Livestock Research for Rural Development 13 (5) 2001 | Citation of this paper |
Thirteen
types of tropical trees and shrubs available in the ecological farm of UTA, at Chamcar
Daung, Cambodia, were selected for a screening test to evaluate in vitro pepsin/pancreatin
digestibility of N and to explore the possible interdependence with other non conventional
tests for assessing nutritive value of foliages for pigs. Leaves and petioles were from Acacia
auriculiformis, Artocarpus heterophyllus, Borassus flabellifer, Cocos nucifera, Desmanthus
virgatus, Eucalyptus spp, Flemingia macrophylla, Gliricidia sepium, Hibiscus rosasinensis,
Leucaena leucocephala, Moringa oleifera, Morus alba and Trichanthera gigantea. DM,
N and NDF range of value were 21.0 to 60.9%, 1.27 to 4.13% and 24.1 to 73.0% in dry basis
respectively.
It was found
that an increase in pepsin/pancreatin, in vitro N digestibility was associated with
less NDF-linked N (R2 0.50; P<0.007) and lower dry matter content (R2
0.58; P<0.002) in leaves, and higher values of DM solubility (R2 0.67;
P<0.001), in vitro DM digestibility (R2 0.76; P<0.001) and N water
solubility (R2 0.82; P<0.001).
Highest in vitro N digestibility coefficients were obtained for Moringa oleifera
(79.2%), Hibiscus rosasinensis (74.2%), Gliricidia sepium (69.4%) and
Morus alba (47.9%). The lowest in vitro N digestibility was observed for
palmaceae (Cocos nucifera, 9.4% and Borassus flabellifer, 5.1%).
It is
suggested that simple, cheap and easy methods can be used for the nutritional evaluation
for pigs of leaves of trees and shrubs in the tropical world. It is recommended to
continue studying simple methods of estimating the N status of leaves for pigs and to characterize by this
approach other plant species.
According to
Blair (1989), the trees and shrubs that can be used as fodder encompasses some 74 genus of
plants, while Brewbaker (1986) suggested that more than 200 species of trees fix N and are
reported to be useful as fodder species.
The use of trees and shrubs leaves as
pig feed has received little attention in the tropics, in spite of the fact that major
tropical crops have a high energy efficiency as sun-capturing plants. Research with these
plants for monogastric animal feeding has mainly been directed to their use as sources of
energy, as many of them produce substances which are either devoid of cell wall materials
or contain very small amounts (Perez 1977). Amongst
these sources of energy are the juice from sugar cane and the sugar palm (Borassus flabellifer),
the oil from the oil palm, and the starch from the roots of cassava. When these energy sources are used as
the basis of the diet, the inclusion of
fibrous biomass rich in protein is facilitated, since the amount of cell walls in the
overall feed will be similar to that in conventional pig diets based on cereal grains.
Very little is known of the
nutritional value of tree and shrub leaves for pigs, especially the protein fraction, and
data arising from ruminant nutrition studies are of negligible value since they can not be
extrapolated to monogastric animals. Furthermore there is a need to develop rapid and
inexpensive methods to assess the nutritive value of foliage feeds for pigs, as a first
approach to advancing knowledge about digestive utilization by the animals of leaf
nutrients.
In a previous report, it was shown
that the water solubility of N was strongly correlated with pepsin/pancreatin, in vitro
digestibility of N in several samples of tropical forages (Ly and Preston 2001). The aim
of the present communication is to report the potential nutritive value of thirteen
tropical tree leaves for pigs, using non-conventional methods of feed evaluation.
Thirteen tropical trees and shrubs grown in the Ecological Farm,
at Chamcar Daung (Table 1), the leaves of several of which are periodically harvested for
feed, were selected for the study. Samples of leaves and petioles were separated from
stems and either sun-dried and ground, or sub-sampled to determine water solubility of DM
and N as described by Ly and Preston (2001). In addition, NDF and NDF-N were also
determined following the recommendations and methods of Van Soest et al (1991). The ash
content of the original samples was determined according to AOAC (1990) procedures and
organic matter percentage was considered to be 100 - % ash. DM was estimated in a
microwave oven according to the method described by Undersander et al (1993). All the
analyses were carried out in duplicate.
Table 1. Identification
of the tropical trees and shrubs used in the study |
|||
|
Common name
|
||
Scientific name |
English |
Spanish1 |
Khmer2 |
Acacia
auriculiformis |
Acacia |
Acacia |
Acacia |
Artocarpus heterophyllus | Jackfruit |
Artocarpus |
Knol |
Borassus flabellifer | Sugar palm |
Palma azucarera |
Scoo thnout |
Cocos
nucifera |
Coconut |
Coco |
Daung |
Desmanthus
virgatus |
Desmanthus |
Desmento |
- |
Eucalyptus
spp |
Eucalypt |
Eucalipto |
Preng kchol |
Flemingia
macrophylla |
Flemingia |
Flemingia |
- |
Gliricida
sepium |
Gliricida |
Bienvestida |
- |
Hibiscus
rosasinensis |
Hibiscus |
Marpacifico |
Phka angkeadai |
Leucaena
leucocephala |
Leucaena |
Leucaena |
- |
Moringa
oleifera |
Drumstick |
Marango |
Deum mroum |
Morus alba |
Mulberry |
Morera |
Deum mon |
Trichanthera
gigantea |
Trichanthera |
Tricantera |
- |
1 Cuban Spanish 2 Transcripted to English |
There was a wide range of values (Table
2) for the content of DM (21.0 to 60.9%, on fresh basis),
N (1.27 to 4.13% in DM) and NDF (24.1
to 73.0% in DM). In vitro, pepsin/pancreatin digestibility of DM and N was assayed
in re-ground samples in quadruplicate according to the method of Dierick et al (1985).
Incubations of leaf sample were conducted in quadruplicate and analytical methods were the
same used for determination of the chemical composition.
Table 2.
Chemical composition (DM as % of fresh matter and other elements as % in DM) of the
samples of leaves |
||||
Scientific name |
DM |
OM |
NDF |
N |
Acacia
auriculiformis |
40.8 |
93.4 |
68.0 |
2.73 |
Artocarpus heterophyllus | 48.5 |
82.5 |
50.1 |
1.77 |
Borassus flabellifer | 60.9 |
90.7 |
79.7 |
1.27 |
Cocos
nucifera |
47.2 |
93.3 |
67.4 |
1.38 |
Desmanthus
virgatus |
37.1 |
93.8 |
41.4 |
3.13 |
Eucalyptus
spp |
35.5 |
94.6 |
38.0 |
1.35 |
Flemingia
macrophylla |
41.8 |
94.1 |
73.0 |
3.19 |
Gliricida
sepium |
27.1 |
93.0 |
59.1 |
3.27 |
Hibiscus
rosasinensis |
21.0 |
87.5 |
49.8 |
2.53 |
Leucaena
leucocephala |
43.5 |
93.1 |
66.0 |
3.09 |
Moringa
oleifera |
24.4 |
92.0 |
24.1 |
2.53 |
Morus alba |
33.3 |
86.3 |
31.5 |
3.54 |
Trichanthera
gigantea |
26.3 |
85.4 |
50.8 |
3.46 |
Pearson correlation coefficients and other basic statistical
approaches were determined by standard biometrical analyses (Steel and Torrie 1980), using
the Minitab software (Ryan et al 1985).
Table 3.
Mean values (%, DM basis) for water solubility of DM and N and in vitro
digestibility of the samples of leaves |
||||
Scientific name |
WSDM |
IVDDM |
WSN |
IVDN |
Acacia
auriculiformis |
33.8 |
21.7 |
48.6 |
44.6 |
Artocarpus heterophyllus | 29.1 |
13.9 |
7.7 |
5.1 |
Borassus flabellifer | 7.3 |
17.6 |
5.5 |
3.7 |
Cocos
nucifera |
32.1 |
16.0 |
12.2 |
9.4 |
Desmanthus
virgatus |
39.4 |
27.2 |
55.2 |
22.2 |
Eucalyptus
spp |
38.0 |
33.2 |
20.4 |
25.0 |
Flemingia
macrophylla |
25.3 |
25.9 |
46.5 |
29.8 |
Gliricida
sepium |
52.6 |
57.7 |
62.2 |
69.4 |
Hibiscus
rosasinensis |
52.0 |
48.7 |
59.6 |
74.2 |
Leucaena
leucocephala |
36.1 |
30.0 |
30.4 |
21.0 |
Moringa
oleifera |
49.6 |
75.3 |
70.0 |
74.2 |
Morus alba |
43.7 |
45.0 |
39.3 |
47.9 |
Trichanthera
gigantea |
35.7 |
30.4 |
34.4 |
17.5 |
WSDM, IVDDM, WSN and IVDN are water
solubility of DM, in vitro digestibility of DM, water solubility of N and in vitro
digestibility of N respectively. |
Gliricidia sepium, Hibiscus rosasinensis, Moringa oleifera and Morus alba had the highest values for DM water solubility (Table 3). Even higher values for water solubility of N (70.0 and 62.2%) were recorded for Moringa oleifera and Gliricida sepium, respectively. Highest values for in vitro N digestibility were obtained for Moringa oleifera (79.2%), Hibiscus rosasinensis (74.2%), Gliricidia sepium (69.4%) and Morus alba (47.9%). The lowest in vitro N digestibility was observed in the palmaceae (Cocos nucifera, 9.4% and Borassus flabellifer, 5.1%). Palm leaves also exhibited low values for DM water solubility and in vitro digestibility of DM.
The analysis of interdependence amongst the different nutritive
indices indicated that N content in leaves was not associated with water solubility and in
vitro digestibility values (Table 4). On the other hand the cell wall fraction of
leaves was positively (P<0.05) associated to NDF linked N, and was inversely related
(P<0.05) with water solubility and in vitro digestibility of DM. There was a
negative relationship (P<0.05) between the NDF-N fraction and all the solubility
indices.
Table 4.
Pearson correlation coefficients for non-conventional indices of nutritive value of tropical tree and shrub leaves |
|||||||
|
DM |
N |
NDF |
NDFN |
WSDM |
IVDMD |
WSN |
N
|
-0.190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NDF
|
0.597 |
-0.410 |
|
|
|
|
|
NDFN |
0.626 |
-0.403 |
0.767 |
|
|
|
|
WSDM |
-0.891 |
0.228 |
-0.658 |
-0.741 |
|
|
|
IVDDM | -0.708 |
0.208 |
-0.598 |
-0.586 |
0.773 |
|
|
WSN |
-0.778 |
0.081 |
-0.434 |
-0.670 |
0.766 |
0.775 |
|
IVDN |
-0.762 |
0.194 |
-0.477 |
-0.704 |
0.816 |
0.874 |
0.903 |
DM, N. NDF,
NDFN, WSDM, IVDDM, WSN and IVDN are dry matter, nitrogen, neutral detergent fibre, neutral
detergent fibre-linked N, water solubility of DM, in vitro digestibility of DM, water
solubility of N and in vitro digestibility of N, respectively. |
The results of the present investigation strongly support previous
findings (Ly and Preston 2001) claiming that water soluble N is strongly correlated with in
vitro, pepsin/pancreatin digestibility of the N fraction of leaves of tropical trees
and shrubs. The present report provides some analytical information about one of the
possible causes of the unavailability of N compounds present in leaves from several trees
and shrubs. This is of particular importance, since it has been clearly demonstrated that in
vitro digestibility of N can predict in vivo, ileal digestibility of N (Dierick
et al 1985; Boisen and Fernandez 1995). On the other hand, total tract digestibility data
obtained from balance experiments conducted with pigs fed different tree leaves, suggest
that a similar, parallel order rank could exist in leaves fed to pigs (Table 5).
Table 5. In vivo and in
vitro digestibility of leaves from tropical trees and shrubs |
|||||
In vivo
|
In vitro
|
|
|||
Scientific name
|
DM |
N |
DM
|
N |
Reference |
Morus alba |
84.4 |
81.1 |
57.9 |
47.7 |
Ly et al (2001) |
Trichanthera gigantea |
69.3 |
66.2 |
30.9 |
37.5 |
Ly et al (2001) |
Desmanthus virgatus |
36.9 |
22.0 |
24.4 |
22.2 |
Ly and Pok Samkol (2001) |
Flemingia
macrophylla
|
24.9 |
21.7 |
25.8 |
19.8 |
Pok Samkol and
Ly (2001) |
In vivo
digestibility refers to total tract digestibility as measured in pigs and estimated by
difference. In vitro digestibility refers to pepsin/pancreatin solubility resembling in
vivo ileal digestibility |
It is suggested that simple, cheap and easy methods can be used
for the nutritional evaluation for pigs of leaves of trees and shrubs in the
tropics.
This publication is an output from a collaborative research project partially funded by FAO, Rome (certifying officer, Dr Manuel Sanchez, AGAP). The authors are indebted to the laboratory and field staff of the University of Tropical Agriculture Foundation (Chamcar Daung) for technical assistance.
AOAC 1990 Official Methods of
Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 15th edition (K Helrick
editor) Arlington pp 1230
Blair G J 1989 The
diversity and potential value of shrubs and trees fooders. In: Shrubs and Trees Fodders
for Farm Animals (C Devendra, editor) International Development Research Centre. Ottawa p
2-9
Boisen S and Fernandez J A 1995 Prediction of the apparent ileal digestibility of
protein and amino acids in feedstuffs and feed mixtures for pigs by in vitro
analysis. Animal Feed Science and Technology 51:29-43
Brewbaker J L 1986 Leguminous trees and shrubs for Southeast Asia and
the South Pacific. In: Forages in Southeast Asia and South Pacific Agriculture (G J Blair,
D A Ivory and T R Evans, editors) Australian Centre for Internatinal Agricultural Research
Proceedings Series No. 12 Camberra p 43-50
Dierick, N, Vervaeke, I, Decuypere, J and
Henderickx, H 1985 Protein digestion in
pig measured in vivo and in vitro. In: Proceedings of the 3rd
International Seminar on Digestive Physiology in the Pig (A
Just, H Jorgensen and J A Fernández, editors). National Institute of Animal
Science. Copenhagen p 329-332
Ly, J,
Chhay Ty, Chiev Phiny and Preston, T R 2001 Some
aspects of the nutritive value of leaf meals of Trichanthera gigantea and Morus
alba for Mong Cai pigs. Livestock Research for Rural Development 13(3):electronic
version http//www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd13/3ly 133.htm
Ly J and
Pok Samkol 2001 Nutritive value of
tropical leaves for pigs. Desmanthus (Desmanthus virgatus). Livestock Research for
Rural Development 13(5):electronic version http://www.cipav.org.col/lrrd/lrrd13/6ly136.htm
Ly J and
Preston T R 2001 In vitro
estimates of nitrogen digestibility for pigs and water-solble nitrogen are correlated in
tropical forage feeds. Livestock Research for Rural Development 13(1):electronic version
http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd/lrrd13/1ly131.htm
Perez R
1997 Feeding pigs in the
tropics. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper No 132. Rome pp 185
Pok Samkol
and Ly J 2001 Nutritive value of
tropical leaves for pigs. Flemingia (Flemingia macrophylla). Livestock Research for
Rural Development 13(6):electronic version
hhtp://www.cipav.org.col/lrrd/lrrd13/6pok136.htm
Ryan, B F,
Joiner, B L and Ryan Jr, T A 1985 Minitab (2nd
edition) Hilliday Lithograph
Steel, R G
D and Torrie, J A 1980 Principles and
Procedures of Statistics: a Biometrical Approach. McGraw-Hill Book Company (second
edition). Toronto pp 663
Undersander, D, Mertens, DR and Theix, N 1993 Forage analysis procedures. National Forage Testing Association. Omaha pp 154
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, J B and Lewis, B A 1991 Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber
and non starch polysachharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science
74:3583-3593
Received