Citation of this paper |
The primary objective of this study was to identify production strategies employed by pig farmers in some peri-urban areas of southwestern Nigeria (Lagos and its environs) to cope with production constraints and soaring demand for pork. Sixty pig farmers were randomly selected and interviewed with the aid of structured questionnaires. In addition, participatory Rural Appraisal Techniques were employed to provoke responses in order to ascertain strategies used to address peri-urban production and marketing constraints in Lagos and its environ.
The result indicated that 70% of the pig farmers owned less than 100 heads of pigs. Controlled breeding methods were adopted by farmers which enabled them to determine the precise time to wean piglets or re-bred sows. Individually mixed feed seemed to be preferred to commercial pig feed, since 87% of the farmers did not have desirability for proprietary pig feed. Perhaps this is an indication of a gloomy future for commercial pig-feed market in the study area. However, regularity of securing feed ingredients from agro-industries or the local market may be a constraint to contend with.
The practice of disposing off pigs at 50 - 70 kg live weight and use of
self-made feed are strategies among others for keeping feeding costs at a
competitive level.
These efforts seem to have assisted the farmers to cope with the peri-urban
pig production and marketing constraints in Lagos
The all-time low
average level of 7.7g animal protein intake per day of an average Nigerian
(Aromolaran and Bamgbose 1999) simply exemplifies a recurring shortcoming in
the African food consumption culture.
It has been demonstrated that the most striking feature of food
consumption in many African Societies is the overwhelming importance of starchy
staples which contribute over 70% of total calorie intake (Anthonio and
Adeyokunnu 1973). Today, the increasing
human population in the face of inelastic production strategies appears to have
widened the demand-supply gap and accentuates scarcity of food, particularly meat
products. Comparative statistics
(Ademosun 1989) puts Nigeria's total meat production at 810,000 tonnes for a
population of about 110 million resulting in a meat production index of 22g per
caput per day. Similar estimates from
USA. and UK put the daily production index at 297g and 155g per caput
respectively
Beside the failure of
meat production capacity to match with the human population growth, the
distribution of meat animals in Nigeria is apparently lopsided. Composite transportation cost incurred
coupled with remote distance between major meat producing areas and consuming
urban centres (such as Lagos) together make the value of wholesome beef,
mutton and chevron often unaffordable.
Consequently there is an over bearing demand pressure on pork production
- an enterprise for which Lagos seems to have a comparative advantage. This perhaps explains the widespread
adoption of the various production strategies among the peri-urban pig
producers in Lagos environ. It has been
shown that peri-urban farming is a highly cost-sensitive venture (Aribido and
Umaru 1994) and prior production objective among producers is to maximize
profit and productivity while minimizing cost and wastage in all forms. High cost of living, as well as the
stringent production and competitive marketing conditions under which pig
production and distribution activities are carried out in Lagos, enforce strict
adherence to this objective. It is
important to note that there is a high demand for pork in Lagos State for
either direct consumption or industrial use in confectioneries. This situation seems to task the ingenuity
of pig producers in managing all production factors to suit their peculiar
circumstances. Sonaiya (1982) had
rightly envisaged that as consumers became more articulate and organized,
presumably like it is now in Lagos, consumer demand for wholesome animal
products will exert a powerful influence upon quality, production method and
strategies. Recent increases in
expendable income of urban dwellers have tendencies to stimulate greater demand
not only for quality but also quantity of meat products. For example, in Abeokuta recently, monthly
expenditure on animal products was estimated at 21% of average monthly income (Aromolaran and Bamgbose 1999).
The objective of this
study was to identify production strategies employed by pig producers in Lagos
in an attempt to cope with production cost and soaring demand while sustaining
the supply of pork for the teeming urban population. The knowledge derived from the study will also assist all
stakeholders in pig farming in the state to plan and manage the seemingly over
stretched production resources in a better way. In addition, the findings may be a useful input for
conceptualizing models for coping with acute demand for livestock products as
it is currently being experienced in most Nigerian urban centres.
Sixty pig farmers were
randomly selected and interviewed with the aid of structured
questionnaires. The survey instrument was
developed to address nutrition, breeding cost and profitability aspects of pig
production in the study area. Enquiries
in these facets of pig production enterprise were intended to provoke responses
to ascertain strategies being used in the highly populated Southwestern Nigeria
to address pig production and marketing constraints. The study area included Oko-oba, Ojoo, Akute, Agbado and Iju in
Lagos State and Oke-Aro in Ogun State to make the sampling exercise representative. Farmers’ responses are presented in
frequency tables.
Herd size of the
majority (70%) of farmers was below 100 heads of pigs. Less than half (40%) have up to 50 pigs on
their farms (Table 1).
Table
1. Total herd size |
||
Herd-size |
Frequency |
% Respondent |
50
or less |
24 |
40.0 |
51
- 100 |
18 |
30.0 |
101
- 200 |
12 |
20.0 |
201
- 301 |
4 |
6.7 |
No
response |
2 |
3.3 |
Total |
60 |
100.0 |
Large White is the
most common breed of pig found in Lagos since 53% of the respondents showed
preference for Large White over Duroc and Land Race (Table 2).
Table 2. Breeds of pig |
||
Breeds |
Frequency |
% Respondent |
Large
White |
32 |
53.3 |
Duroc |
10 |
16.7 |
Land
Race |
10 |
16.7 |
Berkshire |
2 |
3.3 |
Others |
6 |
10.0 |
Total |
60 |
100.0 |
Criss - crossing was
the most widespread (43%) breeding method adopted by the farmer (Table 3). However, terminal and uncontrolled breeding
also featured in some farms.
Table
3. Breeding Method Adopted |
||
Breeding
Method |
Frequency |
%
Respondent |
Criss-crossing |
26 |
43.3 |
Terminal
Crossing |
16 |
26.7 |
Uncontrolled
breeding |
12 |
20.0 |
No
response |
6 |
10.0 |
Total |
60 |
100.0 |
Controlled method of
breeding is useful for determining age and live weight criteria for weaning
piglets. Weaning age is minimally
defined at 6 weeks of age, as most of
the farmers wean their piglets above 6 weeks (Table 4).
Table 4.
Weaning
age (in weeks) |
||
Weaning age (wks) |
Frequency |
%
Respondent |
Above
6 |
26 |
43.3 |
6 |
20 |
33.3 |
4 |
10 |
16.7 |
5 |
4 |
6.7 |
Total |
60 |
100.0 |
Weaning weight ranged
from 6 10 kg for most farms as alluded to by more than 70% of the
respondents(Table 5).
Table 5.
Weaning
weight |
||
Weaning live weight (kg) |
Frequency |
% Respondent |
10 and above |
4 |
6.7 |
6 - 10
|
42 |
70.0 |
5 |
12 |
20.0 |
No response |
2 |
3.3 |
Total |
60 |
100.0 |
Weaning weight and
average daily gain have been reported to be significantly influenced by litter
size, maternal parity, sex and period of birth (Osinowo 2000).
Individually mixed
feed competes more advantageously with proprietary feed as the commonest type
of feed fed to pigs in Lagos (Table 6).
Table 6.
Type
of feed preferably used |
||
Feed type |
Frequency |
% Respondents |
Individually mixed feed |
28 |
46.7 |
Proprietary feed |
22 |
36.7 |
No response |
10 |
16.7 |
Total |
60 |
100.0 |
Indications further
showed that there was a low desirability for commercial pig feed among the pig
farmers. A large proportion (87%) of the
farmers had no desirability for commercial feed (Table 7). The result paints a gloomy future for
the commercial pig feed market in the study area, unless a more attractive product
is developed.
Table 7.
Desirability
for use of commercial feed |
||
Desirability |
Frequency |
%
Respondent |
Not desirable |
52 |
86.7 |
Desirable |
6 |
10.0 |
No response |
2 |
3.3 |
Total |
60 |
100.0 |
A clearer observation was recently reported by Ikani et al (2001) of the low percentage of farmers using various brands of commercial pig feed such as Pfizer livestock feeds (11.9%), Sanders (4.2%), Guinea (3.9%) and Top Feed (2.3%). However, the reported 5.7% of pig farmers who produced their own feed contrast sharply against 87% of respondents with desirability for self-made pig feed in this study.
Table 8
Regularity of securing
feed ingredient |
||
Regularity |
Frequency |
%
Respondent |
Regularly |
28 |
46.7 |
Not regular |
28 |
46.7 |
No response |
4 |
6.7 |
Total |
60 |
100.0 |
There was an equivocal
responses on regularity and irregularity of obtaining ingredients (Table 8). Two major sources of feed ingredient
identified by the farmers were the agro-industries (57%) and local market (30%)
(Table 9).
Table 9.
Sources
for obtaining feed ingredient |
||
Source |
Frequency |
% Respondent |
Agro-industries |
34 |
56.7 |
Local Market |
18 |
30.0 |
No. response |
8 |
13.3 |
Total |
60 |
100.0 |
A report by Dafwang et al (2001) had shown that availability was a major determinant of the type of feed ingredient to buy. Other determinants, in a decreasing order of importance among pig farmers were reliability of supply, good quality and low cost. The feeding frequency adopted by virtually all pig farmers in the study area was the twice daily feeding system. (Table 10).
Table 10
Number of Ttmes of feeding per day |
||
Number of
times |
Frequency |
%
Respondent |
Twice |
54 |
90.0 |
Once |
2 |
3.3 |
Unscheduled |
4 |
6.7 |
Total |
60 |
100.0 |
The majority of the pig farmers maintained
average daily feeding cost per pig within a range of one to twenty naira for
all categories of pigs (Table 11).
Table 11.
Daily average feeding cost
per pig |
||||||||||
Cost (
Range |
Piglet |
Weaner |
Finisher |
Fattener |
Breeder |
|||||
Freq. |
%Resp. |
Freq. |
%Resp. |
Freq. |
%
Resp. |
Freq. |
%Resp |
Freq. |
%Resp. |
|
1 - 20 |
18 |
69.2 |
26 |
81.3 |
20 |
83.3 |
16 |
61.5 |
16 |
72.7 |
21-40 |
2 |
7.7 |
2 |
6.3 |
2 |
8.3 |
6 |
23.1 |
- |
0.0 |
41-60 |
- |
0.0 |
- |
0.0 |
- |
0.0 |
- |
0.0 |
2 |
9.1 |
61-80 |
2 |
7.7 |
- |
0.0 |
2 |
8.3 |
2 |
7.7 |
2 |
9.1 |
81-100 |
4 |
15.4 |
4 |
12.5 |
- |
0.0 |
2 |
7.7 |
2 |
9.1 |
N= Naira (Nigerian
Currency) 1 Dollar = N120.00 |
The result
implies that farmers need to depend on locally sourced non-conventional feed resources such as
farm, household and agro-industrial wastes in order to maintain average daily
feeding cost within the range of one to twenty naira per pig. Maize and rice offal have been found to have
the highest adoption level (54.3 and 46.3%, respectively) among
pig farmers
(Dafwang et al 2001). The exact reason
for which most farmers dispose off their stock at 50 to 70kg live-weight lies
between profitability and market considerations (Table 12).
Table 12.
Average
live weight for sale or slaughter |
||
Live weight (kg) |
Frequency |
% Respondent |
Less than 50 |
2 |
3.3 |
50-70 |
22 |
36.7 |
71-100 |
10 |
16.7 |
101 and above |
8 |
30.0 |
Total |
60 |
100.0 |
Widespread consumer
aversion for excess fat in pork probably provides an explanation. The tendency for high fat deposition is known to
accelerate at about 70kg live weight when nutrient conversion to fat may be
considered as an economic waste (Olomu 1995).
For as much as pig production integrates well in to the peri-urban farming activities in Lagos and its environs, it is highly sensitive to demand and supply variables. As such, breeding and general management feeds and feeding, cost and profitability aspects of pig production enterprise are targets for strategic manipulations to meet desirable production and marketing objectives in order to remain in business.
While the current production strategies adopted have apparently impacted positively on quantity and quality of pork put on the table of consumers, they tend to paint a bleak future for commercial pig feed market; unless a more attractive commercial pig feed product is developed.
Non-conventional feedstuffs obtained from farm, household and agro-industrial wastes are indispensable for many of the farmers to keep operational cost, particularly average daily feeding cost within a range of one to twenty naira per pig.
Sale or slaughter of pigs at pre-determined live weight (50
to 70 kg) forms
part of the overall strategy to reduce economic wastage and enhance profitability
in order to stay firm in the business.
Ademosun A A 1989 Structural Adjustment and the Nigerian
Livestock Industry: Stupor in Infancy.
Keynote Address delivered at the Nigerian Society for Animal Production
Annual Conference held at University of Agriculture, Makurdi, April 1989.
Anthonio O and Adeyokunnu T O 1973 The
Changing Pattern of African diets in Relation to Income. Nigerian Agricultural
Journal 10(1); 27-42
Aribido S O and Umaru M 199 Extension Priorities in Peri-Urban Dairy Development in Nigeria. In: Issues and Priorities for Nigeria
Agricultural Extension in the 21st Century. Afolayan S O and
Akinbode I.A (Editors) Proceedings of the Inaugural Conference of the
Agricultural Extension Society of Nigeria. February 28-March 4, 1994 held in
ARMT. Ilorin. pp. 97-105.
Aromolaran A B and Bamgbose A M 1999
Comparative Cost Analysis of Meat Products and Energy Production in Abeokuta,
Nigeria. Tropical Journal of
Animal Science 2(1): 185-193.
Dafwang I I, E I Ikani, D O Chikwendu, I E J
Iwuanyanwu, A O K Adesehinwa and A I Annatte 2001: Adoption of non-conventional feedstuffs by
Poultry and Pig farmers. In: Aduli
A.E.O and Adeyinka I.A (Editors) Proceedings of the Nigerian Society of Animal
Production pp. 254 - 257.
Ikani E I, Dafwang I I, Chikwendu D O, Adesehinwa A O
K, Annatte A I and Iwuanyanwu I E J
2001 Socio-economic Characteristics and Sources of feed
for Poultry and Pig farmers in Nigeria In: Aduli A.E.O and Adeyinka I.A
(Editors) Proceedings of the Nigerian Society of Animal Production pp. 250 -
253.
Olomu J M 1995 Monogastric Animal
Nutrition: Principles and Practice. Jachem Publication, Nigeria.
Osinowo O A 2000 Be Fruitful and Multiply: The blessings, the
livestock and the quality of life. An
inaugural lecture delivered at the University of Agriculture, Abeokuta,
Nigeria. 22nd November 2000.
Sonaiya E B 1982 Beef Quality and the Nigerian Consumer. In: Beef Production in Nigeria. Osinowo et al (Editors) Proceedings of the Nigerian National Conference on Beef Production. pp. 555 - 564.
Received 5 May 2003; Accepted 24 June 2003