Citation of this paper |
Moringa oleifera leaf meal replaced cottonseed cake (0, 33.3, 66.6 and 100%) in a supplement containing 76 to 80% hominy meal (maize bran), which was fed (270 g/day) to Black Head Persian male sheep receiving Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana) hay and a mineral mixture as the basal ration. Two trials were conducted. The first was a growth study in which feed intake and weight gain were measured for a period of 84 days. The second was a digestion study.
Hay dry matter intake (57 to 60% of the diet), dry matter digestibility and live weight gain were higher, but feed conversion was poorer when Moringa oleifera leaf meal replaced all the cottonseed cake.
It was concluded that Moringa oleifera leaf meal could serve as an alternative protein source to cottonseed cake in sheep rations based on maize bran and Rhodes grrass hay
The Moringaceae is a single genus family with 14 known species.
Of these, Moringa oleifera is the most widely known and
utilised species. It is native to sub-Himalayan regions of India
and is now naturalised in many countries in Africa, Arabia, SE
Asia, Caribbean Islands and South America (Ramachandran et al 1980). Moringa is
a fast-growing tree which can
reach 12 m in height at maturity, yielding up to 120 tonnes/ha/yr
when planted very densely for use as forage (Makkar and Becker
1997). As Moringa oleifera trees
have a loose canopy, which prevents excessive crop shading, they
are useful for alley cropping. Foliage can be regularly pruned and
left in the field to improve soil fertility or fed to livestock in a
cut-and-carry system. The leaves are highly nutritious containing
significant quantities of Vitamins A, B and C, Ca, Fe, P and
protein. Laboratory analysis (Makkar and Becker 1997) showed that
the protein concentration in leaves is about 27% with negligible
amounts of tannins (1 to23 g/kg) in all fractions of the Moringa
oleifera plant and high levels of sulphur-containing amino
acids. Young leaves are used by farmers in India as cattle fodder
to improve milk yields (Bostock-Wood 1992) and in Zimbabwe as
animal feed (Clarke 1994). Both large and small-scale farmers in
Tanzania grow Moringa oleifera for extraction of seed oil, so
there is potential to use the foliage for feeding livestock
(Sarwatt et al 2002).
Despite the high CP content of Moringa oleifera leaf meal, there are few reports in the literature on feeding trials with livestock. In Tanzania, livestock are regularly fed a concentrate mixture containing hominy meal and a protein meal with low quality roughage in the dry season. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects on feed intake, digestibility and growth of Black Head Persian sheep of substituting Moringa leaf meal for cottonseed cake in the concentrate mixture.
The treatments were 4 levels of moringa leaf meal (MLM) substituting cottonseed cake (CSC) (0, 33.3, 66.6 and 100%) in a supplement (Table 1) fed with Rhodes grass hay (Chloris gayana). The other component of the supplement was Hominy meal (consists of maize bran and the germ). Twenty-four Black Head Persian male sheep (initial weight 15.9+ 2.2 kg) were randomly allocated to the 4 treatments in a completely randomised block design with 6 animals on each treatment.
Table 1. Proportions (%) of MLM and CSC in the four supplements |
||||
|
Treatments |
|||
M0 |
M33 |
M66 |
M100 |
|
Hominy meal |
79 |
77.7 |
76.8 |
75.7 |
Minerals | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
MLM |
0 |
7.4 |
14.8 |
22.3 |
CSC |
19 |
12.7 |
6.4 |
0 |
Mature Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana) was cut and baled in September (late dry season) from the University farm, and stored in a well ventilated place. Moringa oleifera leaves were collected from tree branches that were cut and air-dried for 24 h before removal of the partially dried leaves by threshing. They were left to dry under shade on concrete floors. The dried leaves were then ground in a hammer mill and stored in sacks. Decorticated cottonseed cake was purchased in the market, ground in a feed mill and bagged ready for compounding with the other feedstuffs. Hominy meal was purchased from a local maize miller. The Rhodes grass hay was chopped in a forage chopper before feeding to reduce length and minimise wastage.
A preliminary period of 14 days was allowed for the animals to get used to the experimental diets. They were then treated against internal and external parasites before the experiment started. The animals were weighed weekly throughout the experimental period of 12 weeks, at 07.00 h before the morning feed. They were kept and fed in individual pens fitted with facilities for feeding hay, supplement and water. It was assumed that each animal would consume about 4% of its body weight as daily total DM intake and that about 30% of the intake should come from the supplement, in order to support moderate growth rates of about 50 g/day. On this basis the supplement allowance was set at 270 g/day, which was consumed completely. The hay was offered at 600 g/day, which was estimated to be about 20% above ad libitum. Leftover hay was removed before the morning feed, weighed and sub-sampled for DM and chemical analysis.
Digestible organic matter (DOM) was determined using the two stage in vitro digestibility technique as described by Tilley and Terry (1963). Digestible energy (DE) and metabolisable energy (ME) were then estimated from the equations of Devendra and McLeroy (1987) thus:
DE (MJ) = 19.2*DOM (kg)
ME (MJ) = 0.82*DE (MJ)
Hence:
ME (MJ) = 0.82*19.2*DOM (kg).
The P:E (protein: energy ) ratio was calculated as crude protein intake (g/d) divided by ME (MJ/d). Feed conversion ratios(FCR) was obtained by dividing the daily DM intakes (g/d) by daily weight gain (g/d).
After the live weight gain study, a digestibility and N-balance trial was carried out. Twelve sheep were randomly selected from the animals in the first study, treated against internal parasites, and randomly allocated to the 4 treatments. Each sheep was placed in a separate metabolism cage, which allowed for separate collection of faeces and urine. A preliminary period of 10 days was adopted followed by a 7-day collection period. The amounts of hay and supplement offered were calculated on the same basis as in Experiment 1. Water was freely available.
During the collection period, the total faecal production for each sheep was collected and weighed at 08.00 h. After thorough mixing, about 10% of each day's collection was stored in air-tight plastic bags in a deep freeze at -5oC. Subsequently, the samples collected over the 7-day period for each sheep were combined. About 20% of the fresh sample for each animal was retained for DM and N determination. The rest was oven-dried at 60oC for 48 h, ground to pass through a 1 mm sieve and stored in plastic bags for chemical analysis.
Total
urine output over 24 h was collected in individual plastic
containers with 20 ml of copper sulphate solution to trap gaseous
nitrogen, sieved to remove foreign materials, mixed thoroughly and
a 10% sub-sample stored in air-tight sample bottles in a deep
freeze. Samples collected over the 7 days for each sheep were
bulked before analysis for N.
All dried samples of feeds, refusals and faeces were milled through a 1-mm screen before analysis for DM, organic matter (OM), N, ash, ether extract (EE), crude fibre (CF), Ca and P according to the standard procedures of AOAC (1990).
Data from digestibility, intake and live weight gain studies were analysed using statistical software (SAS 1990). The live weight gain study data were analysed based on the following model:
Yij = m + Ti + b(Xij -
x) + eij
Where:
Yij = dependent variables
m = general effect (overall mean)
Ti = effect of the ith treatment
b = regression coefficient (from regression of dependent variable on initial body weight)
Xij = initial body weight of the ith sheep
x = mean of initial body weights of all sheep
eij = random effect.
The following model was followed in analysing the digestibility data:
Yij = m + Ti + eij
Where:
Yij = dependent variables
m = general effect (overall mean)
Ti = effect of the ith treatment
eij = random effect.
The hay used in this study was low in crude protein and ether extract, and high in cell wall components. The higher levels of cell wall components in the hay refusals indicate that the sheep had selected the more nutritious components.
Table 2. Chemical composition of the feedstuffs used in the experiments (as % of DM except for DM which is as % of air-dry material) |
||||||||||
|
Feeds |
Refusals |
||||||||
Homily meal |
MLM |
CSC |
Hay |
M0 |
M33 |
M66 |
M100 |
|||
DM |
94.1 |
93.4 |
86.9 |
93.5 |
91.8 |
90.8 |
91.6 |
90.5 |
||
CP |
12.0 |
27.7 |
35.3 |
2.5 |
2.0 |
2.1 |
2.1 |
1.9 |
||
CF |
4.3 |
11.5 |
23.2 |
35.1 |
38.1 |
39.1 |
41.8 |
39.3 |
||
EE |
13.1 |
5.2 |
9.1 |
2.6 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
||
ASH |
5.0 |
14.3 |
6.2 |
7.7 |
5.1 |
5.1 |
4.6 |
5.2 |
||
OM |
95.0 |
85.8 |
93.8 |
92.3 |
95.0 |
94.9 |
95.4 |
94.8 |
||
NFE |
59.7 |
34.6 |
13.2 |
45.6 |
46.3 |
44.2 |
42.7 |
43.7 |
||
ADF |
11.1 |
20.5 |
25.3 |
50.6 |
53.3 |
51.7 |
54.8 |
49.9 |
||
NDF |
30.6 |
28.6 |
32.4 |
74.6 |
78.9 |
75.9 |
76.2 |
78.6 |
||
|
Table 3. Chemical composition of the experimental diets |
||||
Parameter |
Treatments |
|||
M0 |
M33 |
M66 |
M100 |
|
DM, % |
89.9 |
90.2 |
88.9 |
88.3 |
As % of DM | ||||
CP |
14.5 |
14.7 |
14.8 |
14.4 |
CF |
9.3 |
7.6 |
7.9 |
6.4 |
EE |
7.1 |
7.6 |
7.5 |
7.4 |
ASH |
6.0 |
7.2 |
7.1 |
8.7 |
OM |
83.9 |
83.0 |
81.8 |
79.6 |
NFE |
53.1 |
53.3 |
51.8 |
51.3 |
NDF |
39.4 |
35.5 |
39.4 |
34.2 |
ADF |
12.2 |
12.5 |
12.7 |
12.9 |
ME, MJ/kg DM |
13.6 |
13.6 |
15.1 |
13.8 |
Ca, mg/kg |
2973 |
3952 |
4373 |
6205 |
P, mg/kg |
8376 |
8526 |
8922 |
8086 |
Intake of hay, and therefore of the total diet, increased in accordance with the degree of substitution of CSC by MLM (Table 4). This could be due to an improved rumen ecosystem due to introduction of MLM, leading to higher intakes. Addition of fresh grass (Guttierrez and Elliott 1984) or leucaena hay (Kabatange and Shayo 1991) to a diet low in N and of low digestibility, improved the rumen ecosystem and fibre digestibility in sheep.
Table 4. Effect of replacing cottonseed cake (CSC) with Moringa oleifera leaf meal (MLM) on feed intake (DM basis) of Black Head Persian sheep (Least square means ± SEM) |
||||
|
Treatments |
|||
M0 |
M33 |
M66 |
M100 |
|
DM intake, g/day |
|
|
||
Hay, g/d |
323±9.3b |
337±8.8b |
337±12.3b |
355±8.9a |
Supplement, g/d |
245±4.1 |
245±3.9 |
242±5.4 |
242±3.9 |
Total, g/d |
568±8.6b |
582±8.6b |
579±11.4b |
597±8.3a |
Total, g /kg W0.75 |
64.2±1.01b |
64.8±0.95b |
67.2±1.3a |
68.2±0.96a |
P:E ratio# |
8.80±0.04a |
8.86±0.04a |
8.27±0.05c |
8.53±0.04b |
ab Means within
rows without letter in common are significantly different (P>0.05). |
Growth rate was higher when MLM replaced all the CSC in the supplement (Table 5). Considering the type of hay fed, the rates of live weight gain (52 to 62 g/d) are acceptable and fall in the range of 40 to 65 g/d reported for BHP sheep from birth to 72 weeks on Chloris gayana hay supplemented with Leucaena leucocephala (Das and Sendalo 1991; Kifaro et al 1996). Surprisingly, the feed conversion was poorer on the diets of M66 and M100 compared with M0 and M33.
Table 5. Effect of replacing cottonseed cake (CSC) with Moringa oleifera leaf meal (MLM) on live weight gain of sheep fed a basal diet of Rhodes grass hay (Least square means ± SEM) |
|||||
|
Treatments |
|
|||
M0 |
M33 |
M66 |
M100 |
SEM |
|
Live weight, kg |
|
|
|
||
Initial |
16.3 |
16.9 |
16.8 |
16.3 |
0.48 |
Final |
20.7 |
19.4 |
21.5 |
21.5 |
1.74 |
Growth rate, g/d |
51.9a |
52.7a |
56.6a |
62.1b |
3.10 |
FCR |
10.8±0.1a |
10.5±0.1a |
13.2±0.1b |
13.8±0.1b |
|
ab Means within
rows without letter in common are significantly different (P>0.05). |
Digestibility of DM, OM and cell wall constituents were higher on the diet with the M100 supplement compared with diets having lower levels of MLM (Table 6).
Table 6. Effect of replacing cottonseed cake (CSC) with Moringa oleifera leaf meal (MOLM) on nutrient digestibility (%) of a basal diet of Rhodes grass hay |
|||||
|
Treatments |
|
|||
M0 |
M33 |
M66 |
M100 |
SEM |
|
DM |
60.4b |
67.8ab |
62.7ab |
70.1a |
2.50 |
OM |
57.0 |
64.9 |
59.3 |
61.9 |
4.60 |
Crude protein |
65.0 |
65.6 |
69.6 |
68.0 |
1.43 |
NDF |
66.4b |
72.6ab |
69.4ab |
75.2a |
2.07 |
ADF |
64.4b |
71.5ab |
67.8ab |
73.5a |
2.21 |
ab Means within rows without letter in common are significantly different (P>0.05). |
There were no significant (P>0.05) differences in N intake and N utilisation (Table 7).
Table 7. Effect of replacing cottonseed cake (CSC) with Moringa oleifera leaf meal (MLM) on nitrogen utilisation |
|||||
|
Treatments |
|
|||
M0 |
M33 |
M66 |
M100 |
SEM |
|
N balance, g/day |
|
|
|
|
|
Intake |
6.22 |
6.48 |
6.67 |
6.42 |
0.68 |
Retained |
1.51 |
1.75 |
1.50 |
1.40 |
0.16 |
N retained as % of: |
|||||
N intake |
20.8 |
27.5 |
30.5 |
22.5 |
6.05 |
N digested |
29.2 |
38.1 |
39.3 |
34.9 |
7.69 |
Replacing cottonseed cake with Moringa oleifera leaf meal (20% of the diet) in a diet for growing sheep based on maize bran resulted in a 20% improvement of growth rate but poorer feed conversion.
The authors thank the Norwegian Agency for International Development (NORAD) through Tanzania Agricultural Research Project (TARP II) for funding this study. In addition, we thank the Department of Animal Science and Production of Sokoine University of Agriculture, for providing the experimental animals and laboratory analyses.
AOAC 1990 Official Methods of Analysis. 15th Edition, Association of official analytical chemists, Washington, DC
Bostock-Wood C 1992 Trees in society in rural Karnatica, India. Natural Resources Institute, Chatham, UK
Clarke J 1994 Building on indigenous natural resource management: Forestry practice in Zimbabwe's communal lands. A report of the Forestry Commission, Harare
Das D M and Sendalo D S C 1991 Small Ruminant Research Highlights in Tanzania. Quarterly Review(January-March 1991), Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock Development and Co-operatives, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Devendra C and Mc Leroy G B 1987 Goat and sheep production in the tropics. Intermediate Tropical Agriculture Series. Longman, New York 270 pp.
Guttierrez E and Elliott R 1984 Interacción digestiva de la pulpa de henequén (Agave fourcroydes) y el pasto estrella de africa (Cynodón plectostachyus). In: Alternativas y Valor Nutritivo de Algunos Recursos Alimenticios Destinados a Producción Animal. Fundación Internacional para la Ciencia. Santo Domingo, República Dominicana. Septiembre, 1984. pp. 229-246.
Kabatange M A and Shayo C M 1991
Rumen degradation of maize stover as influenced by Leucaena hay supplementation.
Livestock Research for Rural
Development 3(2)
Kearl L C 1982 Nutrient requirements of ruminants in developing countries. International Feedstuff Institute, Utah State University, Salt Lake City, USA pp 381
Kifaro G C, Moshi N G and Mtenga L A 1996 A note on growth performance of BHP sheep at SUA. Proceedings of the 23rd Scientific Conference of Tanzania Society of Animal Production (TSAP), Morogoro, Tanzania 70, 70-79.
Makkar H P S and Becker K 1997 Nutrients and anti-quality factors in different morphological parts of the Moringa oleifera tree. Journal of Agricultural Sciences (Cambridge), 128, 311-322.
Muhikambele V R M 1990 Protein and mineral supplementation to growing goats on pasture. M.Sc. Thesis. Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Ramachandran C, Peter K V and Gopalakrishan P K 1980 Drumstic (Moringa oleifera): A multipurpose Indian vegetable. Economic Botany, 34 (3), 276-283.
SAS 1990 Statistical Analysis System. SAS/STAT User's Guide. (Statistical Analysis Institute, Inc) Cary, NC, USA).
Sarwatt S V, Kapange S S and Kakengi A M V 2002 Substituting sunflower seed cake with Moringa oleifera leaves as supplemental goat feed in Tanzania. Agro-forestry Systems 56:241-247.
Tilley J M A and Terry R A 1963 A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18:104-111
Received 11 July 2003; Accepted 18
September 2003