Citation of this paper |
Abstract
This experiment was conducted to evaluate the
comparative growth performance of Local and White Leghorn chickens under
intensive and scavenging conditions with or without supplementation. Replicated
groups of Local and White Leghorn baby chickens were subjected to scavenging,
scavenging plus supplementation, and intensive feeding in completely randomized
design, for a study period of 20 weeks.
Mean daily feed consumption, body weight gain, feed utilization
efficiency and rate of survival were used as evaluation parameters.
Both Local and White Leghorn chickens were suitable to scavenging conditions in terms of growth performance. Mortality from hatching to maturity was higher for White Leghorn than for Local chickens kept under scavenging condition, indicating that exotic chickens are subjected to considerable hazard of diseases, parasites and predators under scavenging condition. Mean daily weight gain of supplemented scavenging White Leghorn chickens was higher than that of Local chickens kept under intensive condition, showing that White Leghorn chickens are more responsive to supplementation and more suitable to intensive production system, compared to Local chickens. Mortalities and morbidities were higher for Local than for White Leghorn chickens kept under intensive conditions.
There seems to be no
economic justification for supplementary feeding and intensive management of
Local chickens for the purpose of meat production due to their poor feed
utilization efficiency and low survival rate in captivity.
Introduction
The
Ethiopian local chickens are estimated to be over 56 million, and traditional
chicken rearing is practiced by virtually every family in rural Ethiopia,
indicating that chickens are an affordable source of animal protein. Traditional
chicken rearing fits quite well to the conditions of rural households, creates
employments and generates family income. The small feed cost and space
requirement and the low price of the animals make chicken rearing a suitable
farming activity for the rural poor. Unfortunately, despite the fact
that more than 99% of the Ethiopian poultry production system consists of local
chickens, traditionally considered to be disease resistance and adaptive to
their environment, their contribution to human nutrition, gross domestic
products and export earnings are disproportionately low. The major reasons for
such a low productivity (low rate of growth and delayed maturity) are low
standards of management, health care and feeding. There is general agreement
indicating that improvement in management and nutritional status of the local
chickens could result in increased output per bird. But what has been studied so
far in Ethiopia is not tangible enough to show the relative effects of genetic
and non genetic factors on the growth performance of local chickens (Alemu Yami
and Tadelle Dessie 1997). Thus the major objective of the study was to evaluate
the comparative growth performance and survival of Local and White Leghorn
chickens under scavenging and intensive systems of management.
Materials and methods
This
study was conducted in Ethiopia at Jimma College of Agriculture; located at an
altitude of 1700m and 335 km southwest of the capital, Addis Ababa. The trial on the scavenging condition was
conducted within a peasant association located at a distance of 10 km from
Jimma College of Agriculture.
Local
eggs purchased from Jimma town and exotic eggs collected from the White Leghorn
flock of Jimma College of Agriculture poultry farm were used for the experiment.
An adequate number of eggs of each of Local and White Leghorn chickenswere
selected against undesirable size, shape and shell structure. The selected eggs
were fumigated with formaldehyde gas (17g KMn04 +100ml of 20%
formalin) and incubated to hatch the experimental chickens.
All
the chickens were transferred from the incubator to a brooder house as soon as
they were dry and placed on a standard starter ration (the
only commercial ration with specified energy value and protein content that is
available on the market in Ethiopia).
At an age of 10 days, 500 baby chickens of each breed were randomly
selected and divided into 5 groups each with 100 chickens (5 groups of Local and
5 groups of White Leghorn). Each group
was housed in a separate experimental house equipped with all the necessary
chick brooding facilities, and fed a commercial starter ration for a period of 2 months (brooding period),
followed by appetite feeding with commercial grower ration for an additional
period of 3 months. Twelve groups of each of the two breeds, with 70 chickens
each were, at the age of 10 days, distributed to 12 selected farmers who
constructed their own hay-box brooder (a portable home-made box in which no
artificial heat is employed used to raise baby chickens to an age of 8 weeks)
(Demeke 2003), poultry house and poultry house equipment according to the
design provided. The sex ratio of both the Local and White Leghorn baby chickens
was almost 1:1 during the brooding period. Pooled mean values of equal number
of males and females of each breed (separately raised during the rearing
period) were used in data presentation and statistical analysis.. The selected farmers were given data
collection forms and adequate amount of the required commercial poultry
ration. Finally the distributed chickens
were subjected to scavenging condition, with or without a supplementary daily
basic ration equal to 50% of the amount required for intensive feeding.
In the cases of supplementation and
appetite feeding, feed was offered at 10% above intake (adjusted daily) and
refusals were
collected and weighed once a day. The experimental chickens were weighed once a
week. Feed consumption, growth, feed conversion and economic
efficiencies and rate of survival were used to evaluate the comparative growth
performance of the experimental chickens, along with other related parameters.
An analysis of variance was carried out by Fisher's method (Snedecor and Cochran 1972) with Duncan's multiple range test for grouping treatment means, where F-values were significant (Duncan 1955).
There was no difference between White Leghorn and Local chickens raised under scavenging condition in mean daily body weight gain to 2 months (Table 1). However, when supplementary feed was offered, the performance of White Leghorn was superior both in scavenging and confinement conditions. Mortality was higher for White Leghorn than for Local chickens under scavenging conditions but the reverse was the case in confinement.
Table 1. Growth performance of Local and White Leghorn (WLH)
chickens kept under intensive and scavenging condition with or without
supplementation |
||||||
Item |
Household |
Household + DBR# |
Appetite
feeding |
|||
Local |
WLH |
Local |
WLH |
Local |
WLH |
|
Feed cost, Birr/quintal## | ||||||
Commercial |
- |
- |
138 |
138 |
138 |
138 |
Home made |
|
|
60 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
Total feed consumption, g |
- |
- |
1242 |
1173 |
2700 |
2040 |
Body weight, g | ||||||
At hatching |
36 |
40 |
37 |
40 |
36 |
40 |
Initial |
39 |
42 |
39 |
41 |
38 |
42 |
Final |
197a |
221a |
217a |
270b |
240c |
351d |
Daily gain |
2.63a |
2.98a |
2.96a |
3.82b |
3.37e |
5.15d |
Feed conversion rate |
- |
- |
7.0a |
5.2b |
13.4c |
6.6d |
Mortality, % |
5.6a |
13.9b |
6.5a |
11.3c |
22.0b |
8.1a |
#DBR =
Supplementary daily basic ration of about 50% of the requirements |
Table 2. Growth performance of Local and White Leghorn (WLH)
growers kept under intensive and scavenging condition with or without
supplementation |
||||||
Item |
Household |
Household + DBR# |
Appetite feeding |
|||
Local |
WLH |
Local |
WLH |
Local |
WLH |
|
Feed cost, Birr/quintal## | ||||||
Commercial |
|
|
138 |
138 |
138 |
138 |
Home made |
|
|
60 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
Total feed consumption, g |
|
|
3.6 |
3.4 |
11.76 |
9.81 |
Body weight, g | ||||||
Initial |
197 |
221 |
217 |
270 |
240 |
351 |
Final |
985a |
1170a |
1082a |
1400b |
1300c |
1600d |
Daily gain |
8.8a |
10.5a |
9.6a |
12.6b |
11.8e |
13.9d |
Feed conversion rate |
- |
- |
4.2a |
3.2b |
11.1c |
7.9d |
Mortality, % |
4.6a |
6.7b |
4.5a |
6.6c |
24.0b |
4.1a |
#DBR = Supplementary daily basic ration of about 50%
of the requirements |
The growth performance of White Leghorn chickens kept under scavenging condition was improved (by 10 and 21%, during the brooding and rearing period, respectively), as a result of supplementation with a daily basic ration of 50% of normal requirements (Tables 1 and 2). There was no effect of supplementation on rate of growth of Local chickens kept under scavenging conditions. At an age of 5 months under intensive management, Local chickens reached 81% of the mean body weight achieved by White Leghorn chickens (Table 2). However, feed conversion was much poorer in the Local birds.
The
result of this study showed that White Leghorn chickens
are suitable for scavenging conditions in terms of growth performance, and that they are more
responsive to supplementation than Local chickens.
The poor performance of Local chickens under intensive management is in
agreement with the findings of
Teketel Forsido (1986), who reported that
the body size and the carcass weight of intensively managed Local chickens from
southern Ethiopia reached 61 and 64% of that of White Leghorn chickens kept under
similar conditions at an age of 6 months. Abebe Hassen (1992) also reported that
the body weights of intensively managed Local chickens from eastern Ethiopia
attained 72% of the weight of White Leghorn chickens kept under similar conditions at 6 months of age.
Under intensive
management, the feed consumed from hatching to maturity (defined as 5
months of age) was higher (P<0.05) for Local than for White
Leghorn chickens. The
market price of live poultry in Ethiopia varies depending on sex, color, size,
age, market locations and fasting and non-fasting periods (AACMC 1984). Feed
cost also varies from place to place (Alemu Yami and Tadelle Dessie 1997). At
the
time of conducting this experiment, the market price of live mature chicken was
about Birr 10 to 15. In order to reach slaughter weight of 1.5 kg, about 18 kg of commercial ration (Birr 25) was needed to raise day-old
Local chickens, compared to 11 kg of commercial
ration (Birr 14)for White
Leghorn chickens.
There seems to be no economic
justification for either supplementary or appetite feeding of Local chickens in
Ethiopia due to their poor feed utilization efficiency and to the high cost of
poultry feed. This result is in
agreement with that of Burley (1957), Teketel Forsido (1986) and Goshu Mekonen
(1981) who reported that there is an increase in the production performance of
Local chicken with improvement in feeding and management, but not to at an
economically acceptable level. Local
chickens are appropriate for the traditional low input - output system, since
they hatch their eggs and brood chickens (Alemu Yami and Tadelle Dessie 1997).
Mortality
from hatching to maturity was
higher (P<0.05) for White Leghorn
than for Local chickens kept under scavenging condition with or without
supplementation (Tables 1and 2). Highest losses occurred during the early phase of
the experiment in White Leghorn chickens. The
superior health status and rate of survival
of Local compared to White Leghorn chickens, kept under
scavenging conditions with or without supplementation, is in agreement with the
report of AACMC (1984) that Local chickens are well adapted to the local
environment and considered to be disease resistant. Exotic chickens
introduced into scavenging conditions of Ethiopia are subjected to considerable
hazards of diseases, parasites and predators.
They appeared to be less alert and responsive to sound / signal communication traits which are
important under the Ethiopian scavenging conditions, characterized by prevalence
of predators.
Local chickens kept under intensive management were inferior to
White Leghorn chickens kept under similar conditions in health status and rate of
survival. Lack of interest in their
environment, wing droppings, huddling at the corners, signs of leg weakness, and
cannibalism were frequently seen among Local chickens kept under intensive
management. Local chickens kept in
captivity (managed intensively), were also slow in rate of feathering, and
exhibited recurrent outbreaks of disease, which tended to spread to the others. Higher
mortalities and morbidities among Local compared to White Leghorn
chickens kept under intensive management conditions have been reported in Awassa
(Teketel Forsido
1986), in Debre Zeit (Abebe Hassen 1992), in Arsi (Brännng and Pearson 1990) and
in Alemaya (Abebe Hassen 1992). The reason
for high mortality of Local chickens under intensive management could be due to
the fact that they are not used to confinement. Probably diseases which are
important under confinement in Ethiopia, such as coccidiosis, chronic
respiratory disease, Marek's disease, and Salmonella pullorum and nutritional
deficiencies could cause more serious problems in Local than in exotic stock
(Tadelle Dessie
and Ogle 1996).
In terms of growth performance, White Leghorn chickens are equally suitable to scavenging conditions as Local chickens, and are more responsive to supplementation. However, their survival rate is lower.
There seems to be no
economic justification for keeping Local chickens under intensive management systems for the
purpose of meat production due to their poor feed utilization efficiency and
low survival rate in captivity.
Abebe Hassen 1992 Terminal report
on the comparative evaluation of native chicken in the Hararge Administrative
Region and their crosses with the single comb White Leghorn. Mimeographed report.
Alemu Yami and Tadelle
Dessie 1997 The status of poultry research and development in Ethiopia.
Proceedings of the 5th national conference of the Ethiopian Society
of Animal Production. 15-17 May 1997, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
AACMC (Australian
Agricultural Consulting and Management Company) 1984 Livestock sub sector review, volume 1, Annex
3.
Brännäng E and Pearson S
1990 Ethiopian Animal Husbandry. Uppsala, Sweden, pp 127.
Burley R H 1957 IECA and JATS
staff report. Agriculture of Ethiopia,
Volume VI.
Duncan D B 1955 Multiple range
and multiple F-test Biometrics.11:1-42.
Goshu Mekonen 1981 Summary of animal production research. AAU. Debre Zeit Agricultural
Research Center.
Snedecor W G and Cochran G W
1972 Statistical methods, 6th
edition Iowa State University Press.
Ames. IA.
Solomon Demeke 2003 Suitability of home made hay-box brooder to the
Ethiopian rural household poultry (Submitted to Livestock Research for Rural
Development)
Tadelle Dessie and Ogle B 1996 A survey of village poultry production in
the central highlands of Ethiopia, MSc thesis. Swedish University of
Agricultural Sciences, Upsalla, Sweden
Teketel Forsido 1986 Studies on the meat production potential of some local
strains of chicken in Ethiopia. PhD Thesis.
J.L. University of Giessen, pp 210.
Received 7 October 2002; Accepted 16 February 2003