
Cassava foliage |
|
|
|
|
Range |
16.5-29.3 |
18.2-39.2 |
2.69-4.9 |
0.9-2.94 |
Average |
20.8±1.14 |
26.7±2.53 |
3.34±0.20 |
1.86±0.24 |
Grass |
|
|
|
|
Range |
12.2-36.0 |
19.8-53.5 |
1.26-2.87 |
1.01-2.8 |
Average |
18.4±2.68 |
33.9±3.45 |
2.00±0.18 |
1.7±0.24 |
Table 3: Proportions of cassava foliage, and DM and crude protein contents, in offer and residue |
||||||
|
Proportion, % |
DM, % (of fresh matter) |
N*6.25, % (in DM) |
|||
Offer |
Residue |
Offer |
Residue |
Offer |
Residue |
|
Stem |
32.0 |
69.7 |
13.0 |
34.4 |
8.63 |
7.25 |
Petiole |
26.9 |
27.0 |
14.8 |
21.3 |
9.63 |
7.69 |
Leaves |
41.1 |
3.40 |
27.1 |
36.6 |
32.6 |
27.9 |
The values for composition of the cassava and grass were similar to those
in the first experiment (Table 4). For wheat bran the protein content was
typical of literature values (FAO 2003).
Table
4: Chemical composition of feed ingredients
|
||
|
DM |
N*6.25, % in DM |
Wheat bran |
89.7 |
13.8 |
Cassava foliage |
17.0 |
20.4 |
Grass |
24.1 |
10.6 |
The actual proportions consumed of cassava foliage and cassava foliage + grass were close to the planned proportions of 50% of the diet DM (Table 5). Total DM intake expressed as a percentage of live weight, and daily live weight gain, tended to be higher (P=0.16) for the treatments with cassava foliage compared with grass alone. Feed conversion was poorer on grass alone with no differences between cassava and cassava + grass. Protein intake as percent of live weight was highest on cassava and lowest on the grass supplement.
Table 5: Mean values for feed intake and live weight gain in goats fed Brewer's grains supplemented with cassava foliage alone, cassava mixed with grass, and grass alone |
|||||
Treatment |
C |
C + G |
G |
SE |
P |
Live weight |
|||||
Initial |
15.6 |
16.2 |
21.3 |
1.35 |
0.04 |
Final |
22.5 |
25.2 |
28.1 |
2.00 |
0.21 |
Daily gain, g/day |
9 |
115 |
8 |
13 |
0.16 |
Feed intake (DM) |
|||||
Brewer's grain, % |
42.2 |
45.2 |
48.4 |
|
|
Cassava, % |
57.8 |
24.9 |
0 |
|
|
Grass, % |
0 |
30.0 |
51.7 |
|
|
Total DM intake, g/day |
582 |
680 |
705 |
29.9 |
0.05 |
DM intake as % of LW |
3.07 |
3.25 |
2.78 |
0.16 |
0.16 |
Feed conversion (DM) |
6.42 |
6.09b |
9.10a |
0.70 |
0.03 |
Protein intake |
|||||
Total protein intake, g/day |
152 |
146 |
130 |
6.06 |
0.078 |
Protein intake, g/kg of LW |
8.04 |
7.00 |
5.13 |
0.04 |
0.004 |
ab Means without letter in common differ at P<0.05 |
DM intakes did not differ among treatments and were of the same order (as % of LW) as in Experiment 1 (Table 6). Protein intake, as percentage of live weight was higher on the cassava diets (C and CG) than on the grass diets (G and Gt). However, growth rates were much lower and feed conversion poorer than in Experiment 1.
Table 6: Mean values for feed intake and growth rate of goats fed wheat bran supplemented with cassava foliage alone on the growth of local goats on the basal diet of wheat bran (Experiment 2) |
||||||
|
C |
C + G |
G |
Gt |
SE |
P |
Live weight, kg |
|
|||||
Initial |
9.32 |
7.39 |
8.90 |
10.7 |
0.66 |
0.035 |
Final |
12.6 |
9.34 |
11.5 |
12.8 |
0.72 |
0.024 |
Daily gain,
|
43.7 |
29.3 |
30.7 |
28.0 |
5.86 |
0.334 |
DM Intake, %
|
|
|||||
Wheat bran |
47.0 |
48.8 |
46.6 |
42.1 |
|
|
Cassava |
53.0 |
18.9 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Grass |
0 |
32.3 |
53.4 |
58.0 |
|
|
Total DM intake,
g/day
|
298 |
274 |
353 |
381 |
9.60 |
0.127 |
DM intake as % of
LW |
2.79 |
3.26 |
3.37 |
3.19 |
1.85 |
0.259 |
DM feed conversion |
7.2 |
11.1 |
11.6 |
14.7 |
1.96 |
0.155 |
Protein intake |
|
|||||
Total, g/day |
55.5 |
41 |
43.3 |
46.1 |
3.42 |
0.086 |
g/kg of LW |
5.2 |
4.9 |
4.1 |
3.9 |
0.26 |
0.021 |
Growth rate was higher on cassava alone than on the other treatments combined (mean difference 14.5±4.6; P=0.057). The same was true for DM feed conversion which was better on cassava alone than on the other combined treatments (mean difference 5.29±1.7; P=0.056) (Figure 1). There was no beneficial effect on performance traits from the anthelmintic treatment at the beginning of the trial (G vs Gt).
Figure 1: Mean values for live weight gain
and feed conversion for goats supplemented with cassava alone (C)
versus the combined data for the other diets (CG, G and Gt)
(Experiment 2)
DM intake was higher and apparent digestibility coefficients lower when
cassava alone was the forage supplement compared with the grass treatments (Table
7). Faecal DM content was higher, as was faecal pH, for goats given the
diets with cassava (C and CG) compared with no cassava (G and Gt).
Table 7: Mean values for feed intake, apparent digestibility and faecal indices during the 5-day collection period at the end of experiment 2 |
||||||
|
C |
C+G |
G |
Gt |
SE |
P |
DM intake, g/kg LW |
29.3 |
20.6 |
26.7 |
24.0 |
1.32 |
0.003 |
Digestibility, % |
||||||
Dry matter |
70.3 |
81.0 |
86.2 |
87.6 |
2.90 |
0.011 |
Nitrogen |
78.6 |
88.6 |
91.9 |
91.7 |
2.23 |
0.009 |
Organic matter |
72.3 |
82.4 |
86.8 |
88.1 |
2.78 |
0.015 |
Faecal indices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pH |
7.82 |
7.65 |
7.07 |
7.11 |
0.18 |
0.033 |
Dry matter, %
|
53.1 |
44.9 |
32.1 |
33.6 |
2.54 |
0.001 |
The changes in EPG during the experiment showed marked differences between treatments with increasing EPG on the grass treatment and negligible values for the treatments involving cassava foliage (Figures 2 and 3). However, even on the grass the level of infection was quite low.
Figure 2: Trends in EPG before (day 0) and during the experiment after injection of invermectin on day 1
Figure 3:
Mean values for average EPG in goats supplemented with cassava foliage alone,
mixed with grass or grass alone (Experiment 1)
EPG counts were high on the cassava and cassava + grass treatments at the beginning and showed a steady decline during the experiment from about 4000 to 5000 in the first 30 days to about 1500 after 70 days (Figure 4). The goats on the supplement of grass only had low EPG at the beginning and maintained these values throughout the trial. Those treated with invermectin had nil EPG for the first 60 days and then began to show signs of re-infection (range of EPG from 150 to `1200 on day 70).
Examination of the larvae cultured from the eggs in the faeces samples from
4 goats (one on each treatment) showed that the worms were almost entirely
of the Haemonchus contortus species.
The faster growth rates and better feed conversion in Experiment 1 probably relate to the breed and origin (Bach Thao cross goats from UTA in Experiment 1 compared with native goats purchased from farmers in Experiment 2), the heavier initial body weight and the higher protein content of the diet in Experiment 1, and the fact that in Experiment 1 the goats were accustomed both to confinement and to eating cassava foliage before the the experiment began. The latter point was evident from the longer time needed to adapt to the cassava foliage in Experiment 2, while feed refusals of the cassava foliage in this experiment were also relatively higher than in Experiment 1. Considering both growth rate and feed conversion, the data from both experiments indicate better goat performance with the high level of cassava foliage as the supplement, which is in agreement with the earlier findings of Seng Sokerya and Rodríguez (2001). Nguyen Kim Lin et al (2003) also reported better growth of goats when fresh cassava foliage rather than grass was the forage supplement to a diet of rice bran.
The results for DM digestibility (70%) are only slightly lower than the value (73%) reported by Theng Kouch et al (2003a) who fed a sole diet of cassava foliage to goats with the same feeding system (foliage placed in the feed trough) as in our experiment. Tran Thi Thu Hong (2002) fed 100, 75 and 50% cassava to goats, together with wheat bran (on the 75 and 50% cassava diets), and reported DM digestibilities of 79.3, 76.3 and 78.3%, respectively. It is relevant to note that this researcher fed the cassava as a hanging bunch of foliage, a feeding method that was found to result in higher intakes and higher DM digestibility (81%), compared with feeding the cassava foliage in the feed trough (73%) (Theng Kouch 2003a). Ho Quang Do et al (2000) fed up to 47% of cassava foliage to goats replacing rice straw. The reported DM digestibility for the straw alone was 36% and for the diet with 47% of cassava was 57%. Even without the expected positive interaction from the presence of the cassava foliage with a nutrient-poor substrate such as rice straw (see Guttierrez 1978), the calculated digestibility (by difference) of the cassava foliage alone would have been 76%.
The question could be asked: why was growth and feed conversion better with cassava foliage supplement than with grass even though digestibility was higher on the grass? The most likely explanation is the much higher protein intake on the former (8.04 g protein/kg live weight) than on the latter (5.13 g protein/kg live weight). A high level of protein nutrition is also important in developing natural immunity against nematode parasites (Nolan 1999).
The lower apparent digestibility coefficients recorded
for the goats fed the high cassava supplement (50% of DM intake), compared with
those receiving grass, appear to be in conflict with the data for growth rate
and feed conversion, which favoured the high cassava treatment. However, a
negative effect on digestibility has been reported by many workers when they
fed forages with high levels of condensed tannins to small ruminants (Romero et
al 2000; Silanikove et al 2001; Mcsweeney et al 2001; Feutos et al 2002;
Barry and McNabb 1999) so presumably it was the condensed tannins in the
cassava that were responsible for the depression in digestibility on the
cassava as opposed to the grass diets.
The data for worm egg counts support the earlier findings of Seng Sokerya and Rodríguez (2001), with much lower EPG on the cassava supplement in Experiment 1, and a steady decline from initial high values in Experiment 2. The difference was that the degree of infestation was much less in Experiment 1 than in the study of Seng Sokerya and Rodríguez (2001). In Experiment 2, the decision was taken deliberately to block the goats according to initial EPG counts, on the basis that this would prove if there were compounds (eg: the condensed tannins) in the cassava foliage that would act as an anthelmintic directly affecting the parasite. The steady decline in EPG on both the cassava alone and the mixed cassava and grass diets would appear to support that decision. Surprisingly the EPG on the grass supplement in Experiment 2 remained low throughout the experiment, which contrasts strongly with the findings in Experiment 1 where the EPG (following invermectin treatment) steadily increased with time. It is possible that the grass used in Experiment 2 did not contain infective material as it was cut at a higher level from the ground, compared with the practice adopted in cutting the grass in Experiment 1 (which was cut at ground level). This finding is similar to the result from the study by Nguyen Kim Lin et al (2003) on the effects of the cutting height of the grass fed to growing goats in North Vietnam. The faecal egg count was about 2 times higher when the grass was cut low compared with when it was cut high. Growth rate was also better when the grass was cut high rather than low.
These observations are supported by the findings of Coffey et al (2001), who showed that when the grass was tall the infective nematode larvae did not climb up to the top of the plant. It is known that the infective larvae migrate vertically on plants via the moisture film (Niezen et al 1998). These authors indicated that the number of infective larvae that successfully develop and migrate up the stems of the herbage (to be consumed by host animals) can be influenced by pasture-plant species, and that some plant species might have thicker water films than other plants. This migratory behaviour of the infective larvae could also partially explain why the goats in experiment 1 that consumed only cassava foliage had negligible levels of EPG, as it is unlikely that the larvae would climb the stems of the cassava.
Considering the results of the two experiments, together with the findings of Seng Sokerya and Rodríguez (2001), it would appear that there is evidence that cassava foliage contains compounds (presumably the condensed tannins) that have an anthelmintic effect against nematode parasites in goats. In this respect there are many reports in the literature that ascribe such an action to the presence of condensed tannins (Coop and Jackson, No date; Granum et al 2003; Butter et al 2000; Kabasa et al 2000; Molan et al 2002; Niezen et al 1996; Kahn et al 2001).
Other indirect effects of cassava foliage could be the higher level of protein as compared to grass (Tables 4 and 7), and the expectation that the tannins present in cassava foliage will enhance the supply of essential amino acids to the small intestine (Wanapat 2003). The other advantage of cassava foliage compared with grass is that the infective larvae are unlikely to migrate up the stems of a shrub plant such as cassava. There are many reports in the literature that tannins (in a moderate concentration of 2 to 4%) increase the availability of protein in the small intestine of ruminants, and that this indirectly improves host resistance and resilience to nematode parasites (Barry and McNabb 1999; Kahn and Diaz-Hernandez 2000; Kahn et al 2001). The importance of the protein nutrition of the host animal as a factor enabling it to overcome parasitism has been emphasized by many authors (Coop and Kyriazakis 2001; Haile et al 2002; Nolan 1999; Waller 1997; Meissner and Paulsmeier 1995; Coop and Holmes 1996).
Diets for growing goats containing cassava foliage, and either brewer's
grains or wheat bran, supported better growth and feed conversion, and
exhibited protective mechanisms (presumably due to the content of condensed
tannins in the cassava) against nematode parasites, than similar basal
diets supplemented with freshly cut grass.
DM digestibility was apparently depressed on the cassava, compared with the
grass, diets but this negative nutritional effect appeared to be more than
compensated by the much higher protein intakes with cassava.
The present experiment is part of a study on the use of
cassava foliage as a feed and natural anthelmintic source for goats. It was
partially supported by the MEKARN project, financed by the SIDA-SAREC
Agency, and the regional project “Development and Testing of an Integrated
Approach to the Control of Gastro-Intestinal Parasites of Small Ruminants in
South and South East Asia (TAG 433)". The authors express their gratitude to
the staff of the Ecological Farm, of the
University of Tropical Agriculture Foundation, for help with the
experiment. Thanks are also expressed to Dr
AOAC 1990 Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 15th edition (K Helrick editor). Arlington pp 1230
Barry T N and McNabb WC 1999 The implications of condensed tannins on the nutritive value of temperate forages fed to ruminants. British Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 81 no. 4 pp 263-272 (10)
Burns R 1971 Method for estimatation of tannin in grain sorghum. Agronomy Journal, 63: 511-512.
Butter N L, Dawson J M, Wakelin D and Buttery J 2000 Effect of dietary tannin and protein concentration on nematode infection (Trichostrongylus colubriformis) in lambs. The Journal of Agricultural Science 134:89-99
Chandrawathani P, Adnan M and Waller P J 1999 Anthelmintic resistance in sheep and goat farms on Peninsular Malaysia. Veterinary Parasitology Volume 82 Issue 4 pp 305-310
Chandrawathani P, Adnan M and Zaini C M 2000 Preliminary study on Neem (Azadirachta indica) as an alternative anthelmintic for sheep. Proceeding of 12th Veterinary association Malaysia Scientific congress, Malaysia, Kuanyan
Chartier C, Soubirac F, Pors I, Silvestre A, Hubert J, Couquet C and Cabaret J 2001 Prevalence of anthelmintic resistance in gastrointestinal nematodes of dairy goats under extensive management conditions in southwestern France. Journal of Helminthology vol. 75 no. 4 pp 325-330(6)
Coffey Linda, Wells Anne and Earles R 2001 Sustainable Goat Production: Overview, Appropriate Technology Transfer for Rural Areas. (ATTRA) http//www.atta.org/atta_pub/#raising
Coop Bob and Jackson Frank No date http://www.mri.sari.ac.uk/Parasitology/helm.htm
Coop R L and Holmes P H 1996 Nutrition and parasite interaction. International Journal of Parasitology 26 (8-9) pp 951-962
Coop Robert L and Ilias Kyriazakis 2001 Influence of host nutrition on thedevelopment and consequences of nematode parasitism in ruminants. TRENDS in Parasitology. 17 (7) pp. 325-330
Elliott R and Gutiérrez E 1984 Interacción digestiva de la pulpa de henequén (Agave fourcroydes) y el pasto estrella de africa (Cynodón plectostachyus). In Alternativas y Valor Nutritivo de Algunos Recursos Alimenticios Destinados a Producción Animal. Fundación Internacional para la Ciencia. Santo Domingo, República Dominicana. Septiembre, 1984. pp 229-246.
FAO 2003 http://www.fao.org/WAICENT/FAOINFO/AGRICULT/AGA/AGAP/FRG/afris/index_en.htm
Frutos P, Hervás G, Ramos G, Giráldez F J and Mantecón A R 2002 Condensed tannin content of several shrub species from a mountain area in northern Spain, and its relationship to various indicators of nutritive value. Animal Feed Science and Technology 95 (3-4) pp 215-226
Granum G, Wanapat M, Wachirapakorn C and Pakdee P 2003 A comparative study on the effect of cassava hay in swamp buffaloes (bubalus bubalis) and cattle (bos indicus). Msc thesis, Dept. Animal Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
Haile Aynalem, S Tembely, D O Anindo, E Mukasa-Mugerwa, J E O Rege, Alemu Yami and R L Baker 2002 Effects of breed and dietary protein supplementation on the responses to gastrointestinal nematode infections in Ethiopian sheep. Small Ruminant Research, 44 (3) pp. 247-261
Hansen Jørgen and Perry Brian 1994 The epidemiology diagnosis and control of helminth parasites of ruminants. International Laboratory for Research on Animal Diseases, Nairobi, Kenya
Ho Quang Do, Vo Van Son, Bui Phan Thu Hang, Vuong Chan Tri and Preston T R 2002 Effect of supplementation of ammoniated rice straw with cassava leaves or grass on intake, digestibility and N retention by goats. Livestock Research for Rural Development 14 (3): http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd14/3/do143b.htm
Kabasa J D Opuda-Asibo J ter Meulen U 2000 The Effect of Oral Administration of Polyethylene Glycol on Faecal Helminth Egg Counts in Pregnant Goats Grazed on Browse Containing Condensed Tannins. Tropical Animal Health and Production vol. 32 no. 2 pp 73-86 (14)
Khan L P and Diaz-Hernandez A 2000 Tannin with anthelmintic properties. in Tannins in Livestock and Human Nutrition. Brooker, J.D (Ed) www.aciar.gov.au/publications/proceedings/92/index.htm
Kahn L P, Knox M R, Walkden-Brown S W and Lea J M 2001 Enhancing live-long resistance to nematode parasite: possibility from nutritional supplementation of recently weaned sheep. Recent Advance in Animal Nutrition in Australia. Volume 13 pp. 87-95
Knox Malcolm and Stee John 1996 Nutritional Enhancement of Parasite Control in Small Ruminant Production Systems in Developing Countries of South-East Asia and the Pacific. Volume 26, Issues 8-9 pp 963-970
McSweeney C S, Palmer B, McNeill D M and Krause D O 2001 Microbial interactions with tannins: nutritional consequences for ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology 91 (1-2) pp 83-93
Meissner H H and Paulsmeier D V 1995 Plant compositional constituents affecting between-plant and animal species prediction of forage intake, Journal of Animal Science (73) pp 2447-2457.
Molan A L, Waghorn G C and McNabb W C 2002 Effect of condensed tannins on egg hatching and larval development of Trichostrongylus colubriformis in vitro. The Veterinary Record. 150 (3) pp. 65-69(5)
Narjisse H, Elhonsali M A and Olsen J D 1995 Effects of oak (Quercus ilex) tannins on digestion and nitrogen balance in sheep and goats Small Ruminant Research. 18 (3) 201-206
Netpana N, Wanapat M, Poungchompu O and Toburan W 2001 Effect of condensed tannins in cassava hay on fecal parasitic egg counts in swamp buffaloes and cattle. In: Proceedings International Workshop on Current Research and Development on Use of Cassava as Animal Feed. T R Preston, B Ogle and M Wanapat (Ed) http://www.mekarn.org/procKK/netp.htm
Niezen J H, Charleston W A G, Hodgson J, Mackay A D and Leathwick D M 1996 Controlling internal parasites in grazing ruminants without recourse to anthelmintics: approaches, experiences and prospects. Int. J. Parasitol. 26:983-992.
Niezen J H, Charleston W A G, Hodgson J, Miller C M, Waghorn T S and Robertson H A 1998 Effect of plant species on the larvae of gastrointestinal nematodes which parasitise sheep. Int J for Parasitol, 28(5): 791-803.
Nolan J V 1999 Management of parasitic disease in livestock- can resistance be programmed by dietary manipulation? Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia Volume 12 pp. 7-14
Nguyen Kim Lin, Preston T R , Dinh Van Binh and Nguyen Duy Ly 2003 Effects of tree foliages compared with grasses on growth and intestinal nematode infestation in confined goats. Livestock Research for Rural Development (15) 6 Retrieved, from http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd15/6/lin156.htm
Orr Crissy, No date. Comparing Alternatives for Controlling Internal Parasites in Dairy Goats: Herbal vs. Chemical. http://www.7mfarm.com/goat-articles/Herbal-VS-Chemical.html
Pandey V S, Pralomkrarn W, Kochapakdee S and Saithanoo S 2001 Benzimidazol resistance in Haemnchus Contortus from goat in Thailand. PSU goat research publication. pp 337
Peacock Chistie 1996 Improving Goat Production in the Tropics. A Manual for development workers. Oxfam (UK and Ireland) in association with FARM- Africa
Pralomkarn W, Kochapakdee S, Choldumrongkul S and Saithanoo S 2001 Effect of supplementation and parasitic infection on productivity of Thai native and cross-bred. 1. Growth, Parasite infestation and blood constituents, PSU goat research publication, pp 291- 302
Preston T R 2001 Potential of cassava in integrated farming systems. Use of Cassava as Animal Feed. Proceedings of International Workshop, Khon Kaen, Thailand. http://www.mekarn.org/procKK/pres.htm
Romero M J, Madrid J ,
Hernández F and Cerón J J 2000
Digestibility and voluntary intake of vine leaves (Vitis vinifera L.) by sheep.
Small Ruminant Research Vol. 38 (2) pp. 191-195
Seng Sokerya and Rodriguez L 2001
Foliage from cassava, Flemingia
macrophylla and bananas compared with grasses as forage sources for goats:
effects on growth rate and intestinal nematodes.
Livestock Research for Rural Development. 13(2):
http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd13/2/soke132.htm
Silanikove N, Gilboa N, Perevolotsky A and Nitsan Z 1996 Goats fed tannin-containing leaves do not exhibit toxic syndromes. Small Ruminant Research. Vol. 21 (3) pp. 195-201
Silanikove N, Perevolotsky A and Provenza F D 2001 Use of tannin-binding chemicals to assay for tannins and their negative postingestive effects in ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology. Volume 91 Issues 1-2 pp 69-81
Theng Kouch,
T R Preston and J Ly 2003a: Studies on
utilization of trees and shrubs as the sole feedstuff by growing goats; foliage
preferences and nutrient utilization;
Theng Kouch, Nam Noch and Preston T R 2003b Observations on goat raising system of farmers along the Mekong river. Livestock Research for Rural Development (15) In press
Tran Thi Thu Hong 2002 Digestibility and N retention by goats fed graded levels of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) foliage. http://www.mekarn.org/procKK/contents.htm
Undersander D, Mertens D R and Theix N 1993 Forage analysis procedures. National Forage Testing Association. Omaha pp 154
Van D T T, Nguyen Thi Mui, L D L Bien, Dinh Van Binh and Goulding C 2000 Study on processing and utilization of foliage from Flemingia macrophylla and Cassava leaf as protein supplements for goats. Proceeding of Workshop of Animal Nutrition Science, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Vietnam.
Van Keulen J and Young B A 1977 Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash as natural marker in ruminant digestibility. Journal of Animal Science 44:262-26
Waller Peter J 1997 Sustainable helminth control of ruminants in developing countries. Veterinary Parasitology. 71 (2-3) pp. 195-207
Wanapat M, Pimpa O, Petlum A and Boontao U 1997 Cassava hay: A new strategic feed for ruminants during the dry season. . Livestock Research for Rural Development 9(2): http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd9/2/metha92.htm
Wanapat M 2003 Manipulation of Cassava cultivation and utilization to improve protein to energy biomass for livestock feeding in the tropics. Asian-Aust. J. Ani. Sci. 16(3) pp 463-472
Received 4 July 2003; Accepted 10 August 2003