Livestock Research for Rural Development 14 (4) 2002 | Citation of this paper |
The “dry
ammoniation” method was developed at “La Esperanza” farm,
The effects
of storage time (14 and 21 days), water volume (200 and 400 ml/kg hay) and urea
quantity (20 and 40 g/kg hay) on the crude protein content (CP) and in
vitro digestibility of NDF were studied using a factorial arrangement
design (2x2x2) plus one control (non-treated hay) with three replications per
treatment. Small hay bales of 1 kg, made from several commercial hay bales of Brachiaria
humidicola, were used as experimental units. The urea solutions were added
into plastic containers (19 l) before placing the hay, leaving a space of 5-8
cm between the hay and the solution. Thereafter the containers were covered
hermetically with a plastic sheet and stored under a roofed area.
The “dry
ammoniation” improved the CP (3.2 to 8.3%) as well as the NDF in vitro
digestibility (46.2 to 57.1%), when the control hay was compared against the
average of the treated hays. The best result was obtained when the hay was
stored for 21 days and treated with 200 ml of water + 40 g of urea/kg (10.6 % CP and
63.1% NDF in vitro digestibility).
The low nutritive value of
tropical grass hays is mainly responsible for the low productivity observed in many animal production systems in the
tropics. The low protein content and the high degree of lignification are two
major factors influencing utilization by ruminants. There are different
physical, biological and chemical techniques that can counteract the negative
effect of these factors. Ammoniation is one of the chemical treatments most
studied in the past few years. This technique is based on the hydrolytic action
of the ammonia over the linkage between the lignin and the structural
polysaccharides, thus increasing the organic matter potentially available for
the ruminal microorganisms. This treatment also improves the crude protein
content through a fixation process of part of the ammonia. Such changes
interact promoting a better rate of digestion (Sundstol et al 1978).
Gaseous anhydrous ammonia has been used in developed countries,
while in tropical regions of the developing countries the spraying and dipping
of hay in urea solutions has been preferred (Chenost and Kayouli 1997).
The first method is more effective, but its high cost and the special storage
facilities required have made it difficult to be adopted by farmers. The use of
a urea solution is a simple and low cost technique; however, it has not become
yet an alternative widely accepted. The labor involved to handle the material
and the appearance of molds as a consequence of the high humidity have been
some of the limiting factors to allow acceptance by the producers at the
commercial level. All these limitations prompted us to improve the procedure
and thus the so called “dry ammoniation” technique was developed at “La
Esperanza Farm” in the
Even though the preliminary
results observed using this technology were positive, it is important to study
different factors that could affect treatment efficiency so that a reliable and
precise technology could be offered to our farmers.
This study was conducted at
“La Esperanza Farm” of the University of Zulia, located in a dry tropical region
(10° North latitude and 72° 40´ East longitude). Small hay bales (1 kg), made
from material taken from commercial bales of Brachiaria humidicola, were
used as experimental units. The effects of storage time (14 and 21 days), water
volume (200 and 400 ml/kg of hay) and urea quantity (20 and 40 g/kg of hay) on
the crude protein (CP) and neutral detergent fiber in vitro
digestibility were studied. A factorial arrangement ([2x2x2] + control [non-treated hay]) with three
replications per treatment was used. The treatment effect was analyzed through
the orthogonal contrast, using the GLM procedure (SAS 1988).
Each experimental unit was
prepared as follows: the corresponding urea solution was added first to a 19
litre plastic cylindrical container, placing simultaneously a small amount of
hay as an ureolitic agent. Then the small bales were placed in the container,
leaving a clear space of 5 to 8 cm between the urea solution level and the hay,
to avoid wetting of the material. Finally the top of the container was covered
with plastic to avoid loss of ammonia and then stored for 2 or 3 weeks
according to the assigned treatment. When the storage time was
over, each container was uncovered and the hay was removed and exposed to the
air for 3 h. A sample was taken from each bale to determine N (AOAC 1990) and
NDF in vitro digestibility using the modified Tilley and Terry method
(NDF solution instead of pepsin [Van Soest 1967]).
The “dry ammoniation”
improved (p < 0.001) the nutritive value of the Brachiaria humidicola
hay (Figures 1 and 2). These results are in agreement with findings reported by
several authors, using different techniques as well as different fibrous
materials (Silva and Ørskov 1988; Fondevila et al 1994). The changes observed
in the proportional increment of the crude protein and NDF in vitro digestibility
are very similar to those reported by Klee and Murillo (1989). They found
increments of 178 to 240 % in crude protein and between 33 and 39 % in the dry
matter in vitro digestibility when wheat straw was treated with
different levels of anhydrous ammonia.
The amount of urea used had
a significant effect on both the crude protein content and digestibility. The
crude protein value obtained with the use of 40 g urea/kg hay was higher (p
< 0.001) than with 20 and 0 g urea/kg hay (10.1, 6.5 and 3.4 %,
respectively; Figure 1). Brown and Adjei (1995) found similar results when Panicum maximum hay was wet-treated with urea
solutions equivalent to 0, 40, 60 and 80 g urea/kg. The final crude protein
values reported were 4.3, 10.5, 13.8 and 18.4 %, respectively. Preliminary
observations showed increments in CP inferior to one percentage unit when
urea was used at levels above 40 g/kg using the “Dry ammoniation” technique on
Brachiaria humidicola hays (Barrios and
|
|
The water volume used
affected (p< 0001) the crude protein content, with observed values of
9.3 and 7.3 % in DM when 200 and 400 ml /kg hay were used, respectively (Table
1). The higher crude protein values were associated with a higher
concentration of urea in the 200 ml/kg level. Probably there was a lower amount
of NH3 given off due to a larger
enzyme dilution at the 400 ml level. On the other hand, the NDF digestibility
was not affected (Table 2).
Table
1. Effect of the amount of urea, volume of solution and treatment
on the crude protein content (% in DM) of Brachiaria humidicola hay (SEM = 0.47; n= 3) |
||||
Time,
days |
Urea
level, g |
Volume, ml |
|
|
200 |
400 |
|
||
14 |
20 |
7.6 |
4.6 |
8.0 |
40 |
10.7 |
9.1 |
||
21 |
20 |
8.2 |
5.6 |
8.6 |
40 |
10.6 |
9.9 |
||
|
means |
9.3 |
7.3 |
|
The moisture content of the
hay increased from 12 % to about 18 %, as a result of the evaporation and
condensation of the urea solution. This moisture content is low when it is
compared to the wet and spraying techniques and therefore it could make the
difference as far as the mold appearance in high humidity conditions. According
to Sundstol (1988) the humidity in the fibrous material favors the treatment
action, but levels above 15 to 20 % moisture can cause problems in the alkali
distribution and the mold contamination.
Table
2.- Effect of the amount of urea (g/kg hay), volume of solution (ml/kg
hay) and treatment time on the NDF in vitro digestibility of Brachiaria
humidicola hay. (SEM = 0.95; n= 3) |
||||
Time,
days |
Urea
level, g |
Volume, ml |
|
|
200 |
400 |
|
||
14 |
20 |
52.3 |
53.6 |
55.0 |
40 |
55.3 |
58.9 |
||
21 |
20 |
56.3 |
54.4 |
58.9 |
40 |
63.1 |
61.7 |
||
|
means |
56.8 |
57.2 |
|
The storage time affected considerably
the NDF in vitro digestibility (Table 2), being higher (p < 0.003) at 21 days (58.9 %) than at 14 days
(55.0 %). These results are similar to those found by other authors (Reis
et al 1991; Fundora et al 1992).
In conclusion, acceptable
improvements in crude protein content and in NDF in vitro
digestibility were obtained when the Brachiaria humidicola hay was
exposed to the dry ammoniation method, using 40 g of urea in 200 ml of water/kg
hay for 21 days.
Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (AOAC). (1990).
Barrios, A. and Ventura, M. (2001a). Agrotécnico. Facultad de Agronomía. LUZ. Nº14. 38-39
Barrios,
A. and Ventura, M. (2001b). Archivos Latinoamericanos de Producción Animal. Vol. 9. Suppl 1.
pag 356.
Brown, W.F
and Adjei, M.B. (1995). J. Anim. Sci. 73:3085-3093.
Fondevila, M.; Castrillo, C.; Guada, J.A. and Balcells, J. (1994). Animal Feed Science and Technology. 50:137-155.
Fundora, O.; Stuart J.R.; Sierra, J.F.; Regaladao, E. and Llerandi, R. (1992). Revista Cubana de Ciencia Agrícola. Vol.26(3):311-315.
Klee, G.G. and Murillo, Q.I. (1989). Agricultura Técnica (Chile). Vol. 49(1): 1-8.
Reis,
R.A.; García, R.; Queiroz, A.C.; Silva, D.J. and Ferreira, J.Q. (1991). Pesq.
Agrop. Brasil. 26(8):1183-1191.
SAS Institute
(1988). SAS User’s Guide: Statistics. (version 6.03). SAS Institute, Inc, Cary
NC.
Silva,
A.T. and Orskov, E.R. (1988). Anim. Feed Sci. and Technology. 29:251-264.
Sundstol, F.; Coxwort, E. and Mowat, D.N. (1978). Revista
Mundial de Zootecnia. 26:13-21.
Sundstol,
F. (1988). In: World Anim. Sci. B Disciplinary approach. Feed Science Chapt.
10. pp. 257-273.
Van Soest, P. J.
(1967). J. Anim. Sci. 26:119-128
Received